the benefactor of care7, and as having at its roots a shared sense of living well8. Caring has been described as recognizing the integrity of others and engaging in mutual learning9. These characteristics of care and caring made it a natural fit for the working with approach. In addition to discussing what care means and how it has been described in literature, students were asked to arrive at their own individual care statements. In doing so, they were able to apply the concepts of care and caring themselves and arrive at an articulation that enables them to put their care into practice. In addition to developing individual care statements, the students were requested to ensure that their individual care statements and the
, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs.Dr. Deborah K. Nykanen P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato Deborah K. Nykanen is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She received her Ph.D. degree in civil engineering from the University of Minnesota in 2000. Her teaching, research and professional experience focus on water resources, hydrology and
this statement with the program outcomes for ABET Criteria 3 which includethe following3: 3c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability; 3f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; and 3h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.Thus, integrating the theory and practice of sustainability into a curriculum is a critical issue forengineering educators to address. We seek to examine how best to insert these criteria ofsustainability into our
(Riley and Lambrinidou, 2015) in engineering ethics literature, it is still not surprising tosee persistent reliance on presupposed “correct” responses for a given case; an overemphasis onheroic actions and unusual mistakes without contextual considerations; and the overlooking ofthe importance of society and peer culture in the teaching of ethics. In this paper, we argue thataddressing imaginal capacity as a core component in ethics curriculum helps educators movebeyond isolated and product-oriented pictures of engineering ethics instruction and we illustrateways to bridge complexities embedded in how we think and how we relate to one another insociety.Stimulating moral imagination has been recognized as one of the major goals of
theemployers and clients, the Professional Engineers shall act in professional manners as faithfulagents or trustees for each employer or client. However, in this practice, the engineers areexpected to exhibit the highest standards of honesty, integrity, fairness and impartiality inprotecting the public health and safety in delivering professional services. To that end, engineersmust perform their professional duties in compliance with the highest principles of ethicalconduct. The Civil Engineering graduates, through their careers, will be involved in working inteams or managing projects where decision making will often be an inevitable part of theirresponsibilities. Therefore, there is an emerging need within the engineering education curriculaacross
societal context, is so broad that it is difficult to know howto assess this outcome. Outcome i, a recognition of and the need for an ability to engage in life-long learning, and Outcome j, a knowledge of contemporary issues, are again, both broad anddifficult to assess. The difficulty in assessing these outcomes motivated ABET to refine the a-kstudent outcomes to seven, which will be adopted in the future.3,4 Much heated discussion isongoing concerning these changes. From the CAEP, the only curricular requirements for aprogram such as mechanical engineering are: “The curriculum must require students to apply principles of engineering, basic science, and mathematics (including multivariate calculus and differential equations); to model
Engineering Education, 2018 Risk Management and Ethics in Senior DesignAbstractEngineers make ethical decisions all the time in solving design problems, which is theintellectual core of engineering. They need to make those decisions and the grounds for themexplicit. Careful examination of a course’s syllabus can reveal how the ethical considerationsalready there can be made explicit. The Ethics Across the Curriculum (EAC) program at theRochester Institute of Technology (RIT) was designed to bring together faculty from diversedisciplines across the university, who would then spend time examining their syllabi, and seeinghow ethical considerations could be made explicit or naturally introduced as an integral part ofthe course, not as
;Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She directs the Iron Range andTwin Cities Engineering programs, which integrate technical, design and professionalism contentin an upper-division, project-based learning curriculum. She was a 2011-12 AAAS Science andTechnology Policy Fellow at the Division of Engineering Education & Centers in the NationalScience Foundation and received a Fulbright to Brazil in 2009-10.SummaryIt is not unusual for faculty to teach outside of their comfort zone, but this is often definedin terms of technical competencies. Teaching ethical thinking can be a challenge since themethods and “answers” often appear to be different from typical classes. The goal of thisinteractive session and paper is to
