-peak.Eileen Milligan, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAlexander Rokosz, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyElizabeth Schanne, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Rahaman returned to MIT in 2018 after a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharmaceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries to lead the four School of Engineering Technical Leadership and Communication (TLC) Programs – the Gordon-MIT Program in Engineering Leadership (GEL), the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Program (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Immediately prior to MIT, Reza was the Vice
Technol. Soc. Mag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 31–38, 2001, doi: 10.1109/44.952763.[11] H. Han, “Virtue Ethics, Positive Psychology, and a New Model of Science and Engineering Ethics Education,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 441–460, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9539-7.[12] T. Iseda, “How should we foster the professional integrity of engineers in Japan? A pride- based approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 007-9039-0.[13] G. Frigo, F. Marthaler, A. Albers, S. Ott, and R. Hillerbrand, “Training responsible engineers. Phronesis and the role of virtues in teaching engineering ethics,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–37, Jan. 2021, doi
gratefullyacknowledged.References[1] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. W. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Educatingengineers to work ethically with global marginalized communities,” EnvironmentalEngineering Science, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 320–330, 2021.[2] L. Roldan-Hernandez, A. B. Boehm, and J. R. Mihelcic, “Parachute Environmental Scienceand Engineering,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 14773–14774,2020.[3] D. Sedlak, “Crossing the imaginary line,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 50,no. 18, pp. 9803–9804, Sep. 2016.[4] M. A. Edwards, A. Pruden, S. Roy, and W. J. Rhoads, “Engineers shall hold Paramount thesafety, health and welfare of the public - but not if it threatens our research funding?,” FlintWater Study , 10-Oct-2016
. Figure 11. Color-indexed Hierarchy of Ethics Topics (Green: Top 1-8, Yellow: Top 9-17, Orange: Top 22-36, Red: Uncovered Topics)AcknowledgementProject sponsored by the National Security Agency under Grant/Cooperative Agreement NumberH98230-21-l-0167. The United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distributereprints notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Security Agency. This manuscript is submitted for publicationwith the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints.References[1] S. Deb
: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[10] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[11] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[12] M. H. Bazerman and A. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.[13] R. F. Clancy, “The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1935–1965, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0.[14] B. Keysar, S. L. Hayakawa, and S. G. An, “The Foreign-Language Effect,” Psychol. Sci., 2012, doi: 10.1177
andsocial identity development is Turner et al.’s [14] Self-Categorization Theory. This theoryexplicitly notes that, depending on a situation’s relative value to a person, one or both identitytypes will influence the person’s behavior. This is also the reigning difference between Tajfel’s[14] Social Identity Theory and Turner’s [18] Self-Categorization Theory; where the former“suggests a continuum of interpersonal versus intergroup behavior,” the latter “pronounces thatboth—social and personal identity processes—may be at work simultaneously” [15]. Self-Categorization notes that personal identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s personalattributes and social identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s membership of a
Ethics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2022.[6] M. Davis, “Integrating ethics across the engineering curriculum.,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 556–565, 2020.[7] O. Pierrakos, M. Prentice, C. Silverglate, M. Lamb, A. Demaske, and R. Smout, “Reimagining Engineering Ethics: From Ethics Education to Character Education,” IEEE, pp. 1–9, 2019.[8] C. Fleddermann, Engineering ethics, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[9] C. E. Harris Jr., M. S. Pritchard, M. J. Rabins, R. James, and E. Englehardt, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 6th ed. Cengage Learning, 2018.[10] J. Lee, “Incorporating service learning into engineering ethics education,” Technology
widely used approach in qualitative research, was used in this study toidentify, analyze, and report patterns within data [26]. As described by Braun and Clarke [26],“[a] theme captures something important about the data in relation to the research question andrepresents some level of patterned response or meaning within the data set” (p. 82).Data coding: ATLAS.ti was the platform used for this study to generate, and organize the codes.After verbatim transcription, the data was systematically coded. In particular, we identified partsof the texts where participants referred to particular events and stories related to ethics andequity. Then, we developed codes for each identified story to capture the main issue(s) that wereraised. This was done by
: 10.59198/8259gnir7.[4] L. Kohlberg, The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1984.[5] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022-2023”. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and-proced ure-manual-appm-2023-2024/ (accessed Feb. 7, 2024).[6] Rest, James; Narvaez, D.; Bebeau, M.; Thoma, S. (1999). “DIT-2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment,” Journal of Educational Psychology. vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 644-659. 1999.[7] L. G. Kisselburgh, J. L. Hess, C. B. Zoltowski, J. Beever, and A. O. Brightman, “Assessing a
