deploys airfoils parallel to the rotational axis in such a way that, unlike other windmills, it rotates around a ring frame, leaving the central portion open for other uses. This enables VayuWind to extract wind power using existing structures such as commercial buildings and skywalks with minimal noise pollution.Dr. Timothy J. Kriewall, Kern Family Foundation Timothy J. Kriewall leads the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) Program at the Kern Family Foundation located in Waukesha, Wis. Prior to this role, he served as President of Wisconsin Lutheran College in Milwaukee, a position he held for five years. He began his career at Bell Telephone Laboratories where, with a colleague, he helped develop one of
Robert M. Bunch is a Professor of Physics and Optical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy and an Innovation Fellow at Rose-Hulman Ventures. Since joining the Rose-Hulman faculty in 1983, he has been active in developing undergraduate and graduate courses and laboratories for the optical en- gineering educational program. He has directed 23 completed master’s degree thesis projects, consulted with industry, and is co-inventor on two patents. In 2000, he received the Rose-Hulman Board of Trustees Outstanding Scholar Award. His research and technical interests include development of optics-based products, fiber optics, optical instruments, and systems engineering.Dr. Thomas W. Mason, Rose-Hulman Institute of
collaborative instructors with like-minded teaching goals. Well organized EML online-modules such as elevator pitch makes deployment easy to implement in the engineering classroom [15]. Inthis semester-long project, students were introduced to new engineering topics in lecture, they practicedtechniques in mini labs, and then applied the knowledge to their project while considering theentrepreneurial mindset at every step. In this paper, we hypothesized that an EML module that utilized aproject-based approach would improve student engagement, improve technical laboratory and writing skillsand foster student’s curiosity to learn about human body motion. This project led to a mastery in kinematics,kinetics and human body motion technology with a stronger
successful, software engineering studentsmust learn to effectively communicate with those who have different areas of technical expertise.Institutional ProfileThe Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE) offers an accredited Bachelor of Science degreein software engineering and has been accredited since 2001. As an institution, there is a strongemphasis on small class sizes 13:1 student to faculty ratio) and extensive laboratory experience.Students graduating from MSOE spend on average 600 hours in laboratories related to theirmajor. Institutionally, there is more square footage devoted to lab space than lecture hall space.All engineering students are required to complete a three-course capstone experience. Whilemost students on campus are in the
Paper ID #12140Fostering the entrepreneurial mindset through the development of multidis-ciplinary learning modules based on the ”Quantified Self” social movementDr. Eric G Meyer, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Meyer directs the Experimental Biomechanics Laboratory (EBL) at LTU with the goal to advance experimental biomechanics understanding. Dr. Meyer teaches Introduction to Biomechanics, Tissue Mechanics, Engineering Applications in Orthopedics and Cellular and Molecular Mechanobiology. He has been an active member of the engineering faculty committee that has redesigned the Foundations of Engineering Design
appointment as an Assistant Research Scientist, Dr. Tadd began teaching part time in the Chemical Engineering Department. He has taught the junior heat and mass transfer laboratory course, ChE 360, and the senior-level process design and simulation course, ChE 487. Dr. Tadd officially joined the Chemical Engineering faculty as a full-time lecturer in Fall 2013, teaching the process design course senior design and the junior year separations course, ChE 343. Most recently, Dr. Tadd has been developing an elective course on statistics and applications to industrial quality, including an overview of SPC, Six Sigma terminology and techniques, and basic design of experiments.Ms. Elaine Wisniewski, University of Michigan Elaine
AC 2010-44: 25 YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIPDavid Barbe, University of Maryland Dr. Barbe received B.S.E.E. and M.S.E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering from West Virginia University in 1962 and 1964, respectively and the Ph.D. degree from The Johns Hopkins University in Electrical Engineering in 1969. After positions at Westinghouse and the Naval Research Laboratory, and the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, he joined the University of Maryland in 1985 as Executive Director of the Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Barbe was awarded the rank of Fellow of the IEEE in 1978 for his pioneering work on charge coupled
successfulenterprises on the campus. Although, this would not necessarily be an undesirable outcome, thegoal of the program is more in the realm of building a firm foundation. That being said, start-upsprovide the laboratory for a variety of learning experiences, which is difficult to simulate in theclassroom. We will discuss the aspect of nurturing start-ups later in the body of this paper.The Marketing Plan for the Certificate Program to the StudentsThe Certificate Program was marketed initially by writing and printing a brochure that succinctlydescribed the requirements and benefits of the program. The program was then presented througha variety of means. The program was primarily marketed by “word of mouth”. Briefpresentations were given to students
