Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anton E. Bowden, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Spencer P. Magleby, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, annually. Junior and senior level experiences have proven to be most effective whenthey are tailored to the needs of the respective departments. Inclusion of a regularly scheduled,premiere engineering leadership seminar series has proven to be invaluable in maintainingstudent and faculty excitement regarding the inclusion of leadership topics in the curriculum. Page 24.874.9Bibliography1 Hawks, V., Harb, J., Parkinson, A., & Magleby, S. A college-wide program for teaching leadership: Framework,model, and outcomes. Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. AC 2009-1287, Austin, TX:ASEE.2 R. J. Bennet and E. R. Millam

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tim G. Kotnour, University of Central Florida; Charles H. Reilly, University of Central Florida; John A. Selter, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

section the Engineering Leadership &Innovation Institute (eli2) is described. eli2 is a college-wide initiative which responds toABET’s and industry’s call for more well-rounded undergraduate engineering students. eli2 is acollection of faculty, courses, programs, and labs. The intent of this case study is to provide afoundation description and understanding of eli2. Detailed impact assessment is not yetavailable. Initial measurements are being developed and gathered.eli2’s Mission & GoalsTo respond to the need for engineering leaders, the University of Central Florida is implementingeli2. eli2 was initially started in 2006 as a leadership institute funded by Progress Energy. Thisinitial effort provided the foundation to expand and grow

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Joshua Schmidt, Brigham Young University; Anton E. Bowden, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

and teamwork," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, pp. 7-15, 2001.7 Hinkle, G.C. What every engineer needs to know about leadership and management. SPIE Student Services andSPIE Professional Leadership Searies. Accessed 1/2/2014 from http://spie.org/x15555.xml.8 Farr, J.V., and Brazil, D.M., “Leadership Skills Development for Engineers”, Engineering Management Journal,vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3-8, 2009.9 Tomek, S., “Developing a Multicultural, Cross-Generational, and Multidisciplinary Team: An Introduction forCivil Engineers,” Leadership Education for Engineering Students, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191-196, 2011.10 Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwoh, D.R., “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: theClassification of

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew C. Hurt, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robert C. Deadman, Ivy Tech Community College; Jenny Daugherty, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel O. Lybrook, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

., Foston, A., & Justis, R. (2011). The Importance of Being Educated: Wage Benefits for Indiana's Adult Students, Indiana Business Research Center, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University.6. Daugherty, J.L., Mentzer, N. J., & Lybrook, D.O. (2010). Perspectives on technology leadership. In Technological Learning and Thinking: Culture, Design, Sustainability, Human Ingenuity International Conference Proceedings. Vancouver, Canada.7. Daugherty, J.L., N.J. Mentzer, D.O. Lybrook, & Little-Wiles, J. (2013) Philosophical perspectives on technology leadership. In Wang, S., & Hartsell, T. (Eds.). Technology integration and foundations for effective technology leadership. IGI Global, 42-56.8

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Bayless, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

leadershipdevelopment of the respondents.References[1] Hochstedt, K., Erdman, A., and Schuhmann, R., “Learning Expectations and Outcomes for an Engineering Leadership Principles Class,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013, Paper 6028.[2] Egan, T., “The Impact of Leader Coaching Behavior on Engineers’ Motivation to Learn and Voicing Behavior ,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013, Paper 7839.[3] Pitts, S., McGonagle, S., and Klosterman, S., “Developing Engineering Leaders using Engineering Leadership Capabilities and Leadership Labs,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013, Paper 8230.[4] Osagiede, A., Cox, M., and Ahn, B., “Purdue

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Ahn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

; Matsch, L. A. (1996). Desired attributes of an engineering graduate – An industry perspective, Proceedings of the 19th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1996.3. Wisler, D. C. (2003). What you don’t necessarily learn in school, Mechanical Engineering Magazine Online, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2003.4. Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-Engineering Graduate Skills – A Case Study, European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 131-139.5. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G. (2010). Developing leadership skills of undergraduate engineering students: Perspectives from engineering faculty. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor Robert Smith, Brigham Young University; Rollin H. Hotchkiss P.E.,D.WRE, F.ASCE, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

