activism.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Jocelyn GarciaMaria Oralia Tinoco Alegre, Florida International UniversityMalak Elaouinate, Florida International University Malak Elaouinate is a Florida International University
highlights the importance of resilience and adaptability. I remember my experiences and learnings... applying Black feminist and womanist theory held me through to graduation."QUESTION 2: Why do you choose to be a member of ASEE, and describe how you’veserved the organization and engineering education community over the years?In response to the question regarding their membership and contribution to the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE), the Authors share a range of experiences and motivations.Meagan Pollock recounts joining ASEE as a natural step in their doctoral journey, eventuallybecoming deeply involved in leadership roles, including a significant position on theCommission for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Their journey
. Alain also serves as the lead program manager of the Summer Engineering Camps an effort that is centered on development of the engineering identity through direct experiences with Engineering fields and design challenges in the informal STEM learning space. Finally, he manages and supports research and development of new and innovative approaches to exposing Pk-12 students to active learning frameworks such as Maker Sprints and Project Based Learning. Alain has a Master of Science in Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies from the University of Texas at El Paso and a Master of Arts in Design and Innovation from Southern Methodist University. As part of his goals to contribute across the University Alain also
the USA,women represent only 19.7% of engineering graduates and 18.7% of computer sciencegraduates, lagging behind the 35.5% of women in all STEM fields [2]. The goal of this projectwas to understand student thinking about diversity and inclusion with the long-term aim ofimproving culture for females and under-represented groups. The engineering workforce andengineered products, infrastructure, and services can certainly benefit from designs created bydiverse teams. Prior researchers have linked diversity to increased creativity in teams andwork-groups [3, 4].Building an inclusive culture is challenging but very important. A negative campus climate canaffect students’ self-efficacy. A campus with a lack of diverse students can create a
alsofeatured opportunities to develop a shared lexicon for ARDEI concepts and interrogate one's ownidentity and positionality.By making this a required course, we set the expectation that considering the societal impacts ofresearch is an important and natural part of the entire research process. We chose to expand anexisting professional development course for graduate students that originally solely coveredtopics like laboratory safety, library use, grant writing, and communication, to include ARDEIand social justice content. Into this predominately passive content, we added active and complexreflections and discussions of identity, bias, and (in)justice. We believe that developing thisreflective skill early sets students up to think about social
adult inform their research work.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and approaches for teaching and assessing systems thinking skills. Kirsten holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education, M.S. in Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Virginia Tech.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is
common goal.6. The workshops and speakers were valuable too.7. The community-centered research.The student responses above indicate what elements participants found valuable about ROLE,confirming the importance of interacting with others, shared values through their culture, andcommunity building. When participants were interviewed, they reflected on more specificexamples. For instance, participants were aware of ROLE’s research space created to encourageresearch activities among minority and underrepresented students in engineering. Someparticipants reflected on their ethnic and engineering identities. Troy vented, “Being a Latinoengineer, it's definitely a minority in the engineering field…it made me sort of form more of abond if I see
helpengineers and their communities meet their needs, and clarifies that engineering does notinherently require technocratic solutions to communal problems and needs.PositionalityThe primary and secondary authors are both engineers, labor organizers with the AmericanFederation of Teachers (AFT) local GEO-3550, and children of union members fromworking-class backgrounds. Both were participants in the 2020 GEO-3550 abolitionist strike fora safe and just campus for all [29]. The first author was also taking graduate coursework inintroducing the concepts of engineering education research during the writing of this paper,which provided a critical reflective space for learning and grappling with theoretical frameworksand their applications. We reached out to
Development. He graduated from the University of Alabama in August 2012 with a PhD ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Social Justice in Infrastructure: A Community of Practice Framework for the use of Case StudiesAbstractThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) was created in 2013 as acommunity of practice (CoP) for those interested in the scholarship of infrastructure educationand has developed a model introductory infrastructure course with over 40 lessons available toany instructor to use or modify. In the summer of 2023 CIT-E held a workshop “TeachingStudents about Equitable Infrastructure”. As a result of that workshop, one of the ongoing
, takeaways for future development of this and other comparable communitiesof practice for student participants in engineering education are considered.1.1 BackgroundThe EECS Design Student Community of Practice Program at Oregon State University in theSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science was originally developed and piloted in2017 as a means to interweave aspects of academic, extracurricular, career preparation, andprofessional identity-building in the engineering discipline based upon the model presented byWenger [1]. Over the 6 years since the pilot, program leaders have conducted developmentresearch that has guided advancements in basic organization, educational practice, resourcefocus and overall implementation methodology [2-4
