]. Purpose & Research QuestionAlthough past research has been conducted integrating intersectionality theory into research inSTEM disciplines and entrepreneurship respectfully, there is a gap in how experiences of raciallyminoritized populations in STEM entrepreneurship are studied. The goal of this study is tohighlight the importance of using intersectionality to examine the experiences of raciallyminoritized populations in STEM entrepreneurship. We seek to explore the following question:How are the experiences of racially minoritized populations in STEM entrepreneurship studied?In the following sections, we summarize how racially minoritized experiences in STEMentrepreneurship are studied, provide an overview of the frameworks being in
Paper ID #31662WIP: Using neuro-responses to understand creativity, the engineeringdesign process, and concept generationTess Hartog, University of Oklahoma Tess Hartog is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. Her inter- ests include creativity, engineering education, and neuroimaging. Her research focuses on understanding creativity and divergent thinking in engineering students via the use of electroencephalography (EEG).Megan Marshall, The University of Oklahoma Megan Marshall is an M.S. Aerospace Engineering candidate at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The
individual consultations to faculty on areas related to their own teaching and to student learning. Prior to her current role, she has applied her interests in a STEM learning environment and taught a variety of psychology courses to both undergraduate and graduate students in face-to-face, hybrid, and online formats. Shannon earned a BS in psychology, a MA in experimental psychology, and a Ph.D. in curriculum & instruction with a focus in higher education.Dr. Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University Scott A. Sell, Ph.D. is currently an Associate Professor and the Biomedical Engineering Program Coor- dinator in Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology at Saint Louis University. Prior to joining
the curriculum, computer engineering-related electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. He spends a great deal of time looking for ways to break out of the traditional engineering mold and to make engineering more broadly accessible to students. His research interest is the application of mobile computing to interesting, human-focused problems. He holds three degrees in computer engineering including graduate degrees from Virginia Tech and an undergraduate degree from NC State University. c
and system integration and risk management. He is the director of the Dynamics Environment Simulation (DES) Laboratory and the Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) Laboratory. He is the supervisor of the capstone senior design project team on the Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) which has competed in the international competition in the last three years. During his tenure, he has the privilege of developing 3 new undergraduate and 6 new graduate courses in the areas related to computational methods and design.Xiaoxiao Hu, Old Dominion University Xiaoxiao Hu is an Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at Old Dominion University. She received her PhD in Industrial/Organizational psychology from George Mason
that the number of engineering schoolsoffering EEPs will increase. Furthermore, this growth is anticipated due to continued calls forfostering innovation [21] and recognition of entrepreneurship as an important element ofengineering education [22], [23]. Depending on the availability of resources and targeted goals,EEPs for engineering students follow a variety of existing models, such as specialized academicdegrees, including minors [18], standalone entrepreneurship courses [24], and entrepreneurialtraining integrated into existing engineering design programs [25]. In addition to variedprogrammatic structures, EEPs also differ in their pedagogical approaches which range fromstudent-centered teaching practices, formalized mentorship with
you keep in mind that some of the respondents graduated 16 years ago.In order to increase response-rate we took multiple actions that were developed based on pastexperiences and best practices [40]: • The invitations and survey featured clear but appealing design with photos of the course • We ensured concise content without unnecessary details. The content of the three e- mails varied slightly, highlighting various values for the respondent each time: the opportunity to give something back to their alma mater and prospective students by further improving the curriculum; the chance to reflect on their own educational and career goals; and an opportunity to win a prize. • The initial drafts took 20
papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a Kern Fellow for Entrepreneurial Education recognizing his efforts to bring innovative team based problem solving into the engineering curriculum to promote the entrepreneurial mindset. In addition to his work on ethics and entrepreneurial skills, Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer. As founding Director of the Great Lakes Stormwater Management Institute, he conducts research on water management and routinely provides professional lectures/short courses on innovative stormwater treatment design and its role in Low Impact
