Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Stavros Valenti, Hofstra University; Kevin Patrick Nolan, Hofstra University; Lynn A. Albers, Hofstra University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton; Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group; Vinayak Vijayan, University of Dayton; Timothy Reissman, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #38872Work in Progress: Self-Starter Faculty Learning Community to ImplementEntrepreneurially-Minded Learning (EML) Micromoment ActivitiesDr. Erick S. Vasquez, University of Dayton Erick S. Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Dayton. He received his B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering at UCA in El Salvador. He obtained his M.S. from Clemson University and his Ph.D. from Mississippi State University, both in Chemical Engineering. His laboratory research involves nanotechnology in chemical and biological pro- cesses. His educational research

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helen Hu, Westminster College of Salt Lake City; Tricia D. Shepherd; Clifton L. Kussmaul, Green Mango Associates, LLC; Patricia B. Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

students' experience with the activities.4.5. Overall Insights of AWPThe benefits respondents listed from participating in the AWP focused on having a betterunderstanding of POGIL and more confidence in their ability to write and implement POGILin their classroom. They also appreciated getting feedback on their work and collaborating withothers in the same discipline. Specific comments included: I feel like I have a MUCH better understanding of what POGIL activities should look like and how to go about writing them. It was also great to have one fully completed POGIL activity and one that`s almost ready to be submitted. Collaborating with colleagues that are interested in the same discipline, and at times in the same

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Enakshie Prasad; Eric Marcus, University of New Haven; Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven; Joseph Smolinski

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

institution.Faculty participating in our study were asked to develop projects and course integrations that aim todevelop some aspect(s) of students EM. The final deliverable, at the conclusion of the 2-year period, isthe submission of an Engineering Unleashed Card [8]. These cards function as a combination of blog andresource-sharing website all in one page, documenting the course plans/activities with sufficient detailthat other faculty could then take the plan/activity and modify it to fit and deploy it in their own courses.Research on mentoring models for faculty developmentThere has been a growing body of research on the effectiveness of peer mentoring programs rooted insocial cognitive theories and research on influence [9]. Social cognitive theory, SCT

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mireia Perera-Gonzalez, Northeastern University; Shiaoming Shi, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

factors were attributed to the nativelanguage being English (yes/no).Results and DiscussionTable 1 Breakdown of averaged Turnitin scores for each submission (S). Turnitin Scores (%) All YES Eng NO Eng YES Biol NO Biol YES Native NO Native S #1 20 ± 19 22 ± 12 15 ± 16† 20 ± 19 23 ± 19 14 ± 12 25 ± 21† S #2 14 ± 14* 13 ± 10** 10 ± 13* 12 ± 10** 19 ± 18† 10 ± 7** 17 ± 16**,†YES/NO refers to their background in: Biol = Biological Sciences, Eng = Engineering. *,**denotes statistically significant differences (t-test) between submissions (*p<0.05, **p<0.01); †between YES and NO categories (†p<0.01

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianina Morales, University of Pittsburgh and Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile; Rene Alejandro Noel, Universidad de Valparaiso, Chile

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

also some mismatch between the declared knowledge of atool and its described practice or the instructors’ conceptions. The future inclusion of empiricaldata from observations and artifacts will give us a broader perspective to approach these questionsand arrive at conclusions on the long-term impact of our faculty development program.References[1] R. M. Felder, “Teaching engineering in the 21st century with a 12th century teachingmodel: How bright is this?,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 110–113, 2006.[2] R. Graham, Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successfulchange. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering & Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2012.[3] S. Freeman et al

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tiantian Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kristin Bartlett; Wanju Huang, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #39376Instructor Experiences Teaching Model-Based Systems Engineering OnlineModules to Professional LearnersMr. Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University, West Lafayette Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 2nd-year PhD student at Purdue University’s engineering education pro- gram. He completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of S˜ao Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in assessment instruments and engineering accreditation processes.Ms. Tiantian Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tiantian Li (Olivia) is a dedicated Ph.D. student in Engineering

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Jamieson, Miami University; Eric James Rapos, Miami University; Nathaniel Bryan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. M. Jones, “Teachers’ perceptions of a maker-centered professional development experience: A multiple case study,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 697–721, 2021.[10] S. Meyers, K. Rowell, M. Wells, and B. C. Smith, “Teacher empathy: A model of empathy for teaching for student success,” College Teaching, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 2019.[11] C. R. Rogers et al., Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Merrill,, 1969.[12] S. Slater and M. Inagawa, “Bridging cultural divides: Role reversal as pedagogy,” Journal of Teaching in International Business, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 269–308, 2019.[13] G. P. Wiggins, J. McTighe, L. J. Kiernan, and F. Frost, Understanding by

