leadership in different capacities at Lehigh University and Virginia Tech.Dr. Daniel S. Brogan, Virginia Western Community College Daniel S. Brogan has been an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Virginia Western Community College since 2017, where he primarily teaches first-year general engineering courses. From 2011 to 2017 he was a doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech, where his research involved the development and classroom implementation of the Online Watershed Learning System (OWLS), a guided, open-ended cyberlearning environment that is driven by HTML5, JavaScript and CSS and serves as a user interface to the Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) Lab. In 2011 he founded
learning. Entrepreneurial Indicator Item(s) used Level of Proficiency Mindset for assessment “Parameter” Well Above Proficient Proficient Below Proficient Curiosity Exploring Porosity The student is able to The student is able The student is alternative calculations correctly calculate the to correctly able to correctly scenarios porosities of fabric calculate the calculate the materials greater than porosities of fabric porosities
courses and pro-environmental knowledge and behavior and environmental attitudes.References[1] S.-W. Liang, W.-T. Fang, S.-C. Yeh, S.-Y. Liu, H.-M. Tsai, J.-Y. Chou and E. Ng, “A nationwide survey evaluating the environmental literacy of undergraduate students in Taiwan,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 1730, Jun. 2018. Available: 10.3390/su10061730.[2] K. J. H. Williams and J. Cary, “Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection,” Environ. Behav., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 257–274, Mar. 2002.[3] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “AR4 Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report,” 2007.[4] L. Chawla and D. F. Cushing, “Education for strategic environmental behavior,” Environ. Edu. Res., vol. 13, no. 4, pp
9 22 41 12 3.64The frequency of communication by instructors 0 4 12 42 27 4.08Rate instructor(s) overall teaching effectiveness? 2 2 5 41 38 4.26The results from the post-survey are listed in Table 2. The pattern and trend remain the same,however, there is an overall positive shift in satisfaction across all categories. Specifically, theaverage score for each individual element increased in the post surveys. In addition, thestatistical modes increased for two of the categories, namely Frequency of Communication byyour Instructors and Rate Instructor(s) overall teaching
instruction, and face-to-face instruction," Computers & education, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 733-741, 2010.[2] L. Kinney, M. Liu and M. A. Thornton, "Faculty and student perceptions of online learning in engineering education," in 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2012.[3] P. Panindre and R. S. Thorsen, "Assessment of Learning Effectiveness in Online and Face- to-Face Learning Environment for Engineering Education," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2020.[4] S. Papanikolaou, "E-Learning and Assessment in the Cloud: Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2020.[5] R. Zaurin, S. D. Tirtha and N. Eluru, "A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to- Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for
program participants were able to learn about sustainability initiatives including urban 3development and infrastructure, waste-to-energy plants, and public transportation systems.Table 1: Major activities, as related to application of technical or cultural topics, and yearsincluded in itinerary. All topics were within the context of environmental sustainability. Technical or Cultural Topic Activity Year(s) Governance and federal policy Swedish Parliament All Municipal governance Stockholm City Hall All Federal environmental policy Swedish Environmental Protection 2015, 2017
both the lack of aclear set of instructions relevant to the audience as well as the publication of high qualityreviews using these instructions that may serve as a template for future efforts.AcknowledgementsThe author wishes to thank the additional workshop organizers, including: ProfessorHeather Ross, Professor Pascal Saikaly, Dr. Muhammad Ali, and Tobias Heselton.References 1. Henry and L. Stieglitz, “An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature,” in Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34121. [Accessed May 20, 2021]. 2. S. Oerther, and D. B. Oerther, “Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice offers nurses a
implementation of the course and accentuated diverse skills and understandingsin our lectures, discussions, and course assignments. Quantitative and qualitative measures ofour students’ perception of their interdisciplinary understanding of climate change before and atthe end of the course suggest that our efforts were successful (Tables 3 and 4). Multidisciplinary teaching is known to be effective.9,10 We hope that our apparentsuccess with our multidisciplinary course provides an example that can be emulated by othersinterested in new models for teaching climate change and other highly complex subjects.WORKS CITED (1) Lemos, M. C.; Klenk, N.; Kirchhoff, C. J.; Morrison, T.; Bremer, S.; Fischer, A. P.; Bruno Soares, M.; Torres
elements of narrative, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.[10] M. Hiner, Paper engineering for pop-up books and cards. Tarquin Publications, 1985.[11] G. Date and S. Chandrasekharan, “Beyond efficiency: Engineering for sustainability requires solving for pattern,” Engineering Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12-37, 2018.[12] M. Foucault, The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France, 1981- 1984 (G. Burchell Trans.), New York, NY: Macmillan, 2005.[13] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.[14] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
” education to haveinsufficient curricular coverage at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Research is less clearas to if and how considerations of gender and race are integrated into environmental engineeringlearning frameworks (e.g., it is possible that these considerations are included within the “socialjustice” or “engineering and poverty” topics in Bielefeldt et al.’s [13] survey, but not known ornamed precisely). Many faculty members and cross-sector partners have strong interest increating learning settings that highlight the human health, cultural, social, and justice relateddimensions of environmental studies [5], [8], [14]. Yet course experiences that aim to expandunderstanding of how different gender and racial groups enter
approaches to sustainability in higher education: the role of project-oriented learning," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 133, pp. 126–135, Oct. 2016 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.079[6] W. Leal Filho and E. Manolas and P. Pace, "The future we want," International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 112–129, Jan. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2014-0036[7] L. Gelles and S. Lord, "The Final Straw: Incorporating Accessibility and Sustainability Considerations into Material Selection Decisions," 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online, ASEE 2020, USA, June 22-26, 2020. Doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 35319. https