Michigan Tech since its inception in 2000, and is responsible for its overall coordination and development. Her responsibilities include corporate sponsorship development, interdisciplinary program evaluation and assessment, and workshop/course instruction in the areas of teaming and leadership. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry. Page 14.250.1© American Society for Engineering Education
-radicalization of Hampshire College. Page 11.1287.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The Ethics Blog: Students making connections among ethics, thermodynamics, and lifeAbstractThe question of whether engineering ethics should be taught in a stand-alone course or beintegrated throughout the curriculum has been a subject of debate in engineering education, witheach approach having its own advantages and drawbacks. Integrating ethics across thecurriculum ensures that students engage ethics and personal moral development throughout theirundergraduate career, models the notion that all engineering
be productive in their chosen careers. … In all cases we will try to integrate lectures and clinical findings. It is important [to]understand the clinical implications of what they learn. … All that the course will cover will have ethical considerations regarding the use and misuse of technology in medicine.Ethical DidacticsFor over a decade, the ~50 students/ semester (90% engineers, 10% from business and the lifesciences = ~1200 students in total) were given lectures on human research requirements and mis-use and required to complete the CitiProgram on-line human research course. In other lectures,they were introduced to ethical models,5 the sensory-motor nervous system and spinal cordinjury (SCI) pathology, and assistive technology for
financial incentives. This could adversely impact thedecision-making process and impair the professionals from choosing the ethical option. Thecompetition between companies also contributes to ethical lapses in professional careers. Wetried to capture this in the Foundations Engineering design project. However, this problem needsto be expanded further to make the ethical dilemma less obvious.We intend to incorporate design problems in the future semesters for these engineering coursesas well as other courses during the coming semesters. The overall goal of this study toincorporate ethics modules with case studies and design problems in different civil engineeringdisciplines courses. The problems presented in this course will be improved based on
the criticalconsequences of a decision, when students did not see the situation relevant to their career orsituation, they tended to fall for fallacies and/ or to rationalize the situation. The finding from my research suggests that an interaction of individual’s characteristicsand characteristics of moral issues affect the decisions of individuals. This further supports theoverall argument of the ethical decision model provided by Trevino (1986). According toTrevino’s (1986) model, individual and situational variables interact with the cognitivecomponent to determine how an individual is likely to behave facing an ethical dilemma. Another finding is that although there is a lot of emphasis on ethical theories andframeworks in
behaviors to consolidate, manifest and persist in theprocess which needs to be defined jointly. professional practice throughout life.The formation process requires a follow-up of the Ethical formation is a complex, difficult and time-student's evolution. This implies that the team of consuming process to build. It requires pedagogicalfaculty accompany and offer feedback permanently mediations throughout the entire engineer educational process from the beginning until the endof the career. It is not achieved with isolated Engineers: Exemplary Education Activitiescourses. It must be integrated to the curriculum. and Programs. Washington, DC
engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a research professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State University
preparation for anyethical situations that may arise in their future professional careers. Completing the entiremodule was worth a small portion of the students’ final grades, determined by the engineeringprofessor. Following the heuristics assignment was a student survey used to evaluate student opinion onthe ethics module and whether they found the module useful. The engineering professors andethics professors involved in implementing the modules were also asked to provide feedback onthe usage of the module.Results and DiscussionPhase one: in-class modules Throughout this two year study, case studies were used as the basis for assignments andethical thinking. Using case studies requires for the students to understand the situation andexplore
26.686.7 responsibility? • [B] How can safety/ethics be communicated across cultural and socio-economic divides? • [A] How can ethical and safety standards keep up with a rapidly advancing scientific forefront? • [B] How do engineers best approach the unknown unknowns of new technologies when employed in consumer products?Use of Risk Assessment During the early discussions, students reported high levels of satisfaction with thetechnical descriptions of the catastrophes and the discussions of the underlying ethical choices.Engineering students early in their student careers generally possess good black/white criticalthinking skills on technical issues17. However, since almost all of the case studies occurred in
preparationsignificantly.Motivating Social Justice Topics. Helping students understand why questions of social justiceare being posed in the course is crucial. Connecting to student experience, contemporary issuesof interest to a variety of student backgrounds and career aspirations can broaden the receptiveaudience. Outside authorities who represent destinations to which students aspire, or whom theyrespect, can carry more weight than the course instructor many times. Helping them connect tostudents in other majors, or faculty in future courses they might take, can be motivational. Inboth Mass and Energy Balances and Thermodynamics, students were asked to reflect regularlyon their learning, which created opportunities for students to find within themselves a place