University of Cincinnati and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of California-Berkeley. He worked as a research scientist at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. before joining the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He has several publications in the areas of microflu- idics, chemical and biological sensors, and MEMS technology. He is also passionate about engineering pedagogy. He has not only published articles on engineering education but has also led several workshops on using instructional methodologies that make classroom instruction more engaging and effective.Dr. Eric G. Meyer, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Meyer directs the Experimental
, West Lafayette Nicholas is a Ph.D. student in engineering education at Purdue University. His research interests include engineering design, team learning, and instructional laboratories. He has conference publications on cooperative learning, engineering laboratories, innovation, and design. Page 23.740.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Innovation Process Mapping Protocol: An Approach to Assessing Students’ Understanding of Innovation As a ProcessAbstractThe assessment of knowledge, skills, and behaviors related to innovation is a challenging
Electrical Engineering curriculum is the Electric Circuits course (4semester credit hours). The course covers electric circuit analysis techniques along with certainaspects of circuit design. The course objectives include circuit analysis, design, simulation, anddata gathering and analysis in the laboratory. The analysis-portion of the objectives emphasizesproficiency in the analysis of DC and AC circuits, including operational amplifiers, first-ordertransient analysis, ideal transformers, and balanced three-phase circuits. The design objectives inthe course include design and construction of simple circuits based on given specifications. Thelab component of the course emphasizes competence in the simulation of circuits with PSPICE,safely
efficiency. Then, in Phase III students will be working on the specific project ofdeveloping HPTS.The work procedure for Phases I and II is basically the same since it implies embedding selectedconcepts, in a modular fashion, in existing courses. The procedure is: a) develop a list of resources and notes that will be used as pedagogical and reference materials b) develop and prescribe lectures and lab, and their corresponding assignments c) plan complementary activities (e.g., guest speakers, case studies seminars) d) evaluate, assess and revise developed materials and implementation procedures.In the modified courses, laboratory exercises are designed to reinforce student learning in theclassroom through hands-on practices. To
. The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation. Simplicity – the art of maximizing the amount of work not done – is essential.The programmers were then introduced to their clients as part of a laboratory session where eachengineering education major provided a brief presentation on their lesson plan. Eachprogramming team had to evaluate and rank the lesson plans in a bidding-type process. Thesebids were reviewed by the instructor and teams were then assigned to specific lesson plans. Thefirst half of the next laboratory session was dedicated for the teams to interact with their assignedclient in order to discuss the specifics of the lesson plan and to
than once in a cohort’s four year program. The difference between thedifferent modules that carry the same name lies in the specific activities that comprise them.1. “Community Modules”: Our university unique location allows interaction with a cultural-, racial-and age-diverse community for enriching the learning and teaching environment. This module makes useof this diversity and consists of several elements. One of these elements is reaching out to the K-12community where some of the students in the program will help in teaching technology at local schools.Students from each cohort will be engaged in hands-on laboratory experiments. For example, they mightdesign, build and test miniature bridges using dedicated computer programs; use fiber
Research Advisor to the Stanford University Epicenter.Dr. Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael R. Ladisch is Director of the Laboratory of Renewable Resources Engineering (LORRE), and Distinguished Professor of Agricultural and Biological Engineering with a joint appointment in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering. He was CTO at Mascoma Corporation from 2007 to 2013 and serves on Agrivida’s SAB. His BS (1973) from Drexel University and MS (1974) and PhD (1977) from Purdue University are in Chemical Engineering. Ladisch’s research addresses transformation of renew- able resources into biofuels and bioproducts, protein bioseparations, and food pathogen detection. He is an author of two
propulsion systems. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, aeronautics, wind energy, and propulsion systems. Research interests include experimental gas turbine heat transfer and wind energy.Dr. Buford Randall Jean, Baylor University Buford Randall Jean, Ph.D., Associate Professor of electrical and computer engineering, is the holder of nine U.S. patents and corresponding foreign patents in the field of microwave metrology, which have resulted in scientific and industrial instruments for a wide range of sensing and control applications. Industrial products based upon these inventions are in use world-wide. He has more than 25 years of aca- demic and
Laboratory Modules inBiomedical Engineering,” ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis IN,2005.
