- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jeffrey A. Jalkio, University of St. Thomas; Brianna R. McIntyre, University of St. Thomas
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
not discuss the case of themicrostrip in the first semester of our sequence, so the students would need to be quite confidentof their experimental and computational methods before tackling it. Thus the students wouldhave an example of validating a computational technique with known cases and the applying it toan unknown case.For the computational work, we decided to use MATLAB since all of the students had taken aprogramming course that included MATLAB at some point in their curriculum. The MATLABlanguage had also been used in prior physics and engineering classes taken by these students.The plan was that students would be given a sample program implementing a relaxation solverfor the coaxial cable geometry with specific inner and outer radii
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Scott Ryan Kirkpatrick, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Maarij M. Syed, Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech; Richard W. Liptak, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
colorsMDM structure vs. MDM filters made with multiple layers. Ellipsometric analysis has revealedmuch more information regarding the non-idealities present in the MDM structures (e.g., surfaceroughness, interfaces, etc.). We plan to publish a technical report based on these results in thenear future. 3. Conclusions In conclusion, we have presented a proposal for a hands-on lab project that incorporatesmany of the key characteristics that are viewed as desirable in an EP curriculum. The projectrelies on interdisciplinary teams that have to work together in a timely manner to design anddeliver a product that can be benchmarked against real-world counterparts. In doing so studentswill not only be exposed to the entire design, improvement, and
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Timothy J. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
a period of 6 years (including the planned changes for the upcoming offering). The FCI assessment test was administered each year (pre-‐ and post-‐class) as the changes were incorporated. The FCI test consists of 30 multiple choice questions that examine conceptual knowledge of mechanics (i.e. there are no quantitative questions). According to Hake14 who has studied application of the FCI test in over six thousand students, the best metric for presenting the results is the normalized gain given by !"#$ !"#$$ !"#$!%# !(!"# !"!"" !"#$!%#) 𝐺
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Wenli Guo, Queensborough Community College
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
have enough time. When asked “what do you think you gained fromwriting journals?”, majority of the students expressed that they have gained in several differentways, especially a. understand better; b. be able to point out what they did not understand before;c. writing in their own words helps to retain the knowledge; d. good review tool; e. better writingskills; f. have questions answered; g. look for examples related to the concepts learned in class;h. better note takers, etc. Based on our preliminary data, we have found the following benefitsfrom reflection through journal writing in physics. We are planning to conduct a finer-grainedanalysis of students’ responses to investigate the impact of the intervention on students’conceptual
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
James G. O'Brien, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gergely Sirokman, Wentworth Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
members then each chosepositions for their crew. The positions included a helmsman to record and plan movement, atactical officer to record and track enemy movements as well as missile fire, and a captain whowas responsible for declaring actions as well as keeping the team on a time schedule.Experimental ProceduresLab tables were arranged so that a game board consisting of two tables would be flanked by twowork areas of one table each, prior to students arriving in lab. Once present, students assembledtheir teams and took position on opposite ends of the game board in the work areas, and obtaineda small plastic ship attached to a small circular (360°) protractor. Students then agreed on acoordinate system which was then drawn onto the table with
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Wenli Guo, Queensborough Community College; Vazgen Shekoyan, Queensborough Community College
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics & Physics
again without knowing it or hewould have come to office hours more often or the quiz reflections were more in depth than justmemorizing or he would make things a lot harder simply because he would not get that chance todiscover what he did wrong. We are planning to conduct a finer-grained analysis of students’responses to investigate the impact of the intervention on students’ problem solving skills. Theanalysis of the intervention impact on students’ scientific attitude is in progress as well. Moredata analysis and research will be done on how students categorize their mistakes and howdifferent professors would have categorized instead.The article titled “Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and sevenprinciples of good