global challenges of the 21 st Century. World Economic Forum: A Report of the Global Education Iniciative, (April), 184. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.13967047. Duval-Coetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., & Haghighi, S. (2011). The Engineering Entrepreneurship Survey : An Assessment Instrument to Examine Engineering Student Involvement in Entrepreneurship Education. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 35–56.8. Graham, R. (2012). Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering (Vol. 101). Recuperado a partir de http://epc.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Ruth-Graham.pdf9. Astin, A. W. . A. O. (1966). A Program of Longitudinal Research on the Higher
these tablesare collected and sent to a Tomra commercial recycling unit where their labels are scanned andthe items crushed. The throughput of the Tomra is much slower than our counting tables. Sincethey have such variety, cans are either sent to a large table (~12’ X 12’) for hand sorting and bag-ging, or they are put through the Tomra machine. Using an Omega LC101 S-beam load cell anda Red Lion Strain Gage Conditioner (LD2SG5P0) that has a large 2.25” high 5-digit LEDdisplay, the students constructed a hanging scale with a calibrated 1 to 1000 gm range to weighfilled can bags. It was a good idea but we soon found that can weights varied widely from onebrand to another and even within a brand, so the scale idea was abandoned after a center
/Engage, a structuredand coached course process of reflection to one´s own identity and personality, while within ateam setting. The rationale for presenting this learning method and practice is that the processdoes not happen by itself; therefore, by definition, it is more based on social rather than naturalscience and hence, cannot by typically coached by engineering educators without solid structureand a step-by-step process description with rationale included. Methods introduced in this papershed light on this matter and we argue that if implemented accordingly, they can be used by avariety of educators. Storytelling Based Learning is a context driven approach that borrows frominterpersonal psychology, organizational psychology, social
of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295.17. Kim, K. H., & Coxon, S. V. (2013). The Creativity Crisis, Possible Causes, and What Schools Can Do. In J. B. Jones & L. J. Flint (Eds.), The Creative Imperative (pp. 53-68). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.18. Rollo May: The Courage to Create. New York: Nortin, rev. ed., 1994.19. U. Bertram, W. Preißing, “Navigieren im offenen System: Unternehmensführung ist ein künstlerischer Prozess,”, Leonberg: Container Verl., 2007.20. J. A. Fodor, “A theory of the cild’s theory of mind,” in Cognition, vol. 44, 1992, pp. 282-296.21. S. H Schwartz, “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries,” in M
robot worked together and could repair or re-assemble the robot. The CoEstudents, working on the same project, learned, from the WCOB students, what the business casewas behind the robots and why each type of functionality was important to a consumer need.Measuring ProgressChanges in creative thinking abilities and in student engagement will be measured by using theAbbreviated Torrance Test for Adults (ATTA) [11] and the National Survey of StudentEngagement in Engineering Students (E-NSSE) [12], respectively. The Team Climate Inventory(TCI) [13] will be used to evaluate whether regional technology companies that offer authenticSTEM experience internships or co-ops experience a significant increase in their climate forinnovation in the area(s
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012.[3] B.J. Tewksbury, “Specific Strategies for Using the “Jigsaw” Technique for Working in Groups in Non-Lecture-Based Course,” Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), pp. 322- 326, 1995.[4] D. Fitzgerald, “Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3), p. 88-90, 2013.[5] D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, and S.A. Bernhardt, Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol 128, pp. 21-29, 2011.[6] S. Freeman, et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23) pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[7] S. Martin, D
interested faculty, educators, or entrepreneurs emphasizing different subject matterand integrated to produce a tailored course of study, correct academic deficiencies or used in atraining and certification program. Knowledge modules can span disciplines, departments,colleges and universities, and can cross industrial, government, and international boundaries.As an example, we have used a requirement driven, systems engineering approach to spirallydevelop this project1. The initial educational content included an introduction to systemsengineering, optics, and human factors. A built in assessment and rewards capability has beenincluded in the knowledge module(s) as well as a means to link modules that are generated bydifferent collaborators
