Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebekah Riddle, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Todd Schenk, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lucas Michael Goodman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

scenario where observing how their actions can impact thenegotiation process can help encourage the adoption of strategies in future negotiations. Thegame was also specifically developed to have a reinforcement loop, where there is no “correct”policy outcome, allowing the actions of the players to be amplified and reflections to be moreauthentic. Two key concepts within the social learning theory are vicarious reinforcement andallowing learners to understand the feedback and reflect on their actions [18].Learning Outcomes of the GameWhile the game has a general theme of antibiotic resistance, the overall goal is not simply toelucidate what stakeholders surrounding antibiotic resistance believe and are seeking, but also togain a more nuanced

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Centers, The MITRE Corporation; Michael A Balazs; Titilayo Ogunyale

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

15 , panel membersdeparted after having shared insightful reflections, recommendations for the future, andencouragements for next steps. Within the reflections shared, it was mentioned that several panelmembers appreciated the opportunity to increase their understanding of how the Federalgovernment works, thus demonstrating a desire for more active transparency when it comes toSTEM education policy for non-Federal stakeholders of STEM education. Among the panel’srecommendations provided, some that stood out were that Federal STEM efforts should 1. Ensure the inclusion of the multiple disciplines within STEM in future strategic plans and government programs. 2. Encourage the inclusion of STEM in reading and writing curricula. 3

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Simone Nicholson, Florida International University; Christopher Alexander Carr, George Mason University; Tina Fletcher; Brittany Boyd

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

institution’s goal of reaching R1 status (Ford, 2023; Weissman, 2023).The Carnegie Classification® is the leading framework for recognizing and describinginstitutional diversity in U.S. higher education. The Carnegie Commission on Higher Educationdeveloped the system in 1973 to support its research and policy analysis program. Derived fromempirical data on colleges and universities, the Carnegie Classification® was updated in 1976,1987, 1994, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2018, and 2021 to reflect changes among colleges anduniversities. The system includes any institution of higher education that conferred at least onedegree during 2019-20, as reported through the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel P.E., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

plan which needs to beaccepted by the unit’s executive committee. (The executive committee consists of the tenuredfaculty in the unit, excluding those tenured faculty holding certain administrative roles.) Thisallows a faculty member and the executive committee to agree upon a plan of work that bestsuits the skills and interests of the faculty member, while allowing the unit to satisfy its staffingneeds. Most of these five-year plans will closely reflect the standard workload policy of the unit,but some may adjust the distribution of the work of a faculty member between teaching,research, and service as deemed appropriate. Ideally, a comprehensive PTR conducted by a unitwill be based upon how well the faculty member met the five-year plan as