. Csikszentmthihalyi M. et al. “The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic,” J. Paul GettyMuseum and the Getty Foundation, 1990.18. Daniels M., “Developing and Assessing Professional Competencies: a Pipe Dream?” DigitalComprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from Faculty of Science and Technology 738,AUU, 2011.19. J.Dewey, “How We Think”, Renaissance Classics, 2012.20. J. Dewey, “Experience and Education”, 1938, retrieved from:ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/experienceducationdewey.pdf (retrieved August 2015)21. Dym C. D. et al. “On Designing Engineering Education: Lessons Learned at Mudd DesignWorkshop IV,” Int. J. Eng Ed. 20, 2004, 470-474.22. H. Doss, A.Brett, The Rainforest Scorecard, A Practical Framework for Growing InnovationPotential, T2
PhD in Sci- ence, Technology and Innovation Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology.Dr. Shelly Engelman, SageFox Consulting Group Shelly Engelman, Ph.D. is a senior quantitative researcher at SageFox Consulting Group. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Fostering Institutional Change in Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Social Network Analysis ApproachABSTRACTOver the last decade, faculty champions across the country have made significant strides inintegrating innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) into engineering education. However, suchefforts have not resulted in lasting and widespread change. This purpose of this study is tounderstand the degree
Industrial Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Binghamton University (SUNY). Her background and research interests are in quality and productivity improvement using statistical tools, lean methods and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven Jean Nocito-Gobel, Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of New Haven, received her Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. She has been actively involved in a number of educational initiatives in the Tagliatela College of Engineering including KEEN and PITCH
Paper ID #30561Incorporating an Entrepreneurial Mindset Competition into a StructuralAnalysis CourseDr. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani P.E., Ohio Northern University Dr. Ardakani is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He has previ- ously served as Project Engineer at Englekirk Structural Engineers and Lecturer at South Dakota State University. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of Nevada, Reno. His research in- terests include seismic performance and design of reinforced concrete structures, computational modeling of structures, and engineering education
creative potential of our citizens. One of the three critical areas addressed inthe strategy includes, “Invest[ing] in the Building Blocks of American Innovation” by focusingon education, research, technology and building of infrastructure. The nation’s push towardscreating an innovative and creative workforce is likely to have significant impacts on STEMeducation at both the K-12 and university levels.In engineering education, the National Academy of Engineering (2004) envisioned the Engineerof 2020 to possess not only strong analytical skills, but also characteristics such as practicalingenuity and creativity.1 As the Academy notes, “Yesterday, today, and forever, engineeringwill be synonymous with ingenuity – skill in planning, combining, and
David Reeping is an undergraduate research assistant with a major in Engineering Education and a minor in Mathematics. He is a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year and the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and The DeBow Freed Award for outstanding leader- ship as an undergraduate student (sophomore) in 2014. David is a member of the mathematics, education, and engineering honor societies: Kappa Mu Epsilon, Kappa Delta Pi, and Tau Beta Pi respectively. He has extensive experience in curriculum development in K-12 and develops material for the Technology Stu- dent Association’s annual TEAMS competition. His research interests involve the analysis and refinement of the
Paper ID #7975Designing an Introductory Entrepreneurial Thinking CourseMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes
, 2018.[14] S. Tharayil, et al., “Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning,” International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), p. 7, 2018.[15] B.A. Oakley, et al., “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results From a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,”IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(3), pp. 266-272, 2007.[16] P. Arce, “The Colloquial Approach: An Active Learning Techniqu,”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(3), pp. 145-160, 1994.[17] K. Nguyen, et al., “Students’ Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 33, pp. 2-18, 2017.[18] K. Nguyen, Personal email
themes such as Future, Things Work, andImprovement. One student response remarked “wondering what could be improved, andimagining the possibilities with future technology is amazing and drives all brilliant inventions”.Student responses also show a correlation with exploring contrarian views in themes like TryNew Things, Hands-On, and Interest. A student response that reflected these ideas conveyed“just knowing that there's so much in the world that's undiscovered is what interests me in[engineering]”. It can be inferred that Curiosity aids students in exploring their surroundings, andinspiring them to learn about and help the world around them.ImplicationsThese results have several implications for how instructors and curriculum designers
University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Eunjeong Park, The Ohio State UniversityAlexia Leonard, The Ohio State University Alexia Leonard is a second year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at The Ohio State University. She is currently working as a Graduate Teaching Associate for the First Year Engineering program within the Department of Engineering Education.Jack DeLanoDr. Kai Zhao, Florida State University Kai Zhao is a research faculty
- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Building Toys for Children by Applying Entrepreneurial-Minded Learning and Universal Design PrinciplesAbstractIncorporating entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) into engineering curricula has been anincreasingly popular educational practice over