andcurriculum development: the role of engineers in humanitarian activities. Additionally, reforminitiatives in science and engineering (S&E) graduate education have yet to realize their potentialfor integrating ethics into curricula. Addressing such challenges, this paper will describeactivities to date of an interdisciplinary faculty team at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM)working on the development of graduate-level curriculum in humanitarian engineering ethics(HEE). The HEE faculty team has 1) reviewed and critically assessed relations betweenhumanitarianism and engineering in order to develop an applicable concept of humanitarianethics (HE) in engineering education and practice; 2) researched barriers and opportunities in thedevelopment and
University of Michigan-Flint. He finished his gradua- tion in Computer Science Major. His research is on Student Satisfaction and Ethics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Perception of Ethics in Bangladesh, India and USAAbstract: Ethics is an important attribute that students must develop to succeed in theiracademic career and profession. To improve the ethics perception in students, it is essentialto integrate ethics in the curriculum. A survey questionnaire was used to investigate thestudents’ perception of ethics in three different countries. The objective was to evaluatestudents’ perception of ethics using 5 factors: 1) the impact of education and faculty onethics; 2
Paper ID #8996Ethical Concerns of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems in EngineeringProgramsProf. Richard S. Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Dr. Richard S. Stansbury is an associate professor of computer engineering and computer science at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. His research interests include unmanned aircraft systems, field robotics, and applied artificial intelligence. He is program coordinator for ERAU’s new MS in Unmanned and Autonomous Systems Engineering program, which began in fall 2013.Mr. Joshua Lloyd Olds, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona BeachDr
are primarily trained in applied math,science, and engineering coursework that leaves little room for worthwhile soft skills.While engineering technology has been well established at WTAMU for several decades, the mechanical (2003) andcivil (2010) engineering programs are relatively new. Curricula for the newer engineering degree programs aresimilar to other ABET-accredited programs which are constrained in the number of credits that can be allotted toengineering coursework and required general education curriculum. Many engineering programs in the UnitedStates use one of three approaches to ethics instruction: 1) an ethics component built into modules presented in oneor more engineering courses, 2) a required ethics or philosophy course
Implications of Engineering: Selected Read- ings (Wiley/IEEE Press, 2000) and co-editor of The Growing Gap between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem (Springer, 2011), and has published numerous articles on engineering ethics and societal implications of technology in engineering, law, social science, and applied ethics journals. Herkert previously served as Editor of IEEE Technology and Society Magazine and an Associate Editor of Engineering Studies. He is or has been an active leader in many professional or- ganizations including the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, the Society on Social Implications of Technology (SSIT) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
attitudes also have broad implications inengineering such as design bias [4], algorithmic bias [5, 6], hiring/management bias [7], as wellas other types of workplace bias [8]. These ethically and economically relevant topics to allfields of engineering can be difficult to integrate into courses that are already laden with contentand technical skill development [9]. On the other hand, students find stand-alone ethics trainingless relevant to their field [10]. The most common method for balancing these opposites isintegrating a module into an engineering design course that uses a case study approach. Thetopics covered are canonical (i.e. Space Shuttle Discovery O-rings) and are almost alwaysassociated with ethical behavior in regards to job
learningopportunities. As Eyler points out, such opportunities provide students with “‘real world’challenge” [5, p. 41], and through workplace experiences students often come to see “therelevance of the curriculum to life in a complex organization” [5, p. 50]. Eyler (1993) morespecifically found that co-op students learned how to be “an expert on people and organizations”[5, p. 47], including how to be an effective member of their employing organization. It has alsobeen argued that internship or co-op programs are helpful for students’ professional growth [6].Based on their empirical study with business students, Bhattacharya and Neelam reported thatstudents developed greater confidence, negotiation skills, social sensitivity, and cross-culturalunderstanding
