Paper ID #39735Using a Framework to Define Ways of Integrating Ethics across theCurriculum in EngineeringDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University at RaleighCynthia BauerleLisette Esmeralda Torres-GeraldCarrie Hall ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Using a Framework to Define Ways of Integrating Ethics across the Curriculum in EngineeringEthics are an important part of engineering and computer science education for many reasons,ABET accreditation being only one. Historically, engineering ethics have been taught as a part ofa specific class, often outside of the engineering
Paper ID #42120Navigating the Mystery: An Approach for Integrating Experiential Learningin Ethics into an Engineering Leadership ProgramDr. James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian is a Sr. Lecturer with the Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLeo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Leo McGonagle
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Analyzing the impact of a crowdsourced toolkit for embedding ethics in the engineering curriculum (Work in Progress Paper)AbstractIntegrating ethics in engineering education has now become a recurring item at engineeringeducational forums and discussions and is still growing in urgency. It is now no longer aquestion of whether ethics should be integral to curriculum design but how, who, what andwhy. How can it be incorporated? Who should be teaching ethics? What should we beteaching? And, more fundamentally, why are we teaching what we teach? The aim of thispaper is to present how an internationally curated open source ‘Engineering Ethics
and Engineering Ethics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343-351, 2004.[12] L. Bottomley, "Using a Framework to Define Ways of Integrating Ethics across the Curriculum in Engineering," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, 2023.[13] J. Li and S. Fu, "A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, pp. 339-349, 2012.[14] J. A. Cruz and W. J. Frey, "An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 543-568, 2003.[15] A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, "Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97
instill in students the ability to recognize and act uponethical responsibilities in diverse global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts [1].Existing literature on engineering ethics education reveals a multi-faceted approach, rangingfrom traditional classroom-based instruction to innovative experiential learning methods [6].Common methods for integrating ethics into the curriculum include exposing students to ethicalstandards, using case studies, and discussion activities [6]. Central to these discussions is theevaluation of ethical reasoning, wherein tools like the Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument(EERI) play a pivotal role [7]. The EERI, an assessment tool developed to measure engineeringstudents' ethical reasoning, includes
Paper ID #43877The Virtues of Engineering Practice: An Investigation of Professional Codesof Ethics in EngineeringElizabeth M BoatmanDr. Kyle Luthy, Wake Forest University Dr. Kyle Luthy is an Assistant Professor and founding faculty member in the Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Kyle has taught across the engineering curriculum and placed intentional focus on the virtue of humility. Kyle holds a Ph.D. and a MS in Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University, as well as BS degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science from Louisiana State University. As an
-making dilemmasuggests a pluralistic framework for structuring the chemical engineering curriculum. It adaptsconcepts and situations studied in business and social studies degrees to an engineering setting,creating an applicable, critical interdisciplinary and reflective curriculum [6-8]. The aim of thisstudy is to investigate how the integration of an entrepreneurial mindset into case-studies andcourse materials influences the perceptions of ethical dilemmas and develops critical thinkingskills in upper-level undergraduate chemical engineering students. It also identifies how thiscomplexity of the human factor and self-efficacy can be reflected in an assessment via a Likertscale survey and reflective journals.LiteratureEthics modules covered in
Paper ID #40015Redesign of an Engineering Failure Course to Incorporate LearningObjectives in Diversity, Ethics and InclusivityDr. Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University Dr. Halada, Associate Professor in Materials Science and Chemical Engineering at Stony Brook Uni- versity, directs an interdisciplinary undergraduate degree program in Engineering Science. He designs educational materials focused on nanotechnology, advanced manufacturing and engineering adaptation for climate change. He also works with faculty from other disciplines to explore the integration of STEM and liberal arts education
Paper ID #43795Pedagogy of Engagement: Exploring Three Methods in an Engineering Ethicsand Professionalism CourseJessica Wolf, University of British Columbia Jessica Wolf is a PhD student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UBC. Her research focuses on equity issues in engineering education, particularly looking at the impacts of engineering outreach programs on historically marginalized groups in STEM.Gayatri Gopalan, University of British Columbia Gayatri Gopalan is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy in the Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia. Her research
necessitates taking the contextsof action into account in instructional design. From the perspective of assessment, “ethics inaction” is problematic for instructors who encounter students only in the classroom context. It isnonetheless quite useful because it provides an integrative, non-hierarchical framework thatallows us to think about engineering ethics education on a larger scale than we ordinarily do. Italso opens up the possibility of recognizing the structural factors that have made it difficult tointegrate ethics into the engineering curriculum on a systematic basis.Despite an abundance of resources available to support engineering ethics instruction, includingcases provided through the Online Ethics Center (OEC), “the engineering literature
