ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying all 18 results

Board 79: Engineering Source: How Robust is the Coverage of the Engineering Literature?

Conference Session: Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amy S. Van Epps, Harvard University; Robyn Rosenberg, Harvard University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

Paper ID #25604Board 79: Engineering Source: how robust is the coverage of the engineeringliterature?Prof. Amy S. Van Epps, Harvard University Amy S. Van Epps is Director of Sciences and Engineering Services in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Li- braries at Harvard University. She was recently an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue University. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective methods for integrating information literacy

Relevance Score: 0.63040364

Building Support: Findings and Recommendations from Conversations with Civil and Environmental Engineering Researchers at Two Canadian Universities

Conference Session: Making an Impact: Building Support with Data and Design
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rachel Figueiredo, University of Waterloo; Angela Henshilwood, University of Toronto; Michelle Spence, University of Toronto; Mindy Thuna, University of Toronto; Siu Hong Yu, University of Waterloo
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

Civil and Environmental Engineering Researchers at Two Canadian UniversitiesIntroductionIn the fall of 2017 and winter of 2018, librarians from the University of Toronto (U of T) andUniversity of Waterloo (Waterloo) interviewed civil and environmental engineering researchersat their respective institutions to learn about their research practices and needs [1], [2]. All of theresearchers interviewed are tenured or tenure stream faculty with the title of Assistant, Associate,or full Professor. The interviewees will be referred to as “researchers” for the most partthroughout this paper because that is the preferred term in the contexts described. The interviewswere part of a larger study facilitated by Ithaka S+R, a not-for

Relevance Score: 0.016802194

Understanding Undergraduate Engineering Student Information Access and Needs: Results from a Scoping Review

Conference Session: Informing the Critical Understanding of Our Users: Using Data to Develop New and Diverse Services
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo; Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo; Ariel Jocelyn Stables-Kennedy, Western University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

al. Knowledge Management in 2004 Ireland 14 behaviors of students Leckie et al.'s[44] Project-Based Learning studying to become (PBL*) Engineering Teams professionals. Modifying the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) engineeringLeachman

Relevance Score: 0.015827503

Maximizing the Effectiveness of One-time Standards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment

Conference Session: Beneficial Partnerships: Enhancing Library Programming with Strategic Collaborations
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Daniela Solomon, Case Western Reserve University; Ya-Ting T. Liao, Case Western Reserve University; J. Thomas Chapin, Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

, Hoboken, NJ, 2008.[10] A. S. Khan, A. Karim, and J. A. McClain, “The state of the use of standards in engineering and technology education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[11] A. Lampousis, “On the pursuit of relevance in standards-based curriculum development: The CCNY approach,” Standards Engineering, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1, 3–6, 2017.[12] M. Phillips and P. McPherson, “Using everyday objects to engage students in standards education,” 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016, pp. 1–5.[13] B. S. Kunst and J. R. Goldberg, “Standards education in senior design courses,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp

Relevance Score: 0.013861103

Board 76: The Great Coffee Hunt: An Augmented Reality Scavenger Hunt

Conference Session: Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kari Kozak, University of Iowa
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

innovative application ofaugmented reality and indoor positioning technologies,” Electronic Library, 34(1), 99-115. 2016[3] C. Own. “Making without Makerspace, Another Study of Authentic Learning withaugmented Reality Technology,” in T. W. Chang & R. H. Kinshuk (Eds.), Authentic Learningthrough Advances in Technologies, pp. 189-201, 2018.[4] S. Adams Becker, M. Brown, E. Dahlstrom, A. Davis, K. DePaul, V. Diaz, & J. Pomerantz.“Time-to-Adoption Horizon: Four to Five Years: Mixed Reality,” Horizon Report 2018 HigherEducation Edition. EDUCAUSE. pp. 46-47, 2018[5] B. Brinkman and S. Brinkman. “AR in the Library: A Pilot Study of Multi-TargetAcquisitions Usability,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Mixed andAugmented Reality

