presentation.Prof. Bradley J. Brummel, University of Tulsa Dr. Brummel is an Associate Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology at The University of Tulsa. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He conducts research on training and development with a specific focus on professional development, ethics, and coaching.Dr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., University of Tulsa Jeremy Daily is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Tulsa in Okla- homa where he is researching Traffic Crash Reconstruction, Vehicle Digital Forensics and Commercial Vehicle Cyber Security. He teaches Automotive Design, Machine Dynamics, and Finite Element Analy- sis. A couple years ago, Jeremy
was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University Debra S. Fuentes is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation specializing in Mathematics Education. She received a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction emphasizing English as a Second Language, and a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, minoring in
) in engineering and science hasbecome much discussed topic in the industry and also in the academia (Detroit Free Press, 2016;Burke, 2016). While the state licensure bodies monitor the professional conduct of the engineers,professional engineering bodies like National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) andAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) insist and expect their members to have goodmoral character and ethical integrity (NSPE, 2016; ASCE, 2012).However, the ethical contact and the professionalism of an engineer do not start with theengineer’s first assignment as a graduate engineer, but with what this individual learns inclassrooms as an engineering student and how s|he gets trained as an engineering intern. Theseeds of ethics
sections share acommon syllabus and common assessments, there is also the possibility of communicating withstudents from other sections and previous years to access additional material or information, sobehaviors were included to address this. The list of behaviors included in the survey can be seenin Table 1.Table 1: List of behaviors included in the survey 1. Copying an assignment from a peer(s) 2. Not contributing to a team assignment that you receive credit for 3. Submitting or copying assignments from previous terms 4. Copying from another student during a test/quiz 5. Sharing your answer during a test/quiz 6. Asking another student for information about a test/quiz that you have not taken 7. Using a false excuse to get
reason to believe thatprefrontal cortex is not fully developed until at least age 25, calling further into question thevalue of undergraduate classroom assignments aimed at improving ethical judgments (e.g.,Aamodt & Wang 2008).25 In general there is reason for hope, as some assessment instrumentshave shown growth from educational interventions. We turn to this topic of assessment next.In terms of assessing how students perceive ethical and moral situations, one of the mostwidely-used instruments for measuring students’ ethical or moral reasoning is the DefiningIssues Test 2 (DIT-2),26,27 that was developed in the 1970’s and takes as its basis Kohlberg’sMoral Development Theory.28 The DIT-2 is administered by evaluating participant
unnecessary delays, frustration,and potential harm due to lack of oversight. Comparison of the evaluations of the tool with PDPand the final DHFs for the same projects will be used to determine effectiveness of the fivequestions tool at early evaluation.Five Questions:1. Are any humans included in the testing plan?2. Is the data collected directly about the person(s) in any way? (e.g. physical, demographic, capabilities, etc. including personal identification information; name, picture, age, SES, etc.)3. Is the data collection from testing / evaluation resulting in any type of tables or graphs?4. Is there a plan to publish or present the results in any public format?5. Is there any risk of harm to any persons in any way? (If yes please
Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop. The NationalAcademies Press.[7] Litzinger, T. A., and Lattuca, L. R. 2014. “Translating Research to Widespread Practice in EngineeringEducation.” In A. Johri, and B. M. Olds eds. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge University Press.[8] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. 2010. Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: ASurvey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US Engineering Departments. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99 (3), 185-207.[9] Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. 2008. Educating Engineers: Designingfor the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass.[10] Bodilly, S. J., Glennan, T. K., Kerr, K. A., and Galegher, J. R. 2004
“extension[s] of man”: the hammer is an extension of the hand, eyeglasses anextension of the eyes, the wheel an extension of the foot.14 Thus media are not separate from theircreators but intimately intertwined. And if media/technologies are physical extensions of people,it follows that they may also embody other human characteristics, such as ethics and values.Furthermore, the user has only limited choice for using a particular technological artifact, as eachhas a built-in bias. According to social critic Neil Postman, “It has within its physical form apredisposition toward being used in certain ways and not others.”15 Each medium“massages”—and hence changes—the information that flows through it.2 “The medium,”McLuhan famously declared, “is the
itproduced a “wrong” answer because it failed to account for the most significant factor in ethicaldecision-making: a decision that has the potential to harm the environment, people or morespecifically children, will have a more greater impact on the decision than the current modelallows [4].A traditional cost-benefit analysis (CBA) consists of listing alternative projects and programs,listing stakeholders, and selecting measurements. In the triple bottom line approach, quantifyingsuch attributes becomes increasingly difficult as has been discussed since the introduction of thesocial and environmental components in the 1970’s. The difficulty in creating a commonmeasurement of quantity for comparing and creating a single CBA rests in the question of
: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3). 403–414.9. Bocong, L. (2012) From a Micro-Macro Framework to a Micro-Meso-Macro Framework. In Christensen,S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, and Philosophy: American, Chinese, andEuropean Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.10. Van De Poel, I., Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., Royakkers, L. (2012). The Problem of Many Hands:Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics 18. 49-67.11. Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of ManyHands. New York: Routledge.12. Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and
organizations often tend to amplify the moral and political values that are lacking and need to be further enhanced in developing contexts. They view technologies as instruments for well-being rather than profits.As engineering educators who are interested in preparing future engineers for the increasinglyglobalized future, we need to be careful about what kind(s) of “global engineers” we are training.Emphasizing one or two approaches to engineering ethics over others represents an incompleteapproach that fails to project an appropriately comprehensive view of global engineering practice.Obviously, we are not training every student to become a professional engineer working in amultinational business company, nor do we expect that