Michigan. Her educational research interests include conceptual understanding of electrical engineering concepts and assessing the impact of curriculum changes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Incorporating Giving Voice to Values (GVV) into an Engineering Ethics CourseAbstractThe Department of Engineering and Society instructors at the University of Virginia recentlydeveloped a new course on Engineering Ethics aimed at second- and third-year students. Unlikeprevious courses in the department, the mid-level course emphasizes micro-ethics and employsthe Giving Voice to Values (GVV) framework. The emphasis on micro-ethics is timely andappropriate
accreditation bodies as an integral part of engineering ethics. For example, the ABETcriterion pertaining directly to ethics evolved from a mere “understanding of professional andethical responsibility” in Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) to “an ability to recognize ethicaland professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, whichmust consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, andsocietal contexts” in the ABET 2019–2020 cycle. The “broad education necessary to understandthe impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context” in EC2000 was joined bythe economic and environmental contexts, in addition to “an ability to design […] to meetdesired needs within
SO4,7 SO2,3,4,5,6,7 Figure 2: Framework connecting character virtues to ethical decision-making in engineeringIII. Study ContextIn 2017, Wake Forest University (WFU) launched its newest undergraduate program, aDepartment of Engineering targeted at offering an interdisciplinary BS Engineering degree.Delivery of the curriculum was happening in the midst of developing the program and vision,and it became clear that this was an opportunity to reimagine and redefine engineering educationand engineering graduates. Virtues like empathy, courage, intellectual humility, integrity, self-awareness, justice, purpose, curiosity, creativity, compassion and authenticity were identified asbeing essential to the kind of engineering graduate
computer science depend on persona and identity, it is critical that everyindividual working in this area have an acceptable level of ethical awareness and sensitivity, andthey must be able to make an ethical decision whenever they face an issue [2]. To achieve this,we need to teach computer and information ethics to students from undergraduate programs,along with theories and technologies in computer sciences. Recent research shows us that ethicseducation improves students’ ethical awareness and sensitivity as well as moral reasoning [3]–[4]. While many undergraduate computer science programs include ethics in their curriculum,the teaching methods, topics, target students, credit hours, and instructor expertise vary [5]–[8].There is an urgent
STEM Curriculum through the University Indianapolis Community-Engaged Learning and (IUPUI) Ethical Reflection Framework (I- CELER) IT #3 Institutional Transformation: Virginia Tech 2017-2023 Cultivating an ethical STEM culture through an integrated undergraduate general education IT #4 Institutional Transformation: Michigan State University 2020-2025 VERITIES - Virtue-Based Education for Responsibility and Integrity to Increase Excellence in STEM IT #5 Institutional Transformation: University of Central 2020-2025 Intersections of Moral Foundations
. Bowen, “Work in Progress: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Macroethical Issues in Aerospace Engineering,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, MD: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44383.[24] E. A. Strehl, S. Olson, C. L. Bowen, & A. W. Johnson, “Work in Progress: Navigating Undergraduates’ Perspectives on Macroethical Dilemmas in Aerospace Engineering,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Portland, OR: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2024.[25] A. Gupta, “A Practitioner Account of Integrating Macro-ethics Discussion in an Engineering Design Class,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus
. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June, 2014. 10.18260/1-2--23130[2] National Society of Professional Engineers. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers.” NSPE.org. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics [accessed Jan. 4, 2023].[3] C. Moos, L. Dougher, L. Bassett, M. Young, and D. D. Burkey, “Game-Based Ethical Instruction in Undergraduate Engineering,” NEAG Journal, no. 1, pp. 20–37, Mar. 2023, doi
Paper ID #43999Research on Engineering Ethics Education in China’s Science and EngineeringUniversitiesDr. Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology I am an associate professor from the Institute of Higher Education, East China University of Science and Technology. I got a Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University in 2014. My research interest includes: engineering eduction research, university-industry collaboration.Xinru Li ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Research on Engineering Ethics Education in China’s Science and Engineering
the top (14th) ”Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs” by US News Report (2023). With this unique vision, Olga has also served as the principal investigator since 2019 on a multi-year Kern Family Foundation KEEN (Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering
news and challenge of globalization for engineering education is the importance of questioning and studying one’s own identity as an engineer, including the knowledge one values and the broader social commitments one takes for granted in doing engineering work. The work of building such questions into engineering education is the responsibility of all engineering educators and the entire curriculum, including the most technical of technical courses and instructors. The big hurdle to overcome is to move these questions from the periphery of engineering curricula to their core.” [2]As Seabrook et al. examine in their comparative study, embedded courses within engineeringschools that draw from the field of
