University Program for Leadership and Character in the Professional schools. In her role she also supports with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program.Mr. Andy Brock, Prolific Living Andy Brock is an electrical engineer with 13 years of IT experience primarily in the software, networking and security space. He worked as a security architect and network solution engineer for government projects before starting his company, Prolific Living Inc with his wife, Farnoosh Brock in 2012. Today, they partner with universities such as Duke, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, as well as visionary organizations to educate engineers and their leaders on Leadership, Communication and
Paper ID #42120Navigating the Mystery: An Approach for Integrating Experiential Learningin Ethics into an Engineering Leadership ProgramDr. James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian is a Sr. Lecturer with the Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLeo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Leo McGonagle
teamsAbstractPsychological safety is emerging in the literature as a gateway to creating high performing teamsand high team satisfaction. Studies have demonstrated that psychological safety is a keyingredient in the ability of teams to perform to a higher degree than they otherwise would be ableto. In this research, we continue to expand the assessment of psychological safety in seniorcapstone teams to include data from engineering programs across four different institutions toprovide a sense of the experiences on capstone design teams and impacts interventions mayhave. We also begin to explore approaches to improve psychological safety in senior capstoneteams by focusing on improving students’ awareness of their ethics (the principles that guidetheir choices). The
Paper ID #43424Exploration of Career and Ethical Challenges of Analytics and GenerativeArtificial Intelligence in an Engineering Leadership CourseDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc.Zhendi Zhang, Texas A&M UniversityMiles O. Dodd, Texas A&M University Miles Dodd is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology at Texas A&
when engineers appreciate and strive forfairness [4]. Understanding the educational context and the importance of integrating equityissues is crucial to help engineers develop an equity ethic. However, the rigid and technology-focused nature of engineering education, rooted in meritocracy and a lack of political awareness,often prevents engineering students from exploring the social aspects of their field. To promotesocially just engineering practices, we must change how engineering students are taught andequipped to address issues of inequality in the workplace. Like in many other professions,engineering culture and values may be imparted to students through belief systems that arediscussed in more subtle ways rather than just fundamental
student opinions about strategicnetworking before and after they experience the course material and activities. The second of thesesurveys explores the effectiveness of each intervention as perceived by students. This latter surveyalso explores the potential positive effect of portraying strategic networking to doing good for others.While the students’ first survey opinions were slightly on the positive side of neutral about strategicnetworking, they nevertheless evidenced concerns over the ethics and authenticity of strategicnetworking and lack of skill in practicing it. Course content was oriented in part to portray strategicnetworking as a practice that benefits others and promotes worthy causes; it is servant leadership inpractice. Student
expectations, supporting faculty intheir development, communicating effectively, behaving ethically, and managing the departmentin an organized and fair manner are valued for leading, developing, and supporting faculty.IntroductionEffective department head or chair leadership is an important part of both faculty and studentsuccess. The civil engineering community has invested significant effort into developingoutstanding faculty over the last 25 years through the American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) Teaching Workshop [1, 2]. Whilethere is evidence that the ExCEEd Teaching Workshop also develops great leaders [3] andfosters an inclusive environment [4], there has not been much effort applied to
workshops onsuch topics as “developing leadership philosophy,” “cultural competency,” “leading,micromanaging, and mentoring,” and “ethics, pragmatism, and risk-taking,” among others.Members also engage in outreach projects and are provided with individualized assessments 2geared to the career and personal goals of each. Participation in the program provides myriadbenefits to members, including mentoring from industry representatives and UConn Engineeringleaders, resume building, exclusive JLLA-related grants and fellowships, faculty social hours(providing interdisciplinary networking), and a professional community through which memberscan make
) ● sub-disciplinary cultures (Gilbert, 2008; Godfrey, 2007; Murphy et al., 2007) ● national cultures (Downey and Lucena, 2005) ● assessment cultures (Borrego, 2008).Godfrey [9] also cites studies of cultural change in engineering education, related to the role of ● institutional culture in effecting change (Covington and Froyd, 2004; Kelly and Murphy, 2007; Kezar and Eckel, 2002; Merton et al., 2004), and ● measuring cultural change (Fromm and McGourty, 2001; Lattuca, Terenzini, and Volkwein, 2006).4.1.2 Observable Engineering Education Cultural Beliefs and ValuesBeliefs such as meritocracy, ethics, complexity, difficulty, worthiness and stress are beingstudied with respect to engineering education culture and the impact on
professionals as well as from national sources including the NationalAcademy of Engineering (NAE) [2], the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)[14], and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [1] (See Appendix Afor competency definitions and dimensions). Each competency can be assessed on one of threeperformance levels designated as: Exploring, Engaging, and Explaining (Table 2) [15].Table 1: Key Professional Competencies [15] ● Communication ● Ethics ● Lifelong Learning ● Creativity ● Global/Cultural Awareness ● Risk Management ● Empathy ● Grit/Persistence/Resilience ● Systems
