substantialinstruction in design thinking, entrepreneurship and innovation. The College recognized thatfuture engineers must have, in addition to technical-based education in engineering and math andscience, exposure to innovation and entrepreneurship. In doing such, students would now have themindset and skills to become innovative, entrepreneurial engineers who would be flexible,resilient, creative, and empathetic and, as such, have the ability to recognize and seize opportunitiesduring their entire engineering career. 1 This is shown as Figure 1 in a Venn diagram. Figure 1 – Venn diagram showing intersection of technology, innovation and entrepreneurship education Technical Engineering
Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E) learningenvironments in engineering courses and programs, it is valuable to assess the characteristics andcareer goals of engineering students who pursue them.Research QuestionsThe primary research questions for this study are: 1. What are characteristics of engineering students who are pursuing business minors, concentrations, and certificates? 2. Are these students more likely to be involved in entrepreneurship-related and other extra- and co-curricular activities than are other engineering students? 3. Do these students have higher (or lower) innovation self-efficacy than do other engineering students? 4. Is there a difference in career goals between these students and their peers
Paper ID #17396Approaches to Entrepreneurship and Leadership Development at an Engi-neering UniversityMrs. Galina Burylina, Kazan National Research Technological UniversityDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University - West Lafayette Dr. Sanger is a professor in the School of Engineering Technology in the College of Technology of Purdue University. His focus and passion is real world, industry based, senior capstone experiences both domes- tically and internationally. He has successfully developed this area at Purdue and at Western Carolina University. Prior to his career in academia, Dr. Sanger had a successful 30 year
Policy and Management and her M.Ed. from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group Alan Peterfreund is Executive Director of SageFox Consulting Group, an education research, evaluation located in Amherst Massachusetts. Alan has a Ph.D. in Geology from Arizona State University, and has been a research faculty member at Brown University. A career-shift in 1984 led to 16 years of consulting in the private and public sector with primarily emphasis on organizational change, quality management, and employee participation. Starting in 2000, Alan began to focus on supporting higher education partners in projects that address broadening participation in the sciences, graduate
engineering and direct collaboration with healthcare professionals and busi- ness and regulatory partners. Bioinnovation graduate students participate in transformative biotechnology development in collaborative teams that link partners from Tulane’s Schools of Science & Engineering, Medicine, Public Health & Tropical Medicine, Business and Law. Additional business and regulatory training through local biotech incubators and accelerators as well as a summer internship at the US Food and Drug Administration help to sharpen student’s entrepreneurial acumen and prepare them for advanced careers as leaders at the interface of academia and industry.Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator
entrepreneurship education assessment research. Explanations for women’s underrepresentation in male-dominated fields, such as engineeringand entrepreneurship, have been subject to debate for decades 16,17. However, upon closerexamination of the literature, these explanations can be divided into two major categories:characteristics of the individual and characteristics of the environment. Individual characteristicssuch as a person’s sense of self-efficacy and agency certainly contribute to one’s interest andcapability for success in a particular field. Yet, the nature of the environment in which onechooses to participate also plays a critical role in women’s academic and career decision-making.Key arguments pertaining to individuals’ characteristics
. Entrepreneurial experience (Creed, Suuberg, & Crawford, 2002), leadership skills(Nerad et al., 2009), the ability to adapt to and manage shifting goals (McCook, 2011), andexperience collaborating with individuals outside their disciplines could enhance contributions ofnewly graduated scientists and engineers (Etzkowitz et al., 2000; Gilbert, Balatti, Turner, &Whitehouse, 2004; Gilbert, Balatti, Turner, & Whitehouse, 2004; Taylor, 2011). Focus groupsconducted with PhD students in STEM fields found that there is wide variability in perceptionsof career preparedness and this is highly dependent on their PhD advisor, and/or the culture andnorms of their labs or academic departments (Wheadon & Duval-Couetil, 2014).To achieve their