/current/webonly/wex110205.html5 Kauffman Foundation. (2006). Collegiate Entrepreneurship Resource Center. RetrievedSeptember 1, 2006 fromhttp://www.kauffman.org/campuses/?CFID=2998988&CFTOKEN=283708416 Lafayette College Website. (2006). http://www.lafayette.edu7 McDaniel, B. (2002). Entrepreneurship and Innovation: An Economic Approach. Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe, Inc. p. 318 McDaniel, p.329 McDaniel, p.3210 McDaniel, p.3111 McDaniel, p.32-3312 Kauffman Foundation13 Edmondson, M. (2006). Idea Validation and Opportunity Assessment in the Creative Economy.Invention to Venture Workshop, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ.14 Edmondson, M.15 Baron R. and Shane, S. (2005). Entrepreneurship: A Process Perspective. Mason, OH: South-Western
certificates on aircraft from Boeing 727’s to Piper PA-31. He has authored or co-authored twenty papers in the areas of aircraft testing, aircraft systems design, systems troubleshooting and project management.Craig A. Turner, East Tennessee State University CRAIG A. TURNER is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at East Tennessee State University. His areas of interest and research pertain to the effects of risk on decision-making and contextual determinants of entrepreneurial success and failure. He received his Ph.D. in Strategic Management from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in 1999. His previous experience included 11 years at various positions involving financial and
, J. Courtney, K. Dahm, J. Everett, C. Gabler, R. Harvey, L. Head, D. Hutto, H. Zhang, “Setting theMultidisciplinary Scene: Engineering Design and Communication in the ‘Hoistinator’ Project”, ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2005, Portland, OR.6. S. Bakrania, W. Riddell, K. Dahm and L. Weiss, “Wind Turbines for Teaching Parametric Design,” ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.7. W. Riddell, M. Simone, S. Farrell, P.M. Jansson, “Communication in a Project Based Learning Design Course,”Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, June, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.8. S. Wilson, K. Blauth, W. Riddell and P. Jansson, “RFID Technology for Universally Accessible Doors in PublicBuildings,” The International Journal of
. Victoria Rockwell, 130th President of ASME, on numerous occasionshas championed the need for innovation and creativity. In a letter to the U. S. Senate concerningSTEM education initiatives, she (and ASME) “…strongly support the bill’s focus on innovationthrough a variety of best practices such as hands-on engineering competitions, STEM MasterTeachers, and innovative professional development models.”18 For these reasons the KEENInnovator program was developed at Baylor University.KEEN InnovatorsThe Kern Family Foundation, located in Waukesha, Wisconsin, was created in 1998 through agenerous gift from Robert and Patricia Kern, the co-founders of Generac Power Systems. Theprimary mission of the foundation is to improve lives by promoting strong
, Page 22.1547.14 Sep. 2001.[18] D. Champion and N. Carr, “Starting up in high gear: An interview with venture capitalist Vinod Khosla,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 78, 2000, p. 99.[19] D. Stangler and R. Litan, Where will the jobs come from?, Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation, 2009.[20] M. Horrell and R. Litan, After inception: How enduring is job creation by startups?, Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation, 2010.[21] S. Jain, G. George, and M. Maltarich, “Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity,” Research Policy, vol. 38, 2009, pp. 922–935.[22] F. Murray, “Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks
education: introduction tothe thematic issue,” International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, vol. 3.1, pp. 3-26,2010.[4] M. Lackeus, “Entrepreneurship in education – What, why, when, how, Entrepreneurship360Background paper”, OECD, 2015.[5] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students andentrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes”. International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 28(2), pp. 425–435, 2012[6] E. M. Eisenstein, 2010. “Engineering and entrepreneurship: Creating lasting value fromengineering”. IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skillsfor Complex Global Environments, Dublin Ireland, 2010.[7] R. M. Carey and R. D. Shonat, “Assessment of Self-Paced
), and 5 (definitely). The baseline is set at 1meaning no increase in understanding, assuming nobody felt they had less understanding as aconsequence of this course. In addition, space was provided for the students to specify “in whatway(s)”. From the 98 responses, the mean was 3.35 with a standard error of 0.12 (see Figure 1and Table 1). 72% of the students elaborated on their numerical response, which includedstatements like “thinking about how engineering really applies to real world technologicalapplications” and “my actions as an engineer have the ability to change lives.” 35! Number of students! 30
to plan a crossing strategy o Discussion is allowed during this phase o No stepping on maze during this phase Action phase: o Absolutely no talking o Body movements are allowed Page 13.750.7 o No objects, no computing/communication devices, no paper, no writing, etc. o Each team must send an explorer first, i.e., a team member that explores a non-beeping “clear” path. A clear path must include all rows. No row skipping (but path may include horizontal movement (left/right) o After the explorer crosses, the team must cross. The team (or member(s) of) may follow the same
