larger, mixed methods study, an online survey was developed using Qualtrics surveysoftware. The faculty portion of the survey consisted of 13 items that were developed by theresearch team and informed by consultations with the project advisory board, prior literature[24], and the team’s prior work experiences in academia and industry. While survey itemsincluded topics such as course background and content specialty, we focused our analysis hereon responses to survey items that align with the conceptual framework dimensions (Figure 1) toreveal inherent faculty perceptions regarding content, importance, and assessment of leadershipin the engineering curriculum. Characteristics of the survey items explored with theircorresponding dimensions are
Paper ID #22439Flipped Classroom and Emotional Learning in an Engineering LeadershipDevelopment CourseDr. Dean H. Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering facilities design to research that applied engineering
College,2016. Report. [Online]. Available: https://www.hmc.edu [Accessed January 30, 2018].[14] “Program Educational Objectives,” 2018. [Online]. Available:http://www.hmc.edu/engineering/curriculum/program-educational-objectives/ [Accessed January30, 2018].[15] R. E. Sturm, S. N. Taylor, and L. E. Atwater, “Leader Self-Awareness: An Examination andImplications of Women's Under-Prediction,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 35, no. 5,pp. 657–677, Dec. 2013. [Online] Available: Wiley Online Library, www.wiley.com. [AccessedMar. 9, 2018].[16] J. E. Froyd, P. C. Wankat, and K. A. Smith, “Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of EngineeringEducation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. Special Centennial Issue, pp. 1344-1360,May 2012.[17] L
involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is a Professor of Engineering at Olin College of Engineering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student-centered learning, and gender and STEM.Dr. Kate Roach, UCLMrs. Emanuela Tilley, University College LondonDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Associate Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Director of the Madison Engineering Leadership Program
involvement ofstudents from marginalized groups. Cooperative class environments are also perceived as“warmer” by students, which contributes to positive outcomes in a host of learning outcomes (likepersistence in STEM after graduation), especially for female engineers [35, 39]. Finally, reflectivelearning can be an important contributor to leadership development as it leads to interdependencewith others [39, 42]; connecting leadership experiences to coursework can deliberately engagestudent in reflective learning on their experiences.The curriculum is only one of two aspects of students’ college experience that influence theirdevleopment. The co-curriculum, such as participation in Greek life, athletics, internships, on-campus employment, or
Design Center (DC) Colorado in CU’s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering educa- tion. His current duties include assessment, team development and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi
students, but rather a self-selected subset. Whileliterature indicates that EL programming is more effective when integrated into the corecurriculum rather than distributed in optional activities [13], other studies reveal that changingthe engineering core curriculum can be quite difficult [6, 14, 15]. These latter studies, coupledwith the observed trend of optional EL course implementation, suggest that the self-selectivenature of students’ EL course participation will continue to be commonplace – at least in the nearterm.Given the voluntary status of many undergraduate EL courses, it may be appropriate for ELeducators to consider the cross-sectional representativeness of their course cohorts relative totheir university’s overall engineering
construction course, capstone design, and aprofessional issues course. Being introduced to leadership ideas early in the undergraduatecurriculum, which are reinforced in later courses, may be a good strategy to motivate studentsand encourage their interest around leadership topics. A number of students also identifiedinternships and other co-curricular activities as contributing to their leadership skills (e.g. ROTC,professional society president, sports activities). Instructors may want to consider the tenets ofEVT when integrating leadership education into the curriculum, explaining the utility value ofthese skills in the workforce and using metacognition to have students reflect on their ownleadership experiences so that they build self-efficacy
: Reflections on two of the eight high-impact practices Attendance at six professional preparation workshops Résumé or curriculum vitae Cover letter Professionally Prepared Reflective Essay: a signature piece in the portfolio, describing how the integration of student assets with in-class, among-classes, and beyond-class experiences applies to their graduate school or employment goals. Presentation of portfolio in a campus forum showcasing student achievement (p. 24)UTEP Edge Experiences include:O Capstone Experiences O#84EA?8L!E<7:8F"4A74L8>!'<86
curriculum. The four initiatives include: 1. How to assist university administrators and faculty to understand the significant value of this new field in academia and practice 2. How to resource Engineering Leadership Education (ELE) programs, such as funds, facilities, and capable faculty and staff 3. How to effectively integrate within the curriculum, teach, and assess leadership development in engineering students from undergraduate to graduate to practicing engineers. 4. How to develop a framework/model that describes the diverse Engineering Leadership needs of companies across industriesAs members of the LEAD division, the authors sought to focus on strategic initiative numberfour. In an effort to begin
engineeringprograms. Instead, students have been expected to learn skills through leadership experiences instudent organizations or through workplace professional development programs or mentorship.The 2004 report on engineering in the new century by the National Academy of Engineering hasprovided impetus to some American engineering schools to incorporate leadership curriculum[2]. The report proposes two main premises as the rationale for the importance of leadershipeducation at the undergraduate level in engineering. Specifically, the inclusion of engineeringleadership in the undergraduate engineering degree program will equip the graduate to be morecompetitive in an increasingly global marketplace, and will enable the graduate to fulfill theirprofessional
leadershipeffectiveness using experimental studies, large-scale surveys, and experientially based calls forchange to argue that either managers need to adapt to engineers’ technical-rational, convergentproclivities, or that engineers as managers need to develop a suite of professional skills tocomplement their technical training. Whether they viewed engineers as a homogenous group ofprofessionals who must be accommodated, as technically trained individuals in need of socialskills, or even as citizens with culturally diverse values, all thirteen researchers focused on theindividual engineer or engineering manager as the primary unit of analysis. An importantimplication for engineering educators and corporate trainers is to integrate social skills traininginto
Paper ID #22424Faculty, Student, and Practitioner Initial Conceptions of LeadershipDr. Kenneth Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Kenneth is an Associate Professor at Cal Poly Pomona and a licensed Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, storm water, and waste water systems projects. He holds degrees from the University of Nevada Las Vegas (BSCE and PhD) and from Norwich University (MCE).Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he