beneficial? What types of technical skills are most beneficial? What knowledge and skills would you like to see from new graduates that you believe are missing? What do new graduates need to know to be an effective team member? What should students be able to do upon entering the workforce?Data Analysis: This exploratory study is a work in progress. The findings will help identify gaps incurrent student preparedness. This will ensure graduates are better prepared for the demands ofthe field. The data was in vivo coded to nine key areas. Communication; Teamwork; Professionalattitude (Attitude, Work Ethic; Growth & Development; Confidence; Willingness / Drive,Asking Questions); Internships
methods. Theframework used here may serve as a framework for other institutions examining incorporating orimplementing leadership in programs.Overall, USAFA works to instill outcomes for graduates to work towards including: (1) Critical Thinking (2) Application of Engineering Problem-Solving Methods (3) Scientific Reasoning and Principles of Science (4) The Human Condition, Cultures, and Societies (5) Leadership, Teamwork, and Organizational Management (6) Clear Communication (7) Ethics and Respect for Human Dignity (8) National Security of the American Republic (9) Warrior Ethos as Airmen and GuardiansThe fifth institutional outcome describes the leadership outcome, for students to exhibitleadership, teamwork
engineering identity, diversity, equity, and inclusion, Asian American Studies, Critical Mixed Race Studies, engineering ethics, and pop culture.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Zhu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, with additional affiliations in the Department of Science, Technology & Society, the Department of Philosophy, the Center for Human-Computer Interaction, and the Center for Future Workplaces and Practices. He serves as Associate Editor for Science and Engineering Ethics, Studies in Engineering Education, and Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. Additionally, Dr
change?Course description. “Leadership and Management for Engineers” is a theory-to-practice coursefocused on the development of functional leadership skills [2] useful in engineering, computing,and science professions. The core emphasis is process-oriented, collectivistic leadership [3],particularly as conceptualized in the team leadership [4], [5] and shared leadership frameworks[6].Topics covered in the course during the period described in this paper (2017–present) includethose listed in Table 1. During this time, some topics have been added (e.g., psychological safety[7], engineering leadership orientations [8], virtue ethics, and building trust), others have beendropped (e.g., judgment and decision-making [9], [10], the People Styles
as Boeing, identified a growing need for engineers to expand their skill sets beyondtraditional technical expertise. Boeing’s seminal list of “Desired Attributes of an Engineer”underscored the importance of communication skills, global awareness, ethics, teamwork, andlifelong learning [2]. This shift marked a broader recognition that the challenges engineers facedwere increasingly multidisciplinary, requiring a new approach to education. Organizations suchas the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) also contributed to this evolving perspective. NAE’s publication The Engineer of 2020:Visions of Engineering in the New Century [3] and ASCE’s The Vision for Civil Engineering in2025 [4] called
practice” examples we share regularlyfeatures good professional attitudes. We also formally teach professional attitudes in teamworkand leadership lessons. This includes, for example • Ethics thread: Learning in our ethics thread across the curriculum includes lessons in integrity and honesty • Leadership thread: Our teamwork and leadership learning, also a thread across the curriculum, includes dependability, consideration of others, empathy and respect, and flexibility. • Civil engineering case studies: Most of our faculty include case study learning in at least some of their classes. Some have planned learning even in required classes, such as “Professional Issues Friday”Despite faculty-driven
to different views on accountability from students and professionals, which arestrengthened further by the fact the student is a customer, whereas the employee is not.Accountability is not only found across several sections (e.g. Clients & Employers, Peers) of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics [12], but is an essential part of leadership –engineering or otherwise.Fairness, or the perception of, is also different between the two settings. In classroom, fairness isoften viewed as equal work distribution on a specific team project. In an engineering firm, oneteam member may have an essential role on the project, whereas another team member may beless frequently involved – yet they are still contributing, and valued team
(REU) in Engineering Education Elizabeth Volpe, E.I.T., Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., Sara RojasAbstractThe development of inclusive leaders is essential for the success of future engineering and ournation. Equipping students with vital leadership-enabling competencies is necessary to develop aworkforce that is prepared to act ethically, and responsibly, and tackle unforeseen challenges inthe future. Inclusive leaders, or leaders that are self-aware, empathetic, and prioritize diversity,equity, and inclusion in their decision-making, are essential for the forward progress ofengineering. A growing body of literature highlights the numerous ways in which students maydevelop leadership skills outside of the classroom through
Paper ID #48182Considering Personal Mastery as a Framework for Developing Students’ Affinityfor Lifelong Learning [Research]Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey McOwen is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with an academic foundation in physics and industrial engineering. Her research focuses on workforce development, professional training for engineering practitioners, and engineering ethics, with an emphasis on how emerging technologies can enhance continued education. Through her research, service, and academic work, she aims to bridge engineering
ofengineering leadership research first assumes that leadership can be taught and therefore aims toidentify qualities, skills and styles in order to guide curricular and co-curricular programming.The framework by Farr et al. [33] contains both trait-like attributes such as “big thinker”,“ethical and courageous” and practiced skills and behaviors, such as “uses power wisely andgood communicator.” Their proposed leadership qualities framework is intended to supportassessment and development of engineers’ leadership abilities. While the classification ofleadership (for example, skills, competencies, qualities, attributes, themes etc.) varies betweenand even within works, what is valued in engineering leadership converges on a few commonattributes. Handley