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arun R. Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; Rujun Gao, Texas A&M University; M. Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; David Christopher Seets; Emma Edoga, Texas A&M University; Luis Angel Rodriguez; Guillermo Aguilar, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

increases in hard disk drives and was elected a National Academy of Inventors Fellow in 2018. Dr. Hipwell is currently the Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. ’45 Chair II at Texas A&M University, where she has developed new classes on innovation and technology development as part of her leadership of the INVENT (INnoVation tools and Entrepreneurial New Technology) Lab. She is Co-PI on a National Science Foundation engineering education grant to develop a culture of and tools for iterative experimentation and continuous improvement in curriculum development.Dr. Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University Dr. Bergman is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and Executive Director of Interdisciplinary Critical Studies at Texas A

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veto Matthew Ray, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Katrenia Reed Hughes, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Kevin Rose; Carol Rownd

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

specifically aligned to Herzberg’s [24] motivational andhygiene factors. Additionally, future investigation should include increased stratification ofdemographics, including gender and race, to help identify the impacts that factors have onvarying groups.References[1] McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168-187.[2] Tugden, A. “On the Verge of Burnout: COVID -19’s Impact on Faculty Well-Being and Career Plans 2020,” The Chronicle for Higher Education, Washington, DC, USA, 2020. Accessed February 2023. [Online] Available: https://connect.chronicle.com/rs/931-EKA- 218/images/COVID%26FacultyCareerPaths_Fidelity_ResearchBrief_v3%20%281%29.p df[3] Coiro M.J

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Katie Mowat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

department.AcknowledgmentThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF 2027471and 2105156). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 185–207, 2010, doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2010.tb01056.x.[2] (ASEE) American Society for Engineering Education, “Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 12

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy L Brooks, Oregon State University; Jeff Knowles; Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shane A. Brown, P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

influence class activities and assignments throughout the term.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-2111052. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References [1] T. J. Lund and M. Stains, "The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 13, 2015/08/18 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8.[2] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, "Diffusion of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

) further narrowing the list down to a “short list” for an on-site, in-personinterview, 5) deciding which candidate(s) will receive an offer, and 6) negotiation. In somecases, steps three and four are skipped, and only one round of interviews is completed. The faculty hiring process is fraught with bias, including racial bias [1], gender bias inletters of recommendation [2], and search committee members seeking to hire people whoseresearch areas are most similar to their own [3]. Hiring people similar to oneself extends beyondresearch areas. Many search committees look for candidates who would be a good “fit”(generally, scientifically, programmatically) [4, 5]. However, “fit” is highly subjective and opento the evaluator’s personal biases

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renukadevi Selvaraj, The National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research (NITTTR) Chennai, India ; Subathradevi Subramoniam

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

significance of teachers’ Well-being and the use of faculty developmentprograms. Nevertheless, there lies the need for a basic approach to address the Well-being ofteachers. In regards to this review study, there are heterogenous range of programs thatsupports the Well-being of teachers.References[1] Guerriero, S. (ed.) (2017), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.[2] Williams, K.C. and Williams, C.C. (2011) “Five key ingredients for improving student motivation,” Research in Higher Education Journal.[3] Schleicher, A. (2018), Valuing our Teachers and Raising their Status: How Communities Can Help, International Summit on the Teaching

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Kayla Osen

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

forcedchange.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF 2027471and 2105156). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. of the Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111[2] G. D. Kuh, J. Kinzie, J. A. Buckley, B. K. Bridges, and J. C. Hayek. “What matters to student success: A review of the literature,” National

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

easyreference. Some will even informally map the Bloom’s Taxonomy level of their learningobjective(s) to the ACL level(s).While there is no direct assessment of the effectiveness of the mind map (remember it is not aone-size-fits-all final objective document), much evidence has been relayed to the author of itsusefulness. Workshop participants that have advanced to facilitate their own workshops (inparticular, at their own institutions) have distributed and taught from the map. It is known thatWorcester Polytechnic Institute, Western New England University, University of Dayton, andLehigh University have used the map extensively and continue to distribute it to faculty who areapplying ACL for the first time.Finally, the map has shown to be a useful

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Cribbs, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Hariharan Naganathan, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Christopher O'Neil, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Michael J D'Agostino, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Leveraging Faculty Externship to Develop New Concentrations and Specializations in Construction Management CurriculaAbstractThis "Work in Progress" paper provides insight into a viable strategy for enhancing ConstructionManagement (CM) curricula through the integration of concentration(s) and specialization(s)within program degree paths via formalized engagement of a faculty member industry residency.Ultimately, a faculty member's industry residency aims to gain familiarity and hands-onexperience utilizing cutting-edge industry trends and best practices. It requires embedding a full-time faculty member within an industry environment during a typical summer academicsemester, reducing available faculty resources for the related degree

