perception of what they had learned.This survey included 3 questions: 1. What is the most important thing you learned from this exercise? What did you learn that you may use in 10 years in your career? 2. What is the most surprising thing you learned? (or…what was your “Ah-ha” moment during this exercise?) 3. What would you suggest next time I use this exercise?Results:We were first interested in how many students would consider the 4 Ps when approachingvarious engineering challenges. Table 4 and Figures 1 – 3 show that typically less than half ofthe students mentioned people (who it would affect), prosperity (how much it would cost), planet(how it would affect the environment) or politics (how would the
: threesophomores, ten juniors, and two seniors. A few of these students expressed interest in pursuinga career in environmental engineering with the remaining having a general interest insustainability. The class counted for three credits with no laboratory component and met twice aweek for eighty minutes. This course was offered for the second time in the spring of 2015, andat that point, few pieces or equipment were available for conducting traditional water qualitylabs. Therefore, the lessons described in this paper were designed to be inexpensive and easy toimplement with minimal facilities. As at many other institutions, this marked the first time firststudents were presented water treatment technologies in a formalized setting.The series of lessons
supply and distribution systems that we have becomeaccustomed to. In many areas where systems have been developed they may need to be removedand proper feasible systems engineered that will fit the needs of the people integrated with anenvironment where no further development can occur as none can be sustained.If we wish to prepare students in our American engineering programs for a more activeinternational role in developing countries in their careers, we have to be able to at least introducethem to a context that is very different from the US engineering scene. Although some factorssuch as funding may be more constraining, the typical legislated constraints that control much ofengineering design in the US may be nonexistent. It will be
2006-1669: SEQUENTIAL COURSE OUTCOME LINKAGE: A FRAMEWORKFOR ASSESSING AN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMWITHIN A CE PROGRAMKevin Bower, The Citadel Dr. Bower is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. Prior to his employment at The Citadel, he worked as an environmental engineer in Akron, Ohio. He received a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from The University of Akron and specialized in modeling carcinogenic chemical production in the drinking water distribution system. Dr. Bower was the 2005 Most Outstanding New Faculty at the ASEE –SE Conference, 2005 Early Career Award Winner from the Environmental Engineering
first-year students at CU near the beginning of their secondsemester in spring 2009, only 11% of the EVEN majors indicated that their understanding ofengineering as a career was “very clear” before they enrolled; 7% were “not at all clear”; theaverage rating was 3.2 on a scale of 1 to 5 (very clear). The primary sub-discipline areas ofinterest among first year EVEN students at CU has changed significantly over the past 4 yearsthat we have collected this data. In 2006, 34% of the students were interested in air and 34% inwater; in 2009 this shifted to 37% interest in energy, 23% water, 14% remediation, and only 5%air. To retain students in environmental engineering, it may be helpful to highlight the interfaceof their interest areas with the
to include such a course during the 2013-2014academic year. We will evaluate the success of the projects and the students’ comprehension oftraditional research methods and how they can be adapted to the field of sustainability. Toreiterate, the goal of this curricular development was to build a model for the researcher insustainability to complement the efforts in other course to build the capacities of collaborationand visioning needed in future careers. We look forward to integrating this course into thegrowing embracement of sustainability at the University of Arkansas.References 1 UNWCED: United Nations World Commission on Environment & Development (1987). Our common future
Center. Dr. Andino earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Sciences from Harvard University and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from the California Institute of Technology. Prior to being recruited to ASU, she was on the faculty at the University of Florida, and also worked for 2 years at Ford Motor Company in both their Chemistry and Chemical Engineering departments. Prof. Andino is the recipient of the 2017 Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers STAR Educator of the Year award, a Fulbright US Scholar award in Renewable Energy (for work in the Republic of Panam´a during her sabbatical from ASU), and a National Science Foundation CAREER award, among many other local and regional awards. She is also a regis
”development of widely used approaches for the management of contaminated sediments”. His research is focused on the fate, transport, and management of contaminants in the environment and the sustainable management of water resources. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Assessment of Reflective Thinking in Graduate Engineering Students: Human and Machine MethodsAbstractEngineering education is increasingly looking to the liberal arts to broaden and diversifypreparation of students for professional careers. The present study involves an elective graduateenvironmental engineering course that incorporated the arts and humanities
Paper ID #33763Development of a Crayfish Behavior Case Study for a New First-semesterGeneral Engineering Course Using a High-frequency EnvironmentalMonitoring SystemSara Freix, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sara Freix is a recent Graduate from Virginia Tech with a Master’s in Educational Psychology. She received her Bachelor’s degree in Biological Systems Engineering. She worked for the Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System Lab during her undergraduate career and was so excited to explore the intersection of her interests in education theory and environmental engineering through co-authoring