Relevance Score: 0.01056084

Board 77: Designing, Launching, and Assessing a Multimedia Online Learning Module for Library Orientation of First-year Engineering Students

Conference Session: Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gavin Paul, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering; Yona Jean-Pierre, New York University; Ana Torres, New York University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

; expand thecontent for more advanced research; and transfer the content into additional platforms anddistribution channels outside of the current NYU Classes.[1] L. Holman, "A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographicinstruction," Reference & User Services Quarterly, v ol. 40, (1), p p. 53-60, 2000.[2] C. A. Germain, T. E. Jacobson and S. A. Kaczor, "A comparison of the effectiveness ofpresentation formats for instruction: teaching first-year students," College and ResearchLibraries, v ol. 61, (1), pp. 65-72, 2000.[3] Q. Zhang, M. Goodman and S. Xie, "Integrating Library Instruction into the CourseManagement System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuringthe Effectiveness of

Relevance Score: 0.010478009

Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspectives of Academic Librarians

Conference Session: Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Natalie Rice, University of Tennessee ; Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jordan Kaufman; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

library research instruction," RQ, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 524-541, 1994.[3] L. R. Kunkel, S. M. Weaver, and K. N. Cook, "What do they know?: An assessment ofundergraduate library skills," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 430-434, 1996.[4] AASL/AECT, Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago, IL:ALA, 1998.[5] S. Virkus, "Information literacy in Europe: a literature review," Information Research-anInternational Electronic Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-56, Jul 2003.[6] M. Hepworth, "A study of undergraduate information literacy and skills: The inclusion ofinformation literacy and skills in the undergraduate curriculum," presented at the 65th IFLACouncil and General Conference Bangkok

Relevance Score: 0.010478009

Board 75: Establishing a Tech Tool Library with Instructional Resources at an Academic Institution

Conference Session: Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jean L. Bossart, University of Florida; Samuel R. Putnam, University of Florida; Sara Gonzalez, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

. Accessed January 23, 2019.https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/does_your_community_have_a_tool_library2. Wang, F., Wang, W., Wilson, S., & Ahmed, N. 2016. The state of library makerspaces.International Journal of Librarianship, 1(1),2-16. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2016.vol1.1.123. Berkeley Public Library. 2014. Tool Lending Library – a brief history. Accessed January 23,2019. https://www.berkeleypubliclibrary.org/locations/tool-lending-library/tool-lending-library-brief-history4. Tabor, N. 2013. Evaluating the success of tool-lending libraries and their contributions tocommunity sustainability. Undergraduate Student Thesis University of Nebraska - Lincoln.5. Ameli, N. 2017. Libraries of Things as a new form of sharing. Pushing the Sharing

Relevance Score: 0.009334552

Understanding the Research Practices and Service Needs of Civil and Environmental Engineering Researchers – a Grounded Theory Approach

Conference Session: Making an Impact: Building Support with Data and Design
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Xiaoju "Julie" Chen, Carnegie Mellon University; Jessica Benner, Carnegie Mellon University; Sarah Young, Carnegie Mellon University; Matthew R. Marsteller, Carnegie Mellon University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

research questions driving this project are “What are the research supports neededby CEE researchers during the whole research lifecycle?” and “What can academic libraries do toimprove services to meet these needs?” We specifically focus on the faculty members who areconducting research in the Civil and Environmental Engineering field at a private university. Thisresearch is part of a larger series of studies coordinated by Ithaka S+R1 on the research supportneeds of scholars by discipline.This study used a grounded theory guided approach consisting of the initial and focused codingsteps. Grounded theory is defined by Corbin and Strauss [10] as “a specific methodologydeveloped by Glaser, Strauss and Strutzel [11] for the purpose of building theory

Relevance Score: 0.008731674

Hack Your Library: Engage Students in Information Literacy through a Technology-themed Competition