holder of a Master’s Degree in Transportation Engineering and received his Doctorate in Civil Engineering (Geotechnical) with a concentration in Pavement Design, both at OSU. In addition, he holds Project Management Professional (PMP) certification with the Project Management Institute (PMI). Dr. Parris is actively involved in curriculum design, introduction of innovative pedagogies of engagement and the practice of engineering education through teaching several courses across the department. He is integrally involved in the design and delivery of the Pre-Freshman and Cooperative Education Program and others of that ilk at OSU, as a part of his specific interest in soft skill development, diversity, recruitment and
not only themodules they were building, but, more importantly, the interfaces among these modules.Moreover, we feel that multidisciplinary teams and prototyping create an atmosphere thatencourages entrepreneurial thinking†. The large body of knowledge that students must masterwithin their chosen areas of study often results in limited exposure to other disciplines.Involvement with a multidisciplinary team introduces students to the critical problems that theircolleagues are attempting to solve as a new product is developed and introduced into themarketplace. Furthermore, prototyping can quickly validate good ideas, suggest improvements,identify problems related to the integration of various subsystems, and be used to gauge possible
., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday14. Ramsey, J. (n.d.). An integrated science and technology undergraduate curriculum. Unpublished manuscript. College of Integrated Science and Technology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.15. Fluellen, Jr., J. (2011, November 18-20). Preparing 21st Century minds: Using brain research to enhance cognitive skills for the future. Creating a nation of innovators: A brief report of the Learning & Brain Conference, Boston.16. Daly, S., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J., Seifert, C. & Gonzalez. (2012). Design heuristics in engineering concept
successful. However, webelieved that we could reach even higher and improve the students’ learning experience. As aresult, we performed an overall class evaluation that included input from students, College ofEngineering faculty members, and employees and cast members from the ETO13. The outcomeof the evaluation was to create a new semester-long course featuring the same fieldtrip in themiddle of the semester over fall break. The motivation for change was three-fold. First, therewas a desire to teach creativity and innovation more effectively and thoroughly. Second, pastparticipants consistently wanted to extend the duration of the class and see additional examplesof applying creativity and innovation to real-world problems. Finally, by integrating
evaluation, and curriculum design and implementation. Gomez works closely with the Assessment and Evaluation Manager and staff in the development and implemen- tation of the NCIIA’s evaluation plans, including client satisfaction surveys, instrument development, data collection, analysis, and reporting.Mr. Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) As an entrepreneur leading a not-for-profit organization, Phil Weilerstein has grown the NCIIA (http://www.nciia.org/) from founding as a grassroots group of enthusiastic university faculty to an internationally recognized re- source supporting and promoting technology innovation and entrepreneurship to create experiential learn- ing
development opportunities in the Engineering Education Coalitions,organizations such as ECSEL, FOUNDATION, GATEWAY, and SUCCEED. Often theseorganizations are competing for the same membership or attendees for training in the facultydevelopment.So we come back to the original question, “How does a consistently ranked undergraduateengineering and computer science program retain its excellence in undergraduate education, whilealso aspiring to become an outstanding research institution?” On Baylor University’s campusthere are a number resources that contribute to this goal. The Academy for Teaching andLearning (ATL) has a two-fold mission: globally, to support and inspire a flourishing communityof learning; locally, to promote the integration of teaching
integration of best practices. These faculty continued tobring up elements from these visits into the discussions of the curriculum design. During thatworkshop, a detailed list of learning objectives for beginning, intermediate, and advancedlearners across a variety of EML constructs was created. In the third phase, the workshopdeliverables were expanded into actual course activities and assessment complete with detailedrubrics. Again, a faculty member who was a researcher in the first phase of work was included inthe course activity development and assessment team. This allowed continuity between thephases of the projects. Currently, the revised curriculum is being piloted and assessed at ouruniversity and is considered the first of many EML