arehoping that through the process of sharing our thoughts with the broader ASEE community, wecan further develop ideas regarding opportunities for anti-racist institutional transformation andincorporate them into ongoing research with students, program coordinators, and universityleadership across the five PNW LSAMP universities and four PNW LSAMP communitycolleges.Theoretical frameworkOur research is motivated by an assets-based Critical Race Theory (CRT) approach aimed atdeveloping a better understanding of the ways that knowledge and experience possessed bystudents from systemically marginalized groups both contribute to their educational success anddraw attention to opportunities for institutional transformation [5], [7], [8]. In this paper
, ‘Developing a Grounded Framework for Implementing Ungrading in a Disciplinary Context’, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2023.[12] S. Ghosh and S. Coppola, ‘This Class Isn’t Designed For Me: Recognizing Ableist Trends In Design Education, And Redesigning For An Inclusive And Sustainable Future’. arXiv, 2024.[13] M. Bahnson et al., ‘Inequity in graduate engineering identity: Disciplinary differences and opportunity structures’, J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 949–976, 2021 [Online]. Available: 10.1002/jee.20427.[14] A. M. York et al., ‘Gender inequity in individual participation within physics and science, technology, engineering, and math courses’, Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 020140, Dec. 2021 [Online]. Available
various disciplines through the recruitment of students from STEM and STEM-related majors across campus including: biology, chemistry, STEM education, chemical Creation of an engineering, behavioral education science, and environmental science. In terms of expansive faculty mentoring, students received training from faculty representing engineering, learning education, marketing, business, multicultural education and sociology. This community learning community met twice a month with faculty and twice a month with their graduate mentorship team. The aim of this type of interdisciplinary learning community helped students establish connections across campus through
welcomedand recognize that I value them as individual learners, even in a large class.Future WorkThese teaching practices presented have specifically highlighted two main practices: clearlyarticulating the expectations in engineering classrooms and building a sense of belonging andcommunity in courses. Expanding the sense of engineering identity and belonging are bedrock toinviting students into a learning community where they can thrive. The authors hope that theseexamples are just the beginning of the anti-racist pedagogy collection. We would like to include acall to action to the educators reading this paper. We ask that you reflect on your own teaching andidentify any pedagogical practices that are focused on inclusive, anti-racist environments
Education Conference (FIE). 2016, (pp. 1-4). IEEE.[15] ] E. J. Abrica, T. B. Lane, S. Zobac, & E. Collins, Sense of belonging and community building within a STEM intervention program: A focus on Latino male undergraduates’ experiences, 2022. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 21(2), 228-242.[16] T. L. Tevis, & Z. Foste, From complacency to criticality: Envisioning antiracist leadership among white higher education administrators, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, (2022), Advance online publication.[18] C. A. Young, B. Haffejee & D. L. Corsun, Developing cultural intelligence and empathy through diversified mentoring relationships. Journal of Management Education, (2018), 42(3), 319-346.[19] M. L. Boucher Jr, More
to support student success inengineering. In border communities of the southwest, where rural communities blend acrossnational and state boundaries, student counternarratives of educational success involvecomplexity. In particular, engineering students’ descriptions of language, familial backgrounds,disciplinary knowledge, hidden curriculum of US post-secondary systems, and financial servicesbuilt for citizens OR international students indicate there is much to be learned about howinstitutions in border communities support or fail to support equitable access to engineeringpathways. In a larger study, transcript analysis of 40 interviews from undergraduates at a borderinstitution indicate scholars navigate familial and background difference
, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[28] National Science Foundation, NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING STATISTICS DIRECTORATE FOR SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES, "Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering," National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, 2019.[29] C. Rozek, Ramirez, Gerardo, R. Fine and S. L. Beilock, "Reducing socioeconomic disparities in the STEM pipeline through student emotion regulation," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1553-1558, 2019.[30] G. M. Bettencourt, C. A. Manly, E. Kimball and R. S. Wells
Paper ID #33756Perceptions of the Engineering Curricula from Women and LGBTQIA+ Stu-dentsDr. Stephanie Lezotte, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Lezotte currently serves as the Assistant Dean of Graduate Studies at Rowan University. She received her Ph.D. in education, with a concentration in postsecondary and higher education. Us- ing organizational theory, she is interested in systems and structures that contribute to the oppression of underserved and underrepresented college students, particular STEM students. She is active in the Amer- ican Educational Research Association (AERA) and the Association for the Study of
AbstractLatinx undergraduate students attending Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), where most of theschool’s undergraduate population comes from similar cultural and linguistic backgrounds, arelooking to belong, persist, and successfully complete rigorous STEM-based educational andacademic programs. HSIs have a unique opportunity to utilize their institutional practices andpersonnel to support and promote student success through culturally relevant pedagogy centeredon Latinx cultural wealth. HSIs work with STEM academic programs to increase enrollment andacademic preparedness through rigorous coursework, however, Latinx students need additionalcommunity support to feel a sense of belonging to fully develop their STEM identities. Latinxstudents find
