Asee peer logo
Displaying all 4 results
Conference Session
Using Computation and Modeling, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rodrigo Cutri, Mauá Institute of Technology, Brazil; Nair Stem, Mauá Institute of Technology, Brazil; Octavio Mattasoglio Neto Neto, Mauá Institute of Technology, Brazil
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
pandemic, the projectwas not evaluated. In 2022, the “evaluation laboratory” tool of Open LMS was added to theproject in design thinking methodology. Using this tool, students can submit the initial seminarplanning to be evaluated by teachers and at the same time do peer review of other groupsactivities. They can ask questions and make reflections about other groups activities sodeveloping critical thinking during this process before submitting the final seminarpresentation. The project has attended expectations, resulting in better academic performance,as well as contributing to the development of the competencies and skills that were aimed tobe developed.IntroductionThe Physics subject is applied to the First-Year students of the Engineering
Conference Session
Pedagogy in Physics Education, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Baishakhi Bose, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
students performinvolve such topics as standing waves on strings, determination of the speed of sound,electrostatics, electric circuit design, motor building, and a variety of activities related to lightand color.In lieu of a final exam, students experience all aspects of writing a professional conferencepaper. This includes submission of an abstract, a first draft for instructor review, a second draftfor peer review, and a final camera-ready paper. On the last day of class, students present theirpapers at an in-class conference. Developed by one of the authors, this course has become ananchor for students pursuing an applied physics minor. Because the course has no prerequisitesother than a Q1 math prerequisite, for most of the students, this
Conference Session
Pedagogy in Physics Education, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Johanna Antonia Perasso, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico; Universidad Andres Bello, Chile
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
, emphasizing theimportance of predictions and discussions with peers before viewing the simulations.The following research focuses on the perception of students facing a physics course for thefirst time, implemented with an active methodology based on Sokoloff and Thorthonmethodology called Interactive Lecture Demonstration [14], which has been modified.Despite the modifications made to this methodology, which can be found in the literature,there are few reports on students' perceptions of these modifications. Therefore, we aim toanswer the following question: What is the perception of non-physics major studentsregarding the modified ILD?Didactic methodologyThe didactic methodology used in this study is the Interactive Lecture Demonstration (ILD)by
Conference Session
Pedagogy in Physics Education, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Frank Efe; Antony Kinyua, Morgan State University; Ezana Negusse; Neda Bazyar Shourabi, Pennsylvania State University, Berks ; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Hannah Abedoh, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Arnesto Bowman, Morgan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
explanations, opinion, judgment, etc Ind Individual thinking/problem solving. CG Discuss clicker question in groups of 2 or more students WG Working in groups on worksheet activity OG Other assigned group activity, such as responding to instructor question Prd Making a prediction about the outcome of demo or experiment SP Presentation by student(s) TQ Test or quiz W Waiting O Other – explain in comments Instructor is Doing Lec Lecturing RtW Real-time writing on board, doc. projector, etc. Fup Follow-up/feedback on clicker question or activity to entire class PQ Posing non-clicker question to students (non-rhetorical) CQ Asking a clicker question AnQ