. 154. ConclusionsThis study assessed the placement, sequencing, and critical features of the 79 technicalcommunication events assessed within the fifteen required courses for environmentalengineering majors (11 courses from our department, and 4 from other departments). Acrosswalk map was constructed to highlight how graded events are leveled through a student’sacademic career (Figure 1). We found that the number of graded events with a technicalcommunication component incrementally increase each year through a student’s academicprogression within the major. Further, the body of technical communication events within themajor transition from individually assessed, relatively ‘low stakes’, primarily written events inthe earlier academic courses
scientific endeavor to which teams ofscientists have dedicated their careers. The author believes the students are better able to assessthe challenges inherent in modeling earth systems and genuinely have become more aware ofindividuals limitations and approaches to complex systems modeling. None-the-less, students © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conferencewere largely satisfied with the place-based project approach to learning the subject, even thoughstudents were challenged with sorting through a complex scenario at the beginning of the course.SummaryThe objectives of the systems engineering course were tailored to personal interests through aplaced
emissions has increased. To approach this ‘era of sustainability’ (Buys et al. 2013, 123) and its global challenges such as food or water issues, environment, energy orinequality it is necessary to use the benefits and opportunities arising from the impacts ofglobalization and rapid technology advances.Engineering education needs to impart this knowledge. The defining problems of futureengineers’ careers will be rapid change, uncertainty and complexity (Mattiussi 2013, 1). Toprepare future engineers to manage these problems and participate in the movement to achievesustainability it is necessary to integrate concepts of sustainability into engineering education(Belu et al. 2016, 94, Boyle 2004, 147). Sustainability, in this context, means
School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Alejandra Magana is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affiliated faculty at the School
ourlecture halls, and preparing for their professional careers. This next generation of engineers haslived their entire lives as beneficiaries of the information technology revolution. They are skilledin instantaneously researching a topic on the internet and making global connections with a fewswipes of their fingers. These skills give digital native students awareness of themultidisciplinary facets (social, cultural, political, economic, and technical) of contemporaryengineering problems as well as prime their penchant for team integration [3], [4]. ABET, the higher education accrediting body that helps set an engineering student onto theroad towards professional licensure, also recognizes that multi-disciplinary teamwork is arequisite skill
evaluator on this project as well as several other NASA and NSF funded projects. Dr. Small joined Clarkson’s Office of Educational Partnerships in 2006 as Curriculum Coordinator. A career educator, she has been a public school teacher, building principal and central office administrator. Dr. Small has also taught organizational leadership and curriculum and assessment courses at the graduate level. Page 26.351.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 CLICS – Integrating Data from Campus Sustainability Projects across
for Georesources and Pollution Research, Ayres Associates Inc., and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He earned his BS (High Honors) and MS in Civil Engineering and his PhD in Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin where he conducted research within the Small Scale Waste Management Project. Prof. Siegrist is an internationally recognized expert in decentralized water reclamation and in situ remediation of contami- nated land. During his 40-year career he has published over 300 technical papers and 3 books and was awarded 2 patents. His new textbook, Decentralized Water Reclamation Engineering, was just published by Springer (www.springer.com/us/book/9783319404714). He has given invited keynote
definition orscope of a wicked problem. Wicked problems exist in a dynamic knot of social, policy,economic, moral, ethical and technical dimensions. Attempts to solve wicked problemsfrequently yield unintended outcomes that render the solution unsatisfactory or incomplete.Environmental engineering practice addresses challenges more like wicked problems than tameproblems. Accordingly, teaching principles of environmental engineering “in context” of the realsocial, political, economic and technical dimensions that exist with the challenges professionalsface in practice provides students with an opportunity to develop critical thinking skillsnecessary to be successful in their careers. Assessment of teaching in-context, and examplesfrom different STEM
? 31 1.97 1.17 2 25 2.24 1.23 2Did your preservice curriculum include anyaspects of Design/Engineering/Technology? 31 2.16 1.27 2 26 2.58 1.63 2Was your pre-service curriculum effective insupporting your ability to teachDesign/Engineering/Technology at thebeginning of your career? 31 1.94 1.09 2 26 2.65 1.38 3How confident do you feel about integratingDesign/Engineering/Technology into yourcurriculum? 31 3.35 1.11 3 26 3.65 0.98 4How important should pre-service educationbe for teachingDesign/Engineering/Technology ? 31 4.29
etc. Yes—this is the best class in my career I’ve learned more from this than any other Oh yeah, I’d say so I think so I’ve def. learned a lot; don’t know how much I’ll use in the field, but it’s been beneficial. I’d like interaction and group work. I think it would be beneficial sometimes but not every class; there is only so much your peers can teach you. Also Page 12.1083.8 I’d like some articles that are scientific but not in a research