understanding of system-based approaches to problem-solving andexperience in rapidly integrating systems to test the efficacy of their ideas.The Pennsylvania State University is one of the largest research universities in the United States.Fundamental and applied research is carried out at its numerous research centers andlaboratories. As the dynamics between technological know-how, engineering talent, andchallenges change, paradigm shifts are necessary in the way research is conducted, as well as theway in which products and processes are designed and developed. Advances in electronics haveenabled a whole gamut of laboratory automation techniques that cut costs, improve quality andproductivity, and enable the rapid testing and evaluation of ideas
excited and inspired thestudents and taught them much about the process of innovation.One of the key concepts we wanted to drive home to the students was that theentrepreneurial spirit does not reside exclusively in small start up firms, but that sameexcitement, attitude and vision can be found in businesses of all sizes and maturity levels.In fact, the entrepreneurial force is a key component in the continued success of some ofthe largest businesses in the world. To illustrate the point, a field trip to the AdvancedTechnology Laboratory (ATL) of Lockheed Martin Corporation was arranged to providethe students the opportunity to see intrapreneurship in action. A Lockheed managerexplained that encouraging intrapreneurship is a key goal in ATL’s
actually spent on teaching them how to identify theircustomers." Students are not conducting experiments in the stereotypical, laboratory-situatedway, but instead through Customer Discovery: students are "testing [their] hypothesis" by talkingwith and gathering feedback from customers. Exploring user needs is the foundation of theentire Customer Discovery process, to determine the value proposition, or the "value" thatcustomer will derive from the product's use. As one interviewee said, "once you understand thevalue, then later you can transform that into your requirements, documentation to conductresearch, [you can] build product, whatever.”Interviewees agreed that Customer Discovery is also when students understand, define andreframe the problem
technology,however, only the three finalist projects are discussed here. Two of the contributions primarilyfocused on experimenting with the flipped classroom practice due to availability of the state ofthe art video and recording equipment purchased and provided by the University. However, oneimplementation targeted introductory math courses while the other focused on a core mechanicalengineering course. Developing a visual support tool to aid learning and training activities for achemical engineering laboratory was the theme of the third project. Table 1 lists the projects andtheir status.Table 1. Three finalist projects from the 2014 Teaching Innovation with Technology Competition. Project Title
entrepreneurship development center invited MBA students tojoin contracting activities. Students gain practical experience as economists andmarket experts in the start-ups located in its innovative park. This centerorganizes training courses for MBA students and PhD students twice a year.This course is dedicated to commercialization of innovations on their way froma laboratory to the market, and is also focused on the innovativeentrepreneurship principles.In 2013, the representatives of a Russian engineering university visited theuniversity in the USA for a short-time training program. The visit has resultedin the development of a new training course at the Russian university. Thiscourse is aimed at commercialization of research and foundations
enlightening and enjoyed theinteraction and exchange of ideas between the instructors and attendees. The engineers gainedbetter insight into the issues that need to be addressed in taking an idea from the laboratory to acommercial enterprise through examining case studies and group-interactive projects. Thebusiness instructors gained a greater appreciation for the fact that researchers from the businessschool think very differently from the Medical and Engineering Schools. A survey wasconducted to obtain feedback and a number of suggestions were made to strengthen the program, Page 15.336.4some of which will be implemented in future series. A
