and multipleoutcomes including economic, environmental and social issues surrounding sustainability.Students are expected to show effort in researching, demonstrating an awareness of all avenuesof sustainability. The assessments are derived from exercises, problems, and project addressingsustainability issues, including greenhouse gas footprint, energy use, and water use.Table 6. Sustainability in Engineering course assessment Course objective/s Assessment Results Sustainable practices needed in environmental and Students were able to find, comprehend, analyze, civil engineering find needed information for quantify, synthesize information about the future solving open ended problems
hybrid water supply systems in the context of urban water management: challenges and opportunities. Water, 7: 153‐174. 5 Gran, S. B., Saphores, J., Feldman, Hamilton, A. j., Fletcher, T. D., Cook, P. L. M., Stewardson, M., Sanders, B. F., Levin, L. A., Ambrose, R. F., Deletic, A., Brown, R., Jiang, S. C., Rosso, D., Cooper, W. J., and Marusic, I. (2012) Taking the “Waste” out of “Wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science, 337(6095): 681‐686. 6 Rahman, S., Khan, M.T.R., Akib, S., Din, N. B. C., Biswas, S. K., and Shirazi, S. M. (2014) Sustainability of rainwater harvesting system in terms of water quality. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. 7 Jhansi, S. C. and
,collectingdataviaacomputerinterfaceanddescribingexperimentalresults.TheavailabilityandcostofmaterialsandinformationassociatedwithfuelcelldevelopmentmaketheMFCtechnologyandexcellentfitforstudentrelatedprojects.References1. UnitedNations,(2012).Waterforlifedecade. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/africa.shtml2. Logan,B.,Hamelers,B.,Rozendal,R.,Schroder,U.,Keller,J.,Freguia,S.,Aelterman,P.,&3. Berman,J.,April2009.WHO:Waterbornediseaseisworld'sleadingkiller.Voiceof America.http://www.voanews.com/content/a-13-2005-03-17-voa34-67381152/ 274768.html4. Verstraete,W.(2006,July14).Microbialfuelcells:Methodologyandtechnology. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es06050165. Paulson,L.(2012,August20).Microbialfuelcelllatrinepromisessanitation,power. http://www.rwlwater.com/microbial-fuel-cell-latrine-promises-sanitation-power/6. Davies,C.(2010,Aug23).Solarenergybringspowertoruralafrica.CNN,http:// www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/08/10
AnalysisThe objective of the second assignment was to apply basic engineering principles of problemdefinition to their system of choice. The assignment goals were to define a system process andrelated variables and identify gaps in the knowledge through a Degrees of Freedom analysis.Students were required to: 1. Sketch your Chesapeake Bay system. 2. Define processes (splitting, mixing, reactions, etc.) and show the streams entering and exiting your process(es). 3. Define and show the variables associated with your processes. 4. Set up a Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) analysis of your system. Determine the variable(s) you will need to calculate (solve for). 5. Determine how many variables will you need to define through research in order
.25886.Donnell, Jeffrey A., Betsy M. Aller, Michael Alley, and April A. Kedrowicz. 2011. "Whyindustry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literaturesays." American Society for Engineering Education.Garcia Lorca, F., & Ferguson, D. M., & Condoor, S. S. 2015. “Reinforcing CommunicationSkills Through Participation in a Team-based Weekly Innovation Challenge,” 2015 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24664Lewis, N. A. 2008. "The engineer as a professor: Bringing experience to the engineeringclassroom." ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section meeting, US Military Academy at West Point, NYLoendorf, W. 2004. “Transitioning From Industry To Education: The First Year,” 2004 ASEEAnnual
://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET/pu blications.html, May.4. Crittenden, J.C. J. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2002, 4(1)6-7. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conference5. De Gelder, C., Oele, M., Cleij, V., Moore, M., Durksz, S., Haringsma, A., Wannee, T. 2012. SimaPro installation manual 1.12. PRé Consultants. the Netherlands.6. Dunn, J.B. 2014. Biofuel Life Cycle Analysis with the GREETTM Model. U.S. Department of Energy Biomass 2014: Growing the future bioeconomy. July 29 – 30, 2014. Washington Convention Center. Washington D.C.7. Fontes, J. 2016. Product Social Impact Assessment: Roundtable for product social metrics. PRé Consultants
and OutreachAfter the conclusion of the capstone, the first opportunity to use the system in outreach/researchwas within the Young Scholar Program (YSP), a very successful program lead by the Center forSTEM Education at Northeastern University. The YSP is a 6-week summer program that offersfuture scientists and engineers a unique opportunity for a hands-on research experience whilestill in high school. The program is open to local applicants who have completed their junior yearof high school (i.e. rising seniors). Over the summer of 2016, two rising seniors were assignedto work under the guidance of the PI(s) on a research project related to water reuse. The studentswere also asked to review the content of the website and create additional
