Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Magdalini Z. Lagoudas, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Rodney Boehm, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

large Southwestern publicuniversity. The program implementation component included program data associated withcurriculum content and format, recruiting approach, and participant data from five cohorts. Dueto the delayed employment of the assessment, the evaluation component included findings fromtwo cohorts using pre- and post-quizzes on knowledge of entrepreneurship terms and pre- andpost-surveys that captured changes in perceptions of entrepreneurship and customer interview.The results of this study indicated that while student interest on entrepreneurship remainedconstant, there were significant improvements of participants in three areas of self-efficacy: (a)entrepreneurship, (b) marketing and business planning, and (c) customer interview

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Ville Mikael Taajamaa, University of Turku; Christopher Andrew Parlier, Stanford University; Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

; Ohland, 2012]. Includes phrases for innovation [33] and innovation self-efficacy [34] as a conception of self that express intrigue, interest, and excitement for observing and experimenting with new approaches. An overlap between achievement motivation and innovation exists since individuals with a high need to achieve also demonstrate a visionary sense and gain a sense of self-worth from excelling and doing something new. Dissimilar to achievement motivation, however, innovators have a creative competence [32] and a comfort with ambiguity [2]. Affiliation It tracks the extent to which a participant is personally capable of understanding the emotional make-up of other people and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.; Scott A. Sell, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.; Michelle B. Sabick, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng.

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

coursesections are often very large, and success rates are often well below campus averages.Project Rationale Attrition rates of undergraduate engineering students consistently hover around 50%throughout the United States [2-11]. Geisinger and Raman [2] conducted an extensive literaturereview on student attrition and retention including 50 and 25 studies, respectively. Theyconcluded that six factors contributed to students leaving engineering: classroom and academicclimate, grades and conceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence, high schoolpreparation, interest and career goals, and race and gender. Furthermore, a 2013 report [11] bythe Institute of Education Sciences (IES) reinforces Geisinger and Raman’s conclusions. Thereport

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

EEPs – entrepreneurial self-efficacy, desirability, entrepreneurial intent, life transitions,information and resources, opportunities and barriers. Recommendations for engineeringeducation researchers and implications for entrepreneurship education research are offered.IntroductionWith the advent of a technology-driven global economy, institutions of higher educations areincreasingly investing in providing undergraduate engineering students with learningenvironments that assist in their professional formation. In addition to technical skills, academiahas recognized the importance of developing domain-general skills needed to solve futureproblems [1]. Engineering entrepreneurship education has been noted as a platform fordeveloping 21st century

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,” unpublished. 4. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and K. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2016 issue, Feb. 2016. 5. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and B. M. Olds, “Assessing student learning in technology entrepreneurship,” 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. 6. J. E. Mcgee, M. Peterson, S. L. Mueller, and J. M. Sequeira, “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: Refining the Measure,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 965–988, 2009. 7. M. Schar, S. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. Sheppard, “Innovation Self

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George D. Ricco, University Of Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

 Orbis Foundation. Fulcher, K. (2004). Towards Measuring Lifelong Learning: The Curiosity Index. James Madison University. Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative Mindsets: Measurement, Correlates, Consequences. Psychology of  Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62‐70.  Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2008). Big Five Personality Factors as the  Predictors of Creative Self‐Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity: Does Gender Matter? The  Journal of Creative Behavior, 47.  Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K‐ DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298‐308.  Krueger, N. (2015). Entrepreneurial Education in

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

process. This collection offactors was related to a wide array of areas such as interpersonal skills, need forachievement, and self-efficacy. In another study, Boulanger & Tranquillo [24] focused ondeveloping EM in students by engaging them in a learning environment that blendsdesign and entrepreneurship. To foster the development of EM, the authors placedemphasis on engaging students in entrepreneurial processes such as opportunityrecognition, examination of customer needs, and field observations. Similarly, otherresearchers centered their conceptualizations of EM on a variety of entrepreneurialprocesses including, but not limited to, opportunity orientation, value proposition,proactive decision-making, risk-taking, dealing with uncertainty

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Galaleldin, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. (Edward T. Higgins, Eds. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012, pp. 43–61.[10] S. A. Gelman, The essential child origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press, 2003.[11] F. J. Jourden, A. Bandura, and J. T. Banfield, “The Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Factors and Motor Skill Acquisition,” J. Sport Exerc. Psychol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 213–226, 1991.[12] J. J. Martocchio, “Effects of Conceptions of Ability on Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Learning in Training,” J. Appl. Psychol., 1994.[13] C. Tabernero and R. E. Wood, “Implicit Theories versus the Social Construal of Ability in Self-Regulation and Performance on a Complex Task,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 104

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christian Schnell, Stanford University; Johann Elmar Nordhus gen Westarp, Technical University of Munich (TUM); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

represent decreased, increased or constant remained intentions in this order.Furthermore, the table shows the overall level of Intentions according to the EMS surveys, whereas0 represents the lowest and 4 the highest intentions. In addition, the table shows the majors of theparticipants. In total 19% have founded or co-founded a for-profit or non-profit company, 6% are 2 C=Constant, I=Increasing, D=Decreasing 3 Measuring on a scale of 0-4, where 0 indicates the lowest and 4 the highest level of intentionsin academia, 25% are working for a small-sized and 50% for a medium- or large-sized business.To make sure privacy is ensured, all the names of the interviewees were changed in order to hidetheir identity.Data Collection and