AC 2011-1884: A WEB-BASED LEARNING MODULE FOR TEACHINGGIS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGSirjana Dahal, Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRichard H Hall, Missouri University of Science & TechnologyProf. Glenn Morrison, Missouri University of Science & TechnologySeth Paul Lamble, Missouri University of Science and Technology Currently a Masters student at Missouri S&T pursuing his degree in Environmental Engineering.Ronaldo Luna, Missouri University of Science & Technology Ronaldo Luna is a Professor and Assistant Chair for Civil Engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Missouri. He received his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Tech- nology in 1995
allowed waste-to-energy plants to become highly clean. 3. Explain the important issues and environmental impacts USA is suffering environmental costs by not utilizing the potential of waste to energy plants. The environmental impact is higher greenhouse gas emissions and loss of cheap electricity. 4. Recommended actions. Create awareness that waste-to-energy plants do not mean the end of recycling Streamline the process of selecting and building the incinerators Change public perception by educating them about effective operation of waste to energy plants elsewhere Government funding 5. Based on your analysis/reflection of the environmental impacts what action(s) you would like to take
-3013.2. Kwak, H.S., Park, S.K., Kim, D.S. (1996). Biostabilization of Kefir with a Nonlactose-Fermenting Yeast. Journal of Dairy Science, 79(6), 937-942.3. Marshall, V.M, and Cole, W.M. (1985). Methods for making kefir and fermented milks based on kefir. Journal of Dairy Research, 52, 451-456.4. Marshall, V.M., Cole, W.M., and Brooker, B.E. (1984). Observations on the structure of kefir grains and the distribution of the microflora. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 57, 491-497.5. Oakes, W., Sharvelle, S., Banks, M.K., Brock, B., Brophy, S. (2007). Achieving graduate competencies through an authentic design experience in a wastewater treatment course. AC2007-614, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii
detention) are prohibitively expensive. A ‘Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Actof 2010’ bill (S. 3561) was introduced into the U.S. Senate in summer 2010 to provide incentivesfor more communities to adopt such practices. Based on these developments it is evident that 21stcentury stormwater management involves a more holistic, ecological-based approach to designthan civil engineering students have learned in previous decades. This approach integratestraditional civil engineering with environmental science and engineering, landscape architecture,and ecology, making it an exciting challenge for civil & environmental engineering academicsand professionals.An opportunity for campus-based sustainable stormwater retrofitsBecause the majority of
. Despotakis. 2010 “Known and Unknown Weaknesses in Software Animated Demonstrations (Screencasts): A Study in Self-Paced Learning Settings.” Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol. 9, pp. 81-98. 3. Lee, M., S. Pradhan, B. Dalgarno. 2008. “The Effectiveness of Screencasts and Cognitive Tools as Scaffolding for Novice Object-Oriented Programmers.” Journal of Information Technology Education. Vol. 7, pp. 61-80 Page 22.1635.7
EWB chapter. Page 22.957.9Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. 2008. Grand Challenges of Engineering. Obtained from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/?ID=115742. ABET. 2009. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Obtained from http://www.abet.org/Linked/Documents-UPDATE/Criteria and PP/E001 10-11 EAC Criteria 1-27-10.pdf3. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.4. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. deWit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H
, 2003, 29:3-6. 3. Waterman, M.A. and Stanley, E.D., “Investigative Case Based Learning: Teaching Scientifically while connecting Science to Society”. CCLI Conference 2008. Successful Pedagogies. Available online:[http://www.aaas.org/publications/books_reports/CCLI/PDFs/03_Suc_Peds_Water man. pdf]. 4. Yeung, E., Au-Yeung, S. Chiu, T., Mok, N., Lai, P. “Problem Design in Problem-based Learning: Evaluating Student’s Learning and Self-directed Learning Practice”. Innovations in Education and Teaching. 2003. Vol 40(3). 237–241. 5. Chung, J. and Chow, S. “Promoting student learning through a student-centered problem- based learning subject curriculum”. Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Environmental Engineers.6. Clark, William C., and Nancy M. Dickson. 2003. “Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14) (8 July): 8059-8061.7. Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews, C. Murphy, & D. Pijawka. (2008). “Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education: Final Report.” EPA Grant X3- 83235101-0, December, 2008.8. Lozano García, Francisco J., Kevany, Kathleen, Huisingh, Donald. (2006). “Sustainability in Higher Education: What is Happening?” Journal of Cleaner Production. 14(9-11): p. 757-760
of these groups are involved with another group in the decision making process,there is a high probability that there will be conflicts in their value systems that must beovercome.References1. Morris, William T. 1977. Decision Analysis. Grid Publishing. Columbus, OH. 290 p. Page 22.164.122. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.,and Greco, S. 2010. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Inc. New York,NY3. Giron, F. J., and Martinez, M. 1998. Applied Decision Analysis.Kluwer Academic. Boston, MA. Page 22.164.13
.2010.12.04910 Bednarz, S.W. (2000). Connecting GIS and problem based learning. In Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.), GIS in Schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.11 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to Implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.12 Torp, L., S. Sage (2002). Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K-16 Education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.13 Kucharski, G.A., J.O. Rust, T.R. Ring (2005). Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project-Based Approach. Education, 125(4), 652.14 Hurd, P.D. (1997). Scientific Literacy: New Minds for a Changing
implemented to achieve these outcomes: Sustainability Learning Modules Multidisciplinary Senior Design Project and Quality Sustainable Engineering InternshipEach program component addresses specific learning objectives/student outcomes associatedwith the outcomes described above. The learning objectives (Table 1) reflect increasedexpectations and levels of complexity as students attain higher academic classifications andmatriculation levels. The key components are described in the sections that follow.Table 1. Engineering sustainable Engineers Learning ObjectivesLearning Objective/Student Outcome Course Level(s)/ExperiencesExplain sustainability concepts and terminology