Governmental Organization to pursue and proliferate ethical behavioural practices at the sprouting age of undergrad engineering students .Dr. Aravind Joshi, Business Ethics Foundation The author has worked with State Bank of India, one of the largest Public Sector Banks in India for 30 years in various capacities at different geogrphies. Post voluntary retirement in year 2000, the author has completed Master´s degree in Personnel Manage- ment and completed Doctorate in Human Resources Management. Author has been working as a facilitator and professor in reputed business schools and corportate concerns in India. The author has published various articles in Management and Soft skills in News papers, magazines and
waveform of Equation (1) can be realized in a three-step process depicted infigure 1. Nonlinear Device Bandpass m(t) + {Switching s(t) Filter modulator} c(t) Figure 1: Amplitude modulation block diagramThe Project AssignmentThe ModulatorAs discussed in ref [5], page 79, a switching modulator circuit can be constructed as shown infigure 2. The large signal carrier V1 and single tone message V2 are
a coherent grouping of similar ways of experiencing thephenomenon among (typically) more than one individual.For Zoltowski et al.’s study, analysis of the data yielded seven qualitatively different ways inwhich the students experienced human-centered design (categories) within the context of“designing for others”. An overview of the categories of description is given in Table 1. Table 1. Categories of Description of Students' Experience of Human-Centered Design10 Category of Description (Human-Centered Design Summary is...) Design is not human-centered, but technology-centered design. The focus of the design is on the technology and solving the technical
about how we will pay for it, who will build it, how will it affect life in the city. (Student response) A(s a) resident for Worcester and a part owner for Atlanta Mill in Millbury, Mr. Harrington (has) concerns about Worcester’s current sewage system for both moral and economic reasons. (Student response) I, Robert C. Booth, resident and owner of a medical practice in Millbury, found it hard to convince some people of the issue with dumping untreated sewage into the Blackstone River. Whether they are too concerned with their own businesses, time
Engineering Education, 95(1), 85-91.2. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latentsemantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review, 104, 211-140.3. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moraljudgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.4. Curzer, H., Sattler, S., DuPree, D. G., & Smith-Genthos, K., R. (2014). Do ethics classes teach ethics? Theory and Research in Education, 12(3), 366-382.
Paper ID #19158Helping Engineering and Computer Science Students Find Joy in Their WorkDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. After serving as USAF pilot in KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, he completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom and returned to the USAF Academy to teach heat transfer and propulsion
: Pre- and Post-Simulation Survey Data Evalulation Question Pre-Simulation Post-Simulation Mean Score / % Mean Score / % Strongly Agree Strongly Agree or Agree or Agree You should be able to anticipate the key impacts 1.63 / 92% 1.75 / 89% (positive or negative consequences) of your de- cisions on yourself and others at the time the decision(s) need to be made. The NSPE Code of Ethics will provide you with 2.72 / 46% 2.98 / 43% a clear
engineering from educators’ standpoint in the respectivenations and region. We also plan to study engineering ethics education in other countries.References[1] ConnecticutHistory.org[2] Baker, R, A Caplan, L Emanuel, and S Latham, eds. 1999. The American Medical Ethics Revolution:How the AMA’s Code of Ethics Has Transformed Physicians’ Relationships to Patients, Professionals, andSociety. 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.[3] Pfatteicher, Sarah K A. 2003. “Depending on Character : ASCE Shapes Its First Code of Ethics.”Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 129 (January): 21–32.[4] Kline, Ronald R. 2002. “Using History & Sociology To Teach Engineering Ethics.” IEEE Technologyand Society Magazine
so.ConclusionIn summary, we found that when paring case studies that relate closely to course content withlectures/discussions led by professors with expertise in ethical theory students found the materialstimulating and reported learning gains. This result did not change when using videos as a way toscale up such joint venture type ethics modules and solve the problems associated with suchmethods.BibliographyBasart, Josep M. and Montse Serra (2013). Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers’ Ethics.Science and Engineering Ethics 19(2) 179-187Bird, S. J., & Sieber, J. E. (2005). Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective onlineeducation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 323-328.Durbin, P. T. (2008). Engineering Professional Ethics in a
appearedheterogeneous in style and argumentation. A few checks revealed plagiarism and going into detailrevealed even more. 22 After contacting the S¨uddeutsche Zeitung (SZ), one of the importantGerman daily newspapers, the SZ published the story asking zu Guttenberg to comment theaccusation. His statement, which was a full denial, was part of the article which started the affair.A few days later the online platform Guttenplag Wiki was published, inviting the community toparticipate via swarm intelligence to search for more instances of plagiarism. 10 The results of 45days of searching is given in the two following pictures (see timestamp of 03 April 2011). Figure1 shows the more than 450 total pages of text indicating different degrees of plagiarism perpage
development of the student, for the benefit of society andfor the quality of the work itself in bringing considerations of social impact into ethics trainingfor all science and engineering students.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no.1338652 (SRR) and grant no. 1449469 (EL-STEM). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1 Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics inengineering. Herkert, J. R. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 2005, 373-385.2 On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct of
. The Journal of Higher Education, 3(8):411, November 1932. [3] Lene Arnett Jensen, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, S. Shirley Feldman, and Elizabeth Cauffman. It’s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2):209–228, April 2002. [4] Michael Kerwin. Cheating epidemic? Denver Post, June 2013. [5] Emily Hendricks, Adena Young-Jones, and James Foutch. To Cheat or Not to Cheat: Academic Dishonesty in the College Classroom. LOGOS: A Journal of Undergraduate Research, 4:68–75, 2011. [6] E. Mavis Hetherington and Solomon E. Feldman. College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4):212, 1964. [7