Paper ID #27773Design of a Laboratory Testbed for Modeling Industrial ExhaustDr. Gordon P. Smith, Western Kentucky University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Design of a Laboratory Testbed for Modeling Industrial ExhaustAbstractThere are a great many industries in the Kentucky and surrounding areas that utilize natural gasburners in their operation, typically on order of hundreds of thousands of cubic feet per month toliquefy and hold molten aluminum for their die operations. Much of the energy content of thisfuel is consumed in plant operation, but a significant amount of heat is released to the
impact was not realizedby those identified as “at risk” [4]. Most of the existing research on PBL addresses residential(i.e. in class) and flipped classrooms environments. As noted in the 2019 ASEE AnnualConference for the division of “Experimentation and Lab-Oriented Studies” the onlineinvolvement of PBL towards engineering experimentation was virtually absent [5].The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the applicability of an online engineeringexperimentation course that empowers engineering students to attain hands-on, appliedengineering experimentation experiences within their normal dwellings. This course usesinexpensive, yet reasonably accurate sensors and data acquisition systems. An objective of thecourse was to deliver students
middle- or high-school levels and/or for STEM outreach.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Duke University teaching assistants who contributed to thiswork: Anshu Dwibhashi ’20, Cooper Lair ’20, Martin Li ’19, Edward Yao ’19, and Joanne Zheng’20. Januario Carreiro ’21 was also instrumental in circuit diagrams for the lab experiments.References[1] J. J. G. van Merrienboer, P. A. Kirschner, and L. Kester, “Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 5–13, 2003.[2] H. C. Powell, T. DeLong, and H. Alemzadeh, “An integrative approach to embedded systems courseware. submission type: Work in progress,” in 2019 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[3
Paper ID #26477Guided Peer Review of Technical Writing for Large Laboratory CourseDr. Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia Dr. Smith is an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Guided Peer Review of Technical Writing for a Large Laboratory CourseAbstractLaboratory courses, and in particular laboratory reports, are logical choices to assess two par-ticular student outcomes: ‘the ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyzeand interpret data;’ and ‘the ability to communicate effectively.’ If
: using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 234-252, 2019.[5] J. Donnell, P. Varney, D. MacNair, A. Ferri, “Optimizing Efficiency and Effectiveness in a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory using Focused Modules,” in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[6] J. Ma and J. Nickerson, “Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, 2006.[7] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual
hoursConclusions:This paper presents an effort attempting to prepare College of Engineering and Technology faculty for allthe uncertainties and changes they had to face as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The series ofdiscussions organized by faculty across different departments certainly have helped many facultymembers facing the enormous challenges in multiple facets. The ideas collected from these sessionsparticularly assisted in transitioning essential experiential learning to appropriate contexts in order tocomply with capacity limitations, PPE requirements, and social distancing. Experiential learning wasunderstandably one of the most impacted areas of teaching and learning given all of the constraints.The authors wish such a discussion at an ASEE
educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evaluation plan de- signed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Department of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of a Portable, Experimental Platform to Demonstrate the Role of Material and Cross-Section in Beam
Virtual Instrumentation (REV) and served as a special session committee member for the Experiment@ International Conference Series (exp.at). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021BYOE: Creating the STAND: Sensors and Transducers Active eNgineering Design-bench. ASEE 2021 – DELROS Division – BYOE SessionAuthor Information: Mark Trudgen, PhD Dominik May, PhD Robert Oliver Zanone Lecturer, School of Electrical Assistant Professor, Student, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Engineering Education and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering Transformations
, and nanotechnology engineering education and research. He is a licensed PE in the State of Colorado, a member of ASEE, a senior member of IEEE, and a senior member of SME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Life of a Lab from Need to Retirement: A Case Study in AutomationAbstractThis work defines ten stages of a lab lifecycle implemented in an undergraduate engineeringcurriculum and exemplified using programmable logic controllers in a set of lab design exercises.The ten stages of a lab lifecycle ̶ need, conception, funding, purchasing, installation, development,deployment, enhancements, maintenance, and retirement ̶ are compared to the
Pittsburgh. He is currently an Associate Professor of Physics and Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania. He has on his record numerous publications in a number of fields in Applied Physics and Engineering, including superconductivity, semiconductor quantum devices, nonlinear optics, semiconductor lasers, infrared detectors and signal processing of medical signals. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Improving Technical Writing Skills through Lab ReportsIn the last few decades, there has been an effort to address how to complement the teaching ofscientific and technical skills to scientist/engineers with other attributes needed for a successfulcareer within diverse
given 113 professional presen- tations. She holds membership of the American Chemical Society, the Soil Science Society of America, and SigmaXi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Students’ Personalized Learning and Engagement within a Cyberlearning SystemAbstract“Advance Personalized Learning” is one of the 14 grand challenges of engineering asidentified by the National Academy of Engineering. One possible approach for thisadvancement is to deploy systems that allow an investigator to understand the differencesin the learning process of individuals. In this context, cyberlearning systems, like remoteand virtual labs, that use networked
- facturing. Dr. Tseng published in many refereed journals such as IEEE Transactions, IIE Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Future Laboratory: Leveraging Consumer Imaging Devices for Student Projects and Sustainable, Accessible STEM EducationIntroductionIndustry, healthcare and STEM education have often relegated chemical analysis, surfacecharacterization, bioassays, and measurements that require special types of
theory.Student Learning Approach and Course DevelopmentIn the Summer of 2019 the authors participated in their Center for Advancement of Teaching’ssummer course (re)design program to design their Control Systems and Instrumentation course.During this program, the authors worked through the book, Building a Pathway for StudentLearning [13]. Before this program, the authors approached the course design as “how can wepossibly consolidate all these topics to one course?” The course changed the authors’ narrative to“what do our students look like after they have completed our course? What can they do thatthey could not before taking our course?” From this crucial change in perspective, the authorsbegan to work backwards from a final project, build an