clear-cut solution.” And according to (Herkert,2000), they “encourage students to express ethical opinions, identify ethical issues, and formulateand effectively justify decisions.”There are disadvantages, however, that limit their educational effectiveness. At the conclusion ofthe case, the appropriate course of action may be obvious, particularly with well-known cases.Students may view the events described in the case as exceedingly rare occurrences that they areunlikely to encounter in their careers, or they may not consider the employment scenariopresented as a realistic possibility for themselves. A third-person account of events also may notprovide the experience required for students to engage emotionally, as is suggested by (Newberry
Paper ID #27666Behavioral Ethics and Engineers: Factors Affecting Decision Making in CasesInvolving Risk and Public SafetyProf. Harold W. Walker, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Professor Walker is the Schwaber Professor of Environmental Engineering at WPI. Prior to coming to WPI, Professor Walker was the Founding Chair and Professor of Civil Engineering at Stony Brook Uni- versity (SUNY). He started his academic career as a faculty member in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Geodetic Engineering at Ohio State University. He has taught concepts in engineering ethics for over 10 years c
; Littlefield, 2001, pp. 101-118.[14] L. Romkey, Attracting and Retaining Females in Engineering Programs: Using a Science, Technology, Society and the Environment (STSE) Approach, ASEE Annual Conference, 2007.[15] A. Diekman, E. Brown, A. Johnston, and E. Clark, “Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers,” Psychological Science, vol. 21.8, pp. 1051–1057, 2010.[16] N. Noddings, Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: University of CA Press, 2002.[17] L. Winner, “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, vol. 109.1. pp. 121-136, 1980.[18] V. Held, Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago
, a Research Associate and President’s Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Minnesota, and as an Assistant Professor and Director of the Advanced Microelectronics Laboratory at Northern Arizona University. Dr. St. Omer is an active member of IEEE, MRS, ASEE, and NSBE AE. She has also held several leadership positions at the national level during her academic career. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Where Should We Begin? Establishing a Baseline for First Year Student Awareness of Engineering EthicsAbstractThe first year engineering design course at a research institution in the southeastern United Statescontains a unit in engineering ethics, most recently
reasoningoutcomes, we turn to ways in which instructors can incorporate ethics into individual courses.Teaching students to analyze situations by applying normative ethical frameworks has long been avaluable strategy in ethics instruction and one which allows students to analyze a variety ofsituations they may find themselves in over the course of their professional careers. In response tothe need to integrate ethics education into a packed technical curriculum as well as facultytrepidation when teaching ethics, we present a series of readings designed to provide studentswith an engaging fictional scenario to serve as a basis for discussing ethical dilemmas in a contentdriven course.Science fiction has long served as a venue for writers to experiment with
: As one of our strategic initiatives to improve the undergraduate program and to better prepare our students for their professional careers, we are investigating means for Page 23.508.7 improving our engineering ethics program. As you are likely aware, most if not all of our students currently are required to take an ethics course from the ethics department. A study that we funded 3 years ago to look at that approach indicated that while the students were getting a good fundamental introduction to ethics principles, they were not getting an opportunity to understand these principles and apply them in an
AC 2012-3498: ETHICAL AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF BIOMET-RIC TECHNOLOGIES: IMPLEMENTATION IN ENGINEERING CUR-RICULUMDr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Rigoberto Chinchilla, PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University, is an Associate Professor of Ap- plied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality design, Biometric and Computer Security and Ethics, Clean Technolo- gies and Automation. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright Scholar and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and university committees at EIU and has been awarded several research grants in his career. Dr. Chinchilla Publications in
monitored. You notice that there is some oil spilled on a stair case that presents an immediate safety risk. However, the stairs can only be cleaned by a union worker but none are immediately available to help. Salaried workers have been cited and penalized for assisting with union work in the past, so you are apprehensive to do the job yourself. What should you do? If the penalty came in the form of a fine, would your decision change if the fine as $50, $500, $5,000? Are you liable if you do nothing?The topics that faculty brought to the team were scenarios that the student may encounter in theearly years of their engineering career or typical ethical issues commonly encountered by young
need to be able to address with ethicalresponsibility at the forefront of their designs. The learning approach asked students to identifypotential ethical problems and solutions to the real world exploration project that they wereexamining.During the spring 2013 semester, scholars examined ethical issues by examining case studiesfrom career fields related to their majors. Before reviewing the case studies, the idea of ethicswas introduced to the class through a required reading during the Winter Break preceding thesemester. Students read “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, a book documenting thediscovery and now widespread use of the “HeLa” cell and the ethical dilemmas involved
rural communities my career.” people’s lives in rural areas and in throughout the world, it is quiteThe benefit of this program is that it creates and enhances cross-cultural connections by offeringa joint course but more importantly allowing US graduate students to learn first hand the impactNSE can have on the developing world. With a strong SEI connection, the course places NSE inthe context of the developing world and encourages a global perspective to the graduateparticipants.SummaryNanoscale science and engineering is believed to be a technology that will have an impact on allareas of society from the development of new medicines and drug-delivery systems to changingthe workforce. As part of its mission, the