Conference Session: Engaging Students with Creativity and Innovation
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lindsay Anderberg, New York University; Matthew Frenkel, New York University; Mikolaj Wilk, New York University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

theirresearch, as evidenced in Respondent 3’s wording, “Believing in an idea and bringing it to life.” Finally, we asked participants to tell us what they would like us to change about thecontest if we to run it again. Two of the respondents gave us no feedback and one wrote “Notsure.” However, two of the respondents gave us helpful advice. Respondent 3 indicated that weneeded to provide more opportunities to find teammates. While the contest was open to bothindividuals and teams, in a semester-long project which requires research, a well-organized teamhas an advantage over an individual. Moreover, learning to work effectively within a team onproject management is an important skill for engineering students to learn. Respondent 5 wantedmore

Relevance Score: 0.008731674

Pop-Goes-The-Library! Using a Pop-Up Library to Reach STEM Students

Conference Session: Engaging Students with Creativity and Innovation
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joanne Dera, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Davida Scharf, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Joseph J. Mercuri, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Raymond Patrick Vasquez, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

, vol. 29, p. 332-353, 2007.[6] J. Fransen, “How do engineering students and faculty use library resources?” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013.[7] H. Empey, N. Black, “Marketing the academic library,” College & Undergraduate Libraries, vol. 12, no. 1-2, p. 19-33, 2005.[8] A. Thorpe, H. Bowman, “Promoting discovery: Creating an in-depth library marketing campaign,” Journal of Library Administration, vol. 53, no. 2-3, p. 100-121, 2013.[9] A. Davis, C. Rice, D. Spagnolo, J. Struck, S. Bull, “Exploring pop-up libraries in practice,” The Australian Library Journal, vol. 64, no. 2, p. 94-104, 2015.[10] J. Barnett, S. Bull, H. Cooper, “Pop-up library at the university of birmingham

Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research Needs Using Topic Modeling

Conference Session: Informing the Critical Understanding of Our Users: Using Data to Develop New and Diverse Services
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Qianjin Zhang, University of Iowa; Kari Kozak, University of Iowa
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

faculty onlineprofiles, are great sources for research interests, courses taught and awarded grants. Interviewing facultymembers is also a great way to learn more about faculty research and teaching needs while buildingfaculty-librarian relationships. Although course syllabi can provide a great snapshot of course informationand types of assignments and even reveal information-seeking behavior which faculty require for theirstudents, accessing course syllabi may need permission and assistance from the departments [1]. Large-scale surveys of faculty may be a great option as they can provide rich information on faculty’sperspectives. For example, the University of Iowa participated in the Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey in 2015and the survey results

Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Designing a Reference Training Course and Cultivating a Community of Practice: Utilizing the LMS for Staff Training and Development

Conference Session: Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah Jane Dooley, Dalhousie University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

. Pemberton, S. Mavin and B. Stalker, “Scratching beneath the surface of communities of (mal) practice,”The Learning Organization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62-73, 2007 [Online]. Available: ProQuest ABI/Inform Global, http://search.proquest.com. [Accessed Jan. 8, 2019].[4] National and State Libraries Australia, “Our work,” National and State Libraries Australia, 2018. [Online] Available: https://www.nsla.org.au/our-work. [Accessed Jan. 18, 2019].[5] E. Bilodeau and Carson, P. “The role of communities of practice in the professional education of academic librarians,” Education for Information, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 25-51, 2015 [Online]. Available: Academic Search Premier, https://search.ebscohost.com

