Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grenmarie Agresar, University of Michigan; Stephanie Marie Kusano, University of Michigan; Tershia A. Pinder-Grover, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

EngineeringIntroductionGraduate student instructors are essential to the teaching team at many research institutions.They often lead laboratories, discussion sessions, and/or hold office hours; and are the primaryliaison between students and faculty. As such, they not only influence student learning, but theycan also be agents of change and improve student retention [1]. Therefore, the training of studentinstructors is critical to enhancing the student experience as well as the classroom climate.Additionally, meaningful assessment of student instructor professional development is criticalfor ensuring quality of such training.To support their key role in the teaching-learning environment, the College of Engineering (CoE)at the University of Michigan requires training of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton; Kenya Crosson, University of Dayton; Aaron Altman, United States Air Force Research Laboratory; Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton; Malle R Schilling, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

Paper ID #25307Work in Progress: Can Faculty Assessment and Faculty Development be Ac-complished with the Same Instrument?Dr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

Paper ID #25936Board 82: Lessons Learned: Using a Faculty Developer’s Skillset to Facilitatea Challenging Revision Process – A Student Evaluation of Teaching ExampleDr. Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana Amy B. Chan Hilton, Ph.D., P.E., F.EWRI is the Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning and a Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana (USI). Her interests include faculty and organizational development, teaching and learning innovations, and systems thinking applied to educational contexts. Prior to joining USI, Dr. Chan Hilton served as a Program Director at the

Conference Session

Connecting Theory and Practice in a Change Project - And What I Wish I Knew Before I Started

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

asintroducing index cards for students to write questions and concerns; others engaged in a full flipof their classroom. Also, many of the participants indicated that they are comfortable employinginteractive strategies in small, higher level courses or laboratories but continue to use primarilylecture when teaching large, entry-level courses. How can SIMPLE groups be adapted to addressthe challenge of translating these strategies to large courses? Would it be valuable to createSIMPLE groups that focus on this challenge, perhaps across disciplines?Many of the teaching development group participants had begun using interactive teachingstrategies recently (1-2 years) before joining the group. It is likely that because interactiveteaching was relatively

Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Gemma Henderson, University of Miami; Ines Basalo, University of Miami

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

, vol. 9, C. Harteis, A. Rausch, and J. Seifried, Eds. Springer Science, 2014, pp. 189–210.[22] W. C. Newstetter, E. Behravesh, N. J. Nersessian, and B. B. Fasse, “Design Principles for Problem-Driven Learning Laboratories in Biomedical Engineering Education,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3257– 3267, 2010.[23] R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330–348, Aug. 2012.[24] D. D. Pratt, J. B. Collins, and S. J. Selinger, “Development and Use of The Teaching Perspectives Inventory ( TPI ),” pp. 1–9, 2001.[25] D. D. Pratt, “Conceptions of Teaching,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 203–220, 1992.[26] G. Hall, S. Loucks, W

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan M. Cruz, Virginia Tech; Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech; Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University; Niyousha Hosseinichimeh

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

steps of constantcomparative analysis.This review suggests the existence of at least 31 factors that can potentially impact the successfulimplementation of RBIS in the classroom. Hence, they could be barriers or drivers toinstructional change in higher education. These 31 factors were classified and organized into sixcategories: 1) culture, 2) change management, 3) institutional support, 4) pedagogical knowledgeand skills, 5) students´ experience, and 6) faculty motivation.BackgroundSeveral reports on engineering education make the call to change pedagogical approaches inengineering by increasingly embedding research on learning into teaching practices [1-3]. Thistype of change, that involves a transformation in instructional practices and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Technical Paper Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

invests in the career growth of anotherindividual. This investment can be made through behaviors such as mentoring, coaching,networking, or sponsoring. In addition, actions such as teaching, counseling, evaluating,listening, advocating, showcasing, collaborating, empowering, and challenging throughdevelopmental relationships are integral to leadership development and career advancement[1],[5],[7],[8]. 1Kram clarified the nature of relationships at work that enhance career development, definedessential characteristics of developmental relationships (career support and psychosocialsupport), and suggested ways to build them at work [5]. Research supports

Conference Session

Faculty Development Round Table

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College; Naja A. Mack, University of Florida; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

technologies and conversational user interfaces.Dr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research includes modeling steady state and transient behavior of advanced energy systems, inclusive of their thermal management, and the characterization and optimization of novel cycles. He has advised graduate and undergradu- ate research assistants and has received multi-agency funding for energy systems analysis and develop- ment. Sponsor examples include the National Science Foundation, Department of Energy and NASA. Dr. Haynes also