elements of the classic utilitarian thought experiment known as the“Trolley Problem” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem). However, the channelizationand levee construction enacted by the USACE that was intended to protect communities mayhave perversely increased systemic flood risks [10]. To the extent that the Mississippi Riversystem acts as a complex system, the consequences of any single engineering action may beunpredictable and uncontrollable – i.e., resulting from hidden or multiple, interdependent causes– that undermine utilitarian reasoning. It is therefore imperative that students preparing forsustainability-related careers possess moral reasoning capabilities that are adaptive to unfamiliarand unexpected situations. We argue
-Strategies Report – will be provide to the student, and they canbe used throughout the student’s career, especially when in a new professional situation.I. Introduction The number of incidents of ethical breaches and research misconduct is worrisome. Arecently released study reported that the frequency of research misconduct and under-reportingof research misconduct among those receiving funding from the U.S. Department of Health andHuman Services is three instances per year for every 100 researchers.1 In fact, the true annualrate of unethical behavior is greater than three incidents per 100 researchers (it may be fargreater), because this study did not take into account unethical behavior that does not constituteresearch misconduct, e.g
Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor of three books and author of over 140 articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender, and communication, particularly in STEM. Her research has appeared in such journals as Human Relations, Communication Monographs, Management Communication Quarterly, Communication Theory, Human Communication Research, and Journal of Applied Communication Research, as well as proceedings for ASEE and FIE. A fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the
Paper ID #19677Investigating Engineering Students’ Understandings of Social and EthicalResponsibility: Coding Framework and Initial FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
listening – but this was implicitly aimedat grooming us to stand out in interviews and boardrooms from the herd ofcolleagues who lacked communication skills. Listening was an asset that we weretaught to view as a “booster” to our career prospects.This career orientation model was built around the goal of creating engineers whofulfill what industry demands. Academia itself was seen as an engineer “churningfactory.” Don’t get me wrong. The curricula and our initiation into the industrialsector were top notch. The message we got about our role in society, however, wasa blur. Although we had courses with case studies depicting huge engineeringfailures and their catastrophic consequences (e.g., the Union Carbide Bhopaltragedy), the public side of these
and discussions of engineering ethics tend to blur the distinction betweenethical judgments/decisions and actions/behaviors, assuming the ability to make ethicaljudgments/decisions will simply lead to ethical actions/behaviors – where unethicalactions/behaviors result from either a lack of knowledge regarding ethics or the inability to applythis knowledge. Charles Huff draws attention to this dichotomy, in terms of “decision-orientedapproaches to teaching ethics and approaches that are intended to develop ethical behavior overthe course of an entire scientific or engineering career.”26 However, personally andprofessionally, the actions and behaviors of others seem more important than their decisions andjudgments.For example, the decision of a
like this were very uncommon, however. This could point to a missing link withrespect to developing a professional sense of social responsibility in engineers that could drawfrom the existing HSS influences that students reported. One student actually discussed howtheir humanities class influenced them negatively with respect to their views of engineering,saying: “Mostly the humanities, the engineering classes I took made me realize how irrelevant my major (mechanical engineering) is to making a difference in the world. I don't plan on using my major for anything in the future- planning on shifting my career path to the humanities/social sciences.”This response came from a female, senior engineering student who
Cybersecurity Computing Programs [20]. The Cyber Systems (CYS) majorprepares future officers for exciting careers within the Coast Guard with a focus on developingand implementing cutting-edge computing technologies in an interconnected cyber world. Cybertechnology is inextricably linked with all aspects of Coast Guard mission performance. TheCyber Systems major comprises a strong academic foundation in technical computing balancedwith a managerial cyber emphasis. The major provides students with the necessary foundationsfor the design and development of assured, secure computer systems in order to defend computernetworks, enable Coast Guard missions, and protect critical national infrastructure in support ofthe Coast Guard’s Cyber Strategy [21]. The
, “Validation of the five-factor model of personality acrossinstruments and observers.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 1987.[22] L. D. Walsh, M. Onorato, and S. V. K. Simms, “Ethical Sensitivity and Its Relationship toPersonality and Area of Study,” SAM Adv. Manag. J., pp. 11–20, 2016.[23] A. Triki, G. L. Cook, and D. Bay, “Machiavellianism, Moral Orientation, Social DesirabilityResponse Bias, and Anti-intellectualism: A Profile of Canadian Accountants,” J. Bus. Ethics,vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 623–635, 2017.[24] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering:An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no.2, pp. 312–340, 2016.[25] G. L. Downey, J
prison time and owing large fines for various chargesstemming from an emissions-cheating scandal [4], [5]. Actions do have consequences. It isbetter to learn this axiom early, rather than late, in an engineering career. Engineering studentsare reminded of this throughout the course.The engineering-ethics guidance provided to students in the course may be summarized in thefour practical points below. 1. Work hard and do a good job 2. Do the right thing a. Be able to sleep at night b. Be able to look yourself in the mirror 3. Make executives earn their salaries 4. Do NOT go to jail!The first point is fairly self-explanatory and