has held these dual responsibilities since 2011. Jeff is currently leading a campus-wide strategic planning process focused on creating more transforma- tive educational experiences for lifelong learners. Jeff first joined UW-Madison’s faculty in 1989 as an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, where he co-founded the Construction Engineering and Management Pro- gram and developed the construction curriculum. In addition, he has authored and co-authored papers on the subject of educating civil engineers. His body of work demonstrates his commitment to using emerging technology in the classroom to prepare the next generation of engineers and other students for the
the existing toolsand techniques used for systems thinking in educational settings. Bloom et al. developed ataxonomy that classifies the outcomes of students’ learning process (i.e. test items).4 Andersonand Krathwohl revised Bloom’s taxonomy by suggesting more learning process objectives.5Along the same vein, Hopper and Stave developed an assessment framework for systems thinkingintervention in educational settings based on a conceptual systems thinking taxonomy andBloom’s et al. taxonomy of educational objectives.6, 7 The framework is designed for K-12classrooms with a primary emphasis on teachers teaching systems thinking in the classroom.Frank supports the inclusion of systems thinking in curriculum stating “the capacity forengineering
Engineering (COE)wanted to teach eight of 10 courses. With the help of the Provost, a compromise was reachedallowing the COB to teach three of 10 courses while COE taught seven of 10 courses. Therevenue for the three COB courses goes entirely to the COB with all administrative costs coveredby the COE. In addition to the quality of the COB courses, another benefit of having three COBcourses in our engineering management program has been enhanced student enrollments. Ourprospective students are very impressed with the COB courses in our curriculum. I would verystrongly advise others who may be considering the development of an engineering managementprogram to work with their COB early on during the proposal phase to reach a compromiseregarding both
State University of New York, College at Fredonia, and B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State University. She is an ASQ Certified Quality Engineer, an ASQ Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence, and a Six Sigma Master Black Belt. Susan has been a member of ASEE since graduate school. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering the Accreditation Process The similarities and differences between ABET engineering accreditation criteria(otherwise known as EC-2000) and ISO 9000, the quality assurance standard in industry, havebeen discussed and documented since the initial public review of EC2000.[20] ISO 9000 is
styles, it is imperative that students understand how changes ineducation will contribute to their long-term development. Changes are commonly met withresistance, but opposition can often be diffused if students have some say in the process.Creating an environment that is engaging and energizing will improve student’s understanding ofthe material and retention rates after transitioning into the work force. Although flippedclassrooms require an adjustment period, this learning approach allows instructors to preparestudents for problems outside the textbook. Bishop and Verleger (11) addressed the concern thatengineering graduates lack the ability to solve real-world problems. Students commonly work ona senior-level end of curriculum problem, but
new curriculum, requires an extensive administrative initiative. Itwould necessitate entering a bureaucratic maze involving obtaining both internal and externalpermissions and approvals which usually take years to complete with no guarantee of finalapproval. Furthermore, budget and funding requirements for such an endeavor makes it veryunrealistic considering the current economic and political conditions of the state, country, andthe world. The second option is less cumbersome and more attractive in lieu of the problemsfaced with the first option. This is the option we have undertaken.Selecting Proper DisciplineThe School of Engineering (SOE) at Morgan State University (MSU) has four degree grantingdepartments; Electrical and Computer
. Manycolleges wait until the later stages of their programs to begin instruction in presentations. Thispractice leaves students and faculty with little time to promote, practice, and hone skills. Oralcommunication skills must be introduced and developed early, and not delayed until postgraduate or after they enter the workforce8. A high value has been placed on developing theseskills early in an undergraduate curriculum and when students have this early experience they aregiven a strong foundation for developing their presentations skills17. Late integration of oralcommunication education are deemed to be less effectively developed, according to surveyedacademics. These academics believe that if left to a late capstone experience or independentpractice
integrity is problematic at a distance.(7) Competition – The online education market has become highly competitive, and universitiesare undergoing pressure to develop programs. The development of regional hubs for TNE makeforeign higher education available regionally or locally at an affordable price [14], [15]. Manydeveloping countries are attracting leading universities from host countries to offer theirprograms in-country (i.e. through Mode 3) for their local students as well as for regional studentsin neighboring countries [15]. Moreover, as countries increase access to higher education,universities of many source countries have emerged as strong international competitorsthemselves. China for example, primarily a source country a decade ago
is preparing the units for ClinicalTesting. Integration of the Engineering College’s multidisciplinary electronic, software andmechanical design disciplines developed the design. The engineering corporation sponsored aninternship for project feasibility. Subsequently the corporation sponsored three Capstone Teams,in the 2011/2011academic year, which built and designed a proof-of-concept operational unit. Asubsequent sponsorship of two Capstone Teams in 2012/2013 produced an engineeringprototype. Presently a single five-student-member Capstone Team is preparing two functionalunits for Clinical Testing. An audiologist from a local medical clinic has provided directmentoring and patient testing support. The paper also describes the
