Conference Session

Continuous Improvement in Engineering Leadership Development Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; John M. Shaw

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

design courses and are evaluated as graduate attributeoutcomes integral to the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) evaluationprocesses. Continual course improvement processes require reflection on the success oflearning activities, the tools used for teaching, and alignment of learning outcomes,activities, and assessment. Peer evaluation and feedback tools can encourage studentlearning and leadership development. The method of data collection, the type of feedbackand the contextual validity of the feedback may impact students’ development of useful teambehaviours and personal strategies for working in team environments. Mixed methodsuccessive case study analysis provides insights enabling targeted improvements to learningactivities

Conference Session

Continuous Improvement in Engineering Leadership Development Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University; Beth Koufteros, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

Program take a three-credit hour leadership course eachsemester. The course in each semester includes a mandatory pre-semester retreat that is anintensive, multi-day event consisting of experiential learning, interactive exercises and dialogue.During the semester, weekly class sessions include dialogue with peers, business simulations,personal reflections, case study discussions, and conversations with thought leaders fromindustry, government, and nonprofit organizations.The student selection process includes an application, reference check and interview. Thestudents must be in good academic standing, but their grade point average is not a considerationin the selection process. Rather, we select students based on commitment to personal growth

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

learning goals and explore potential new learninggoals.Qualitative DataA total of 297 weekly reflection papers and 27 final papers from 27 undergraduate studentsacross two independent cohorts served as the source of data for this qualitative research study.For the weekly reflection papers, the students were asked to reflect on their experiences duringthe weekly T-Group. The students were asked to write a reflection about situations which had asignificant impact on them. The weekly reflection papers enabled the author to perform alongitudinal analysis in regards to the student’s development of their authentic leadership skillsand to conduct triangulation of the data between individuals, peers, and facilitator.For the final papers (min. 3,500 words

Conference Session

Innovative and Impactful Engineering Leadership Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Mihee Park, Pennsylvania State University; Ashley N. Patterson, Pennsylvania State University; John Jongho Park, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

to explore their own implicit bias in the areas ofrace, gender issues, and age (the core focuses within the course). Key elements of successful implementation into the engineering leadership environmentincluded creation and access of peer support and a course operational agreement that studentswere invited to sign that outlined inclusive pedagogical approaches and mindsets. Access to peersupport during the process of building skills necessary to facilitate a course like the onedescribed in this project could be achieved by engaging with diversity offices or other experts,participating in reading groups, or paying consultants with expertise in developing instructorcapacity in the areas of diversity and inclusion. In the case of the

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence Holloway, University of Kentucky; Thomas Ward Lester, University of Kentucky; Joseph Anthony Colella, University of Kentucky College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

program and undergo an interview process. Factors considered in theselection of participants include academics, work experience, effective communication, andinvolvement in student or civic organizations. Since its inception, the program has always beenled by either the currently acting dean or a former dean of the College.The course is structured with the following elements:Curricular elements: 1. Leadership literature and leadership from history: Students were regularly assigned articles and books on leadership and leaders. Students then were required to write reflections on these and to discuss these within the class. 2. Learning from leadership journeys of alumni before: Successful alumni of the college were invited to