, sediments, and tastes and odors. They calculated on the cost to treat one liter of water,and reflected on which scenarios would be most appropriate for each of the purification methodsused in class.In a follow up class, the instructor created a table that the class collectively completed thatincluded the method, whether the method was effective at removing various contaminants. Aguided discussion on water quality and the biological, chemical, and physical contaminants thatcontribute to water quality ensued.Seven purification in total were used: solar water disinfection (SODIS), ultraviolet (UV)disinfection using SteriPEN, membrane filtration using the LifeStraw family size hanging filter,boiling, filtration using a Katadyn filtration system
5.00±0.00 4.00±0.00environmental policy and regulations* Rank (5-Strongly Agree; 1-Strongly Disagree) Page 26.678.12Student rankings from the Likert scale and comments from both the survey and post-questionnaire highlight key outcomes addressed following completion of the capstone designcourse and outcomes that could have been addressed with more detail, better preparing them fortheir pending careers. Faculty ranking of outcomes reflects what they perceived was discussedand addressed during the capstone design course not necessarily the time allocated orthoroughness of how the outcomes were addressed throughout the course. Practicing
Page 26.238.7assessment model tests students’ level of motivation based upon five recommended componentsthat an instructor should consider when designing instruction: eMpowerment, Usefulness,Success, Interest, and Caring. The assessment instruments are modified by changing thequestions to reflect the student’s use of OWLS according to the recommendations by Jones14 inorder to test specifically how use of the OWLS by engineering students impacts their motivationlevels. The questions based on the MUSIC model are being used in the spring 2015 assessments. Quantitative data and analysis (discussed later in the Data Analysis section) results instatistics that provide insights and answers to the research questions in this study. However
and divided engineering design and application Evaluate potential measures to address extremes lectures filled with discussion Reflect on key elements of a resilient urban water questions and a group activity. system Students will be working with time series flow data for statistical analysis of extreme events. Lesson 9 (Planning and Decision Making) is a group activity that requires students to apply the material they have learned in Lessons 1–8 in an urban water system design project. Students are presented with a scenario and are required to select options to design a feasible and sustainable
, students, and society. TheEnVEBOK reflects our profession’s responsibility to address societal challenges withintelligent and practical solutions. It will help to prepare students for an unknown future;to have the skills necessary to learn and apply principles to new problems and make themost of new opportunities.Input from stakeholders is essential to a successful EnVEBOK. Throughout 2008, theTask Force will be seeking input through various means including the EnVEBOKwebsite (www.cecs.ucf.edu/BOK), presentations, emailings, and publication of articles. Page 13.383.5The development of the EnVEBOK is a continuous process of testing and improvement.As it is
.Among the students, there is a rough balance between the big-picture global learners(52% of the students) and the orderly step-by-step sequential learners (48%). Nearly twotimes as many students learn best through sensory input (65%) versus intuition (35%).The preference in the visual-verbal pairing is more skewed, nearly five times the numberof students have a preference for visual learning (83%) versus verbal learning (17%).Lastly, for every student who learns best by reflecting on material (13%), there are almostseven who prefer active learning (87%). These results are similar to past ILS studies ofenvironmental engineering students5. Clearly, a lecture-based course would not be idealfor these students. These results are not a call to
Green InfrastructureThe lesson outcomes for the Green Infrastructure lesson are: 1. Explain the motivation for green infrastructure 2. Suggest candidate green infrastructure to integrate into a new or existing site 3. Design a green infrastructure plan using EPA National Stormwater Calculator 4. Reflect on how green infrastructure can affect quality of lifePre-class activities require students to watch a screencast developed by the lesson authors, towatch a background video on the benefits of green infrastructure, and to familiarize themselveswith the National Stormwater Calculator. This software program, developed by the US EPA, hasthe following purpose [3]: The National Stormwater Calculator is a simple
interview. Furthermore, because the author had developed a close workingrelationship with each of these students, a significant impact from the “Hawthorne effect”would be expected and these results should be interpreted with this in mind7. In otherwords, the responses of the alumni is likely biased by the personal relationship with theauthor, and therefore the results reflect a combination of both the views of the alumni onmastery learning as well as the views of the alumni on the author (i.e., some alumni mayseek to provide a “positive” response in hopes of “pleasing” the author).Of the ten alumni: 1) seven were male and three were female; 2) the ages ranged from 22to 26 years of age; 3) all were employed in the practice of engineering; and 4) all