, D., Ziyatdinova, J. Development of innovative activities of graduate and postgraduate students of the Institute of Polymers using the US research universities experience (2012). Vestnik of Kazan Technological University, 15 (7), pp. 214-218 [In Russian].7. Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhoads, T., Haghighi, S. Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes (2012). International Journal of Engineering Education, 28 (2).8. Sultanova, D., Kochnev, A. Development of entrepreneurial skills among engineering students (2013). Proceedings of International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), P.766-767.9. Ziyatdinova, J.,Bezrukov, A. , Osipov, P. , Sanger, P.A. , Ivanov
small number of design criteria in the course ofcreating design concepts, rather than hoping that they will do so voluntarily as a meta-designstep.References[1] S. Shane. Technology Strategy for Managers and Entrepreneurs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall,2009.[2] K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger. Product Design and Development, 5th edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 2012.[3] J. J. Duderstadt, Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of American EngineeringPractice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, MI: The Millennium Project, University of Michigan, 2008.[4] Anon. National Innovation Initiative Summit and Report: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change.Washington, D.C.; The Council on Competitiveness, 2005.[5] R
toward the task(Pintrich and Schunk, 2002).” (Carberry A. H.-S., 2010)The implication of this research for engineering educators is that as students develop theircompetence for an engineering task, they are better able to perform that task . . . leading tohigher confidence/self-efficacy . . . leading to willingness to take on more complex, challengingtasks . . . leading to intrinsic motivation and learning of competence . . . and onward in a spiralupward of parallel increases in confidence and competence, leading to engineering mastery(Figure 1). Page 26.970.5
different 5 ‘t’ 5 ‘e’ 5 ‘s’ fourteen different forty minus three seven groups of Approximations approximately 34 (the actual number is 35) approximately 36 (the actual number is 35) almost XXXII (The roman number is 32. The actual number of letters is 33)almost XXXIV (The Roman number is 34. The actual number of letters is 33) About 18% t almost 29 (the actual number is 28) about 29 (the actual number is 27) Inequalities
, Austin, TX.3. Komives, S.R., Lucas, N., McMahon, T.R. (2007) Exploring Leadership – For College Students Who Want to Make a Difference. 2nd Ed. Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons.4. Komives, S. R., Owen, J. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Mainella, F.C., and Osteen, L. (2005) “Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory.” Journal of College Student Development. Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 593- 611.5. Komives, S. R., Longerbeam, S.D., Owen, J.E., S. D., Mainella, F.C., and Osteen, L. (2006) “A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory.” Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 401-418.6. Karnes, F. A. & Chauvin, J. C. (1985) Leadership Skills Inventory
Baylor University is one of themany approaches we are taking to accomplish this objective.References1 P.C. Wankat, et al., eds. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering.” Disciplinary Styles in theScholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground, ed. Huber and S. Morreale, 2002,AAHE/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: Washington, D.C.2 M.S. Gupta, “Is Industrial Experience Necessary for Teaching Engineering?” IEEE Transactions on Education,Vol. 31, No. 1, February 1988.3 T.A. Friedman, The World is Flat, New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 2005.4 D.H. Pink, A Whole New Mind, New York: Riverhead Books, 2005.5 R.M. Felder, “A Whole New Mind for a Flat World,” Chemical Engineering Education, 40
division:Traffic light for bikes: Page 23.1302.22Activity: book ShelfYou put many books in a certain order on a shelf.What can you do to (easily) find out if one or more are missing or moved?A solution:Draw a diagonal line from one extreme end to the other. Discontinuity will show up immediately–meaning: missing book(s). If a book is missing on either side of the shelf (the extreme location),the line will not end at the corner.Activity: Design a very simple language (look at bacteria/ bees communication methods, aswell as Morse and Morse “accent” as a start).E. Resourcefulness-based design: Making something from (almost)nothingThese are activities that relate to designing with limited available resources, yet they can lead
of the 21st century," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 37, no. 1. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., p. 38, 2009, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2009.4804347.[2] D. H. Cropley, "Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education," Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–171, May 2015, doi: 10.1037/aca0000008.[3] "Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education American Society for Engineering Education." https://www.asee.org/member- resources/reports/CCSSIE (accessed Feb. 26, 2021).[4] F. O. Soares, M. J. Sepúlveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho, "An integrated project of
