Development. In addition, she has developed numerous tools to mentor young women considering engineering as a career and has been involved in the development of a women in engineering role model book for K-12 students.Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology PATRICIA A. CARLSON is professor of rhetoric at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Force, as well as having had several research fellowships with NASA (Langley and Goddard) and the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground. She has also been a research fellow at NASA's Classroom
written in s fashion that relates the objective is a specific and measurable fashion. This section of the paper investigates how the learning objectives relate to the published course goals. Tables 5, 6, and 7 are matrix tabulations of the learning objectives provided mapped to Page 13.333.11 the corresponding course objective at the appropriate level of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The
significantinfrastructure challenge. Brazil has struggled to provide adequate water, electricity, roads andhighways services for its burgeoning population. Today, many areas of Brazil have madepromising advances in infrastructure but demand outpaces the rate of advance. For instance,while water treatment facilities grew by 80% in the 1990’s, demand for treated water grew by450%. The regions of greatest growth during this time period were the heavily urbanized Page 13.190.8Northeast and the Southeast [2].Water treatment is a process that is as significant to a population, as it is delicate and unstable. Ifany one of the functional components, shown in Figure 1, is
century is described asthe “era of sustainability”. Engineering education needs to foster this concept and impartknowledge about dealing with it to future engineers by conducting innovative teachingapproaches like the EWB Challenge, for instance.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research withinthe project ELLI (Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences). The authorswould also like to thank Mr. Steffen Rolke of Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).ReferencesAllen, Deborah E., Richard S. Donham, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 2011. “Problem-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128): 21–29.Belu, R., R. Chiou, Ciocal L., and B. Tseng. 2016
uncertainty to a relevant environmental engineering scenario.AssessmentBoth indirect assessment (an indicator of perception of outcome attainment) and directassessment (an embedded indicator of performance in outcome attainment) are used to assesscourse outcomes in our program. Because both types of data are important, all outcomes areevaluated using an overall assessment score, which is based on indirect data from surveys (Likertscale) and performance based (embedded) indicators. The indirect score is based on a scaledassessment (1-5 Likert scale) from student surveys using the web-based end of course feedbacksystem and the instructor’s assessment. The students and instructor(s) review each courseoutcome and determine to what degree cadets can
School.” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-617. Honolulu, HI. (2007).3. C. Ramseyer, “An Experiment in Undergraduate Research,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-1832. Honolulu, HI. (2007).4. C. Bott, “Undergraduate Research Experiences that Promote Recruitment into the Field of Environmental Engineering.” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-485. Honolulu, HI. (2007).5. D. Lopatto (2004), “Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First Findings.” Cell Bio. Educ., Page 13.1278.14 3, 270-277.6. E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni (2004). “Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for
(p<0.05) relative to lecture formatfirst PBL unit and with learning overall was generally supported in the student interviews (Table3), although it was also clear that students had difficulty discriminating between student-directedlearning and simply being asked to work in groups. Two of the four students interviewed at the endof the first PBL unit believed the unit was “lecture-based”. Some engineers reported feelingoverwhelmed by the biology course content at the end of the first two units, but it is also possibletheir assessment was colored by a certain temptation to default to the biology student(s) rather thanassume responsibility for the new content. Quiz scores at the end of the second unit did notindicate that the majority of
, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.5.) R. Walters and Z. Gao, Strategy to Incorporate GIS and GPS Applications Into Construction Education, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, Chicago, IL, 2006.6.) S. Dahal, R.H. Hall, G. Morrison, S.P. Lamble, and R. Luna, A Web-based Learning Module for Teaching GIS Within the Context of Environmental Engineering, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2011.7.) Sinton, D. and S.W. Bednarz, Putting the G in GIS, In D. Sinton and J. F. Lund (eds.) Understanding place: GIS and mapping across the curriculum. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 19-33, 2007.8.) Spatial Literacy Program. Retrieved January 5, 2013, from http://www.redlands.edu/academics/school-of- education/9762.aspx9
.2010.12.04910 Bednarz, S.W. (2000). Connecting GIS and problem based learning. In Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.), GIS in Schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.11 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to Implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.12 Torp, L., S. Sage (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16 Education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.13 Kucharski, G.A., J.O. Rust, T.R. Ring (2005). Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project-Based Approach. Education, 125(4), 652.14 Hurd, P.D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing
implemented to achieve these outcomes: Sustainability Learning Modules Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project and Quality Sustainable Engineering InternshipEach program component addresses specific learning objectives/student outcomes associatedwith the outcomes described above. The learning objectives (Table 1) reflect increasedexpectations and levels of complexity as students attain higher academic classifications andmatriculation levels. The key components are described in the sections that follow.Table 1. Engineering sustainable Engineers Learning ObjectivesLearning Objective/Student Outcome Course Level(s)/ExperiencesExplain sustainability concepts and terminology
requirements -15% f The project contributed to my ability to use modern 74 engineering tools and techniques 24% k 80 The project had significant practitioner involvement 18% d,kThe strong survey increases are supported by further examining the student responses to eachcriterion since integration of the ABET criterion is evaluated by each student throughout theexperience, both for the in-country and on-campus design experience. While on-site, studentsmaintain a learning log. For each entry or experience, the ABET requirement(s) that apply to theproject task, experience or lesson are to be documented. A summary report of how