them. Some students may already beexperienced makerspace users; others may be eager to learn, but lack the confidence or initiativeto seek out what makerspaces have to offer. For example, Florida Tech has four high qualityacademic "making" facilities and free training on how to use the equipment available to thecampus community, but only a fraction of students take advantage of them. More class projectswith EML themes early in the curriculum may encourage future makerspace usage for co-curricular activity, better senior design experiences and an overall increase in self-efficacy.The work reported here attempts to address these issues in an incremental fashion. The firstsection of the paper describes a simple team project that could be used by
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
and practice. Asix-part Arduino workshop program created by Sparkfun and previously tested and usedin K-12 educators or students workshops was integrate into the curriculum. In additionto learning and experimenting with microcontrollers, students also learned how to use asoldering iron, a milling machine, and engineering software such as the 2D and 3Dmodeling software, OnShape. They were able to use this modeling software to createparts using a laser cutter and a 3D printer. At the end of each of these engineering toolmodules, students completed an individual project, which they brought home, for a totalof four individual projects. Students were also introduced to the engineering design process. Student groups weretherefore able to use a
ofemphasis available to students of all academic majors. Students may take courses (eitherindividually or as a cluster to promote integrative and intentional learning) that teach designthinking methods or apply design thinking in project-based learning. The University has recentlyestablished the Ciocca Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship which, through variousfunctions, supports the development of an entrepreneurial mindset and facilitates studentventures. Within the School of Engineering, all students must complete a senior design project,in which student teams develop a solution to a specific problem statement and present anddefend their thesis at the end of the academic year, as a part of the curriculum. Additionally,engineering students
. First, the evaluation subjects in currententrepreneurial ecosystem evaluation are mainly regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, studententrepreneurial ecosystem and entrepreneurial ecosystem, and university-basedentrepreneurial ecosystem is not included. Secondly, researchers often evaluate theentrepreneurial ecosystem from the internal and external environment or the composition ofthe ecosystem, without considering the various factors involved in the dynamic process of theentrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper makes a novel contribution by building an evaluationframework of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem based on its essentialcharacteristics.This paper presents the evaluation system model of university-based entrepreneurialecosystem
agreements, and other related agreements with industrial partners. Jim is a registered Patent Agent and holds a B.S. in Environmental Engineering, an M.S. in Civil Engineering and a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Michigan Technological University.Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University Ms. Mary Raber is the director of the Enterprise Program at MTU. In this role, she secures funding and projects from external sources, oversees day-to-day operation of the program and teaches various instructional modules in the curriculum. Prior to Michigan Tech, Ms. Raber worked in the automotive industry for 14 years, holding various positions in engineering and management. Mary holds a B.S.M.E
supplementing story findings. Nextsteps would integrate a more detailed discussion of the meaning of the mood data with thestory findings in the discussion.Since an expectation for negative consequences was such a prominent result in our study andappeared to be an intervening variable, a possible consideration for next steps in research is tocreate a research design focus with carefully defined negative consequences.6. ImpactIt’s useful to recognize how our students redefine the concepts of commitment to work andinnovation. Faculty should continue to be aware of how to, in addition to facilitating naturalsciences driven learning in engineering, increase innovative potential among their studentsinside and outside of the classroom. We realize it is a
characterization techniques and laboratory apparatus for advancement of novel electronic devices, in addi- tion to curriculum development for inquiry-based learning and facilitation of interdisciplinary, student-led project design. She emphasizes engineering sustainable solutions from a holistic perspective, incorporat- ing analysis of the full technological life cycle and socioeconomic impact.Prof. Bryan M. Jenkins, University of California, Davis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Prof. Bryan Jenkins teaches and conducts research in the areas of energy and power, with emphasis on biomass and other renewable resources. Dr. Jenkins has more than thirty years of experience work- ing in the area of biomass
