these grants…” [R3]Another subject whose research is interdisciplinary reflects on his difficult experience withtenure review: “The complication for me was that my research spans two fundamental fields of study... [S]o I had to seek feedback on both sides…in terms of the [first field of study] world, how am I doing? in terms of [second field of study], how am I doing?.. [T]he issues I had [with P&T] were related to that. How you’re reviewed when you’re …. interdisciplinary is a headache.” [R7]As R7 illustrates, faculty with interdisciplinary research are often evaluated by faculty across twodepartments and must uncover the hidden curriculum in both. In other cases, faculty are expectedto meet tenure expectations that may be
lines as a part of the larger NSF grant geared towardsincorporating reflective practices into engineering education. Overall, the findings contribute tothe scholarship of teaching and learning and provide valuable recommendations for instructors.Furthermore, the study lays the groundwork for further research on the integration of reflectivepractices in other STEM disciplines.AcknowledgementThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2235227. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. L. Ash, P. H. Clayton, and M. P. Atkinson, “Integrating
, and S. E. Miller, “Empathy and engineering formation,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 11–33, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20301.[11] Chronicle, “What Does It Mean When Students Can’t Pass Your Course?,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 06, 2022. https://www.chronicle.com/article/what-does-it-mean-when-students-cant- pass-your-course (accessed Feb. 14, 2023). 6
implementing this research question and assessment plan, we aim to understand theeffectiveness of the integrated curriculum and faculty professional development in preparingstudents for careers in the rapidly evolving field of automated manufacturing and assembly lines.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the ETEC department chair, FarukYildiz, and the esteemed former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering Technology(CoSET), John Pascarella, for their generous support in funding this crucial professionaldevelopment initiative through the Fred Pirkle endowment fund.References:[1] B. Esmaeilian, S. Behdad and B. Wang, “The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review” in Journal of Manufacturing
in the Health Professions, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 114-120, 2022.[2] Z. D. Mulla, V. Osland-Paton, M. A. Rodriguez, E. Vazquez, and S. Kupesic Plavsic, "Novel coronavirus, novel faculty development programs: Rapid transition to eLearning during the pandemic," Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 446-449, 2020.[3] A. Boklage, R. M. Carbonell, and M. Borrego, "Making shifts: Faculty development shifts in a university makerspace during the COVID-19 pandemic," in Proceedings of the American Society Engineering Education Annual Conference (Virtual), 2021. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37449[4] H. Buckley, "Faculty development in the
supporting faculty transitions. References[1] C. N. Adichie, “Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: The danger of a single story | TED Talk.” Accessed: Mar. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story[2] A. Perry, S. R. Dean, and A. A. Hilton, “New Faculty Transitions and Obstacles: An Auto- Ethnographic Exploration”.[3] M. Borrego, “Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00920.x.[4] A. Gardner and K. Willey, “Framing the Academic Identity of Emerging Researchers in Engineering Education”.[5] J
objectives of the FDS program, and theircontributions are deeply appreciated.References[1] J. Roy and A. Erdiaw-Kwasie, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2022,” By the Numbers, https://ira.asee.org/wp- content/uploads/2023/12/Graduate-Engineering-Rankings-December-2023.pdf (accessed Feb. 7, 2024).[2] S. Hurtado, Enacting Diverse Learning Environments. Jossey-Bass, 1999.[3] Santiago, Sotto, and Sylk M. What Gets Lost in the Numbers: A Case Study of the Experiences and Perspectives of Black and Latino Faculty in Academic Medicine. 1 Jan. 2017. Accessed 8 Feb. 2024.[4] Villarejo, Merna, et al. “Encouraging Minority Undergraduates to Choose Science Careers: Career Paths Survey Results.” CBE—Life
Paper ID #43637Teacher’s Perceptions of the Fertility in Implementing Project-based Learningin Engineering CoursesDr. Octavio Mattasoglio Neto, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Undergraduate in Physics (1983), master in Science (1989) and phd at Education (1998) all of them from Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Professor of Physics at Mau´a Institute of Technology, since 1994 and President of Teacher’s Academy of the same Instituttion.Gabriel Monesi Souza ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teacher’s perceptions of the fertility in implementing Project Based Learning in
/02602938.2020.1724875 3. Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48–62. 4. Berk, R. A. (2018). Start spreading the news: Use multiple sources of evidence to evaluate teaching. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 73-81. 5. Chism, N. V. N. (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Anker Publishing Company. 6. Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S. and Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research. The Sutton Trust. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp- content/.../What-Makes-Great-Teaching-REPORT.pdf. 7. Hoyt, D. P., & Pallett, W. H. (1999
the areas of reliability, product development, and advanced mechanical and electrical technology development. In these various roles, she established new business processes and an organizational culture that focused on developing innovative solutions from root cause understanding, improved pace of learning, and discipline in experimentation and configuration management. She was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering in 2016 for her leadership in the development of technologies to enable areal density and reliability increases in hard disk drives and was elected a National Academy of Inventors Fellow in 2018. Dr. Hipwell is currently the Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where
Higher Education, S. M. Cahn, ed., pp. 211-216, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2011.