practice of the Innovation Competencies. The first of theseare the Targeted Systems: the real, laboratory, or practice systems subject to innovation bylearning students or practicing engineers, modeled by them as a central part of the InnovationCompetencies. The second is the System of Education (itself a target of innovation), a model ofwhich is summarized in this paper as a configurable reference model to illustrate the impliedchanges and advancements in different situations. The third is the System of Innovation, a modelof which is referenced to understand the underlying framework in which all innovation occurs(effective or not; human-performed or not).IntroductionToday globalization and connectivity mean that businesses and organizations
Journal cover (2008). She is an ac- tive mentor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to numerous ASEE conference proceedings articles and educational journal publications.Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) Babs Carryer is director of faculty development and
development financing through programssuch as SBIR – federal grant funding is greatly enhanced when incubator clients submit a jointproposal with a university or federal laboratory (6) Additional services and resources includingpatent knowledge, alumni who may act as advisors, business contacts and strategic alliancefacilitators or investors, access to a far-flung network of laboratories and technical expertise, andaccess to investment by university foundations.All the above mentioned research findings and other issues and environmental factors wereconsidered when designing the engineering entrepreneurship programs at Florida Tech.Additionally, leading entrepreneurship programs in the country were benchmarked and the bestpractices were adopted.25, 26
officers in the Whiting School of Engineering, BloombergSchool of Public Health, as well as university laboratories and outside federal laboratories.Several students were hired full-time upon graduation by a technology commercializationassessment firm. They prepared studies, prepared business plans, found investors, andnegotiated deals, and recruited several other students as interns. Both the technology transferofficers and this firm have expressed interest in sub-contracting technology assessments to anHSE business. To further explore the possibility, we arranged summer internships for thestudents with the School of Engineering and a university laboratory, who were very happy withtheir contributions. In fall 2006, with a pledge from the Whiting
improves based on improved access to information.33Particularly for students working within university laboratories or serving as research assistantsfor faculty, students’ information access to innovative science-based concepts should improvetheir access to information and therefore improve their abilities in entrepreneurial opportunitydiscovery. Page 13.48.7Search ProcessesEmpirical evidence suggests that those searching for information on entrepreneurialopportunities are more likely to discover opportunities.19 While these searches can be based onpublicly available information, non-public information discovered through personal contacts is
serve as sources of new technologies that might be commercialized by incubatorclient firms and other regional start-ups. Universities can also provide other valuable servicesand unique resources to both the incubator, its clients and other regional start-ups such as (1)Faculty / technologist managerial or technical consulting on a pro bono or fee basis (2) Studentinterns and employees (3) Access to technical labs, facilities and equipment (4) Access todatabases and researchers (5) Access to research and development financing through programssuch as SBIR – federal grant funding is greatly enhanced when incubator clients submit a jointproposal with a university or federal laboratory (6) Additional services and resources includingpatent knowledge
to grade senior-capstone projects. [16] Jones and Abdallah haveventured into the area of performance indicators as a means to pinpoint more specific outcomesin a course. [17] Nayak et. al. has worked to compose rubrics that look to bridge the gap betweenthe course-outcomes in a laboratory setting to program-outcomes outlined by their department ofComputer Science and Engineering. [18] For Knecht, Moskal and Pavelich, their focus wascentralized around measuring and tracking growth in the design program at the Colorado Schoolof Mines. [19] In a study by Dancz, Plumblee II et al, civil engineering students were assessedduring their ‘Grand Challenge Sustainable Entrepreneurship Projects.’ [20] As evidenced by theabove, there is significant