development, and marketing. He received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from UC Santa Barbara, studying with the inventor of the blue and white LED, and an MBA from the University of South Carolina, Moore School of Business.Dr. Jonathan L. York, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo Jonathan York is associate professor of entrepreneurship in the Orfalea College of Business at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo where he also serves as the Academic Director of the Cal Poly Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship which he co-founded in 2009. He joined the faculty at Cal Poly after a long career in the private sector. After earning a bachelor’s degree from Yale University, and a PhD in psychology from Michigan
consulting services across diversified industries. Her extensive experience in business development, strategic planning, marketing, operations, and leadership have left a lasting impact on overall business performance from start-up to turn-around situations. Ms. Pyle is recognized for her unusual ability to quickly create clarity around key issues to ensure that strategic plans are developed, executed and monitored for success. This clarity of vision is informed by her highly diverse career, starting as an exploration/development petroleum geologist, including a brief stint in education when she lived in Venezuela, and to the present day when her clients have ranged from a heavy equipment manufacturer to a discount
wrote the standards for), the SONET (Synchronous Optical Network) architecture, which served as the base for today’s North American telephone network. Rodney was Chairman of the T1X1 Technical Sub- Committee (the organization responsible for SONET standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice President of Business Management, Senior Vice President of Sales Management, Senior Vice
learning programs such as the Enterprise and Pavlis Global Technological Leadership programs. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Dr. James R. Baker, Michigan Technological University Jim Baker currently serves in a split role as Executive Director of Innovation and Industry Engagement and as Co-Director of the Innovation Center for Entrepreneurship (ICE) within the Pavlis Honors College at Michigan Technological University. In this role he
outcomes [3] .Additional questions asked about perceived value of curriculum, and participantlikelihood of future entrepreneurial pursuits. Finally, the survey investigated studenttolerance for risk by directly asking about aversion to various forms (General, Financial,and Career), and presenting a hypothetical business investment scenarios. Thesevalidated measures have also been identified as important for individuals consideringbusiness creation [4] [5]. Collected data were analyzed in aggregate, and a Student's t-test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant (p < .05) positivechange for all survey questions.Results and Discussion Figure 8 shows average participant response to complete startup related actions. Forall
paper describes our origins and approach, andsummarizes some of our progress and challenges to date.IntroductionThere is increasing demand for higher education to produce graduates who are job- or career-ready 1,2. For example, most technical companies expect that new hires will be able to tacklecomplex multidisciplinary problems, and the ability to innovate is now an “integrative meta-attribute” desired in all engineering graduates 3. Pulling together disparate fields in innovativeways is now an expectation. A series of reports from the National Academies, e.g., “Educatingthe Engineer of 2020” 4 and “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” 5 emphasize the need forlifelong learning that bridges multiple disciplines. Engineering educators in
and seven principles of good feedback practice. QualityAssurance Agency for Higher Education.13 Palladino Schultheiss, D. “Elementary Career Intervention Programs: Social ActionInitiatives.” Journal of Career Development, 31:3. 2005.http://jcd.sagepub.com/content/31/3/185.full.pdf+html p. 6614 Siok San Tan, C. K. Frank Ng, (2006) "A problem-based learning approach toentrepreneurship education", Education + Training, Vol. 48 Iss: 6, pp.416 – 42815 Brown, C. (1999), “Teaching new dogs new tricks: the rise of entrepreneurshipeducation in graduate schools of business”, CELCE Digest, Vol. 99 No. 216 Weaver, K.M. and Solomon, G. (2003), “Teaching entrepreneurship to small businessand small business to entrepreneurs?”, Proceedings of the
worked for Telesis, a corporate strategy consulting firm. In this position, he served on consulting teams for clients such as Ford Motor Company, Volvo, and General Electric. He conducted manufacturing cost studies in the U.S., Japan, Mexico, Canada, Italy, Sweden, and France. Ed started his professional career in Washington, D.C., where he has served as a legislative assistant to an Ohio Congressman, staff attorney in the Federal Trade Commission, and staff counsel in the US Senate. He holds a BA degree cum laude with honors from Yale University and MBA and JD degrees from the University of Virginia.Mr. Phil Weilerstein, VentureWell Phil Weilerstein is the President and CEO of VentureWell (formerly NCIIA). Phil began