student mental health-related help-seeking in undergraduate engineer- ing students. She is completing this project in collaboration with faculty members from educational and counseling psychology. With this work, they aim to better understand the help-seeking beliefs of under- graduate engineering students and develop interventions to improve mental health-related help-seeking. Other research interests include engineering communication and integration of process safety into a unit operations course.Melanie E. Miller, University of Kentucky Melanie Miller, M.S., (She/her/hers) is a Counseling Psychology Ph.D. student at the University of Ken- tucky. American c
the threat of the different strains of the Covid-19 virus hasreduced and consequently, a large number of institutions have reverted to in-person modes ofinstruction that prevailed prior to the start of the pandemic (e.g. [2], [3]). The near-totalsuspension of HyFlex instruction has been met with little protest in the academic community,with only a handful of researchers speaking in its favor (e.g. [4]–[6]). In this paper, we align our voices in support of HyFlex learning, arguing that theCovid-19 pandemic taught us the valuable lesson that HyFlex learning options should alwayshave a place in education, as we particularly make a case for our field of design engineeringeducation. Through empirical research consisting of semi-structured
classroommethods + STEM/engineering; inclusive college classroom + engineering/STEM; inclusiveinstruction + STEM/engineering; and inclusive college education + STEM/engineering) were usedto retrieve articles from different databases. The databases include Web of Science, GoogleScholar, IEEE Xplore Library, Scopus, ERIC, Wiley Online Library, and Compendex.Forty-four articles remained in the pool. Finally, in the synthesis phase, these articles werecritically reviewed following the sub research questions, and the information was synthesized togenerate themes. Five themes emerged from the forty-four articles. First theme: Using Identity toFoster Engineering Connections, found to be especially helpful for marginalized students. Secondtheme: Using Technology
improvementstrategy may already be in use and examine through a linguistic and cultural lens the rhetoricalstrategies instructional faculty use to communicate technical concepts to students with the hopethat we can increase utilization of these strategies to benefit students and simplifyrecommendations for instructional faculty who are striving to be compliant with ABET and otheraccreditation bodies and manage their workload within realistic constraints put on educationalinstitutions.Purpose: We believe that by explicitly articulating the applications of coursework to society,learning objectives to social service, and faculty commitment to advocacy for equitable practicesin engineering education and practice we can lay a foundation for a learning space
lecturer.The curriculum was implemented late in the semester, after the class was already comfortablewith each other and with large group discussions. The coursework for this class included severalactivities that are “outside” the typical technical engineering classrooms, such as using Twitter asthe classroom communication tool. Because of this, the students could have been more primed tobe receptive to the curriculum based on class experience so far. When the unconscious biascurriculum is positioned as pertinent to the engineering students’ development in professionalcommunication, the module could theoretically be implemented in any engineering classroom.For the curriculum to be successful, the facilitator must be willing to share their
Christine Stanley Engineering Education Faculty Department of Educational Administration & Human Development Texas A&M University Seth Polsley Sketch Recognition Lab Department of Computer Science & Engineering Texas A&M UniversityAbstractProtests against racial injustice have been increasing in the United States. Universities oftenrapidly respond to acts of injustice through public statements about their position to uphold theequality of all people. To gauge the desires and concerns around discussing events causing socialunrest
Paper ID #36778Conceptualizing Social Justice in Civil Engineering and Professors’Perspective: A Systematic Literature ReviewMs. Tomeka Carroll, University of Virginia Tomeka Carroll is a Ph.D. Fellow in the school of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She is also a Research Assistant with the Behavioral Research at Darden (BRAD Lab). Her research interest revolve around JEDI in engineering education, circular economy and behavior change, as well adaptive reuse and sustainability. Tomeka received her BA in Spanish from Spelman College and attended graduate school at McDonough School of Business
. Based on the African American Male Theory (AAMT) [4], our research team examinedthe three students’ experiences in the context of the interconnected environmental systems(microsystem, mesosystem, exosystemic, macrosystem, chronosystem). Highlighting theconcepts of “resilience,” “resistance,” and “pursuit of social justice” in AAMT, the authorsexplored the three students’ multiple-layered social and professional identities as emerging Blackmale engineering professionals.Theoretical frameworkThis study is grounded in Bush and Bush’s African American Male Theory [4], which providesan effective analytic framework to understand the unique facets of Black males’ experiencessituated in various educational, academic, and community contexts. Like other
2 1 Professors 2 1 1We used a purposive sample - students were selected because they either majored in engineeringor intend/intended to major in engineering and came from an underrepresented community, andprofessors were selected because they teach engineering at the college level. Once the potentialinterviewees were identified, we reached out to them via email to set up an interview by Zoom.The interviews lasted between 30 and 60 minutes and were recorded for transcription purposes.Interviewees were not paid for participation.The interview protocol was developed specifically for this project. The prompts from theprotocol that focused on assessment and identity
Paper ID #41866Teaching Strategies that Incorporate Social Impacts in Technical Courses andEase Accreditation Metric CreationMs. Ingrid Scheel, Oregon State University Ingrid Scheel is a Project Instructor at Oregon State University in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. She teaches Electrical and Computer Engineering fundamentals and design courses, and as a graduate student in Education is focused on curriculum design. Scheel’s industry experience includes prototype development, test article instrumentation, data acquisition, data analysis, and reporting. She contributes to the International Society for Optics