(2010-2012) (2013-2015) 4.14 4.24 Overall Assessment 4.22 4.03 Score 4.22 4.24 Average 4.19 4.17 Standard Deviation 0.04 0.12Table 3. Assessment of the capstone course final project grades. The data reflect studentperformance before and after implementation of 3D printing. Assessment values are basedon a Likert scale of one to five, with five representing the maximum positive score
counting instruments shown in Figure2. The device uses sensors running across the roadway to count the number of vehicles that passover that given section. Figure 2 California Traffic Counting DeviceThe annual average daily traffic, or AADT, is the average count based on the number of daysdata was collected. The counts only reflect weekday counts, and collections are not made onmajor federal holidays.[7] Peak hour counts reflect the average maximum hourly counts of thegiven routes. In the San Diego metro areas, these peak times are between the hours of 7:00amand 9:00am and 5:00pm and 7:00pm.Predictive ModelingBefore data visualization, the automobile traffic data needs to be converted to greenhouse gasvolumes and used
issues, in somecases also promotes positive environmental attitudes, behaviors, and values among variousstudent groups, which range between middle school and college [6]-[13]. Muderrisoglu andAltanlar [14] stated that although environmental attitude and intention may improve, the changemay not be reflected in behavior to the same degree. Lack of participation in activism towardsenvironmental issues among college students was noted as quite concerning [14].Along the lines of activism, Yazdanpanah et al. [13] studied young adults' intentions to conservewater. "The students’ attitude (the extent to which he/she believes that supporting a conservationwater scheme will deliver positive outcomes) was the main determinant of his/her willingness
. The work load can be overwhelming for even the most committed group of volunteers.- Project progress tends not to be steady, as members may put project work on hold for academic or work obligations.Improvements that could be made include addressing the above drawbacks. Additionally, aproject evaluation process should be developed. Although student reflection was encouragedthrough journaling and group discussions, a formal process for student reflection could beincorporated. Finally, a language requirement would improve communication between the teamand the partner community, thereby enhancing the exchange of information and the collaborativerelationship.At UCSB where a service-learning program is not available for engineering students
projects ranging from sales and commercial operations to clinical delivery systems and financial performance. Carl’s teaching interests and experience reflect a wide range of development activities. Carl leads lean-six sigma training and development as part of the administrative process redesign initiative and the adminis- trative excellence strategic initiative at the University of Wisconsin. In addition, Carl is a frequent lecturer on patient safety and healthcare system optimization. As the co-director of the technical leadership cer- tificate program, Carl was instrumental in forging beneficial teaching partnerships with the Wisconsin School of Business. Prior to coming to the UW, Carl managed global corporate
we discuss NO CHANGE course outcomes for engineering education pedagogy. the relevance of this course to other MADE environmental grand challenges. We are unsure exactly what the reviewer is asking us to do. 1 In the Discussion, comment on how you could improve We have discussed our study limitations CHANGE MADE and extend data collection in future iterations in order to and have provided reflections on how we learn more about the cognitive and
structure and home for students while a new program grows to criticalmass and fully develops its courses. Though these early students were officially MDE studentsand met the MDE course requirements (which are slightly different from the current BSEEErequirements), they were taught, advised, and mentored by both EEE and MDE faculty and staff.The first three students entered the MDE/EEE plan of study in Fall 2008, and the first twograduated in December 2010. The program grew significantly to almost 50 students by Fall2012. Early in the planning process, the name of the proposed program was chosen to be“Environmental and Ecological Engineering,” rather than a more traditional “EnvironmentalEngineering.” The name reflects unique aspects of the
3.69 (.947) 3.92 (.862) complex issues Perceive relations and patterns 3.85 (.899) 3.92 (.862) Recognize conflicting points of view and 3.77 (1.013) 3.77 (.832) move beyond to an independent point of view Synthesize from different ways of knowing, 3.85 (.689) 4.00 (.226) bodies of knowledge, and tools for learning Tolerate ambiguity and paradox 3.15 (.899) 3.31 (.947) Reflect constructively on your experiences 4.08 (.760) 4.00 (.707) and knowledge Employ a range of intellectual tools 3.85 (.987) 3.92 (.862) Solve problems and work through situations 3.92 (.862) 4.15 (.222) Connect in and out of classroom work 4.00 (.913) 4.23 (.599
