outside of corporations.The work presented in this paper borrowed ideas on opportunity identification and marketresearch from the Opportunity Thinktank [9], a set of seven modules that help undergraduateengineering students establish an entrepreneurial mindset through opportunity identification.Different from their work, this paper emphasizes on how to integrate entrepreneurial mindsetconcepts in the teaching of entire engineering design process.Design and ImplementationIn contrast to the existing work, entrepreneurial mindset materials were incorporated in a first-semester freshman Introduction to Engineering course, tightly integrated in an open-endeddesign project. The entrepreneurial materials on opportunity identification, market research
in the school ofengineering and is offered with the support of the Fuqua School of Business and the School ofLaw. The program prepares engineering and science graduates to become future industryleaders. The core curriculum consists of marketing, finance, intellectual property and businesslaw, and management, similar to key courses in an MBA curriculum. Technical electives provideflexibility to focus on technology management, innovation management, operationsmanagement, entrepreneurship, financial engineering or master’s courses in specific engineeringdisciplines.Dartmouth’s Master of Engineering Management (M.E.M.) program5 is a professional degreeprogram administered out of the Thayer School of Engineering. M.E.M. engineering andmanagement
is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Prof. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering (BE) – BE 1301 course for over 8 years. Lead the design for the development of the new Basic Engineering course (now UNIV 1301) for engineering at UTEP: Engineering, Science and University Colleges. Developed over 5 new courses, including UTEP tech- nology & society core curriculum classes specifically for incoming freshman with a STEM background. Prof. Perez was awarded the 2014 ”University of Texas at El Paso award for Outstanding Teaching”. Prof. Perez has over thirteen years of professional experience working as an Electrical and Computer Engineer providing technical support to faculty
develop entrepreneurship-related skills inengineering graduates [12].As entrepreneurship education continues to grow and evolve in engineering fields, itbecomes crucial to work towards attaining alignment between curriculum, pedagogy, andassessment in engineering entrepreneurship programs. While educators are expected to beresponsible for developing ‘discovery, reasoning, and implementation skills’; theresearch community needs to focus on critically answering the question ‘how do youteach people to think entrepreneurially or develop an entrepreneurial mindset?’ [13]. Thefundamental step for determining effective pedagogical approaches and assessingengineering entrepreneurship education is building a coherent understanding ofentrepreneurial
. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 96–103.14. Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business review, 86(7/8), 130–139 +162.15. Laird, S. D., George, J., Sanford, S. M., & Coon, S. (2010). Development, implementation, and outcomes of an initiative to integrate evidence-based medicine into an osteopathic curriculum. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 110(10), 593–601.16. Shartrand, A. M., Gomez, R. L., & Weilerstein, P. (2012). Answering the call for innovation: Three faculty development models to enhance innovation and entrepreneurship education in engineering. In Proceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
coordination, curriculum devel- opment, assessment and instruction in the Pavlis Global Leadership program. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Mrs. Abby Lammons Thompson, Mississippi State University Abby Thompson is the Entrepreneurship Program Coordinator in the Office of Entrepreneurship and Tech- nology Transfer at Mississippi State University. Through her current role at the University, Thompson works to cultivate a culture of entrepreneurship
transferrable as concrete tools for auniversal framework for any engineering design curriculum. Introduction The importance of integrating team-building strategies into the engineering curricula concernsuniversities around the world. Not only engineering accreditation agencies are requiringteamwork assessment, but the professional workplace is expecting graduates that are prepared tobe productive in cross-functional teams1,2. From an innovation point of view, team negotiationstrategies are crucial for engineering design. Negotiation techniques entail the ways thatindividuals deliberate, discuss or communicate in order to achieve a particular temporary or longterm agreement or consensus. In this line, Hargadon and Bechky (2006) propose a model
