Paper ID #28894From Q&A to Norm & Adapt: The Roles of Peers in Changing Faculty Be-liefsand PracticeAmber Gallup, University of New MexicoDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments
Paper ID #34338Where’s My Whiteboard? The Challenge of Moving Active-learningMathematics Classes OnlineProf. Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University Jill Nelson is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at George Mason University. She earned a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Uni- versity in 1998. She attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate study, earning an MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Dr. Nelson’s research focus is in statistical signal processing, specifically detection and
Paper ID #29197Designing a Streamlined Workshop for STEM-H Faculty Engaged in theScholarship of Teaching and LearningMs. Jody Zhong, University of Louisville Ms. Zhong is a fourth-year doctoral student in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Louisville. Ms. Zhong’s interests lie in researching identity, diversity, and professional development/thriving within the academy.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD
equipment in mind. The traditional and blended hybrid modalities utilizeclassrooms where social distancing measures can be implemented. The flexible modality allows asmall number of alternating students to be physically present in the classroom while others attendsynchronously online. The remote virtual and online modalities are performed onlinesynchronously and asynchronously, respectively. They exclude any face-to-face instruction.In this paper, we seek to answer: how do faculty members prefer to teach during the pandemic andwhat are the implications? The research is focused on the engineering and computer science facultyat our university because they individually select the teaching modality that fits their class. Thefaculty included in this
reflection?,”“how are reflections shared with students and feedback given?” These questions alone offered avariety of lenses through which to view an exam wrapper assignment.The impact of the guided exercises on exam wrapper development was compounded by theperspectives and discussions between the instructors who participated in the co-design study. Ofthe six participants, there was a significant range of experience with exam wrappers. Some werecompletely new to the concept and some had already been using them in their individual courses.A broad range of class topics, styles, and sizes within engineering curricula was also representedin the group. While each instructor came to the study with an exam wrapper in mind targeted atachieving a certain
power shape reform efforts.Dr. Yan Chen, University of New Mexico Yan Chen is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests focus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic edu- cation.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information and Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical and Biological En- gineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is