on 6 disciplines of study and research:aerodynamics and fluid mechanics; aeroelasticity and structural dynamics; flight mechanics andcontrols; propulsion and combustion; structural mechanics and materials; and system design andoptimization. The school has a faculty of more than 40 tenure-track professors and enrollment ofmore than 1,300 graduate and undergraduate students. There are nearly 20 labs and researchgroups housed within the school.Selected Literature ReviewResearch libraries have provided data management services for over a decade. Many suchservices continue to provide value and to make an impact in their respective researchcommunities. In order to improve data services for research communities, librarians haveconstantly sought
has been shown to improve research skills, the substance ofresearch reports, understanding of subject material [5], and preparedness for advanced researchtopics [6].To help address meeting this information literacy need within the specific context ofundergraduate research, it has been suggested that integrating librarians into the instructionalteams which support undergraduate researchers can help these students increase the developmentof their IL skills [3], [5]. Additionally, as a means of increasing library impact on campus, it hasbeen recommended that libraries increase support to high-impact practices [7], [8].BackgroundNorth Carolina State University (NC State), a land-grant university with a student enrollment ofapproximately 36,000
for your attention. I am seeking your assistance, as director of the MET BS program at[Institution], with a research project to understand the role of and extract best practices for informationliteracy in ABET ETAC student outcome 3.g. ‘Ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communicationin both technical and non-technical environment; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technicalliterature.’I anticipate presenting the results at an upcoming ABET symposium and ASEE Annual Conference toshare best practices on addressing and assessing 3.g student outcomes.For the project, I would appreciate it if you could share the following information from your institution’smost recent ABET self-study: Criterion 4. Continuous
) information for future space studyresearchers to use.Literature Review The focus of most studies on University spaces has been based on the studentengagement framework to explore the role of various study spaces on the university campus (e.g.[1], [2], [3], [4], [13]). Riddle and Souter [5] argued that current practices in designing studentstudy spaces ignore students’ perspectives and reproduce environments that are familiar but lesssuitable for active peer learning and learning supported by technologies that students prefer.Although many researchers have attempted to find the students’ perspectives through varioussurvey instruments, not many have used ethnographic surveys. A study by Harrop and Turpin[3], explored learners’ with photographic
librarians looking toform cross-disciplinary partnerships.While engineering and business students have different information needs, topics such as patents,manufacturing standards, and industry research are relevant to both areas. Collaboration betweenthe librarians serving these programs is important to best support users. Yet at large universities,these librarians might be working on different teams and even in different buildings. Such wasthe case at one university, where the engineering librarian and the business librarian, and theirrespective collections, were for many years based in libraries on opposite sides of campus.In 2016, a newly hired business librarian was placed in an office in the campus STEM libraryand the engineering librarian was
Design Education,” in Design Education Today: Technical Contexts, Programs and Best Practices, D. Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 61–90.[10] A. Patel and C. Dasgupta, “Scaffolding structured reflective practices in engineering design problem solving,” in Proceedings - IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2019, 2019, pp. 287–289.[11] D. M. Balint, “Supporting information literacy development of engineering students in research-based composition courses,” in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2016, vol. 10-13-April-2016, pp. 802–807.[12] K. Mercer, “Understanding Undergraduate Engineering
themselves to highethical standards of practice. Engineering students learn about professionalism through theiruniversity course work and from other engineers [2]. Students learn that an engineer’sprofessional responsibilities include protection of the public and the environment. Students needan understanding of the potential risks resulting from their work. Public safety andenvironmental protection must be at the forefront of their engineering work [3].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET) is a non-governmentalorganization that accredits post-secondary education programs. ABET accreditation is proof thata collegiate program meets standards essential for producing graduates ready to enter theengineering workforce [4
resource factors [3]. The medical information community believes it is ethically responsibleto share clinical trial data [4]. A survey of patients participating in a clinical trial revealed 85 %of the majority perceived the benefits of sharing de-identified data outweigh any negatives [5].There remains an ongoing debate regarding best practices, merits, challenges and approaches onseeking consent to data sharing [6] – [9].Despite research indicating benefits of sharing data, some researchers are unwilling to reportscientific findings. An investigation of 1329 researchers’ data practices indicates scientists do notmake their research data electronically available to other researchers [10]. An analysis of 160reviewed articles published in the
standardsand other grey literature is to help our patrons obtain the full text of information resources thatthey need, even if the purchasing process is special and the cost is more than minimal. Wecurrently extend this service to our undergraduate students because of an increasing emphasis onhigh impact practices in assignment and course design [16] such as design projects andassignments that mimic professional practice, particularly in capstone and other required courses.It is our hope that sharing our library’s approach and rationale for our decisions will be a usefulcomparison for other libraries.Our Goal and AssessmentOur goal was to build on existing tools and workflows with the addition of an aggregatordatabase to increase the probability that
SequentialExplanatory Design: From Theory to Practice,” Field Methods, v.18 no.1 p.3-20, 2006. [Online].DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05282260[15] E. Baek and J. Monaghan, “Journey to Textbook Affordability: An Investigation ofStudents’ Use of eTextbooks at Multiple Campuses,” The International Review of Research inOpen and Distance Learning, v.14 no.3 p.1-26, 2013. [Online]. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237 Appendix A Survey QuestionsThe Library is conducting a study to learn about student preferences regarding textbook formats,with a focus on electronic textbooks. This survey will take 10 minutes or less. The survey doesnot ask sensitive questions, and we will be reporting aggregated data
technical communication and issues of equity, inclusion, and social justice. She is the author of Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalitions for Action (2019), in addition to a range of articles. She has received a number of awards for her research, including the Joenk Award for the best article in IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, the Nell Ann Pickett Award for best article in Technical Communication Quarterly, and the NCTE Best Article in Theories of Technical Communication (in both 2015 and 2018). She is also the co-founder of Women in Technical Communication, a mentoring organization that received the 2015 Diana Award from ACM Special Interest Group in the Design of