to learn more about entrepreneurship and tobetter understand how it can affect their career prospects and choices. While this does not meanevery engineering student will become an entrepreneur, as many as 60 percent want to learnmore about entrepreneurship.6 However, the rigid requirements that define an engineeringcurriculum at most universities can make it difficult for students to have the opportunity to focuson entrepreneurship. 7 Co-curricular options, such as out-of-classroom accelerators, providemotivated students with this opportunity.The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Education at the University of Colorado BoulderThe University of Colorado is situated in Boulder, a true hub of innovation and technology thatincludes a local community
, individuals require technical knowledge. They cannot, however, rely on a skillset alone if they hope to enjoy fulfilling careers. Individuals need a mindset that adds “know-why” to technical “know-how” to contribute to the success of their colleagues and employers, as well as to create value for others. An entrepreneurial mindset is key to personal and professional success. Engineers equipped with this mindset understand the bigger picture and, therefore, can recognize opportunities, evaluate markets, and learn from their mistakes. These engineers are capable of more than solving technical problems; they are constantly looking for unexpected ways to create value After recognizing the
University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Sin- gapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross- disciplinary educational and research background in
increasingstudents’ knowledge about the power of entrepreneurial mindset and the required skills. For thispurpose, a short tutorial course module was presented to clarify the impact of havingentrepreneurial mindset and the associated skills on future career of engineering students.Students mostly consider the projects and case studies just as part of their course load; however,increasing their awareness about the motivation behind the designated activities can facilitate theachievement of EML goals. Once the students understand the significance of the relationshipbetween the course assignments and EML-oriented skills that they are expected to develop, thetraining procedure will be more meaningful and motivating.3.1. Module I: Demand forecasting moduleIn the
studentsinto the learning experiences and outcomes that represent the skills and knowledge they willneed to succeed in their careers.1Yet, these efforts do not come naturally in many of the university ecosystems. In many moretraditional engineering programs, these same agile and lean approaches, not to mention theconcept of design thinking2, fail to get incorporated into the improvement process forcurriculum, co-curriculum and program development.The Grassroots EffortsAt Colorado School of Mines, it all started with a comment from a prospective student and aninquiry from a non-traditional undergraduate who was looking for something outside of the 1
thefirst course that BME students take in their major, involves modules on anatomy, bioethics,careers within BME, and conservation-based problem solving. In previous iterations of thecourse, a design project was implemented that allowed students to propose solutions to problemsidentified during a tour of a clinical care facility. While this project was a useful exercise toengage students in engineering design, they often had no quantitative basis for their designproposal. Instead, they often relied on intuition and preferences as opposed to being data-driven.In the present course offering, the design project was restructured to (1) utilize the data-drivenQS methodology and (2) focus on the development of concepts for devices to aid individualswith
duringthe student’s later engineering career, it definitely shows an effect on the students while being ineducation.References[1] Andersson, N. & Hammar Andersson, P. (2010): “Teaching Professional Engineering Skills - Industry Participation in Realistic Role Play Simulation,” Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference. École Polytechnique, Montreal.[2] Hart Research Associates (2015): "Falling Short? College Learning and Career Success" (April, 2013) https://www.aacu.org/leap/public-opinion-research/2015-survey-results[3] Rüegg, W. & Ridder-Symoens, H. de (1992): “A History of the University in Europe,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[4] Weise, G. (2014
Paper ID #17315Teaching Students How to Create Innovative Design Solutions Within a Prod-uct Development ContextDr. Darren C. Olson, Central Washington University Dr. Olson teaches at Central Washington University, where he is the coordinator of the M.S. program in Engineering Technology. He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Management from Indiana State University, specializing in Quality Systems. He also earned an M.Ed. from Bowling Green State University in Career and Technology Education, and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His interests are related to innovative problem solving, technology
