- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Daniela Topasna, Virginia Military Institute
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
department with plans for development as a capstone orindependent study in connection with research in the thin films lab.References[1] CHIPS and Science Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIPS_and_Science_Act[2] Semiconductor Industry Association, “2024 State of the US Semiconductor Industry”,https://www.semiconductors.org/2024-state-of-the-u-s-semiconductor-industry/, 2024. [Accessed13 January 2025].[3] M. Di Ventra, S. Evoy, E., and J. R. Heflin (eds.), Introduction to Nanoscale Science andTechnology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer New York, NY, 2004.[4] D. M. Topasna, “Strategies and Methods for Improving Understanding of Advanced Conceptsin Introductory Nanotechnology Course”, Proc. New Perspectives in Science Education, 11thedition
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Cherish Bauer-Reich, University of Jamestown; Jakob DeLong, University of Jamestown; Wesley Newton, University of Jamestown
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
, and G. Swackhamer, “Force concept inventory,” The physics teacher,vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 141-158, Mar. 1992.[2] R. Henderson, J. Stewart, and A. Traxler, “Partitioning the gender gap in physics conceptualinventories: force concept inventory, force and motion conceptual evaluation, and conceptualsurvey of electricity and magnetism,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Ed. Res., vol.15, May 28, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010131[3] Y. Shoji, S. Munejiri, and E. Kaga, “Validity of force concept inventory evaluated bystudents’ explanations and confirmation using modified item response curve,” Phys. Rev. Phys.Ed. Res., vol. 17, Sept. 20, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020120[4] P. Nieminen, A. Savinainen, and J
- Conference Session
- Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Pavel Navitski, Oral Roberts University; Elena Gregg Dr, Oral Roberts University; Wesley David Klehm, Oral Roberts University; Gabriel Pendell, Oral Roberts University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
Lancashire, UK calculated the probability of such an occurrence to be 5 × 10-7per hour of operation. This indicates that accidental detections are highly unlikely and should notbe a significant concern [1].rR= K ●rA ●rB ●rC●τ2, where rA, rB and rC are the count rates for the three inputs, τ is the pulsewidth (10-6 s), and K is a constant in the order of magnitude 1 (that depends on experimentaldetails). With count rates for the individual inputs in the order of 0.5 s-1, a random coincidencewill happen once every 105 years.In the second part of our experiment, we explored the angular dependence of muon incidence bypositioning the three GM tubes in Telescope Mode. The students adjusted the Zenith angle of theapparatus to identify the angles that would