. This is notsurprising given the potential rewards of a successful entrepreneurial career both with respect toallowing entrepreneurs the freedom to pursue their own ideas and visions as well as with respect tothe potential for large material rewards. But how do we nurture students to become successful en-trepreneurs? In this paper, we report on an innovative program at the authors’ institution, designedto nurture students to become IT entrepreneurs. While the program builds on the experiences ofother programs, it includes a number of novel components that are integrated together in an un-usual manner to interlock and complement each other.1. IntroductionIt is widely accepted that entrepreneurship is the engine that drives the American economy
Tech, her MS degree in Biomedical Engineering from the joint program between Virginia Tech and Wake Forest University, and her PhD in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Surrey.Dr. Lauren Lowman, Wake Forest University Lauren Lowman is a Founding Faculty member and an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Depart- ment at Wake Forest University and has served in this role since 2018. In this role, she has developed new interdisciplinary curriculum that bridges engineering fields and reflects the Wake Forest University motto of Pro Humanitate (”For Humanity”). Lauren received a Ph.D. and M.S. in Civil and Environ- mental Engineering with a focus in Hydrology and Fluid Dynamics from Duke University, and a B.A
functionality (an engineeringfocus) with aesthetics, user-friendliness, relevance and empathy. It was our objective to developproject oriented courses that integrated these aspects at the university level.Our long journey towards this was inspired by ABET’s3 accreditation criteria 3(a-k) that mapwell to team-oriented semester long projects, as envisioned and implemented in the capstoneprojects of an engineering curriculum. However, not all the criteria can be met in the capstoneprojects. The capstone projects also tend to vary much in quality and focus, leading to demandson faculty and student members alike. This led us to utilize the lessons learned from a six- yearlong industry funded project on significantly increasing engineering design
back once it looks viable. Ensuring that itties to core competencies and platforms that support existing businesses is essential in thisprocess. An internal venture is separate from the main businesses and may even be moved offsite and given a great deal of autonomy. An example was a new TV guide venture that developeda software solution, connecting home-based applications to the cloud, via high-speed dataconnections. In this case, the technology was successfully tested first as a venture and is nowbeing integrated with the existing strategic business. External ventures can include eitheracquisitions, strategic investment, or spinouts. Most work with external ventures is handledthrough Comcast’s venture capital arm. Comcast Ventures is a
Paper ID #6971Reel Entrepreneurs: Illustrating Entrepreneurship with Feature FilmsDr. Zbigniew J Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek received his PhD from the University of Michigan (1993). He is currently an Associate Profes- sor in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. His interests include industrial automation, health care, service engineering and informal engi- neering education. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, SME and IEEE. Page 23.1029.1
Stories Reveal Gendered Perceptions of What it Means to be Innovative in EngineeringAbstractFocus on the role of motivation and emotions as part of engineering entrepreneurial definitionspose an intriguing question: Might understanding how college students characterize a newgraduate’s entrepreneurial action be crucial for expanding a definition of innovation andinfusing new elements in the curriculum? In this paper, we utilized students’ interpersonalperceptions of another to parse out the definition of innovativeness, finding that gender mattersfor achievement motivation and affiliation motivation in conceptualizing anengineer/founder/CEO. The study included two independent elements (gender cue prompt andgender of participant) and
Paper ID #16209Igniting Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Students: The Case forTechnology and Society Courses in Engineering CurriculaDr. Sandy Chang, University of Calgary Dr. Chang’s current research interests lie in the areas of engineering education and international develop- ment. In particular, she is interested in ways to support and enhance diversity in the engineering student population, as well as curriculum development to best prepare students to meet the needs of the green economy. As an extension, she is also exploring ways to engage students in the social side of engineering through community
engineering students primarily and areembedded within the engineering curriculum, while others are campus-wide and target studentsin a wide variety of majors. Programs can also vary in terms of how they define their desiredoutcomes; some focus on generating a general awareness of entrepreneurship as a potentialcareer path, while others focus on developing innovative products and/or new business modelsand ventures. Some engineering schools, rather than offer a stand-alone course inentrepreneurship, integrate entrepreneurship throughout the engineering curriculum. Oneexample is Olin College which offers an integrated approach, whereby “entrepreneurship isinterwoven with mainstream engineering disciplines” (Fredholm et al., 2002).Entrepreneurship
