Paper ID #43553Benchmarking a Foundation for Improving Psychological Safety in TeamsDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is leading a project
Paper ID #43419Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue withEngineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design ConsiderationsMs. Tiffany Smith, NASA Tiffany Smith serves as NASA’s Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO) and Director of the Office of the Chief Engineer’s Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership (APPEL). Ms. Smith is responsible for managing NASA’s APPEL Knowledge Services learning and development program, providing strategic communications and continuous learning to project management and systems engineering personnel, and overseeing knowledge services across the agency in
science. Theframework is presented together with a tool developed to guide any instructor at the college levelto select ways to insert ethical considerations into their class. These insertions could come fromcase studies, every day examples, or even instructional approaches.IntroductionThis paper begins with a discussion of one of the outcomes of an NSF-sponsored project aroundthe future of STEM education at the university level. After this introduction, we present anexample of how to implement the Ethical Reasoning InstrumentTM (ERITM) in a first-yearintroductory engineering class. We hope that this example might inspire others to use theinstrument to embed ethics in disciplinary engineering courses.The Future Substance of STEM Education project
to the prosperity and future developmentof the country. They play an important role in the process of national engineering educationmoving towards practice and engineering technology transforming towards innovation. Toachieve the transformation of engineering education, it is necessary to break the phenomenonof "engineering only", break down the barriers between humanities and social sciences andscience and technology, and cultivate innovative and composite engineers who can adapt topractical needs. In 2016, China became a formal signatory to the Washington Accord and thesolid promotion of the New Engineering Project provided an important opportunity for Chinato move towards becoming a strong engineering education country [2]. The Washington
alumnifrom 2010-2020 (n=65) were surveyed in 2021-2022 to determine their perceptions of the classand its impact on their ethical principles and conduct. Responses were compared to a control groupof graduate students who were enrolled in the same department during the same time period whodid not take the class (n=68). The control group placed significantly higher value on technicalexpertise, salaries, and work on projects for perceived job satisfaction, compared to course alumni,who placed greater value on interactions with the people whose lives their work may impact(p<0.001). Course alumni also were also more likely to listen to members of the public outside oftheir field (p=0.040) in considering ethical dilemmas.IntroductionThrough their work
settings to professional careers, they facethe imperative task of acquiring not only technical expertise but also hands-on experience andpractical insights to be effective in their engineering work. This experiential learningencompasses problem-solving, critical thinking, project management, effective communication,collaboration with multidisciplinary teams, adaptability to industry trends, and a profoundunderstanding of real-world constraints and challenges and therefore involves addressing variousethical dilemmas. In today's society, heightened awareness and expectations concerning ethicaland equity issues underscore the need to assess the preparedness of early-career engineers tonavigate this complex landscape in their professional journeys. To
coverage is included in programs’ cores, how is the learning operationalized toreinforce it as being integral to engineering leadership practice? Proposals for embedding ethicsinstruction more integrally within engineering coursework have included increasing the emphasison human-centric approaches to design on engineering team projects [10, 17], mitigating orreducing the isolation of ethics instruction from other aspects of courses and projects [8, 13], andincreasing the use of experiential learning approaches for ethics instruction [12, 17 - 20], among 18 19others. As this paper’s central focus, we illustrate how an ethical reasoning challenge can
the teaching of engineering ethics. Despite use of de-sign iteration and trial-and-error in engineering practice and projects, engineering instructionbroadly does not seem to leave much room for failure as part of the learning experience. Inclasses, students can be instructed only on how to find the right answer, and then be pun-ished, through low marks or exclusion from opportunities, for failure. Even in classes thatcultivate intuition, innovation and creativity, there is usually a right answer and thus a spe-cific, predetermined pathway to success that, unlike Elden Ring, does not repeatedly endurefailure. This may be a practical position for more introductory, knowledge and theory basedcourses (although still debatable), but one area that
engineers see how they canstay true to their beliefs and lay the groundwork for improved outcomes.An example case illustrates how an early-career engineer stood up for their values in the face ofprofessional pressures. While an undergraduate student at the University of Virginia, that studentstudied the Dominion Energy Atlantic Coast Pipeline project and met residents of in the BlueRidge Mountains of Virginia who were to be directly impacted by the project. These personalencounters made the student question the ethics of the project’s development. She rememberedthat learning experience during her first job as an engineer when she was assigned to work on aconsulting project related to that same pipeline. Aligned with GVV pillars, she drew upon
engineering degree programs.Undergraduate engineering curricula include engineering ethics through specialized courses andprogram-wide integration. While some engineering programs embed one stand-alone ethicscourse within a curriculum, other programs embed ethics modules across a few courses within acurriculum. Very few engineering programs weave engineering ethics across a four-yearundergraduate curriculum in a concerted and developmental way [7]. Engineering ethics taughtin stand-alone courses is usually offered within the first two years of study [4]. According toDavis [6], several engineering programs also embed ethical modules into technical writing andcommunication seminars, senior capstone projects, and introduction to engineering courses
Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Xianghong WUDr. Ryan Thorpe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Assessing the Effects of a Short-Term Global Engineering Ethics Course on theDevelopment of Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning and Dispositions [Traditionalpaper – research/evidence-based, DEI/research methods]1 IntroductionThis paper describes a project to develop, deliver, and assess a short-term (one-week) course onglobal engineering ethics at Shandong University in the Summer of 2022. This project builds onprevious
