communications, engineering economy, and construction planning, scheduling, estimating, and management. Page 13.762.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Integr ating Engineer ing Ethics Education into a Multi-Disciplinar y Seminar Cour se: Making the ÐUqhvÑ"Qwveqogu RelevantIntr oduction The Department of Engineering Technology at the University of North Carolina atCharlotte (UNCC) has developed and implemented a comprehensive program leading toan academic environment of continuous improvement consistent with the ABETTechnology Criteria 2000 (TC2K).1 With the advent of TC2K, many
the soul “encompasses every dimension of human existence.” Aquinas, drawingupon Boethius, further argues that each person is not only an individual substance, but anindividual substance that is connected to other similar substances. The person then exists bothindividually and in communion with other persons. (Summa Theologica I.29 art 1)The high regard for the person as such is not limited to those who would consider themselvesThomists. Immanuel Kant argues the Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals that persons areend in themselves and that human communities should be viewed as a “kingdom of ends’. Kantdoes not explicitly adopt or a reject the person as unity of body and soul, but he certainly seeshuman beings as using their bodies as
topicscovered and the authors’ efforts to develop a handbook to reduce the preparation requiredfor future lunches. The paper will also review the advantages of these lunches, includingreduced workload for instructors and the integration of ethics into the curriculum withoutdisplacing discipline-specific engineering topics.IntroductionMost engineering faculty will agree that student engineers need a strong foundation inengineering ethics. Even if there is disagreement, criterion 3f of ABET’s accreditationrequirement, which states that engineering programs must demonstrate that their studentspossess “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”1, ensures that
“principles of sustainable development”1 as primary to the ASCE’s code of ethics to beimplemented in engineering education. Previously, in June of 1999, the Board of Directors forthe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) approved the following statement onsustainable development in education: Engineering students should learn about sustainable development and sustainability in the general education component of the curriculum as they are preparing for the major design experience. . . . Engineering faculty should use system approaches, including interdisciplinary teams, to teach pollution prevention techniques, life cycle analysis, industry ecology, and other sustainable engineering concepts.2ASEE has aligned
thefollowing intuition: some acts are simply wrong, by virtue of the fact that they are thekind of act which is wrong (not by virtue of contingent considerations such asconsequences). In addition, if an act is wrong, it is wrong for anyone, at any time.Wrong action, according to deontology, is the kind of act which no one ought to do.18This kind of universalizability is an important characteristic of morality for many people.ConclusionsAccording to the preceding arguments, most of us, much of the time, have the followingthree intuitions concerning ethics: (1) ethics is primarily about being a particular kind ofperson, and evaluations of acts is secondary; (2) an action is right in so far as it bringsabout a better state of affairs than any alternative
, current students are the most media-savvy and computer-literategeneration yet seen. They have grown up with the internet, with cell phones, video games, and Page 13.1013.2fast-paced television and video. They are very skilled at multitasking.The downside is that they may have short attention spans, are easily bored, expect to multitaskin every situation, and may have little company loyalty or perseverance. Comments in print: 1. “This age group hates to be bored and they seek entertainment in everything they do -- including college and the work they expect to do when they graduate. Many studies we reviewed indicated this generation
AC 2008-2465: COMPARISON OF CHEATING BEHAVIORS INUNDERGRADUATENorma Mattei, University of New Orleans Page 13.312.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Comparison of Cheating Behaviors in Undergraduate Engineering Students and the General Student Population at the University of New OrleansAcademic dishonesty is a problem at most universities, including the University of New Orleans(UNO). The percentage of students who report cheating varies by college major. Recent studiesindicate that engineering students more frequently engage in cheating behavior than students ofmost other majors [1]. One of the most recent studies, called
ethicalquestions that have practical import. However, these questions are frequently neglectedin the engineering ethics teaching materials. We argue that it is imperative to examinethese issues in engineering ethics education, and that this discussion would complementmovements to orient engineering around fostering peace and social justice.1. IntroductionThe co-development of technology and engineering with military technology ishistorically well established. Indeed, many early mechanisms were designed for wagingbattle, and countless engineers throughout history have worked for military institutions.Likewise, many of the first institutions of higher education to offer degrees in science orengineering have military origins. We review some of the history of