specific examples from the story and reference any external citations employed in your summary (your statement should be less than 250 words and include at least two citations supporting your stance) d. Post Two: (10 points total) at least one professional and thought provoking criticism of someone else’s concluding statement (i.e., While I agree with your overall conclusion, I believe you could improve your argument by… etc.) 3) Instructions for submission of OPTIONAL written homework (handwrite all work; use 8.5x11 paper; label: name, date, assignment, and page numbers; box final answers): a. (12 points total; 4 points each) Chapter Review p. 507ff #’s
QRMA III, which is supported by NIGMS/NIH,Award Number R25GM108593 References1. Medema G, Ashbolt, N. QMRA: Its Value for Risk Management. Microrisk, Microbiological Risk Assessment: A Scientific Basis for Managing Drinking Water Safety From Source to Tap. Microrisk, 2006.2. Ashbolt NJ, Schoen ME, Soller JA, Roser DJ. Predicting pathogen risks to aid beach management: the real value of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). Water research, 2010; 44(16):4692–4703.3. Bambic D, McBride G, Miller W, Stott R, Wuertz S. Quantification of pathogens and sources of microbial indicators for QMRA in recreational waters. 2011.4. Weir MH, Shibata T, Masago Y, Cologgi DL, Rose JB. Effect of Surface Sampling and Recovery of Viruses and
Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2015 Reading Assessment) - Whitman, G. (2015) Web post: 4’33” (Four Minutes and Thirty-Three Seconds): What Our Brains Need, www.Edutopia.org retrieved on Dec 14, 2016. - Moran, S. (2016) Prism ASEE publications Opinion p.60 Link: https://www.asee.org/documents/publications/prism/2016-ASEE-PRISM-Magazine-25- 6.pdf - U.S. Department of Education (2001) The context of postsecondary education. The Condition of Education, NCES 2001072, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 74–84. - Bernold, L.E. (2005) Paradigm Shift in Construction Education is
.” Answer questions 1c and 1d with complete sentences. c. (25 points) Identify the public institutions(s) and private organizations responsible for managing air quality, and explain each entity’s role. d. (10 points) Identify the criteria pollutants that are being managed.Scoring Rubric:Excellent: All answers are complete and correct. Student demonstrates knowledge of allappropriate organizations and their role in managing air quality. All criteria pollutants beingmanaged are correctly identified.Acceptable: Most answers are complete and correct. Student shows partial misunderstanding ofroles of institutions. At least one of two criteria pollutants is correctly identified.Marginal: Student has no answer or is completely incorrect about most of the
, J.D. & Stein, B.S. (1993). The Ideal Problem Solver (2nd Ed). New York:Freeman.5. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation ofphysics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152.6. Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. PoliticalPsychology, 25(1), 1-29.7. Pennebaker, J.W., Boyd, R.L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development andpsychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.8. Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers:Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.9. Korte, R.F. (2009). How newcomers learn the social norms of
analysis. The students generallyperformed well in the overall class and the group project (e.g., the majority of the class obtaineda 70% grade or higher in the course). Future versions of this course could improve students’understanding of LCA software by introducing software earlier in the curriculum or including alaboratory component to the class. Lastly, this class provides skills that could be applied to asenior capstone course, which could enhance the student design experience in future semesters.References 1. Hallegatte, S.; Green, C.; Nicholls, R. J.; Corfee-Morlot, J. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 802−806. 2. State of California. 2017. Retrieved from: http://climatechange.ca.gov/ 3
century is described asthe “era of sustainability”. Engineering education needs to foster this concept and impartknowledge about dealing with it to future engineers by conducting innovative teachingapproaches like the EWB Challenge, for instance.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research withinthe project ELLI (Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences). The authorswould also like to thank Mr. Steffen Rolke of Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).ReferencesAllen, Deborah E., Richard S. Donham, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 2011. “Problem-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128): 21–29.Belu, R., R. Chiou, Ciocal L., and B. Tseng. 2016