Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff R. Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Taylor Joy Mitchell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University ; Leroy Long III, Sinclair Community College - Dayton; Jenna Korentsides, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Joseph Roland Keebler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

placerepresents an essential role in narrative inquiry with the reflection that events impact in eachplace.” Critical because the narratives confront social realities. Akin to critical pedagogy datingback to Dewey and Paulo Freire or critical theory associated with the Frankfurt school, criticalnarratives encourage students to think of power dynamics. Critical also relates to thinking aboutmoral judgment, when moral judgment is defined as issues related to fairness and justice [4].Narrative because if students are going to transfer the problem-solving skills they gained in theclassroom to considering their impact on a variety of stakeholders, they need an intervention thatgoes beyond the traditional case study or a module built around memorizing

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University; Adetoun Yeaman, Wake Forest University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Practical Wisdom (phronesis) is the integrated virtue, developed through experience and critical reflection, which enables us to perceive, know, desire and act with good sense. This includes discerning, deliberative action in situations where virtues collide. Flourishing Individuals and Society Figure 1: Adapted from The Jubilee Framework of the Building Blocks of Character [15].In the context of engineering education, a few publications have previously leveraged the JubileeFramework [3], [4], [30] – [31]. These character virtues can be mapped to the seven ABETstudent outcomes further clarifying their applicability in engineering (Table 1). Multiple virtuesmay map to multiple ABET outcomes and there is room

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

been no exception in engineering ethicseducation. To evaluate the effectiveness of engineering ethics interventions, engineeringeducators have utilized various assessment strategies. Based on their review of the literature,Hess and Fore [2] identified that engineering educators have utilized both quantitative andqualitative strategies to evaluate the effectiveness of their educational interventions: Somecommon quantitative assessment strategies included collecting student perceptions of theeffectiveness of the educational interventions through course evaluation surveys. Some commonqualitative assessment strategies included collecting students’ course evaluations which havetheir reflections on learning gains.However, although there have been

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 9:15 - 10:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Cynthia Bauerle; Lisette Esmeralda Torres-Gerald; Carrie Hall

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

thinking processes YES or NO Does the course include attention to principles of universal design of learning, including access and accommodation? Ex. Consider use of visuals designed to include colorblind students or laboratories that accommodate students with visual or physical impairments YES or NO Does the course include attention to highlighting the contributions of diverse exemplars of engineers? Ex. Tell the full story of the origins of engineered designs, like including the role of Lewis Latimer in the development of the light bulbWizard Outcome 4 - Character4a: Learning activities: YES or NO Does the course include opportunities for students to reflect on

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 9:15 - 10:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tori Wagner, University of Connecticut; Landon Bassett, University of Connecticut; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

with a binarydecision that determines what will happen next in the story. Historically, this game had been ledby an instructor and played weekly, as a whole-class assignment, completed at the beginning ofclass. The class votes and the majority option is presented next. In addition to the centraldecision, there are also follow-up questions at the end of each week that provoke deeper analysisof the situation and reflection on the ethical principles involved.This prototype was initially developed within a learning management system, then supported bythe Twine™ game engine, and studied in use in our 2021 NSF EETHICS grant. In 2022-23 thegame was redesigned and extended using the Godot™ game engine. In addition to streamliningthe gameplay loop and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, Vrije Universiteit Brussels

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

responsibilities ofengineers to the public and environment [6]. Both domains are reflected in the accreditationcriteria for engineering programs in the United States [3]. Accreditation can be a significantexternal influence in shaping engineering ethics instruction [7] [8]. However, there are multiplefactors that can affect an educator’s decision to teach ethics in the context of engineering. Thesefactors can be personal, such as their intrinsic motivation and professional background [9].Within the academic environment, factors such as course type and discipline can affect facultymembers’ views of engineering ethics education [10] [11].CultureThe study of culture is rooted in anthropology, sociology, and social psychology [12]. Comingfrom different

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

group, selected to better ensure that content on diversity andinclusivity is well-integrated into the course in a meaningful and effective manner. This contentincludes interviews with industry professionals who themselves can effectively represent diverseperspectives; readings selected from texts on engineering failures resulting from a lack ofinclusivity (“missing voices”) in design, and case studies on the impact of locating high risktechnologies and facilities in socio-economically disadvantaged areas (often correlated with largeminority populations). Students are asked to reflect on factors which impact their own values aswell as those of engineers who design, site and implement technologies. DIV learning outcomesto be achieved via the

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University; Bhaskar Sinha, National University; Pradip Peter Dey; Mohammad N. Amin, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

challenges if they are given freedom with appropriate responsibility.2. A Key issue is “how should we grade?” to accurately reflect student learning. When we asked the following question to Open AI’s ChatGPT it immediately generated the answer shown with the citation and references given below. Question: “How can a teacher grade an assignment, which is completed by a student using ChatGPT?” ChatGPT Answer: “ChatGPT is a chatbot that uses a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre- training Transformer) language model to generate text based on a given prompt. It is not designed to be used as a tool for completing assignments or for grading purposes. If a student has used ChatGPT to complete an assignment, it would not be an accurate