they are at the post-conventional level of moral development, this may suggest thatthey are able to make moral judgments based on abstract principles and values [8]. In this case,an ethics education program may focus on helping students to deepen their understanding ofthese principles and apply them in a variety of different contexts.To assess our current ethics education curriculum, we used the EERI as a pre-test and a post-test.The pre-test was intended to assess students' baseline knowledge and understanding of ethicalprinciples, while the post-test was administered after students completed an ethics educationprogram. We used the EERI to assess students’ growth in engineering ethics understanding atboth the course and program level to
Editor for Engineering Studies, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Dr. Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott Streiner is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department, teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on
, no. 2, pp. 343–351, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[15] N. H. Steneck, “Designing teaching and assessment tools for an integrated engineering ethics curriculum,” in FIE’99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011, Nov. 1999, p. 12D6/11-12D6/17 vol.2. doi: 10.1109/FIE.1999.841685.[16] J. Borenstein, M. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. Swann, “The Test of Ethical Sensitivity in Science and Engineering (TESSE): A Discipline Specific Assessment Tool for Awareness of Ethical Issues,” presented at the 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2008, p. 13.1270.1-13.1270.10. Accessed
Computer Engineering (CpE), Electrical Engineering (EE), andMechanical Engineering (ME) programs and can be integrated into any academic program to fostercreativity while teaching strategies that promote ethical academic and professional behavior. Theeducational outcomes align with the EE department’s strategic goals and the university’s mission toprovide high-quality academic programs, as demonstrated below: 1. Students demonstrate ethical decision-making and embody the attributes of an engineering profession. 2. Students majoring in Electrical Engineering and Theatre collaborate to educate their peers in ethical awareness and moral values. 3. Students acquire cross-disciplinary lifelong learning skills.To assess the impact
creator of this case study has a specific“answer” to the problem in mind. Burns et al. [ 19] agree saying “If a case is constructed by‘hinting’ at how to examine a set of predetermined principles, the student is being handed acontext that is built to reduce the disagreement to such a fundamental level that no actualsituation could ever resemble it. Most of the serious moral work is already done”. Conversely,when approaching narratives–whether on the page or a podcast – students share an implicitacknowledgement that bias, interpretation, and analysis are an integral part of the genre and,thus, look at the characters and their actions rather than searching for a specific answer to aproblem.The critical narratives we used for this particular study
]. Likewise, if first year engineering students were capable of workingcollaboratively, they would have relatively higher academic achievement to those that did not [16].Thus, the module was created with a largely online component and an in-class case study toanalyze within groups of peers.In general, it is essential for students to identify the importance and relevance of the content beingtaught to keep them engaged [7]. From a professional standpoint, engineering ethical issues areoften integrated with technical problems, and students need to comprehend the weight of theiractions as an engineer [17]. From a teaching standpoint, engineering students’ learning is focusedon the design process, following the steps of identifying the problem
forcomputing programs includes the following requirement: “An ability to understand ethical andprofessional responsibilities and the impact of technical and/or scientific solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” Ethics has been part of the ABET requiredoutcomes since 2004, with the 2019-2020 criteria including ethics into Criterion 5; Curriculum:“The curriculum must combine technical, professional and general education components insupport of student outcomes.” and “The discipline specific content of the curriculum must focuson the applied aspects of science and engineering and must E. Include topics related toprofessional responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, respect for diversity, and quality andcontinuous
justice and behavioral ethicsresearch are concerned with questions of right and wrong, until recently, the study of ethicalbehavior at work has focused on them as two distinct scholarly traditions. Discussing theimportance of linking the two, they stated [7]: The process theories of justice offer an important avenue for integrating behavioural ethics research. If fairness decisions are made through a series of cognitive steps, then there are a number of stages in which ethical considerations could intervene. (p. 891)In the case of engineering education, Rottmann and Reeve [6] identified “a long-lasting divisionbetween ethics and equity in engineering education” (p. 146) and framed it as the micro/macrodivide. While micro-ethics
framework found it useful and they have been thinking about the questions actively in theirprofessional life. I had not collected data when this course was taught with the formalized framework but intend todo so in the future and report on the results. As it stands, this paper is an experience report and anintroduction to the framework that other instructors can utilize. Because of the simple underpinning of the baseline questions, this framework can also be used inindividual modules in coursework throughout the curriculum. At Saint Mary’s ethics module start atthe very �irst course in the CS sequence, and culminates in applying the question-directed frameworkin the capstone course, reiterating the importance of applying the framework to
, Associate Editor for Engineering Studies, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Dr. Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott Streiner is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department, teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based