mainstreamBSE curricula and in providing students with a practical ethics education.1 EAC, however,requires a robust educational infrastructure which empowers BSE professors as ethics mentorsand provides them with renewable materials to carry out this role.Modeled upon the practice of open source code development effectively used by computerprogrammers to collaborate in the development of software and building on an existing opencourseware tool named Connexions®2,3,4,5, the project known as the EAC Toolkit hasestablished an online environment that enables the sharing of best practices in ethics instruction.The Toolkit online platform facilitates integrated access, collaborative creation, continualimprovement, and interactive dissemination of EAC
morality as the determination of right and wrong behavior while ethics is the processby which morals are synthesized into a coherent system. Furthermore, we adopt three primarypropositions: 1. Morality is intimately involved with everyday experiences; 2. Morality and Ethics can, and should be taught; 3. Moral reflection is an important daily occurrence – Socrates The first proposition is in responses to students (and faculty, administrators, staff, etc.)who consider their daily activities to be outside the range of activities to which moral judgmentsshould be applied. This is what allows students to excuse plagiarism – it is a common activity towhich such esoteric philosophical musings as considerations of
’ knowledge of ethics is typically through discussions and essay assignments. Whilemost respondents declared the need to improve ethics education, they recognized as hurdles acrowded curriculum and lack of qualified teachers.Bibliography 1 Fleddermann, C. B., Engineering Ethics, 3/e, 20082 Marshall, J. and Marshall, J., “Integrating Ethics Education into the Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 20033 Wolverton, R. H. and Wolverton, J. B., “Implementation of Ethics Education throughout an Engineering College,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
programs has recognized this need. As a result the EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) and Technology Accreditation Commission (TAC) of ABET,Inc.1 has mandated that undergraduate engineering curricula include the study of ethics. This is aprecautionary approach requiring students to think in ethical terms at all times and not just whenthings go wrong. It could be viewed as defensive ethics by training students how to respond to Page 14.1182.2possible events and anticipate the consequences of their actions. Many ethical lessons areunfortunately learned during an engineer's career only after some unforeseen consequence orunnoticed flaw. The
consequently recorded as final actions.Licensing StatutesIn some instances, such as Alabama, a distinction is made between graduates from accreditedand nonaccredited institutions.: “ 1. Graduation in an approved engineering curriculum plus four years experience…. 2. Graduation in an unapproved engineering curriculum plus six years experience….10Whereas, other states require: “(i) graduation from an approved engineering curriculum of fouror more years.11 Each jurisdiction exercises autonomy and works with the registration boards todevelop statutes which meet their specific needs and make provisions for those coming fromother jurisdictions to either practice permanently or temporarily: “(A) The state board of registration for
universities, a survey wasadministered to several classes at UNO. The survey was based on part of a recent large scalestudy called the PACE-1 Study, involving a seven section survey of 643 undergraduateengineering and pre-engineering students at eleven institutions, ranging from communitycolleges to large research universities. The PACE-1 study attempted to determine what is studentcheating, how often does cheating occur, why do students cheat, and what methods can be usedto reduce or stop cheating. Because of time constraints, the UNO survey was based on the firstsection of the PACE-1 survey. The UNO questionnaire was a short one-page voluntary surveythat was given at the beginning of several large undergrad classes in order to try to determinewhat
clear that a number of them are not technical andthey are sometimes referred to as “soft skills.” Among these soft skills are ethics (outcome “i”),teamwork (“e”), global perspectives (“j”), diversity (“j”), communications (“g”), and life-long Page 14.720.2learning ( “h”). The focus of this paper is the ethics requirement. “Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2009, American Society for Engineering Education” Table 1: TAC TC2K Required Outcomes (Criterion 3) a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern
integrateresearch ethics into the graduate curriculum in science and engineering. Funded by the NationalScience Foundation, this project has developed four workshops directed toward graduatestudents to provide them with decision making tools for reaching ethical decisions. Theworkshops which build upon one another, (1) help graduate students become aware of issues andproblems in research ethics, (2) outline a method of moral deliberation to help them analyzeproblematic situations, (3) provide students with tools and practice in analyzing real world ethicscases in the research context, and (4) offer a capstone activity in which the students give posterpresentations on a case connected to their research interests.This paper focuses on the third of the series
curricula.This is particularly essential for civil and environmental engineering, as human lives may be lostand significant environmental damage may occur as a result of unethical behavior. At theUniversity of Colorado at Boulder (CU), the Civil (CVEN) and Environmental (EVEN)engineering curricula attempt to lay a strong foundation in ethics in the 1-credit Introduction toEngineering courses that first year students are required to take. It is hoped that drawingparallels between professional ethics and cheating behaviors among students will enhance thestudents’ understanding of professional ethics. The perception of cheating behaviors by studentsin these courses was evaluated using the 18 questions from the PACES-1 survey1. Despitelinking the survey
that such an environmentally based ethic has four major pitfalls, as follows: 1. It proves detrimental to the meaning of engineering. 2. It provides an inadequate base for an ethical system. 3. It requires a major shift in worldview, and 4. It could produce a situation that is actually harmful to human lives.Historical background of environmentally-based ethicsBefore discussing the specific impact of environmentally-based ethics on engineering, it isimportant to take a brief look at the events that brought us to our current situation. Seriousconcern for the environment over the last five decades produced both (1) a scientific examinationof the issues at stake and (2) various philosophical or socio-political movements rooted
Figure 1: Boardman Soft Systems MethodologyBrief Overview of the SytemiTool:We will introduce the use of the SystemiTool8, a modeling tool used for a visualrepresentation of a system. Developed by John Boardman, the SystemiTool is used tosupport the creation, editing, and portrayal, in the form of a storyboard of scenes, ofsystemic diagrams referred to as systemigrams. Boardman’s tool was based on thepremise - Is there value in transforming “rich text” into a structured diagram in which theprincipal concepts are identifiable and the sentence structures recoverable? In otherwords, once the words describing the system and its relationships are translated into thesystemigram, will the reader be able to recreate the words that were used to create
and students from ouruniversity worked on a design of a pedestrian bridge to be built in south eastern Kenya. We havereported on our preliminary work at a 2007 conference9. About the time we finished ourpreliminary design a pedestrian bridge failed in Nepal10. This bridge was built by a non-profitagency that uses many volunteers to do their design and building. A photograph of the failedbridge is shown below. Figure 1—Failed bridge in Nepal that had been built by a non-profit agency13This bridge failure shows the importance of ensuring safety in whatever the students design.While the bridge in this example was not the result of a student design, its length is not muchlonger than the largely student designed bridge that was designed
known to other people. The value must also be translated into behaviors that areconsistent with the chosen value and integrated into the life style.Accordingly if some concept is to be considered valued then: (1) It was chosen fromalternatives; (2) It was chosen freely; (3) It is prized; (4) It is affirmed; (5)It is actedupon; and (6) It is acted upon repeatedly, over time.The last category of love, philia, challenges us to see the world in a different way, in thewords of Thomas Berry20 as a collection of subjects. Berry’s most famous quotation is: The Universe and thus the Earth is a communion of subjects, not a collection of objects.By communion, Berry was referring to intimacy or a feeling of emotional closeness, aconnection
analysis of students’ work.Our results show that students met the learning objectives of crafting arguments, reflecting uponcomputing skills, and discussing issues related to professionalism and diversity.1. IntroductionOne of several educational objectives for computer science programs is preparing students for asuccessful career in the software industry. Both ABET and CC2001 emphasize that computer sciencegraduates should engage topics related to ethics and professionalism1,10. For example, CC2001 identifiesthe social context of computing (SP2) and professional and ethical responsibilities (SP4) as core subjectareas. It also describes in detail the scope of these areas (Chapter 10, pages 55-61). ABET programoutcome letter (e) (an understanding
-blowingit is important to emphasize that legal protections for whistle-blowers are uncertain. Further, thefinancial and personal costs of whistle-blowing can be staggering.3 One aspect of whistle-blowing that has not been covered well is the negativeconsequences that may result from filing a wrongful-termination lawsuit claiming whistle-blowerstatus. Some potential negative consequences of whistle-blower lawsuits are illustrated by twocase studies presented below. These two case studies both involve engineers who sued formeremployers claiming whistle-blower protections. Case 1: Scapegoat Engineer at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant? First Energy Nuclear Operating Co. (FENOC) operates the Davis–Besse Nuclear PowerStation in Ohio