included as part of each course unit (i.e.,Appendix 1, below).As shown in Table 1, in the Spring 2016 offering only 2 students were enrolled via distance,while approximately 1/3 of the class was enrolled via distance in Spring 2017 and 2018. Thischange in enrollment for, “Public Health for Environmental Engineers,” corresponds to anoverall trend in enrollment observed at the institution, which reflects an increase in the numberof total students enrolled via distance.As shown in Table 1, the majority of students from each offering held Senior status (i.e,. 19, 20,and 26 individuals in Spring 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively), and were enrolled in, “PublicHealth for Environmental Engineers,” in their final semester of baccalaureate studies
groups. The results showed that the intervention positively impactedstudents, particularly in how students' prejudices changed. However, the expected impact ontheir commitment to and awareness of equality was not as expected. Reflections made within thecourse assignment were relevant when taking an informed stand. A single course moduleintervention indicated that students improved sensitivity to sustainable development goals, but itwas insufficient. The authors recognized the importance of including contextual problems withsocial and environmental considerations in future course modules, especially at the beginning ofthe course. The incorporation of other approaches during engineering training requires intentionon the teacher's part and must be
adopted, uniform BOK program outcomes were alignedwith each course goal. Consistent levels of expected student competence were thenestablished, after which two types of useful data aggregations were possible. The highestorder of data aggregation was created at the department-wide curriculum level where allcourses and course goals were reflected across 1-15 ASCE-BOK outcomes and atassigned 1-6 Bloom’s competency levels. Furthermore, sub-aggregations were producedfor discipline specific courses within the major curriculum concentrations includingenvironmental, structural, transportation and geotechinical. This allowed a more detailedanalysis of student learning and instructional continuity across interconnected courseswithin a meaningful context of
two years of Page 25.1467.11the Engineering Clinic sequence, multidisciplinary teams of Juniors and Seniors advance tosolving real-world problems for industry. “What industry loves about this is that they have had astudent who has solved similar problems during the last two years of clinic,” said Dr. RobertHesketh, Chair of the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University13. “When theystart work within that industry, they know what to do.”13 “These individual honors arenoteworthy and are no doubt a reflection of our multidisciplinary approach to engineeringeducation that includes contributions from all programs in the college,” said
discussed thenegative health impacts to the locals cited by LYG (38%). Few students discussed the more‘emotional’ side of LYG in relation to the situation.Overall, requiring the students to tie the code of ethics to the situation described by LYG on theTampa highway system seemed to work moderately well. If the instructor had time to read thestudent reflections in the homework prior to class, a richer discussion could have been facilitated.It was interesting to see what elements students picked up on. For example, some misinterpretedor seemed to minimize the situation.The ethics assignment was followed by a lecture and homework assignment on JEDI. JEDI wasintegrated into the course as a required CU101 topic for all first-year students. The
55 70 57 45*Hours reflect time spent during the academic year. Much research is done over the summer withoutfunding or salary.Being a part of a large R1 university offers many resources such as additional training, software, andpotential grants, though most are housed at the main campus. Some training classes are brought to thebranch campus and even less are offered remotely (i.e. via conference call). Lab space and equipmentfor research is extremely limited, and any lab equipment is more for teaching purposes and notappropriate for research. Grants that are appropriate and practical for the teaching professor are verysmall and would not begin to cover a summer salary. While larger grants are possible through the
to gain insights regarding the motivations ofminority students to study environmental engineering, as reflected by thequestions asked by the students.MethodsIn the summer of 2007, Michigan Technological University held a week longEngineering Explorations summer camp for minority high school studentsconsidering engineering as a major in college. Nine gender separated groups eachattended the hour and a half session about environmental engineering andwastewater treatment. The males were in four groups of 7-10 students each,including a total of 35 male students. The male students were composed of 30African Americans and 5 Hispanic students. The females were in five groups of 6-8 students each, resulting in a total of 36 females. The female