alsorequires the school to specify learning goals for each undergraduate degree program. Standard15: Management of Curricula lists management-specific knowledge and skills that it would belikely that an undergraduate management degree program should include (AACSB, 2010): • Ethical and legal responsibilities in organizations and society. • Financial theories, analysis, reporting, and markets. • Creation of value through the integrated production and distribution of goods, services and information. • Group and individual dynamics in organizations. • Statistical data analysis and management science as they support decision-making processes throughout an organization. • Information technologies as they
2006-588: GROWTH OF A YOUNG ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMYesim Sireli, University of North Carolina-Charlotte Yesim Sireli is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Management Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Ph.D. degree in Engineering Management from Old Dominion University, and also holds MSc and BSc degrees in Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include business forecasting, decision analysis, customer-oriented product development, quality management, and technology management.S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina-Charlotte S. Gary Teng is the Director of Engineering Management Program and Center for Lean Logistics and
organizations; an understanding of and dealing with the stochastic nature of management systems. They must also be capable of demonstrating the integration of management systems into a series of different technological environments.Appendix B. ASEM Criteria for EM Graduate ProgramsSource: ASEM Website: Certification Academic Standards: Graduate Programs B. Curriculum Requirements 1. A balance between qualitative and quantitative courses 2. At least one third of the curriculum will be management and management related courses. 3. Courses designated “Engineering Management” are in the academic catalog. 4. Course material must be directly related to technology driven organizations. 5. The curriculum must require each
guided by the framework. In this context it becomes essential to use pilotprojects to adequately assess the non-linear effects of both the new market growth strategies andthe additional core competencies that result from the innovative technologies. We have foundthat introduction of a Baldrige category 2 strategic planning process in the new ventureassessment process, as well as considering an expanded form of partnerships much earlier thanhas been traditionally done in the business entrepreneurship curriculum as significantimprovements.One method of deployment is to treat business opportunities as quantifiable changes inoperations that provide measurable results. Such an approach is important because in order to becontrolled these items must be
2006-2085: A CASE-BASED APPROACH TO SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE ANDENGINEERING EDUCATIONJonathan Weaver, University of Detroit Mercy JONATHAN M. WEAVER, PH.D. is an Associate professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy (UDM). He received his BSME from Virginia Tech in 1986, his MSME and PhD in ME from RPI in 1990 and 1993, respectively. He has several years of industry experience and regularly consults with an automaker on projects related to CAD, DOE, and product development. He can be reached at weaverjm@udmercy.edu.Michael Vinarcik, University of Detroit Mercy MICHAEL J. VINARCIK, P.E. is an Interior Trim Engineer with Ford Motor Company and an adjunct faculty
AC 2012-4100: SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING MODULESProf. Victoria C. P. Chen, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. K.J. Rogers, University of Texas, ArlingtonMrs. Andrea M. Graham, University of Texas, Arlington Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering DepartmentJohn F. Dickson, University of Texas, Arlington John Dickson has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Anna University, India, a master’s in engineering management from the University of Texas, Arlington, and is pursuing a Ph.D. in sustainable engineering at the University of Texas, Arlington.Prof. Stephen Mattingly, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. Melanie L. Sattler, University of Texas, Arlington Melanie Sattler serves as an Associate
® learning platform, the rich, collaborativelearning environment fosters a high level of interaction among students and academic coaches,and facilitates discussions that are thoughtful, reasoned, and reflective. The project managementprogram was established in 2002. Following the first six MBA courses, students complete fourcourses in project management. Each course is completed over an eight-week period in thepaced, asynchronous environment. This means that students post their assignments andparticipate in threaded discussions through Lotus Notes® databases. The fourth course isfollowed by an integrative comprehensive exam. We developed all four courses using fourtextbooks and a set of academic readings. The textbooks are as follows
Paper ID #22133The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data as a Road Map for SmartManagement Systems: Case Studies Across IndustriesDr. Mousumi Roy, University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She is currently teaching courses in Management and Engineering for Manufacturing (MEM) program at the University of Connecticut, as an Assistant Professor in Residence. She is involved in solving manufacturing problems for different companies in Connecticut as a part of the course curriculum. Her research
AC 2012-5146: A METRIC-BASED, HANDS-ON QUALITY AND PRODUC-TIVITY IMPROVEMENT SIMULATION INVOLVING LEAN AND SIGMACONCEPTS FOR FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING LAB STUDENTSDr. Yosef S. Allam, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Yosef Allam is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University. He graduated from the Ohio State University with B.S. and M.S. degrees in industrial and systems engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Allam’s interests are in spatial visualiza- tion, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first
Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 19–22, Jan. 1999.[2] C. M. Borror, R. L. Berger, S. LaFond, and M. Stull, “Undergraduate Statistics Curriculum: A Large, Unstructured, Complex Problem,” Qual. Eng., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 201–214, Apr. 2012.[3] D. Kanigolla, E. A. Cudney, S. M. Corns, and V. A. Samaranayake, “Enhancing engineering education using project-based learning for Lean and Six Sigma,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2014.[4] L. B. Weinstein, J. Petrick, J. Castellano, and R. J. Vokurka, “Integrating Six Sigma Concepts in an MBA Quality Management Class,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 233–238, Mar. 2008.[5] Martinez Leon, H.C., “Bridging Theory and Practice with Lean
articles and conference papers. Page 12.744.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Finding Appropriate Data for ABET Self Study Sections B2&3 for Engineering ProgramsAbstractABET accreditation is an established benchmark for undergraduate engineering programsin the United States and ensures the quality of education college engineering studentsreceive. As such, ABET is the recognized U.S. accreditor of engineering college anduniversity programs. ABET outlines the criteria for each engineering program and thekey elements of what is required in each engineering program’s Self Study. However,ABET leaves up to
strong reputation of excellence. He has developed a strong track record of teaching effectiveness based on consistently good teaching evaluations, and he has won some departmental awards in this area. Dr. Gonzalez and colleagues from UTPA and Michigan State University were awarded Honorable Mention in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2004 Curriculum Innovation Award competition. Furthermore, his service as an Associate Editor for The IEEE Transactions on Education has provided him with a means of enhancing and maintaining his knowledge on the issues affecting engineering education. In the area of professional achievement, he has been able to obtain over Four Million Dollars in funding for his academic
Page 23.1251.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 To Be Green Or Not To Be Green? Ethical Tools for Sustainability EngineeringAbstractEngineers are increasingly being asked to design products and process that reduce the overallimpact society has on the environment as more people realize the rising need to developsustainable resources and to be responsible when using existing resources. In order to adequatelyprepare students to enter this ever increasing demand for sustainable engineering, students needto have an understanding of the technical needs of society as well as the human component indesign, be it the use of local resources, the lack of surplus
simulators for labs and healthcare providers together with integrated Logistics support systems for Advanced Cardiac Life Support. One of his current interests is in the area of manufacturing systems for rapid product design and development in international production. An extension of this work is the current effort that established the UTPA Rapid Response Manufactur- ing Center in a consortium of academic institutions, economic development corporations, industry, local, state, and federal governments. This initiative is an integral component of the North American Advanced Manufacturing and Research Initiative (NAAMREI). In addition, he has served and continues to serve in leadership positions in technology based economic
Paper ID #18213Continuous Improvement of Teaching via Peer and Administrator ClassroomObservationDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Ekaterina Koromyslova, an Assistant Professor in Operations Management, has PhD in Economics and MS in Business Economics and Management. She has work experience in industry as an analyst-consultant of manufacturing enterprises and managerial work experience as the deputy head of a customer service department in STS Logistics, which is leading 3PL full service provider in the Russian and CIS logistics market.Dr. Teresa J.K. Hall, South Dakota State University Hall is
studies. The studentsmet weekly to present their work to the person who designed the problem and two otherfaculy members. An assessment was performed, and about 70% of the students wanted toinclude the case study approach in other curriculums, and about 90% felt that they gainedknowledge from this curriculum.Self-LearningLearning for the sake of one’s own knowledge by conducting research, reading articles andbooks, or employing other platforms is termed as self-learning or self-directed learning.Everyone takes advantage of this methodology to some extent, and many well-knownpersonalities, such as Marie Curie 39 have been studied. Rodney Stwart40 (2007) conducted astudy in which three factors of self-learning were evaluated: self-management
Paper ID #7894A proposal for using problem posing to connect learning of basic theory withengineering designDr. Richard L Marcellus, Northern Illinois University Richard Marcellus is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Northern Illinois University. His current research interest is definition and performance evaluation of statistical process control policies. He has taught numerous courses in applied probability, including stochastic operations research, reliability engineering, queueing methods, dynamic programming, and quality control
constructed with varying amounts of variability in the height,width and depth dimensions facilitating different outcomes. Assessment of student performanceand perceptions (behavior and attitudes) from a small-scale (initial) pilot study will be measured,evaluated and discussed.IntroductionMontgomery states that “determining the capability of the measurement system is an importantaspect of many quality and process improvement activities.”1 Quality is integral component ofmost organizations and is a primary method in which organizations compete.2 The Society ofManufacturing Engineering (SME) has repeatedly identified quality as an important competencygap in the field of manufacturing.3,4This paper presents a method to address the quality competency gap
Paper ID #11561Organized Innovation: A Framework for Effectively Managing InnovationDr. Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University Sara Jansen Perry is an assistant professor of management in the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University. She teaches organizational behavior and human resource management courses, including ne- gotiation and principles of management. She earned her PhD in 2009 from the University of Houston in Industrial-Organizational Psychology, also earning the Meredith P. Crawford fellowship in I-O Psychol- ogy from HumRRO that year. In the 2013-14 academic year, she held the Professional Land