skewing interview data.Participants Twenty-five participants were selected who are currently-practicing or recently-practicing professional engineers in the United States. Twenty of the participants were men(80%), whereas five participants were women (20%), which is consistent with gender diversityin the engineering profession (Pew Research Center, 2021). The study included eighteen Whiteparticipants (72%), three Asian participants (12%), two Hispanic participants (8%), and twoBlack participants (8%), which is consistent with racial diversity in the engineering profession(Pew Research Center, 2021). The sample included age groups from participants in their 20’sthrough participants in their 80’s. However, the average age of participants was
Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[2] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “Using case studies in engineering ethics education: the case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 47–63, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1914297.[3] K. S. Kalyan, A. Rajasekharan, and S. Sangeetha, “AMMUS : A Survey of Transformer- based Pretrained Models in Natural Language Processing.” arXiv, Aug. 28, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.05542.[4] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv, Sep. 06
survey. However, existing researchsuggests that demographics items should be placed at the end of surveys due to their potential tocause stereotype threat for marginalized students [28]. For this reason, the demographics itemswere moved to be placed at the end of the survey.Survey AdministrationIn Spring 2023, the survey was administered to aerospace engineering undergraduate students atthe University of Colorado Boulder and the University of Michigan. Students were surveyed intwo classes where we were implementing macroethics lessons–a sophomore aerospace vehicledesign course at the University of Colorado Boulder and a senior space system design course atthe University of Michigan. Prior to the planned macroethics lesson(s), students enrolled
, [Accessed 7 January 2023].[2] C. Mitcham, "A historico-ethical perspective on engineering education: from use andconvenience to policy engagement," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-53, 2009.[3] T. K. Jewell, F. E. Griggs, Jr and S. J. Ressler, "Early Engineering Education in the UnitedStates Prior to 1850," Houston, 2001.[4] E. Layton, The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the AmericanEngineering Profession, 1st ed., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.[5] U.S. News and World Report, "Best Global Universities," 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/engineering. [Accessed 7 January2023].[6] C. o. P. Australian, "What is a Profession?," Australian Council of
emphasis on community well-being, support ethical and comprehensiveapproaches to the development of AI. AI ethics initiatives can guarantee that technological 110advancements benefit all members of society by incorporating indigenous standpoint theory,which prioritizes the protection and inclusion of indigenous communities. Acknowledgingindigenous viewpoints enhances the conversation about AI ethics and promotes a more just andaccountable method of technological advancement.References[1] D. O. Eke, K. Wakunuma, and S. Akintoye, "Responsible AI in Africa: challenges and opportunities," 2023.[2] O. R. Olaopa and O. A. Ayodele, "Building on the strengths of African indigenous knowledge
think aboutethical decision-making. To connect these important approaches from the Philosophy of Tech-nology to Engineering, we propose embracing a playful approach to engineering education,specifically the queer art of failure, to expand the strategies and tools available for engineeringeducators in conveying complicated practice of teaching ethics to engineering students.III. T EACHING E NGINEERING E THICS : T HE S TATE OF THE C RAFTPresently, the incentives that American engineering programs currently have to teach ethicsis to meet hard requirements, such as those set out by ABET Accreditation [3], which areaccreditation bodies within the educational system that judge engineering curricula across allinstitutions and verify that they are
,” Alexandria, VA, 2024. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[7] W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, p. 12, Oct. 04, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism[8] M. Mallinger, “Decisive decision making: an exercise using ethical frameworks,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 1997.[9] J. C. Flanagan, “The critical incident technique,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358, 1954.[10] K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney, “The critical
. 347-380, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391985088516 G. Ottinger, Refining Expertise: How Responsible Engineers Subvert Environmental JusticeChallenges. New York: New York University Press, 2013.17 S. Suryanarayanan, D.L. Kleinman, C. Gratton, A. Toth, C. Guédot, R. Groves, J. Piechowskiet al., "Collaboration Matters: Honey Bee Health as a Transdisciplinary Model forUnderstanding Real-World Complexity," BioScience, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 990-995, 2018.[Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90026611.18 D.L. Kleinman, M. Powell, J. Grice, J. Adrian, and C. Lobes, "A Toolkit for DemocratizingScience and Technology Policy: The Practical Mechanics of Organizing a ConsensusConference," Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, stormwater, and wastewater system projects. He is also the Faculty Director of the Student Innovation Idea Labs at Cal Poly Pomona, which oversees the campus startup programming and maker spaces.Mr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earned ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benchmarking a foundation for improving psychological safety in