bepresented at the ASEE conference in June 2011 and published in a future paper.BackgroundIn the 1920s, less than a third of engineering educators considered the study of differentialequations to be necessary for an engineer’s education, now such study is integral to theengineering curriculum. In the engineering world of the future, a sound understanding of thetheoretical and practical sides of engineering ethics will be as necessary to the proper educationof engineers as a knowledge of differential equations is today, if not more so”.4Robin Tatu in her article “Knowledge Isn’t Enough” takes the famous quote from the Greekinventor Archimedes “Give me a place to stand and I will move the Earth” and argues that “thepotential to wield such power is
Paper ID #14934Instructional Strategies for Incorporating Empathy in Transdisciplinary Tech-nology EducationDr. Colin M. Gray, Purdue University, West Lafayette Colin M. Gray is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology and a Faculty Fellow in the Educational Research and Development Incubator. He holds a PhD in Instructional Systems Technology from Indiana University Bloomington, a MEd in Educational Technology from University of South Carolina, and a MA in Graphic Design from Savannah College of Art & Design. His research focuses on the role of student experience
, two-credit hour course in engineering ethics, since this course curriculum focusedon engineering ethics specifically. No prediction was made about the effects of ethics educationon MFQ scores, although this was an area of interest.5. Hypothesize that higher mean scores on the individuating foundations and lower mean scoreson the binding foundations would be associated with higher P and N2 scores on the ESIT, basedon prior work involving MFT and the DIT2.[20], [21]MethodParticipants. Participants were undergraduate engineering students at the University ofMichigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute (UM-SJTU JI). The UM-SJTU JI wasfounded in 2006 and is a US-Chinese joint educational venture based in Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity
for leveraging sustainable change in undergraduate STEM programs and makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research efforts.Dr. Thomas M. Philip, University of California, Los Angeles Thomas M. Philip is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education & Information Studies at the University of California Los Angeles. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 On perspective-taking by engineering students in discussions of socio-technical issuesIntroductionIn their work engineers often need to work in teams that include some combination of otherengineers, marketing and business executives, sales representatives, clients
they serve.As it is now an engrained part of the undergraduate engineering education process, the ABETEngineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) introduced a significant change in the amount and type ofprofessional and ethical education in the undergraduate curriculum. Specifically, ABETCriterion 3.f required accredited engineering programs to provide instruction and assessment inprofessional and ethical responsibility, but at the same time the outcomes-based wording ofCriterion 3 allowed individual programs to preserve a distinctive focus or mission.As part of a previously completed research program, a mixed-methods (quantitative-qualitative)research program was designed and implemented to evaluate the methods of incorporating ethicsand
Ethics and the Pub- lic.” She is co-PI on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research and education project developing an ethnographic approach to engineering ethics education.Mr. William Joseph Rhoads, Virginia Tech William Rhoads is a PhD student in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech working with Dr. Marc Edwards and Dr. Amy Pruden. His research focuses on various aspects of opportunistic pathogens in potable and hot water plumbing systems and implications of green buildings on public health. William is currently the vice-president of a joint American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation graduate student group and is the recipient of the Via Doctoral Fellowship.Mr. Siddhartha
commercial implementations need new training in ethicsbefore developing the applications for global and distributed geographies. For the pastfew decades most computer users in the test measurement and analysis fields have beentrying and relying on the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) over Transmission ControlProtocol (TCP), but TCP though reliable requires an acknowledgement and produceslong round trip time as well as possibility of infiltration when in wireless mode or cyberspace. This should be as much a topic of ethics in computer communication andengineering field but also in computer science education in cyber security. Research shows that the supply of materials and research workers in U.SMechanical Engineering is slipping since 1999, a