Relevance Score: 0.0073796115

Forming Key Partnerships to Enhance Graduate Student Programming

Conference Session: Beneficial Partnerships: Enhancing Library Programming with Strategic Collaborations
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Emily K. Hart, Syracuse University; Alex Vincent Jannini, Syracuse University; Alexander J. Johnson, Syracuse University; Katy Pieri, Syracuse University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

shows thatstudents prefer having workshops in the evenings as opposed to mornings. The preference forevening workshops is corroborated by Hoffman et al.’s study [7]. This could be due to the timingof survey collection; the 2017 survey was sent out in Mid-March, while the 2018 survey was sentout Mid-January. The differences in preference could be a result of students considering theirschedules for the spring semester in the 2018 data. This could also serve to explain the increasein preference for a one-hour workshop in the ‘amount of time’ data.Figure 3. Student responses to the time of day question asked in the ASEE@SU survey.Figure 4. Student responses to the amount of time question asked in the ASEE@SU survey.Data collected by the STEM

Relevance Score: 0.006600525

Measuring Information Fluency Instruction: Ethical Use of Images in Engineering Student Presentations

Conference Session: Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Amber Janssen, California Maritime Academy; William W. Tsai, California State University, Maritime Academy
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

review of samples ofstudent work from previous classes.References[1] J. Mayer, “Visual Literacy across the Disciplines,” in Research within the Disciplines, 2nd ed., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, pp. 277–299.[2] C. Walck, J. E. Huntoon, J. R. Baker, J. S. DeClerck, and N. Allred, “Web 2.0 Ethics Education: Patents and Copyright for STEM Students,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25.1468.1-25.1468.13.[3] J. Y. Weinraub, “Harder to Find Than Nemo: The Elusive Image Citation Standard,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 480–498, May 2018.[4] M. J. Schoen, “Teaching Visual Literacy Skills in a One-Shot Session,” Vis. Resour. Assoc. Bull., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2015.[5] T

Relevance Score: 0.006534186

Engaging Graduate Students with an Images of Research Competition

Conference Session: Engaging Students with Creativity and Innovation
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alison Henry, University of Alberta; Lucinda Johnston, University of Alberta
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

: Case Studies and BestPractices, M. K. Hensley and S. Davis-Kahl, Eds. Chicago: Association of College and ResearchLibraries, 2017, pp. 157-172.

Relevance Score: 0.00528042

Library Partnerships to Support Data Analytics Engineering Programs

Conference Session: Beneficial Partnerships: Enhancing Library Programming with Strategic Collaborations
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Wendy Mann, George Mason University; Theresa M. Calcagno, George Mason University; Deborah Ann Kermer, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

,” Chron. Higher Educ. Mar. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available:http://www.chronicle.com/article/College-Rush-to-Ride/242674?cid=cp188[2] W. Markow, S. Braganza, B. Taski, S.M. Miller, and D. Hughes, “The Quant Crunch: Howthe demand for data science skills is disrupting the job market,” Burning Glass Technologies,Boston, MA, USA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?htmlfid=IML14576USEN[3] Institute for Advanced Analytics, “Graduate degree programs in analytics and data science.”Accessed Jan. 21, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://analytics.ncsu.edu/?page_id=4184.[4] George Mason University, “Mason achieves top research ranking from Carnegie,” Feb. 3,2016. [Online]. Available: https://www2.gmu.edu/news/182106#[5

Relevance Score: 0.0046203677

Academic Libraries and the Strategic Vision for Diversity in Higher Education

Conference Session: Informing the Critical Understanding of Our Users: Using Data to Develop New and Diverse Services
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: John B. Napp, University of Toledo; Arjun Sabharwal, University of Toledo
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Libraries

toprofessionally classification (Gruber, 2005). Critics view (Peterson 2006; Lee & Neal 2010;Weinberger 2005) folksonomies as unsophisticated, unsystematic, interpretive, and subjective,but those in favor of social tagging point out the value of collaborative indexing and groupintelligence (Avery 2010). Language, cultural, intellectual, and experiential barriers maycomplicate the understanding of the Library of Congress classification system for ESL studentsbecause even if they understood the search terms, they may not understand their association withthe resource(s) they are looking for. Academic libraries in the United States now have a uniqueopportunity to serve as mediators between knowledge organization systems andESL/international students, but