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shreya Kumar, University of Notre Dame; Megan Levis, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

activities used in ethics and non-ethicsengineering courses. We share details and examples of some of our activities, including examplesof student made scenarios. We share our challenges and reflections about the process.(3) Developing and curating different resources for ethics educators through the Virtues andVocations and Ethics at Work initiatives and through a student developed ethics tool.INTERDISCIPLINARY AND PAN-INTITAIVE COLLABORATIONVirtues and Vocations initiativeThese endeavors came into contact with the Virtues and Vocations initiative at the University ofNotre Dame’s Center for Social Concerns. The Center for Social Concerns is an interdisciplinaryinstitute dedicated to justice education and research for the common good with

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 9:15 - 10:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaojiao Fu, Peking University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

index according to the specific situation of the coursetaught. In this way, the specific situation can be handled flexibly, and the teachingsituation of the course can be intuitively understood.The evaluation indexes and methods should be selected according to the curriculumobjectives. In the construction process of evaluation contents and evaluation system, itis necessary to consider whether indicators are easy to obtain fully. Evaluators mustknow how to judge and give opinions based on fundamental indicators and evaluationcontents. Establishing the evaluation index system should comprehensively reflect thevarious dimensions of the course effect of engineering ethics education. According tothe training objectives and talent training needs of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia; William J Davis, University of Virginia; Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia; Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia; Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

schools, such as Texas Tech - Costa Rica, have accessed thecourse GVV modules on the OEC, suggesting that the course has the potential to be widelyadopted. We hope that ASEE members will find this to be a valuable resource for instruction.This evidence-based practice paper introduces the engineering ethics course and provides anoverview of how the GVV framework may be used in an engineering context. Its purpose is toprovide a framework for engineering educators who might wish to consider incorporating theseGVV modules into ethics courses. It further includes the instructors’ reflection on the new courseand how well it is achieving its goal of equipping undergraduates with knowledge,understanding, and practice to prepare them for ethical

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

students are positively disposed toward engineering ethics content [18].Beliefs and assumptions about disciplinary coherence and autonomy (or lack thereof) shape ourthinking and are not usually the subject of critical reflection. The analysis presented here drawson the literature on interdisciplinarity to engage in such critical reflection. The intent is not todenigrate or devalue disciplinary expertise, but rather to understand the ways that disciplinarythinking and structures limit the possibilities for bringing academic expertise to bear in contextsthat are not organized by disciplinary structures.How Research on Interdisciplinarity Clarifies Its Purposes and ChallengesRobert Frodeman provides an approach that is particularly useful in the

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frank A. Mazzola, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Siddhartha Roy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marc Edwards, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

outside of their field (µ=8.62, σ=1.52) than the graduate program control group (µ=8.00,σ=1.89). On the other hand, ethics class alumni rated “academic freedom and free speech” (µ=8.31,σ=1.68) slightly lower than the graduate program (µ=8.57, σ=1.64). The ethics class alumni alsovalued listening to professionals within their field (µ=8.37, σ=1.60) slightly less than the controlgroup (µ=8.57, σ=1.40). However, neither of these differences were of statistical significance(p>0.05). Figure 3: Importance of Various Parameters on one’s Ability to Act EthicallyDiscussionAlumni of the ethics class had different priorities for their professional careers and lives asengineers and scientists (Figures 1 and 2). This may partly reflect a self

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

side. Madeline K. Biomedical Engineering StudentAnother UVA biomedical engineering student shared during a class discussion that she mustdisconnect herself from her feelings when injecting toxic nerve agents, used for militaryresearch, into rats.The split in identity expressed by these students reflects a larger cultural schism that begancenturies ago:As Franco notes: “René Descartes’s (1596–1650) description of animals as “machine-like” was heavily criticized by many of his contemporaries, but nevertheless provided scientists a way to justify what would now be considered extremely gruesome experiments in a time when anesthesia, for humans and animals alike, was not available.” [4] (p. 241)Descartes’s

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice Fox, Stanford; Benjamin C. Beiter, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

, educators attemptingto address the Collingridge Dilemma by better training engineers and designers in ethics needto take a more comprehensive approach to ethics beyond one-off courses in professional ethicsor generic humanities ‘liberal arts’ curriculum requirements (i.e. ethics is nonfungible withlanguage, history, religion, etc.).Additionally, to account for value dynamism, an approach to ethics is needed that is not onlyfocused on legal standards, regulatory guidelines, or ethical checklists. These approaches of-ten grow stagnant if they are not updated regularly, uphold hegemonic societal values anddominant images of user groups (see [27] for additional examples), inhibit critical reflection,and settle for very narrow definitions and

