Displaying results 211 - 217 of 217 in total
- Conference Session
- Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University; Ali H. Al-Marzouqi, United Arab Emirates University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Management
Knowledge as Defined by Coursework, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2007.4. Cherbaka N. and Lavelle J., Proposing an Engineering Management Program at North Carolina State University, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2009.5. Collins T.R. and Youngblood A.D., Engineering Management Program Re- Evaluation, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2002.6. http://www.asem.org/ASEM_Docs/EM_Masters_Program_Certification_- _Academic_Standards.pdf Visited on 29th November 2013.7. Sivaloganathan S. Influencing Factors from the Literature for Engineering Education, The journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri-Lanka. December 2003.8. Grayson L.P. The Design of Engineering Curricula, UNESCO Studies in Engineering Education
- Conference Session
- Technology and Equipment to Improve IE Instruction
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Leonardo Rivera, Universidad Icesi; Andrés López, Universidad Icesi; Andrés Calderón, Universidad Icesi
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
, No. 1, pp.7-24, 2010.3. W.L. Johnson, N. Wang and S. Wu: “Experience with Serious Games for Learning Languages and Cultures”, Proceedings of SimTecT Conference, Australia, 2007.4. V. Brezinka and L. Hovestadt: “Serious games can support psychotherapy on children and adolescents”, Proceedings of the 3rd Human-computer interaction and usability engineering of the Austrian computer society conference on HCI and usability for medicine and health care, 2007.5. M. Mayo: “Games for Science and Engineering Education”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 31 – 35.6. R. Van Eck: “Digital Game-Based Learning: It’s just not the Digital Natives who are restless”, Educause Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 17 – 30.7. D. Charsky: “From
- Conference Session
- Methods, Cases, and Directions
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ted Eschenbach P.E., University of Alaska, Anchorage; Neal A. Lewis, University of Bridgeport; Yiran Zhang, University of Bridgeport
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
in 1975, and his master’s in civil engineering from UAA in 1999.Dr. Neal A. Lewis, University of Bridgeport Neal Lewis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Management, School of Engineer- ing at the University of Bridgeport (Connecticut). He has more than 25 years of industrial experience, having worked for Procter & Gamble and Bayer. Along with coauthors, he has received the 2005 Ted Es- chenbach award for the best article in the Engineering Management Journal and the 2009 Grant Award for the best article in The Engineering Economist. Neal received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri, Rolla (now Missouri S&T) in 1974, M.B.A. from the University of New
- Conference Session
- Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Minha R. Ha, York University; Aleksander Czekanski , CEEA-ACEG
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Management
uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2001.[5] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques Second Edition Edition, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1990.[6] N. Fairclough, Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman, 1995.[7] S. Winton, “Rhetorical analysis in critical policy research,” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 158–177, 2013.[8] J. Meyer and R. Land, “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge : Practising within the Disciplines,” 2003.[9] M. R. Ha and A. Czekanski, “Towards A Conceptual Model Of Design Team Learning In Mechanical Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of The Canadian Society for
- Conference Session
- Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering
- Conference Session
- Tools of the Trade
- Collection
- 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Robert Niewoehner, U.S. Naval Academy; Craig Steidle, US Naval Academy; Eric Johnson, US Naval Academy
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Management
STS-107’s. Crater-like equations were also used as part that foam had neverof the analysis to assess potential impact damage to the wing leading edge RCC. Again, previously been a safetythe tool was used for something other than that for which it was designed; again, it of flight issue.predicted possible penetration; and again, the Debris Assessment Team usedengineering arguments and their experience to discount the results.As a result of a transition of responsibility for Crater analysis from the Boeing A new support teamHuntington Beach facility to the Houston-based Boeing office, the team that conducted failed to admit whenthe Crater analyses had been formed fairly recently, and therefore could be
- Conference Session
- Integrating Research
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alison M. Knight, Mayo Clinic; Gillian M. Nicholls, University of Alabama, Huntsville; Paul J. Componation, University of Alabama, Huntsville
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
of the attempt scores for each homework assignment. Thenumber of attempts and range of attempts were calculated after manipulating the submission dataexported from ANGEL to Microsoft Excel®. The homework submission variables describingthe students’ interaction with the online homework included the time between the first and lastattempt of the homework assignment and the time between the first attempt and the due date ofthe homework assignment. These variables show when students started the online homeworkassessment and how long they took to complete their homework attempt(s). These data werecalculated by using the submission time stamp data from ANGEL for the time of eachsubmission. A macro was written in Excel to transform submission time