, “On Change III: Taking Charge of Change: APrimer for Colleges and Universities,” An Occasional Paper Series of the ACE Project onLeadership and Institutional Transformation, American Council on Education Publications,1999, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED450621[4] M. Borrego, J.E. Froyd, and T.S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: asurvey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal ofEngineering Education, 99(3), 185-207, 2010.[5] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein, “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEMinstructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 48(8), 952-984, 2011.[6] J.M. Williams, E. Andrijcic, S. Mohan, C. Margherio, E
line . 10.18260/1-2- -34915[11] Parker, M.A., Ashe, D., Boersma, J., Hicks, R. and Bennett, V., 2015. Good teaching starts here: Applied learning at the Graduate Teaching Assistant Institute. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(3), pp.84-110.[12] Miller, K., Brickman, P. and Oliver, J.S., 2014. Enhancing teaching assistants'(ta s') inquiry teaching by means of teaching observations and reflective discourse. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), pp.178-190.[13] Chadha, D. and Shah, U.V., 2023, June. Work-in-Progress: Unpacking Graduate Teaching Assistants’(GTAs) Taught Practice—Exploring Training through Decisional Capital. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[14] Chadha, D
your growth/development as a facultymember might not be valued, recognized, or ‘count’ toward promotion/tenure?Q4: How could your growth/development of new knowledge/skills/abilities as a faculty memberbe re-purposed or re-packaged to more clearly communicate their value in a tenure dossier orpromotion package?ReferencesAlperin, J. P., Muñoz Nieves, C., Schimanski, L. A., Fischman, G. E., Niles, M. T., & McKiernan, E. C. (2019). How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? ELife, 8, e42254. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42254Benegal, S. D., & Scruggs, L. A. (2018). Correcting misinformation about climate change: The impact of partisanship in an experimental
recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesBhalla, N. (2019). Strategies to improve equity in faculty hiring. Molecular biology of the cell,30(22), 2744-2749. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-08-0476.Boyle, S.R., Phillips, C.M.L., Pearson, Y.E., DesRoches, R., Mattingly, S.P., Nordberg, A., Wei,W., & Rifai, H. (2020). An exploratory study of intentionality toward diversity in STEM facultyhiring. In 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/34124.DeCuir, J.T., & Dixson, A.D. (2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it isthere”: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in
finances as well aslocation of the institution. Intercity campuses face very different challenges when it comes toexpansion compared to rural campuses, and the low frequency of 1’s in the responses suggestthere might not be straightforward strategies to overcoming this obstacle.Of the 19 statements that were rated with a score of 4 or 5 with a frequency of 29% or greater,statement 48, which deals with independent access to laboratories by students, is the only onewhere no one responded with a 5. These results suggest that while independent access forstudents is a concern, it is not one of the most pressing concerns for new programs. This may betied to availability of resources related to running an academic makerspace, including differentmodels
has been added to mid-course data for the Spring 2024 semester andbeyond.References[1] R. R. Welch, "A model for instructional design," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 167-71, 2005.[2] K. Bain, What the Best College Teachers Do, Harvard University Press, 2004.[3] L. Nilson, Teaching At Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, 4th edition, Jossey-Bass, 2016.[4] J. Reeve, Understanding motivation and humand emotion (3rd ed), Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 2001.[5] W. Grove and L. Hadsell, "Incentives and student learning.," Differences, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 123-127, 2005.[6] G. G. Bear, J. C. Slaughter, L. S. Mantz and E. Farley-Ripple, "Rewards, praise, and
institution is relatively small, these young scholars arealmost invisible when compared to students, staff, and faculty at an institution [2]. There is alsono one size fits all solution for postdocs to improve in all the ways needed to becomecompetitive candidates in the highly competitive market for the tenure-track jobs less than 20%of them will eventually obtain [3]. Nowell et al.’s [3] systematic review of professional development (PD) of postdocsthoroughly examined what was and was not working for post doctoral PD. One of the areas theyidentified as an important skill postdocs wanted to learn or further develop were “grant,manuscript, and proposal writing” and improving their presentation skills. Teaching skills sawthe greatest
." National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, 2009, pp2 -7.2. J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, (2019, June), “A System Approach to Instructional Change in Academia” Paper presented ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, (Florida), USA: 2019. https://peer.asee.org/320053. M. C. Wright, “Measuring teaching effectiveness” in Advancing the Culture of Teaching on Campus: How a Teaching Center Can Make a Difference, ed. C. Cook and M. Kaplan, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2011, ch. 2, pp34-42.4. C. E. Cook and M. Marincovich. "Effective practices at research universities: the productive pairing of research and teaching," in A Guide to Faculty Development. 2nd ed. K. J. Gillespie and D. L. Robertson, San
. Christopher, ‘Self-Study as a Method for Engaging STEM Faculty in Transformative Change to Improve Teaching’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195–213, 2019.[2] E. Elliott, R. Reason, C. Coffman, E. Gangloff, J. Raker, J. Powell-Coffman, and C. Ogilvie, “Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered,” CBE Life Sci Edu., vol. 15, pp. 1-14, March 2016.[3] S. Pulford, N. Ruzycki, C. Finelli, L. Hahn, and D. Thorsen, “Making value for faculty: Learning communities in engineering faculty development,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conf. &