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaojiao Fu, Peking University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

also covers the assessment of theimplementation of the whole curriculum and curriculum elements, which reflects thecharacteristics of the whole curriculum and comprehensiveness. The reliability andvalidity of the comprehensive questionnaire are improved by referring to theengineering ethics course evaluation questionnaire in existing studies, solicitingexperts' opinions many times, conducting multi-type pre-test, in-depth discussionfeedback, and scoring twice.The comprehensive questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part is aboutevaluating the course and students' learning experience, which includes not only thecognition and evaluation of the overall situation of the course but also students'recognition of the course and engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth McDonald, United States Military Academy, Department of Systems Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

engineering program certification. Additionally, professional ethicalcodes evolved to include priorities for the health, welfare, and safety of society as their topconcern. Prior to this, codes were more reflective of protecting the profession and the client.To support this move toward protecting society, professional publications began to addressengineering ethics in articles and conferences [9]. As engineering ethics education becameinculcated into engineering programs, different pedagogical approaches emerged. As much asengineering education is standardized, engineering ethics education pedagogical approaches arenot. The National Academy of Engineering conducted a study in 2016 to identify the bestengineering ethics approaches. The study revealed

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Ryan Thorpe

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

affected. It is worth noting that this paper is not a full paper in a more traditional sense. Rather,some people may call this paper a work-in-progress, theoretical piece. This paper mainlyserves two purposes. First, it serves as a reflective exercise for us as the research team thatallows us to critically examine our own assumptions (which may not be completely visible toourselves) about methodological design and how our methodological design can affect ouraccess to students’ ethics learning experience. In other words, as we are now in the process ofrefining the methodological design for the case studies, insights from this paper will informour decision-making in the process. Second, we also hope this short piece can deliever amessage to

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Hingle, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

talking point, these participants specifically focused on the effect of automatingmanual tasks with drones, self-driving machinery, or remotely operated equipment.Learning about Ethics through the RPS As a debriefing question was answered immediately after completing the RPS, participantswere asked what they learned about ethics through the RPS and case study. For this portion, wechose specific quotes to highlight the range of reflections that our participants highlighted. Thequotes highlighted here were edited for grammar and spelling with care to not change the quote'smeaning. To provide some quantitative measures along the quotes, we use the followingdescriptors: “most” for over 85% of the participants, “many” for over 65%, “half” for

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida; Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Steven Kuebler; Lakelyn E. Taylor, University of Central Florida; Eve Vazquez, University of Central Florida; Victor Milanes, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

structures. Faculty leaders regularly includedepartmental heads/chairs, undergraduate and graduate program coordinators, and chairs ofcurriculum committees. We recognize that faculty who do not have institutionally identifiedleadership positions may in fact function as departmental drivers of ERC when its themes arestrongly reflected in their scholarship, training, and teaching. But, for this study, our initiallyidentified faculty leaders have been current or recent chairs or directors of departments orprograms within the discipline and typically have held administrative leadership responsibilitieswithin their unit. We recruited leaders in their respective disciplines as these are the individualsthat are often responsible for implementing mandated

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology; Xianghong WU; Ryan Thorpe

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

chapters one, two, four, five, seven, and ten. Final course grades were based on threecomponents: completing (1) course readings and reflection exercises; (2) in-classexercises/attendance; (3) a case-study assignment. The course was an elective but counted forcredit in international education. Student at Shandong University are required to take at least 2credits in international education to graduate.Out of a total of 70 students who ultimately enrolled in the course, 73 students completed thesurvey on the first day of class – students subsequently dropped the course – and 47 studentscompleted the survey on the last day of class. After excluding the responses of participants whodid not consent to have their responses used for research purposes, as

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Class action lump settlement 670,000,000 Total 1,162,900,000 Based on text information in [15]The 10-year gap between 2005 and 2015 reflects the time needed for a blood sampling program;rather than splitting the settlement among the plaintiffs, the court initiated the C8 Health Project.Medical personnel sampled the blood of as many residents in specified areas as possible, most ofwhom were unaware of the presence of PFOAs in their drinking water. Incentivized by a $400stipend per person, more than 70,000 participated in a battery of 50 tests, generating a wealth ofdata that took scientists eight years to analyze. The project became “the largest private study ofliving

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Umair Shakir, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

method inengineering ethics education.Case-Based Instruction in Engineering Ethics EducationCase studies or case scenarios (we use these phrases interchangeably) present students withethical dilemmas embedded in real-world contexts. These dilemmas generally do not have rightor wrong answers, but rather better or worse decision outcomes for various stakeholders [2].These shades of gray encourage students to think deeply about their values, experiences, andprofessional practice [14], [24]. Students reflect on scenarios with information provided in termsof news media reports, academic publications, regulatory documents, or other materials.Instructors in engineering classes often teach the code of ethics of professional organizationssuch as the