. H. Church, eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 48-62.3 Dunning, D. (2005). self-insight: roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself, Psychology Press, New York, NY.4 Atwater, L. and Yammarino, F. (1992). “Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions?” Personnel Psychology, 45.5 Bollich, K. L., Johannet, P. M., and Vazire, S. (2011). “In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self- knowledge.” Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 312, .6 Whetten, D. A., and Cameron, K. S. (2007). Developing Management Skills, 7th Ed., Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.7 Fleenor, J. W., Smither, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Braddy, P. W., and Sturm, R. E

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Qin Zhu, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

members.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DUE-112374).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Gouran, D. S. (2003). Leadership as the art of counteractive influence in decision-making and problem-solving groups. Small group communication theory & practice: An anthology, 172-183.[2] Baker, D. C. (1990). A qualitative and quantitative analysis of verbal style and the elimination of potential leaders in small groups. Communication Quarterly, 38(1), 13-26.[3] Taggar, S., Hackew, R., & Saha, S. (1999). Leadership emergence in

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Richard A. House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kay C. Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Jameel Ahmed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Donald E. Richards, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Cultures, Policies, and Practices”25, and Eckelet al.’s “On Change III Taking Charge of Change: A Primer for Colleges and Universities”19.Second, change agents should work to develop a group of partners, including change leaders,who will help coordinate the process; contributors, who will participate in change through de-fined and specific roles; resource providers, who will supply information or resources; constitu-ents, who may not participate but must be kept up-to-date regarding the process and vision; andconstructive skeptics, who will provide thoughtful and useful critiques. With the assistance ofthese allies, the change agent can manage resistors, those individuals who are invested in pre-serving the status quo19. Change agents should

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Consent. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol.250, No. 1, Communication and Social Action, pp.113-120. 2. Denning, S. (2007). The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling. New York: Bantam) 3. Fairhurst, Gail Theus and Farr, Robert A. The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership. (Bloomington, IN: Jossey-Bass). 4. Gardner, Howard. (2011). Preface to Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership. (N.Y.: Basic Books). Originally published in 1995. 5. Gavin, N.T. (2009). Addressing climate change: A media perspective. Environmental Politics, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 765-780. 6. Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard J. Schuhmann, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Huttner-Loan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Management Executive, 1988, 2(2): 127-132 12. Russell, Jeffrey S., W. B. Stouffer, (2005), "Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum", Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 131(2): 118-128 13. Toor, S., Ofori, G., Leadership versus Management: How are they different and why? Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(2), April, 2008 14. Yoder, B.L., (2012), "Engineering by the Numbers." American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC. http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/collegeprofiles/2011-profile-engineering- statistics.pdf

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Lauderdale King, STEM Talent Expansion Program at LSU; Samantha Noelle Fadrigalan; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Summer Dann , Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

wasdeveloped to recognize the graduating student(s) who have made significant contributions to thementoring program. The students who receive the LSU Leadership Legacy Award must benominated by current mentors in the program and voted on by the faculty/staff advisors. Morethan one student can be selected for the Legacy Award each semester. All of the mentors are encouraged to join the LSU Distinguished Communicatorprogram, a university wide program that is listed as a special designation on students’ transcripts.The Distinguished Communicator program recognizes students’ exceptional abilities in fourareas of communication: verbal, written, visual and technological. Currently, every officer inSPM has been accepted into the program and is

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Rhonda K. Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; John W. Nicklow, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

these specifications it would be nearly impossible to havesuccess in the successive steps due to the vagrancies of a poorly written objective. The followingrepresent the SMART specifications:  Specific – target a specific area for improvement.  Measurable – quantify or at least suggest an indicator of progress.  Assignable – specify who will do it.  Realistic – state what results can realistically be achieved, given available resources. Page 24.672.5  Time-related – specify when the result(s) can be achieved.Figure 3Portion of the LDP’s X-Matrix

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, Virginia Tech; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division