- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Justin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
that rather than focusing on quantity or exposure, instructors should focus on the qualityof implemented instructional strategies.Theoretical Framework Yadav and Barry have pointed to a lacking engineering ethics education researchfoundation based on empirical work.27 My position is that this research foundation must bebased on some course design model. This study follows the operational framework offered by,Streveler, Smith, and Pilotte’s where “alignment of content (or curriculum), assessment, anddelivery (or pedagogy or instructional strategy) to design learning modules, courses, andprograms is pivotal to advancing the state of the art of practice in engineering education”.35Engineering educators must not only disseminate results
- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Brittney Hope Jimerson, North Carolina A&T State University ; Eui Hyun Park, North Carolina A&T State University; Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech; Steven M. Culver, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
State University program outcomes areachieved by exposing students to a variety of subject material across the undergraduatecurriculum and effectively teaching students across these courses how to preserve and enhancethe engineering profession including ethical and legal practices. The Department of Industrialand Systems Engineering of NC A&T engineering courses that specifically address ethics intheir objectives is GEEN 100- Engineering Design and Ethics, INE 289- Engineering Teams andLeadership, INE 389- Systems Approaches for Industrial and Systems Engineers, and INE 489-Professionalism and Ethics for Industrial and Systems Engineers. In order to effectively enhancethe engineering ethics curriculum and to assess and document the current
- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David K. Ware; David J. Ahlgren, Trinity College; Harvey F. Silverman, Brown University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
authors also suggest the use of active pedagogies(guided practice, learning by doing), and integration of ethics issues in design courses, whichinherently consider ethical tradeoffs presented by design problems [6].The importance of instruction in ethics and professionalism has been recognized generally by thebusiness and higher education communities. Consider, for example, Bryant University andBentley University – two business-oriented universities that showcase a focus on “ethicalreasoning” (an element of Bryant’s First-Year Gateway core curriculum), and a “commitment tobusiness ethics” where students learn about “management and moral behavior (highlightedthemes of Bentley’s general academic approach of integrating business studies with