approaches to teaching ethics. For many years, these programshave included an engineering ethics course as part of the first-year general education curriculum.Typically, the course covers normative ethical theories, a code of ethics, and three famous casestudies: The Challenger Disaster, SDI: A Violation of Professional Responsibility, and GilbaneGold. Students are assessed based on their report-writing skills, a method that can disadvantageinternational students. Additionally, senior students are expected to evaluate the ethical issues intheir capstone project designs. However, the generic approach to teaching ethics often results inless student engagement and superficial learning [11]. Graduating students are expected topossess in-depth knowledge
of failure. The impact of engineers’ values and ethics, aswell as the crucial role of diversity and inclusiveness on successful engineering design, will bediscussed in detail.”Course redesign, phase I: To meet the DIV requirement, a new learning module was initiallyproposed, accompanied by appropriate readings, assigned video content, and recorded lecturesincorporating a variety of case studies. In addition, specific learning outcomes on diversity andinclusiveness and an assignment focused on evaluating these learning outcomes were added, asper the description below. The evaluation of the final group project (developed as a PowerPointpresentation using VoiceThread as well as a written report) will also proposed to be modified toinclude
are engineering projects that specifically attempt to address animalwelfare, such as painting blades to increase their visibility at the Smøla wind-power plantin Norway, where the annual bird fatality rate was reduced at the turbines with a paintedblade by over 70% [30]. Temple Grandin’s design of a more humane cattle handlingsystem [31] is another example.STS literature has a growing body of synergistic writings pertaining to ethics and animals. Alsopertinent are the fields of Animal Geographies and Multispecies Ethnography. As Hovorkaexplains: “Animal geographies are at their core grounded in ethical commitments and emancipatory practices to improve the lives of animals. Since the late 20th century, animal geographers have
these universities who serve asconsultants on the research project. The email included a link to the survey, with a briefdescription of the research, confirmation of participant age, and consent to have their responsesused for research purposes. This research project and its associated materials were reviewed andapproved by the Colorado School of Mine’s IRB. The survey consisted of four parts, theEngineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT) to measure ethical reasoning [22], MoralFoundations Questionnaire (MFQ) to measure moral intuitions [23], questions about the natureof values and ethical behaviors in engineering and technology [24], and demographic items.The ESIT is a neo-Kohlbergian measure that asks participants to decide on
its own unique way, adapting it to fitthe specific context and demands of the field. In their final year, all students complete a capstonecourse, which allows students to apply their accumulated knowledge in a practical, project-basedcontext. Students are required to not only focus on the technical aspects of design, but also theethical and societal implications of their decisions, as per ABET requirements.The Engineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI) was assigned as a homework assignmentfor data collection purposes. This instrument measures two key metrics: the P score and the N2score. The EERI was administered as a mandatory component of required courses in both thefirst and fourth years of the undergraduate engineering curriculum. The
. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering
minimize the effects ofnegative social identification can provide socialization opportunities to students. Additionally,establishing self-belief in engineering students can be accomplished by socialization of students;allowing them to observe one another’s goal setting and accomplishing those goals will allowthem to model their behaviors after each other. Consider long-term, independent projects thatmodel professional projects which require incremental goal setting and accomplishments; oftenthese take place in capstone or senior design projects, but introduction to these types of projectsearlier not only expose students to various types of engineering careers, but also allow them toexercise self-belief in lower-stakes opportunities.Finally, one
Systems Management; and Ethics. He also has a PhD in Geological Engineering. He is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE), a Project Management Professional (PMP) and a Certified Planner (AICP). He is a Fulbright Scholar and has worked for the Ministry of Education of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and most recently, he traveled to Kosovo in January 2020 to work with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Character Based Engineering VirtuesabstractOne of the most neglected subjects in engineering education is engineering ethics. Theengineering profession has a greater impact on more people every day than any other professionand
I’m not smart. I’ve pretended to know something when I really didn’t because I didn’t want to be judged.Transfer Integrity Sincere One time I crossed the line and let a project fail on a team to spite one person. I crossed the line because I didn't put my recommendations first and acted in a self-interest way. This drove a rift within the team and did not demonstrate any positive virtue by me. I suppose that I wanted to show that I
. Third, weassigned labels to the unlabeled remaining subset of 200 students’ assignments with the NLPapproach. Lastly, we read those (newly) labeled students’ responses to evaluate whether assignedcodes to those responses through the NLP approaches were accurate or not. Here, accuracymeans that the assigned code represented the idea expressed in student responses. We technicallyimplemented those four processes in Google Colab notebooks that were written using acombination of the R and Python programming languages. All code is presented in the GitHubrepository we have set up for this project at: https://github.com/andrewskatz.Data CollectionThe first-year engineering program (FYE) at Virginia Tech teaches students an ethics modulethat comprises a
trying to determine whether an ethical dilemma exists and what action, if any,should be taken in response, it can help to see the “black and white” situations with clarity andnot overanalyze. In Harmony’s case, being asked to misrepresent who owns the fabrication shopwhere a client’s components would be manufactured was an obvious step too far. In response toher leader’s request, she explained, “I immediately took him aside and I said, ‘You’re going tocome up with a reason why the client is going to see somebody else’s name on the gate becauseI’m not!’” Justine shared a similar case about dishonesty in which she faced pressure to share anunrealistic project schedule, stating, “I’m literally being asked to lie to them. This is not okay