classified as cheating and do not havea harmful effect on their education.IntroductionThe number of American-style universities outside of North America is increasing, spurred bythe twin perceptions that (1) American education is a pathway to career success, and (2) in thepost-9/11 world, gaining admittance to America is increasingly difficult. As branch campuses ofestablished American universities open abroad, and as new international institutions obtainaccreditation from US-based agencies, it is important to examine how to provide an “American”education when an institution is surrounded by a foreign culture, populated by non-Americanstudents, and largely staffed by educators with limited academic experience in the United States.Academic honesty
attitudes amongundergraduate engineers enrolled in a course specifically focused on BID.MethodsThe BID class used in this study was an undergraduate multidisciplinary special topics course,cross-listed in biology, polymer textile and fiber engineering, industrial and systems engineering,materials science and engineering, and mechanical engineering. The distribution of engineeringstudents in the class was 1 electrical, 13 biomedical, 8 industrial and systems, 13 mechanical,and 3 materials science. There were also 7 biology students, but they were not part of the studydescribed here.The beginning portion of the course consisted of general introductory lectures on BID, designmethodology, and tools and techniques specific to BID, as well as class
engineeringprograms would incorporate some form of professional and ethical education into their curricula.The U.S. Department of Education states that the “goal of accreditation is to ensure thateducation provided by institutions of higher education meets acceptable levels of quality”(p.50)1. Degree granting engineering programs in the United States, seeking to initially obtain ormaintain accreditation, are required to meet the curriculum content and learning outcomesestablished by ABET, Inc. (formerly known as the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology, Inc.). ABET traditionally makes relatively minor revisions to the accreditationprocess and criteria on an annual basis. However, during the mid-1990s a significant paradigmshift was conceived by
Chernobyl or Challenger are valuable for study, the sheer amount of informationmay be prohibitive for those instructors who take an integrated approach in technical courses,rather than farming out students to the philosophy department for their ethics injection. Smallcases are much more contained: “By their nature,” Lynch and Klein note, “small cases can neverbe presented in full enthnographic detail. . . .”1 Because they are much less detailed than majorcases, these small classes are easier to incorporate in a technical class.While studying ethics in general allows students to exercise their moral imaginations, small cases Page 14.585.2are
epidemicat universities across the United States. In a recent study, 75% of students surveyed admitted tocheating at least once while in college (1). Another study showed that there has been a four-foldincrease in the past 30 years (from 11% to 49%) in the number of students who admitted tocollaborating on assignments when the instructor asked for individual work (2). Multiple studieshave revealed that the incidence of cheating varies substantially across disciplines (2,3,4,5), withmajors such as business and engineering having the highest reported instances. Passow andcolleagues (5) found that older students (4th and 5th year undergraduates) cheat significantly morethan first year students on exams, while second year students tend to cheat more on
sick and enfeebled, children and the elderly, all those dispossessedor powerless in our society.Keywords: Engineering ethics, codes of conduct, models of nature, a morally deep worldIntroductionEngineering applies technical knowledge to solve human problems. More completely,engineering is a technological activity that uses professional imagination, judgment,integrity, and intellectual discipline in the application of science, technology,mathematics, and practical experience to design, produce, and operate useful objects orprocesses that meet the needs and desires of a client.1 Today engineering is seen as aprofession which refers specifically to fields that require extensive study and mastery ofspecialized knowledge and a voluntary and abiding
the feedback is crucial,especially in helping students balance the analytical and reflective aspects. We assert that theblog holds potential for stimulating moral imagination and encouraging students to pursue newideas that emerge from the integration of personal experience, technical content, and concepts inethics. Page 11.1287.2IntroductionEducators in engineering ethics have long discussed the advantages and disadvantages ofteaching ethics across the curriculum versus in stand-alone courses. The integrated approach hasbeen shown to be effective in meeting key outcomes criteria.1 It can also help students betterunderstand the relevance of