, Program Outcomes and the Assessment Methods must therefore be established and evaluated. These items are defined below: • Program Educational Objectives: Broad statements that describe career and professional accomplishments that the graduates are expected to achieve. • Program Outcomes: Narrow statements that describe what students are expected to know upon graduation. • Assessment: A method to identify, collect and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of the program objectives and outcomes. The assessment also considers how general education is applied and evaluated in the engineering courses. For example, how math is used in the engineering courses rather than how many math courses are required
education2, although examplescan be found in civil engineering3,4, construction engineering and management5, andenvironmental engineering6. Many of these examples stress the importance of “GIS for work”, or Page 23.642.2“GIS as a toolbox”—the idea that GIS education and skills are needed to help prepare studentsfor their future career in industry—but a broader reason for GIS education is the notion of“spatial literacy.”Spatial literacy includes the “teas[ing] out [of] complex interrelated elements of connectedsystems7”; and “the confident and competent use of maps, mapping and spatial perspectives toaddress ideas, situations and challenges. The
is an active Affiliate Re- searcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, focusing on the energy efficiency and assessment for IT equipment in Data Centers, and continues this work as a Consultant. He is also a mem- ber of the San Diego Gas and Electric’s Public Advisory Group for ’Workforce Education & Training’. Prof. Ben Radhakrishnan has an MS from State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, M.B.A (Uni- versity of Phoenix), and Sustainable Business Practices Certification from University of California, San Diego. His previous corporate careers include Qualcomm (Director, Technology Program Management) and Senior Program & Design Manager in Lucent Technologies.Dr. Shekar Viswanathan
courses in electronics, power systems, control and power electron- ics, electric machines, instrumentation, radar and remote sensing, numerical methods and data analysis, space and atmosphere physics, and physics. His research interests included power system stability, control and protection, renewable energy system analysis, assessment and design, power electronics and electric machines for wind energy conversion, radar and remote sensing, wave and turbulence simulation, mea- surement and modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education. During his career, Belu published several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He
-cluttering curriculum in a masters course. As statedwithin the study guide, “Using this material to highlight what we refer to as ‘threshold learning concepts’, the unit aims to provide breakthrough learning experiences for all students, regardless of where you are in your post graduate studies, on your career path, or where you are with regard to considering sustainable development.”32The resultant course structure for the 2011 student cohort comprised a 2-day intensive on-campus session at the beginning of semester, followed by three 1-hour workshops and three2-hour seminars (on campus and recorded). During the workshops students were providedwith feedback on their assignments and project progress. During each 2-hour seminar
their own projects? (Student 1- Male, Senior Civil Engineering) I think this really varies from person to person. People who are working on projects that closely relate to their desired career path are very excited by their projects, but those who weren't matched with a project that was their top choice seem to be less interested. (Student 2- Male, Junior Engineering Management, Business Minor) My peers seem to be very interested in their own projects and seem to enjoy working on their projects as well. Albeit, I have not had a lot of interaction with many other groups, the ones I have seen seemed quite interested in their projects. (Student 3- Female, Senior Civil Engineering) It varies with the
. Therefore,the student responses to course evaluations conducted during the fourth and fifteenth week of thesemester may be influenced by both a sense of “maturity” (i.e., Seniors who have participated innumerous courses with a variety of different instructor types) as well as a sense of “apathy” (i.e.,Senior slide before Spring Graduation and subsequent career placement).Table 1. Demographics of a total of 79 students enrolled in three course offerings of “PublicHealth for Environmental Engineers” in the Spring semester of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Spring 2016 Spring 2017 Spring 2018 N = 22 N = 28 N = 29
slide presentations can serve as useful tools to a certain point in theclassroom, but without augmenting this classroom learning with experience through application,much of what is gained by students in the classroom may not endure throughout a student’ssubsequent career. In our ever more complex and dramatically changing world, futureenvironmental dilemmas will require innovative solutions from our rising engineers. Thisinnovation demands mastery in both understanding and applying science and engineeringfundamentals – skill sets that are gained through deliberate and effective experiential, pragmaticlearning opportunities.References[1] M. A. Butkus, M. C. Johnson, and J. C. Lynch, Linking Courses and Essential Experiences inan Undergraduate
AC 2007-109: PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS FORSERVICE-LEARNING IN ENGINEERINGFrank Giannelli, Lafayette College FRANK R. GIANNELLI graduated from Lafayette College in Easton, PA in May 2007. He received his B.A. in Engineering with a minor in Economics and Business. He is interested in project management and plans to pursue a career in engineering management.Sharon Jones, Lafayette College SHARON A. JONES is an Associate Professor at Lafayette College in the BA Engineering Program. Her research includes environmental and infrastructure policy. Dr. Jones received a BS Civil Engineering from Columbia University, and a PhD Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. She