entrepreneurial courses due to the crowded curriculum and doesnot require students to take entrepreneurial courses, entrepreneurial concepts were integrated inclassroom activities in the various and existing engineering courses.Another reason for using the above approach is that each author who are full-time faculty havetaught between 35-plus courses in electrical engineering, computer engineering, systemengineering, mathematics and physics at the University. This advantage allows CoE to carefullyintegrate entrepreneurial activities in a number of courses throughout the engineering curriculumto help students build an entrepreneurial mindset.CoE has integrated entrepreneurial classroom activities in several undergraduate courses [1] [2][3] [4]. By
higher education, or community service program, and with the community; and (iii) helps foster civic responsibility; and(B) that- (i) is integrated into and enhances the academic curriculum of the students, or the educational components of the community service program in which the participants are enrolled; and (ii) provides structured time for the students or participants to reflect on the service experience.Service Learning thus embodies teaching and learning strategies that integrate communityservice with instruction and reflection to enlighten the learning experience, teach civicresponsibility, and strengthen communities. The National Service Learning Clearinghouse [11]provides a timeline for the development of Service
growing a business or venture.2 In general,the definition of entrepreneurship varies with people’s perceptions. Others defineentrepreneurship in terms of the context of their field of study. A more accurateassessment of entrepreneurship for this study may be a more specific definitionwhich encompasses the broad scope of entrepreneurship. The EntrepreneurshipCenter at Miami University of Ohio defines entrepreneurship as “The process ofidentifying, developing, and bringing a vision to life. The vision may be aninnovative idea, an opportunity, or simply a better way to do something. The endresult of this process is the creation of a new venture, formed under conditions ofrisk and considerable uncertainty.”As the field of entrepreneurship is
surveys of alumni. This paperwill share the significant lessons learned from offering the Entrepreneurship Minor as acurricular option within the Engineering Curriculum for the past decade. In doing so, the paperwill highlight the ways in which Villanova University’s program is unique among EngineeringEntrepreneurship Minors located at other universities.History of the MinorVillanova University started an engineering entrepreneurship minor program in the fall 2008semester. At the time, an entrepreneurship minor was offered in the Business School and a groupof engineering faculty members had been considering offering a minor to engineering studentsbut the initiative did not gain traction until a seed grant was provided by the Kern FamilyFoundation
Brunhaver et al. [19] produced similar findings about the difficulty ofassessing EM content in courses using the existing KSOs. The solution to this problem ofmeasurability proposed in that study was to develop an assessment of self-reported studentunderstanding of EM. The recommendation from this present study is to instead modify orredefine the objectives used to integrate EM content into curriculum to be measurable, ratherthan measuring it using a separate assessment tool.Although the sets of objectives analyzed in this study were difficult to use for the purposes ofmeasuring the EM content of courses, they can be used in other ways, including to help guide theprocess of generating EM course objectives. These objectives can also be useful for
issues and proposedattributes for successful engineers of 2020, these attributes and issues may almost alwaysbe couched within the following pedagogical concerns: There is a need to construct engineering curriculum so as to serve more diverse learners. There is a need to help students develop better complex thinking skills. There is a need to provide learning environments that more actively engage students on multi-disciplinary team projects. There is a need to create an opportunity for value added curriculum, particularly in the areas business, management, and leadership skills.To do this is going to require more active and engaged pedagogies that usually providesome opportunity for experiential
6mentioned6. The other is in the area marked “T-shaped Education” in Figure 4. This will be thefocus of the remainder of this paper, and will be used as an example to convey the final of step ofthe intrapreneurship study process, which is to build intrapreneurship competency throughengineering educational opportunities. Potential challenges and obstacles to achieve this areidentifying what new and differentiated educational opportunities should be provided, how bestto integrate these into the engineering education experience without adversely affecting otherparts of the curriculum, and how to assess their effectiveness in developing the competenciesneeded for intrapreneurship. The ultimate measure of how effective this approach is will be inthe