Engineering collection.AcknowledgmentThe Center for Sustainable Engineering is funded by NSF Grant DUE-0442618, and by EPAGrant Agreement X3-83235101. Although work in the Center has been funded in part by the Page 14.1183.4EPA, this paper has not been subjected to the Agency’s peer and policy review and thereforedoes not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and no official endorsement should beinferred.Literature Cited:1. C.I. Davidson; C.T. Hendrickson; H.S. Matthews; M.W. Bridges; B.R. Allenby; J.C. Crittenden; Y. Chen;E. Williams; D.T. Allen; C.F. Murphy, S. Austin, Adding Sustainability to the Engineer’s Toolbox: A Challenge
moreevenly distributed among diverse disciplines. Unfortunately, we are unaware of any suchprogram currently.ConclusionsA one-year-long learning exercise was undertaken wherein a student team tackled the complexproblem of recovering phosphorus from sewage and using the recovered phosphorus as afertilizer. The student team consisted of undergraduate and graduate engineering students aswell as seniors in environmental studies. The major hurdle to the success of this course was aresult of the diverse backgrounds of the students and may be reflective of an underlying need forimproved interdisciplinary training. Although the faculty members participating in the coursewere capable of providing a highly interdisciplinary environment for learning, it
mapsseemed useful to judge the success of different instructional methods, and provided anassessment of students’ sustainability knowledge.IntroductionIt is important for engineering students to consider sustainability in their designs. Sustainabilityshould be among the standard criteria used to judge the quality of design options.13 Sustainabilityis a complex idea, and therefore multiple criteria are likely needed to reflect a sustainable design.The ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) program-specific criteria for civil,architectural, and environmental engineering require educational content related tosustainability.1 However, proposed changes to the general ABET EAC outcomes appear to placeless emphasis on the importance of
major. Two of the major motivators were job market concernsand the image of the engineering discipline. Given that enrollments do not reflect jobopportunities, the role that image has on enrollments in the environmental engineering major isworth exploring.9The general image that something presents to the public is in part the picture that comes to mindframed by its definition. The environmental engineering discipline does not have a uniformlyaccepted definition. In one sense an argument could be made that this permits maximumflexibility in describing the profession to others. In another sense, as long as the inclusion of theterm “environmental” remains popular for advertisement purposes, the lack of a commondefinition “allows everyone who works
to allow greater studentparticipation. Although, some scholars say that such a method puts forth a completely differentapproach to college education compared to a traditional lecture format (Midgley, 2002). Therefore, it is important to assess the students’ learning capabilities and not just his/hermemory (Brown & Cooper, 1976). In other words, assessment of learning is not a third-partyresearch project or someone’s questionnaire; it must be viewed as a community effort or nothing,driven by a faculty's own commitment to reflect, judge, and improve (Marchese, 1991 & 1997). Hawkins and Winter’s ACORN model also helps to document ideas and providesguidelines to conquering and mastering change (Hawkins and Winter, 1997
Millennium Development Goals set forth by the UN.7It is widely recognized that more than engineering and health care initiatives are needed toimprove the living conditions in Benin. The United Nations Millennium Development Goals setforth inter-related goals that address the foundation of a society’s needs.7 While these goals gowell beyond what one simple program can address. The goals do prescribe important connectionsin international development, in the hopes that development can be sustainable.Over a period of three years, a service learning-based project was developed to address some ofthe needs in Benin, while simultaneously meeting the needs of academic programs for studyabroad opportunities.Upon further reflection and discussion between
Engineering applications. With the assistance of the instructor, students are selectingone article from the peer reviewed literature for an oral presentation in class. To facilitatelearning, each article presentation is followed by a group discussion and students are required tomaintain a journal of their thoughts and reflections on the articles.3. Targeting a broader base of Engineering majors: At CSU, the course materials originallydeveloped at UC have been significantly expanded to target a broader base of Engineeringdisciplines. While all Engineering majors have been welcomed to enroll in the course, it hasbeen specifically advertised to Civil, Environmental, Chemical, and Biomedical Engineeringmajors. The intention is to modify the nature of the