19. Self-critical sustainability 20. Draw insights from reflection 50. Understand economic impact 21. Give and receive feedback 51. Recognize impact of work on 22. Self-directed learning various stakeholders 23. Reliable 52. Recognize ethical responsibilities 24. Relational skills 53. Frame and solve problems 25. Mutual performance monitoring 54. Design to address specified needs 26. Backup behavior 55. Analysis 27. Team orientation 56. Tinkering 28. Promote shared mental model 57. Recognize professional 29. Create supportive climate
[11]. Therefore, combining technicalskills with interpersonal abilities is necessary to meet modern professional demands.Engineers lead multidisciplinary teams, manage complex projects, and adapt to globalchallenges [1], [2]. Beyond project management, leadership in engineering demandsstrategic foresight, ethical decision-making, and the ability to integrate technical and socialdimensions in complex systems [12]. This underscores the need for leadership training inengineering education to equip graduates with both technical and managerial skills.Leadership is a skill that involves communication, teamwork, and problem-solving, whichdrive innovation and help achieve goals. Many institutions adopt transformationalleadership models, which have
disciplines, but rather require aninterdisciplinary approach. Originally conceptualized by Rittel & Webber [2], wicked problemsare problems with multiple stakeholders and competing demands, which often contain ethical,social, political, or environmental dimensions. They are challenging to frame and scope, giventhe lack of an obvious “stopping point” when the problem to solution process is complete.Wicked problems reflect pressing societal issues like climate change, transportation and urbandevelopment, healthcare and technological unemployment – problems that frequently engage thetechnical expertise of engineers but require a breadth of disciplinary knowledge outside ofengineering as well, requiring strong collaborative skills and an intellectual
educational practices and professional outcomes. The integration of empathyinto engineering education and practice enhances the ability of engineers to design solutions thatare not only technically sound but also socially responsible and user-centered. Empathy helpsengineers understand and address the diverse needs of users, leading to more inclusive andeffective design solutions. This perspective is supported by various studies that highlight the roleof empathy in engineering education and practice [2], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Empathy is considered a necessary interpersonal skill for modern engineers, supportingcreativity, ethical decision-making, and collaboration. However, perceptions of its importance inpedagogy vary among instructors
solve, Negotiation, Driving change) ● Business / Financial Acumen ● Societal impact (Environmental impact, Equity, Ethics) ● Lifelong learning ● Innovation (agility, creativity) ● Self-Confidence (Self-Esteem, Sense of Belonging) ● Independence (Self-autonomy, Self-sufficiency)Table 1 below shows the options for undergraduate student activities.Table 1: Options for Undergraduate Activities and Corresponding Short-form for Analysis Response Short-form Conduct research with a faculty member Research Work in an engineering environment as an Co-op Intern intern/co-op Participate in a work-study program Work-Study (non-engineering role or non-research) Work
Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 21- 35.[6] Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International journal of management reviews, 12(4), 384-412.[7] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Fastest growing occupations. Occupational Outlook Handbook. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/fastest-growing.htm[8] Subagja, I. K. (2020). Effect of motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance through working discipline at PT. Bamboo Tirta Engineering. International Journal of Business and Social Science Research, 1(1), 28-35.[9] San Santoso, D., & Kulathunga, H. E. R. (2016). Examining happiness: Towards better understanding of performance improvement. Procedia Engineering, 164, 354-361.[10] Chew, Y. T. E., Atay, E., &
-dominatedenvironments and pursuing male leadership models. Figure 1. Critical engineering skills for facing challenges and seizing opportunities.Significant disparities become apparent when discussing gaps between industry demands andthe skills possessed by engineering graduates. Previous studies have identified criticaldeficiencies in areas such as effective communication, teamwork, management and decision-making, ethical leadership, and social responsibility within the engineering field. Engineersoften encounter challenges applying these soft skills in dynamic work environments,underscoring the pressing need to address these discrepancies during academic training.The ability to communicate effectively and collaborate in multidisciplinary teams is
, and develops student leaders to embody the principles of professional academic advising and leaders within their academic, professional, and social communities. These student leaders serve as invaluable resources for their peers, offering guidance, support, and insights into the biomedical engineering experience. Grounded in student development and servant leadership principles, the PALs program fosters ethical and inclusive leadership, building strong peer-to-peer relationships that facilitate knowledge transfer and personal growth. Dr. Paige’s unwavering commitment to guiding and educating students in higher education drives her to advocate for the development of critically reflective students, scholars, leaders
learn.Future research in engineering education using virtual reality (VR) should focus on areas thatenhance learning, improve accessibility, and align with pedagogical best practices. Specifically,future research should consider pedagogical effectiveness, curriculum integration, enhancingtechnical skills, collaborative learning, cognitive and psychological impacts of VR, accessibilityand inclusion, long-term impacts and sustainability, and ethical and social responsibility.While traditional face-to-face instruction remains the foundation of education, industry demandsthat students be more proficient with technology. VR emerges as a powerful supplementary tool,as it enables immersive, interactive, and highly customizable learning experiences, offering