extracurricular activities that promise to cultivate anentrepreneurial mind-set and develop skills needed in this start-up world. Risk taking, in a way,has become the new critical thinking. It’s what colleges believe they need to teach for graduatesto meet the needs of today’s work force. For students, entrepreneurship offers the creativity andindependence that traditional careers seem to lack” 3,4.Integrating entrepreneurial skills and activities into the Engineering program may be one way torespond to the serious challenge of Engineering student retention, especially in the transitionbetween freshman and sophomore years5,6,7. It has been reported that students may decide toleave engineering if motivation for the required hard work is not provided via
benefit of the Fermi Method, is that it considers units when making an estimation. Fartoo often students arrive at an answer that is off by a factor of the units. They multiply and dividecorrectly, but do not pay attention to their units in the process. Unfortunately, this problem hasfollowed a few students into their careers. Major disasters, such as the NASA Orbiter and GimliGlider are a result of this. In the case of the Gimli Glider, an Air Canada aircraft, the fuel wasweighed and added in kilograms, rather than imperial units (1kg≠ 1lb)11. However, Fermiaccounts for this because your units must cancel in order to achieve your final answer. Fermi canalso be used as an inspection to make sure that your calculated value is in the correct range
further innovation, the people who pursue a career of innovation,or at least become serial/multiple innovators, seem to have been motivated by one or more of themotivational forces depicted in Figure 6. Innovator biographies such as those written about Jobs,Gates, Edison, Ford, Watt and others have highlighted the drive for recognition, safety/necessity,financial reward, escape, self-esteem and responsibility as forces driving one or anotherinnovator. While certainly corporate or university management can evolve systems to create oneor more of these forces, the question of whether they will interact with the psyche of theindividual(s) exposed to such forces is clearly up to the individual and not to the organization. Inall likelihood, the
, this new course is intended to build uponthe foundation established in the freshman year for the development of an entrepreneurialmindset. Specifically, students in the sophomore studio are expected to identify opportunities anddefine problems themselves, interact with real customers, and design, build, and test prototypesthat create value for these customers. In addition, project management, communication,teamwork, and market analysis skills need to be developed in this course to prepare students fortheir senior capstone projects and future careers. Bringing all of these aspects together, thefollowing learning objectives were identified. By the end of the semester, the student will be ableto: 1. Generate, screen, and select promising design
onlyentrepreneurial mindset which can be likened to a bridge to no-where. This paper is at variancewith the work of Taks et al. (2014), which was geared toward encouraging individuals’ internaldevelopment of an entrepreneurial mindset. Since entrepreneurial studies may encourage willingstudents to pursue careers as future entrepreneurs, what can stop a young adult student entrepreneurfrom designing curriculum tailored to his or her own need and get academic credit for it?Cumbersome roadblocks often found between getting a sound education and pursuing anentrepreneurial venture can be removed. Therefore, engineering entrepreneurship educationshould focus on teaching young adults, at earlier ages, about innovation and the associatedchallenges. Some of these
Paper ID #15275Infusing Innovation and Entrepreneurship into Engineering Education: Look-ing for Change as Seen by ASEE Members, 2012to2015Dr. Alan R. Peterfreund, SageFox Consulting Group Alan Peterfreund is Executive Director of SageFox Consulting Group, an education research, evaluation located in Amherst Massachusetts. Alan has a Ph.D. in Geology from Arizona State University, and has been a research faculty member at Brown University. A career-shift in 1984 led to16 years of consulting in the private and public sector with primarily emphasis on organizational change, quality management, and employee participation
, and Identity,” Engineering Science, Skills,and Building, 2006, 165-185.47. Kowalewski, S.; Waukaw-Villagomerz. “Storytelling and Career Narratives in Organizations.Global Journal of Business Perspectives, 4, 2011, 83-92.48. Langer E. J. “Mindfulness.” Merloyd-Lawrence, 1990.49. Leifer L. J. and Steinert M. “Dancing with Ambiguity: Causality Behavior, Design Thinking, andTriple-Loop-Learning,” Information Knowledge Systems Management, 10: 2011, 151–17.50. Levina N. and Vaast E. “Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and OverlappingBoundaries in Offshore Collaboration,” MIS Quarterly, 32: 307-332, 2008.51. Levina N. and Vaast E. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice:Implications for Implementation and Use of