of Marburg and Bielefeld (Germany). Since 2013 she has been a lecturer at the Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Department of Social Sciences. Her research topics are gender studies and the impact of information technology on society. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Evaluation of an AI-based medical application using AI-generated methods: student experiences with a case studyon “patient preference predictors”Bernd Steffensen 1,2, Bettina von Römer 1,21 Department of Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt2 European University of Technology, European Union1. IntroductionEngineering students are often unfamiliar with ethical issues. In their actual field of
leadership positions for professional organizations such as ASME and ASEE. He is a past chair of the Engineering Ethics Division at ASEE and past chair of multiple groups in ASME. Dr. Barakat is also a program evaluator for ABET and a consultant for engineering programs development and evaluation under other systems. Dr. Barakat is an active consultant who is currently collaborating with international teams of professionals from academia and industry to build capacity and education programs in areas such as: Engineering Leadership, Engineering Ethics, Professionalism, Societal Impact of Technology, Curriculum Development, and Communication. Dr. Barakat expertise and interest include also the areas of Mechatronics, Control
adequate replacement for case studies written by professionals. Thus, the textbook remains animportant aspect in our course because it provides guidance on developing the ethical andprofessional judgement that is necessary to become a good engineer.References[1] M. Giannakos et al., "The promise and challenges of generative AI in education," Behaviour & Information Technology, pp. 1-27, 2024, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886.[2] S. Nikolic et al., "ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering," Australasian
Survey of Undergraduate Engineering MajorsAbstractAs evident from several products recently analyzed in research and legal hearings, ethicalconsiderations of products’ influence on user behavior, choice, and well-being may be eclipsedin favor of business outcomes. Persuasive design, a unidirectional process through mobile appsand other digital-enabled products, may translate to consumer risk or inadvertent outcomes. Inthis study, we examine utilization of ethical safeguards and psychological competencies inundergraduate engineering capstone courses, to inform innovative product design with studentconsideration of user well-being. To this end, we propose a research collaboration betweenengineering technology and psychology to promote
Paper ID #46117ChatGPT in Engineering Education: Revolutionizing Writing, NavigatingEthics, and Promoting Responsible UseDr. Tianjiao Zhao, East Carolina University Tianjiao Zhao joined the Department of Construction Management at East Carolina University as an assistant professor in Fall 2022. With a robust background in semantic web technologies, intelligent transportation, BIM, green building, Lean Six Sigma, Internet of Things, and water engineering, she brings extensive expertise to her role. Maintaining an active research agenda, her work primarily revolves around enhancing the efficiency, safety, and eco
], [12]. This may involve framing ethics education aroundreal-world dilemmas, engagement with communities, personal narratives, or the livedexperiences of professionals [13]-[20].This study builds on the concept of the ‘living library’, a method originally designed tochallenge stereotypes through face-to-face engagement with ‘human books,’ seeking totranslate it within engineering ethics education. The paper reports on the use of living librarysessions in a sociotechnical course on Decisions Under Risk and Uncertainty offered at aDutch technological university. The course featured four guest speakers, who took the role ofstory tellers, sharing their personal trajectories and professional experiences with ethicalengineering and ethical dilemmas
Paper ID #48859Empowering Engineering Graduates to Contribute towards Designing SaferGenerative AI Tools through an Ethics CourseSourojit Ghosh, University of Washington Sourojit Ghosh is a fifth year PhD Candidate at the University of Washington, Seattle in Human Centered Design and Engineering.Dr. Sarah Marie Coppola, University of Washington Sarah Coppola is an Assistant Teaching Professor the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington. Dr. Coppola is an educator and researcher whose work focuses on how technology and systems design affects people’s performance and health. She
chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, his M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively, and his M.A.Ed. In Educational Psychology with a specialization in Research Methods, Measurement, and Evaluation in 2023. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Leveraging NLP for Classifying Student Ethical Responses in an Engineering Narrative GameThis work-in-progress explores the application of pre-trained, open-source transformer modelsdesigned to run efficiently on local hardware for natural language processing (NLP) inclassifying student short-answer responses within the context of the
Paper ID #47648Navigating the AI Ethics Frontier: A Cross-national Comparison of AI PolicyDocuments for Developing Responsible AI WorkforceEmad Ali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Emad Ali is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on the integration of artificial intelligence in engineering education with particular emphasis on its ethical implications. He holds a master’s degree in Electrical Engineering with specialization in Embedded Systems, from the Information Technology University (ITU Lahore), as well as a Bachelor’s degree in Avionics
, specializing in engineering ethics, technology and society, and professional responsibility. His teaching and research focus on the intersections of ethics, governance, and technological practice, with a particular interest in how engineers navigate ethical dilemmas in real-world contexts. He is the co-author of L’´ethique et le g´enie qu´eb´ecois (PUQ, 2024) and regularly collaborates with professional orders and institutions to enhance integrity and transparency in engineering education and practice.Mr. Animesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh (he/they) is a Ph.D. student at the Engineering Education Transformation Institute at the University of Georgia. Their research explores user experience and the transition of
Engineering and Materials Science at Duke University, NC, USA. She received her B.Sc. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Master in Translational Medicine from the Universities of California Berkeley and San Francisco. She completed her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2022 from Duke University. Her research interests include applied medical robotics, human robot interaction, and robotics education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Case Study: Using Synthetic Datasets to Examine Bias in Machine Learning Algorithms for Resume Screening Annika Haughey, Brian Mann, Siobhan Oca Mechanical
impedance of biological tissues, the use of fractional-order equivalent circuit models, and exploring impedance-based sensing for health-focused applications.Miriam E. Sweeney, The University of Alabama Dr. Sweeney is a critical cultural scholar of digital media technologies who researches interface design, big data infrastructures, and impacts of artificial intelligence in society. She also researches ways to integrate and enhance ethical training and critical perspectives in engineering education.Claire Major, The University of Alabama Claire Major is a Professor of Education at the University of Alabama. She studies teaching and learning in higher education. ©American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #49238Curriculum Design for a Professional Development Program to Enhance STEMResearchers’ Capacity to Identify and Address the Ethical Dimensions ofTheir WorkDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rockwell Clancy conducts research at the intersection of technology ethics, moral psychology, and Chinese philosophy. He explores how culture and education affect moral judgments, the causes of unethical behaviors, and what can be done to ensure more ethical behaviors regarding technology. Rockwell is a Research Scientist in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia
, and R. Thorpe, “The Relations betweenEthical Reasoning, Moral Intuitions, and Foreign Language among Engineering Studentsin the US, Netherlands, and China,” Oct. 11, 2024, In Review. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5241927/v1.[11] A. Gammon, Q. Zhu, S. Streiner, R. Clancy, and R. Thorpe, “Exploring thePerceptions of Professional Values among First-Year Engineering Students: ACross-Cultural Comparison,” in 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology andSociety (ISTAS), Hong Kong, Hong Kong: IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227117.[12] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,” QualitativeResearch in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–597, Aug. 2019, doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806