Conference Session

Student Recruitment and Retention in ET Programs and Labs in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark J. Indelicato, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); George H Zion, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Joseph Alan Nygate, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

maximum point total. The scores for each part are summed and represent the total score forthat question. Each question is a total of 5 points, resulting in a total of 15 points for all threequestions. For each of the PRE and POST instruction surveys, the following data is collected: • Individual question scores for each student – Parts A and B individually • Individual question scores for each student – Sum of parts A and B • Average student score for each question – Parts A and B individually • Average student score for each question – Sum of parts A and B • Total student score for all three questions – Q-1 + Q-2 + Q-3 • Average total student score for all three questions – Q-1 + Q-2 + Q-3 • Normalized Gain for each

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET-Related Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sri R. Kolla, Bowling Green State University; David Border, Bowling Green State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

team members and to possess appropriate oral and written communication skill.Program Educational Objective 3 The program will prepare graduates to value their profession and to recognize the global impacts of their profession on society. They will recognize their professional need to advance in their careers and continue their professional development.III.2. Student OutcomesThe faculty next developed student outcomes for the program9. Eleven learned capabilities ofstudents in the ECET program were set in the list of student outcomes. The student outcomes, ‘ato k’, for the ECET program are identical to the student outcomes of criterion 3 of ABET4.In addition to student outcomes ‘a to k’, there are six student outcomes, ‘l to q

Conference Session

Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Villiers, Florida Gulf Coast University; Carlin J McFarlane, Florida Gulf Coast University; Patricia O'Connor-Benson, Florida Gulf Coast University; Thomas Patrick Felke MSW, PhD, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

survey answers and comments. Then next questions examine the levelof support that students have toward expanding this new technology to other courses throughoutthe university (Question 10). Ninety five percent (95%) responded that they would like to seeLecture Capture expanded (see Figure 4). In the comment section, some students reported “Moreinstructors need to record their lectures”.ii Q 5 – I could easily access and download the lecture recordings. Q 1 – Lecture recordings provided a convenient way to reinforce course materials. Q 2 – Lecture recordings assisted me in preparing for homework and exams. Figure 4. Student is learning - Future of Lecture CaptureiiiConclusion and RecommendationsThe main

Conference Session

Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip A Jones P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Edward R Evans Jr. , Pennsylvania State University, Erie

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

x’   X A P X’Y’ Part B D Cut through Stresses at Point, P, Mohr’s Circle for point at angle on a Part Point P Q: Which point on Mohr’s Circle (A, B, C, D, E) indicates the values of σX’ and σX’Y’? Figure 18: Sample

Conference Session

Software Applications in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University; Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University; Scott A Kuhl, Michigan Technological University; Bochao Li, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

introductory PLC concepts are relatively easy to find3-5. There areseveral web sites that provide free PLC information such as book chapters, programs fordownload, and online Q&A3,6,7. The Grand Valley State Michigan Tech has a free downloadablee-book3, 8. However, tutorials that provide opportunities for practice with feedback are harder tofind, and tutorials that adapt practice and feedback to the needs of individual learners appear tobe non-existent. Some web sites provide ladder logic editors free downloads3, 9 however, not allof these editors simulate program execution. A non-web-based commercial software LogixPro,available for low cost, provides a good PLC simulation environment and comes with variousanimations for various processes, such as

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET-Related Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Purpose of Assessment,” In Designing Better Engineering Education through Assessment. Spurlin, J.E, Rajala, S.A., and J.P. Lavelle, eds., 2008, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA10 ASQ Quality, Glossary – Q, Retrieved from http://asq.org/glossary/q.html11 ASQ Continuous Improvement, Retrieved from http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/continuous- improvement/overview/overview.html12 Quality management systems-Requirements, ISO 9001-2015 Standard, Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9001:ed-5:v1:en13 Embedded assessment: quality control vs. quality assurance. 2009. Presentation at Teaching Learning Center Faculty Development Series, South Dakota State University.14 Deming’s 14 Points on Total Quality Management, Retrieved from

Conference Session

Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R Haughery, Iowa State University; D. Raj Raman, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

Implementation of a Mechatronics Learning Module in a Large First-Semester Engineering Course. IEEE Transactions On Education, 53 (3), 445-454.7. Durfee, W. K. (2003). Mechatronics for the masses: a hands-on project for a large, introductory design class. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19 (4), 593-596.8. McLurkin, J., Rykowski, J., John, M., Kaseman, Q., & Lynch, A. J. (2013). Using multi-robot systems for engineering education: Teaching and outreach with large numbers of an advanced, low-cost robot. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56 (1), 24-33.9. Nedic, Z., Nafalski, A., & Machotka, J. (2010). Motivational project-based laboratory for a common first year electrical

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raheem Taiwo Ariwoola, East Tennessee State University; Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University; Keith V. Johnson, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

= × 𝐴 × ∆𝑇 (1) 𝑑𝑡 𝑅 𝑑𝑄 The thermal power ( ) , due to amount of heat (Q) passing through the target in a time 𝑑𝑡unit, is dissipated from the target surface by means of convection, conduction, and radiation.According to Albatici et al.(2008), the contribution of conduction is not as important a factor asconvection and radiation 8. Fokaides et al. (2011), Ham et al. (2013), hypothesized that the mainheat transfer from the target to the sensor of the thermal camera is due to thermal radiation andthermal convection as given in equations (2) and (3) 4,8 . The calculation of the R-value in

Conference Session

Distance Learning in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Megan Mize, Old Dominion University; Rochelle Rodrigo, University of Arizona; Alok K. Verma P.E., Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.664Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers' learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 194-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.002Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(27). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdfMacias, J. A. (2012). Enhancing project-based learning in software engineering lab teaching through an e- portfolio approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(4), 502-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2191787McCready, T. (2007). Portfolios and the assessment of competence in nursing: A

Conference Session

Active Learning and Undergraduate Research in ET

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University; Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; April Tallant, Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. Honors Contracts Q&A for faculty and Students at WCU: http://www.wcu.edu/WebFiles/WordDocs/Honors_Contract_QandA_2011.docx 4. Bazlamit, S., & Middelberg, A., & Stiles, J., & Reza, F. (2004, June), Introducing Research Into Undergraduate Honors Programs Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/12894 5. Hochel, S. & Wilson, C.E. Challenging the Superior Student Using Honors Contracts (1996, November), Challenging the Superior Student Using Honors Contracts. presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED402859.pdf 6. National Collegiate Honors Council (2015