intellectual property of the students.Figure 3. Breakdown of student team outcomes categorized as high impact deliverables based on the ImpactInnovation Scale produced by the first cohort of IBL students during the academic year Fall 2019 to Spring 2020.Figure 4. The student outcomes for each team involved in the 2 nd cohort of the IBL classroom.Table 4. Calculating a Fall 2020’s Multidisciplinary score (total number of unique student disciplines per team) andan Institutional Score (number of universities/colleges students are attending from) per team show teams with aMultidisciplinary Score also seem to have a greater amount of end-of-semester high impact deliverables. Comparingthese scores to Fall 2019 shows an increase in Multidisciplinary scores
of innovative projects:A theoretical concept and empirical evidence." Organization science, vol.12, no.4, pp. 435-449,2001.[10] S. W. J. Kozlowski, and K. J. Klein, "A multilevel approach to theory and research inorganizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.", 2000.[11] G. A. Neuman, and J. Wright, “Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability.”Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 376-389, Jun 1999, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376.[12] J. R. Mesmer-Magnus, and L.A. DeChurch, “Information sharing and team performance: Ameta-analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 535 -546, 2009, doi:10.1037/a0013773.[13] J. Bradley, B. J. White, and B. E. Mennecke, "Teams and tasks: A temporal
in cosmetics, protective coatings, drug delivery, and stain-resistant clothingOngoing research and development at a large number of educational institutions andresearch laboratories should enlarge the set of commercial applications of nonotechnologyin the near future. Two educational institutions engaged in these efforts are highlighted inthis presentation.Nanotechnology ApplicationsDespite the fact that the concept underlying nanotechnology was first discussed by RichardFeynman almost 50 years ago, it was not until 1980 that the term “nanotechnology” wasdefined in the context of its application by Dr. K.E. Dexter. (1) Two developments in1980’s, the formalization of cluster science, and the invention of the Scanning TunnelingMicroscope (STM
, Honolulu, USA, June 2007.12. Clark, B. Creating entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, 1998 (Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science).13. Bharadwaj, S. and Menon, A. Makin innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2000, 17(6), 424- 434.14. High, A., Mann, C. and Lawrence, B. Problem solving and creativity experiences for freshman engineers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.15. Weaver, J. and Muci-Küchler, K. In-class creativity exercises for engineering students. In: Proceedings of the
and Mind-Set,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2005, pp. 233 – 243.3. Barbe, David F., J. Robert Baum, and Karen S. Thornton, “Campus Entrepreneurship Opportunities,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2001.4. Ports, Ken, et. al. “Senior Design Project Commercialization and Entrepreneurship,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.5. Stanford Technology Ventures Program. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://www.stanford.edu/ group/stvp6. MIT $50k Entrepreneurship Competition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
study could develop statistically significant data which would validate these correlations.Appendix AAppendix BBibliographyAmmeter, A. P., & Dukerich, J. M. (2002). Leadership, Team Building, and Team Member Characteristics in High Performance Project Teams. Engineering Management Journal, Vol 14, No. 4, Pages 3- 10.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A Theory of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification and Development. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 18, Pages 105-123.Boni, A. A., Weingart, L. R., & Evenson, S. (2009). Innovation in an Academic Setting: Designing and Leading a Business Through Market Focused, Interdisciplinary Teams. Academy of Management Learning &
potentialcourse restructuring.References[1] KEEN Engineering Unleased, Retrieved from http://engineeringunleashed.com/keen/[2] KEEN Framework, Retrieved from http://engineeringunleashed.com/keen/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/KEEN-Frameworks-2016.pdf[3] K. Thoroughman, A. Hruschka, and P. Widder, “Engineering virtue studio keen modules to fosterentrepreneurial mindset in an integrative first-second year online course”, Proceedings of the 121st ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 15-18, 2014, Indianapolis, Indiana.[4] K. Reid, D. M. Ferguson, “Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers”, Proceedings of the118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, 2011, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.[5] S. Condoor, M. McQuilling