. Herkert, J. R. (2002). “Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Education.” The Bridge, 32(3).7. McEachron, D, Vaidya, S., and Ake, S. 2009. “A model for Integrating Ethics into an Engineering Curriculum”,AC 2009-898, ASEE National Conference, Austin, Texas.8. King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). “Developing Reflective Judgement: Understanding and PromotingIntellectual Growth and Critical Thinking In Adolescents And Adults.” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.9. Riley, D. (2008). “Ethics in Context, Ethics in Action: Getting Beyond The Individual Professional inEngineering Ethics Education”. Smith College. American Society for Engineering Education.10. Dyrud, M. A. (2005). “Ethics 101”. Oregon Institute of Technology. Proceedings of the 2005
and assessed the embedded model ofdelivering integrated macro and micro ethics education to science and engineering graduatestudents for the second time. While the faculty participants were the same as before, theembedded module was implemented in the second semester of the Biodesign core seminar, ratherthan the first as we did in fall 2009. This changed the context of the ethics instruction somewhatas the course has fewer contact hours, a more applied curriculum, and spread the research ethicscomponent over more days. Eleven students enrolled in the course which met for ninety minutesthree days a week. The course focused on integrative areas of bioinformatics, systems biologyand synthetic biology, and their application in biomedical research
consequently recorded as final actions.Licensing StatutesIn some instances, such as Alabama, a distinction is made between graduates from accreditedand nonaccredited institutions.: “ 1. Graduation in an approved engineering curriculum plus four years experience…. 2. Graduation in an unapproved engineering curriculum plus six years experience….10Whereas, other states require: “(i) graduation from an approved engineering curriculum of fouror more years.11 Each jurisdiction exercises autonomy and works with the registration boards todevelop statutes which meet their specific needs and make provisions for those coming fromother jurisdictions to either practice permanently or temporarily: “(A) The state board of registration for
measures that wehope will be appropriate and useful to measure something like “ethical competence” at theundergraduate student level. We are doing this in order assess our varied educational programs,and to identify the best practices in different contexts. This report focuses on measures being developed at IIT, using the InterProfessional(IPRO) program as our primary partner. Our partner program at Purdue, the Engineering Practicein Community Service (EPICS) is also developing an ethics curriculum and measures; they arereporting elsewhere on their work.Measures Under Development and Preliminary Results Ethical decision-making (EDM) Our approach is based on that used by Mumford6 to explore ethical decision makingbehavior in
engineers is broadened importantly. Those potentialitiesand possibilities are as important to the ongoing dynamic process of creation in theUniverse as those that reside within us as each of us plays an integral role in thecommunion of subjects.As educators, we might ask how can we integrate an engineering ethic based on love intothe curriculum? No, we are not calling for a new course or a new section of course thatfocuses on engineering or professional ethics. Rather, we are suggesting that whilemodeling engineering problems whether in capstone design or engineering sciencesettings we can directly and explicitly speak to the issues that have been tabbed by theUnited nations as the most important challenges we face as a society at the start of
engineering. Her other research interests include mixed-methods research design, integrating sustainability and professional ethics into the engineering curriculum, and communication of science and engineering concepts to non-technical audiences.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best
/home/CAIB_Vol1.html 5. Bates, S., “Flint water crisis: For young engineers, a lesson on the importance of listening”, NSF, 23 March 2016. Web. 29 March 2016. http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=138060&WT.mc_id=USNSF_1 6. Herkert, J., "Engineering ethics education in the USA: content, pedagogy and curriculum", European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303-313 (2000). 7. Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D., “Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional Formation.” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703-740 (2011). 8. Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith E. E, & Killingsworth, S. S., "Digital Games, Design
little doubt that one lesson and one homework assignment are not sufficient to develop acommitment to both understand and practice professional ethics, but the assignment provides anintroduction to this field, to be continued elsewhere in an engineering curriculum. In addition, atthe end of the course, there is no available evidence as to whether students had changed theirown ethical decision making process, or what their disposition was with respect to thestakeholders’ perspectives in the in-class exercise.Ethical ConsiderationsThe data from consenting participants will have been de-identified prior to analysis, inaccordance with IRB regulations [13]. We will also assume that the data accurately reflectparticipants’ responses to the assignment