andare currently preparing a proposal for a minor in entrepreneurship.As part of the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) Program sponsored by theKern Family Foundation, UDM is developing a number of entrepreneurship case studies whichare being integrated into existing engineering fundamental courses. These case studies areintended to illustrate how entrepreneurs have capitalized on their knowledge of specificengineering topics. The aim is to provide routine exposures to successful engineeringentrepreneurs and principles of entrepreneurship throughout the curriculum. The ideal, long-termvision is that each engineering course would have one or more corresponding case studies. Thispaper will summarize the three cases which have been
Training Programs Province Figure 2 entrepreneurial Capability Training System in XJTU3.2.1 A Research -and-Teaching-Integrated Model for Engineering Education InnovationResearch and teaching integration consists of two parts: entrepreneurial curriculum and collaborationwith industrial partners. To begin with, XJTU creates an overall systematic plan for practicaleducation that features a comprehensive entrepreneurial curriculum. With inputs and participationfrom the industry, XJTU’s plan increases the proportion of practical education in students’ credits.This is done in part by creating for-credit entrepreneurial courses. The plan also providesopportunities for industry to play a greater role in cooperative education
. Researchers also could, in the future, consider the relationship between students’selected 3C and the “life experiences” discussed in the original reflection prompt. These effortscould lead to major improvements in undergraduate engineering curriculums, as well asempower undergraduate engineering students to recognize the importance of reflection andutilizing an EM.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Kern Family Foundation for conference registrationfunding for the authors of this paper.References[1] J. Turns, B. Sattler, K. Yasuhara, J. Borgford-Parnell, and C. J. Atman, “Integrating Reflection into Engineering Education,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24.776.1-24.776.16.[2] D. A. Schön
entrepreneurial studies. In addition to teaching, Dr. James directs the ESCALATE program, a living-learning community focused on integrating entrepreneurship and technical disciplines. Dr. James is also an avid inventor with over a dozen patents and he has several publications in peer reviewed journals related to his research in biomechanical systems. Prior to joining academia, he worked in the consumer products industry for 13 years where he was the Director of En- gineering at Milwaukee Electric Tool. Following an acquisition by Techtronic Industries, he became the Senior Vice President of Global Engineering for the power tools division, headquartered in Hong Kong, where he lived and worked. c
] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Springer International Publishing, 2017.[2] H. E. Dillon, L. Hamilton Mayled, M. L. Nagurka, M. I. Carnasciali, and D. E. Melton, “Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Practices and the Entrepreneurial Mindset Intercollegiate Coaching in a Faculty Professional Development Program that Integrates Pedagogical Best Pract,” 2020.[3] C. Vest, “Open Content and the Emerging Global Meta-University,” EDUCAUSE Review, 2006.[4] W. J. Frey, H. D. Sánchez, and J. Cruz-Cruz, “Ethics Across The Curriculum: An Effective Response To Abet 2000,” in 2002 Annual Conference
visionary faculty champions makeefforts to integrate these 21st century skills into the curriculum in an incremental fashion(adding a course or launching an elective program). However, the partners involved withthe Epicenter project observed that deeper change and sustainability did not directlyfollow these efforts. Existing efforts to stimulate entrepreneurship had clearly had some Page 26.1401.2impact, but the overall landscape of engineering education had only shifted to a smalldegree.Pathways program development began with an independent literature review to identifypromising models and practices that could guide the design and implementation of
importance of EML skills.IntroductionRecently, there has been significant interest in the inclusion of activities based onentrepreneurially minded learning (EML) in engineering courses.1-3 The interest is due to avariety of factors, including feedback from employers that students with EML skills are morehighly sought than those with strictly technical backgrounds.1 Skills that have been identified asbeing important for an entrepreneurial mindset include effective communication, teamwork,customer awareness, learning through failure, and tolerance for ambiguity.1 Since these skillsare not typically cultivated in the traditional engineering curriculum, new EML-based activitiesthat can be implemented in existing engineering courses are highly sought.At
