. Masoud, “Writing a laboratory report for senior electrical engineering courses:Guidelines and recommendations,” 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference(EDUCON), 2017, pp. 340-346, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942870.[5] Gravé, I. (2019, June), Improving Technical Writing Skills Through Lab Reports Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32951[6] Rhudy, M. (2019, April), Short Writing Assignments within a Laboratory Course to ImproveUnderstanding and Interest in Course Material Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Zone I Conference& Workshop, Niagara Falls, NY. https://strategy.asee.org/33783[7] Genau, A. (2020, June), Teaching Report Writing in Undergraduate Labs Paper presented at2020
. H. Tan, and R. S. Rajab, "Haptic- based virtual reality system to enhance actual aerospace composite panel drilling training," in Structural Health Monitoring of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites: Elsevier, 2019, pp. 113-128.[17] A. Stratos, R. Loukas, M. Dimitris, G. Konstantinos, M. Dimitris, and C. George, "A virtual reality application to attract young talents to manufacturing," Procedia CIRP, vol. 57, pp. 134- 139, 2016.[18] P. Wang, P. Wu, J. Wang, H.-L. Chi, and X. Wang, "A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training," International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 15, no. 6, p
-11.1093. 12. doi:10.18260/1-2--28[15] S. Chitikeshi, J. Hildebrant, O. Popescu, O. M. Ayala, and V. M. Jovanovic, “Integrating statistical methods in engineering technology courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018. doi:10.18260/1-2--30689[16] J. Burns, and M. Hammond, “Work in progress: Redesigning a multidisciplinary engineering statistics course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. doi:10.18260/1-2--33577[17] D. Myszka, “Alternative student performance evaluations in mechanical measurement courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, 2008, pp. 13.168. 1-13.168. 10. doi:10.18260/1-2--3290[18] N. S. Vidic, and R. M
conducted [16]found that students who received Experiment-Centric form of instruction scored higher on tests ofscientific knowledge than those who received Traditional lecture-based instruction. The authorsalso found that Experiment-Centric Pedagogy increased students’ motivation to learn, withstudents reporting greater interest in the subject and greater self-efficacy when compared tostudents in the Traditional lecture-based instruction group.Similarly, a study conducted by Zhang X., et al 2019 [17] found that Experiment-Centric Pedagogywas effective in increasing students’ knowledge and understanding of Biology topics, as well astheir interest in the subject. In addition to studies that have investigated the impact of Experiment-Centric Pedagogy
] Chopra, A.K. (2016) Dynamics of Structures, 5th Ed. Pearson.[7] Clough, R. W., & Penzien, J. (2003). Dynamics of structures. Berkeley. CA: Computers &Structures.[8] Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions,comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.[9] McDaniel, C., & Archer, G. (2009, June), Developing A Feel For Structural Behavior Paperpresented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5095[10] Facciolo, C. D., & Behrouzi, A. A. (2019). Interactive Physical Experiments in anAdvanced Undergraduate Structural Dynamics Course. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition.[11] Riley, C., Millar, J. D
with Disabilities: Engaging the Community through Educational Outreach and Toy Donation,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/engagement-in-practice-toy-adaptation- for-children-with-disabilities-engaging-the-community-through-educational-outreach-and- toy-donation[10] M. Y. Mollica, H. Feldner, A. Caspi, K. M. Steele, and D. G. Hendricks, “Toy Adaptation in Undergraduate Education and Outreach: An Initial Examination into Participant Experience and Perceptions,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[11] M. Y. Mollica, H. A. Feldner, S. Israel, A. Caspi, K. M. Steele, and D. G
, and N.J. Washuta, “A Simple, Economic Refrigeration Lab for Thermal/Fluids Courses,” paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 15, 2019.[9] TecQuipment, “H408 – Experiment Fluid Friction Apparatus,” [Online]. Available: https://www.tecquipment.com/fluid-friction-apparatus. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2023].[10] TecQuipment, “H16-Experiment Losses in Piping Systems,” [Online]. Available: https://www.tecquipment.com/losses-in-piping-systems. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2023].[11] Armfield, “C6-MKII-10-Fluid Friction Measurements,” [Online]. Available: https://armfield.co.uk/product/c6-fluid-friction-measurement. [Accessed Feb. 1, 2023].[12] Armfield, “F1-22 Energy Losses in Bends and
Safety Coordinator, and lead for the SAFEChE (Process Safety Across the CHE Curriculum) modules as well as the Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering Equipment. Currently, he serves as a Director for the ASEE ChE Division.Dr. Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University Joanne K. Beckwith is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis Janie is a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. Her PhD is in chemical engineering from Purdue University. Research focus areas include laboratory courses, process safety, and chemical engineering pedagogy.Prof
. 1109–1114, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.158.[4] R. Ng and A. Wong, “PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE AND LEVELS OF TECHNICALENGLISH COMMUNICATION SKILLS AMONG STAKEHOLDERS IN ENGINEERINGFIELDS,” IJEAST, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 43–50, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.33564/IJEAST.2020.v05i02.008.[5] C. Hubka et al., “A Writing in the Disciplines Approach to Technical Report Writing inChemical Engineering Laboratory Courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32019.[6] S. Wu, S. Zha, J. Estis, and X. Li, “Advancing Engineering Students’ Technical Writing Skillsby Implementing Team-Based Learning Instructional Modules in an Existing LaboratoryCurriculum,” Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 8
new geospatial technology competency model: Bringing workforce needs into focus," Urisa Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 55, 2010.[14] L. Potts and H. Jin, "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): A conceptual framework for instruction and learning the Geospatial Technology Competency Model (GTCM)," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40743.[15] L. Potts and H. Jin, "Cognitive strategies in STEM education: Supporting the development of engineers’ multi-and cross-disciplinary competence," in 2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40044.[16] S. W. Bednarz and K. Kemp
, experimental testing, and 3D printingthrough a 4-week project while providing students an opportunity to be creative through anengaging, open-ended project of appropriate level of challenge.The assessment of the lab aimed to answer the following research questions:(1) What resources and tools do students find helpful during the lab?(2) Which major attributes of the lab are perceived as educational by students?(3) Which major attributes of the lab posed a challenge for students?(4) Which major attributes of the lab were engaging for students?IV. MethodsSample: The DBT lab was assessed over a period of two years (2019, 2020). The students wereenrolled in the required junior-level lab that met once a week in-person. A total of 39 studentsparticipated
Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2019.[28] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[29] H. W. Fennell, G. S. Coutinho, A. J. Magana, D. Restrepo, and P. D. Zavattieri, “Enhancing student meaning-making of threshold concepts via computation: The case of Mohr’s circle,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017-June.[30] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no
Suturin, Monash UniversityDr. Robert Lee Read, Public Invention Robert L. Read, PhD, founded Public Invention in 2019, 35 years after first being inspired to do so by Buckminster Fuller. He is a professional computer programmer and manager, an amateur scientist, physicist, mathematician, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer. He speaks Esperanto fluently. He hopes that 20 years from now you will be able to go to a party and say, ”I’m a Public Inventor” and have everyone know what that means. Email: . Twitter: @robertleereadNathaniel Bechard ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A democratized open-source platform for medical device troubleshootingIntroductionThe COVID pandemic