experimentation(increased research and development costs) can have on Wall Street’s perception of acompany. Our university recently merged the colleges of Business and Technology andApplied Sciences resulting in a cross-pollinated faculty and the establishment of coursesin the graduate and undergraduate curriculum where business and engineering technologystudent’s work together on class projects, many of which involve an innovationcomponent.It is interesting that many of the faculty who incorporate a discussion or exercise relatedto the innovation process in their classroom have had extensive experience in anindustrial setting prior to joining the university faculty. Industry seasoned faculty bringtheir “real-world” experience to the classroom and
established the Mobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL)in 2002 to enhance the senior project design experience for the undergraduate students. Thesingle semester, “works once” project model typically employed in academia was expanded to atwo-semester sequence for project planning1 and project execution.2, 3 This resulted in three keybenefits to the curriculum. First, because the students were given an additional semester tocomplete their project, the faculty noticed a significant increase in the quantity and quality of Page 12.631.2effort by the students. Second, this increase in quality has resulted in more interest in the designand innovation
used towards this effort.The common curriculum approaches include offering business-oriented courses and/or offering aminor in entrepreneurship. However, the engineering programs at our university are already verypacked and there are limited elective credits available for courses in entrepreneurship.Furthermore, being a small private university, it is also a challenge to find faculty members withrequisite expertise in entrepreneurship. To overcome these constraints, we employ an innovativecurricular model that is based on integrating short e-learning modules into existing engineeringcourses. Content experts around the country were invited to develop these modules. As a result,the curricular approach we have adopted involves the following
papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and
). Integrating innovation and entrepreneurship principles into the civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 141(3): 1-8.13. KEEN (Retrieved 2/9/2021). Engineering Unleashed. https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset.14. Zappe, S. E. (2018). Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing entrepreneurial mindset. Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1), 1-12.15. Zappe, S. E., Cutler, S. C., & Gase, L. (Submitted, 2021). A Systematic Review of the Impacts of Entrepreneurial Service Programs in STEM Fields. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy.16. Rayess, N. E. (2016). Instilling an Entrepreneurial Engineering
, Chem-E-Car, or Design-Build-Fly. Many competitions are sponsoredby professional technical societies, such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, or byindustry, such as the Shell Eco-Marathon. As Bland et al. have observed, based on their researchwith students who participate on engineering competition teams, “engineering competitions mayact as a catalyst for students to learn how to integrate technical and professional skills andknowledge in their development as an engineer.” [2] In addition, engineering students’involvement in activities outside of the classroom, such as student competition teams, contributesto their achievement of numerous other outcomes; according to Simmons et al., engagement withthese activities enhances
business students are both attracted to and motivated byentrepreneurial learning opportunities very early in their college careers.IntroductionThere is ongoing discussion among engineering educators regarding whether or not engineeringstudents should be exposed to business subjects in order to better prepare them for engineeringcareers.1 And, if so, what would be the best way to integrate such material into the traditionalengineering curriculum? The issue of teaching entrepreneurship (how to start a company) toengineering students is even more complex, since few engineering faculty have had actualstartup experiences and only a small percentage of engineering graduates will go on to start theirown company sometime during their career.And yet
perceptionof faculty on integrating entrepreneurship into capstone courses [11], the extent to whichengineering faculty value and practice entrepreneurship education [9], and the beliefs of facultywho teach entrepreneurship to engineering students on various dimensions related to EM and thecontent of entrepreneurship courses [7], [8], [10]. However, there is very little documentation inthe engineering education literature on engineering deans’ perspectives on this topic. A few insights have emerged from the few studies that have focused on this critical groupof stakeholders. In an ASEE paper describing Baylor’s KEEN Innovators Fellow program, Fryand Jordan [6] mention that the Dean of Engineering and Computer Science had publiclysupported the