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarira Motaref, P.E., University of Connecticut; Mousumi Roy, P.E., University of Connecticut; Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

circumstances, such as poor acoustics, room size, temperature, or aglaring blackboard, that could interfere with teaching and learning, are noted. The classobservation is completed before the end of the tenth week of the semester.Post Observation: This meeting is essential to share the observation outcomes. A post-observation form with guiding questions ensures that peer-observers follow a standardizedprocess. Faculty members also ask their own questions to the peer-observer(s). The discussioninvolves sharing notes and comments with the instructor, highlighting the positive aspects of theinstructions, and providing suggestions to further improve the quality of teaching. Either thecommittee member or the instructor may bring up any issue that needs

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 9

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Gregory Mason, P.E., zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitiveDr. Gregory Mason, P.E., zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Gregory S. Mason received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. de- gree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digitalDr. Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University Professor Teodora Rutar Shuman is the Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle Uni- versity. She is the PI on a NSF-RED grant. Her research

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Hadley Perkins, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mentorscounts as mentoring when she shares, “…part of their recommendation as a mentor is that[classroom strategy] increases your [student evaluations] a lot… so, I guess that's a form ofmentorship." She recalls times of receiving help and affirmation, stating, “ [Another] professorjust in passing [said], ‘yeah, I have lab get-togethers,’ and I said, ‘yeah, I do that too.’” Here shecontinues to be uncertain whether these interactions were mentorship when she adds, “I don’tknow if that counts.” Blake seems more confident identifying non-relational forms ofmentorship, saying that she “Google [s] about it a lot, so it’s like the hive mind of mentorship(laughs), and [she goes] to workshops [that are] not really like one-on-one, but kindaprogrammatic

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K.S.A. Dinesh Kumar, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India; Janardhanan Gangathulasi, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India; Shanmuganeethi Velu, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #38908Empowering Faculty Members through Mooc in Techno-Pedagogical Con-tentDr. K.S.A. Dinesh Kumar, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research, Chennai, India Dr. K. S. A. Dinesh Kumar, M. E., Ph.D. is presently Professor of Civil Engineering at National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research (NITTTR) Chennai, Government of India. He has coordinated more than 150 training programmes for National participants and 06 International programmes in the area of Technology Enabled Teaching Learning, Student Assessment and Evaluation, Instructional Design and Delivery system

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff Knowles, Oregon State University; Amy L. Brooks, Oregon State University; Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Shane A. Brown, P.E., Oregon State University; Mustafa Aljabery, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

choices and functionalities of all the available options.Having a one-on-one consultation appointment, in which a CTL advisor walks through ashortened list of alternatives could make the process more palatable to faculty.Considering participant P46’s experiences, another proposed avenue for combatting resource-related barriers to EBIP implementation is training at a graduate level. It is not uncommon inPhD or Master’s programs for students to take on graduate teaching assistant positions. Thisexperience is often considered as preparation for holding an academic position in highereducation. Therefore, it is reasonable at this stage for graduate students to be exposed to EBIPsthrough some form of training. This type of coaching may prepare

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Ziminski, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. 5, no. 1, pp. 37-52, 2003.[14] L. Malcom, and S. Malcom, “The double bind: The next generation,” Harvard EducationalReview, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 162-172, 2011.[15] M. Wyer, “Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender asinfluences on persistence among science and engineering majors,” Journal of Women andMinorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, 2003.[16] S. V. Brown, “The preparation of minorities for academic careers in science andengineering: How well are we doing,” Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientificenterprise, pp. 239-269, 2000.[19] Y. J. Xu, “The experience and persistence of college students in STEM majors,” Journal ofCollege Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University; Julianne L. Holloway, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mentoring program for juniorfaculty: Recommendations for practice. In To improve the academy, vol. 16, editedby D. DeZure. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press and the ProfessionalOrganizational Development Network in Higher Education[4] Schlosser, L. Z., S. Knox, A. R. Moskovitz, and C. E. Hill. 2003. A qualitativeexamination of graduate advising relationships: The advisee perspective. Journal ofCounseling Psychology 50(2):178–188.[5] Matthews, K., (2014) Perspectives on Midcareer Faculty and Advice forSupporting Them. Cambridge, MA: Collaborative on Academic Careers inHigher Education White Paper.[6] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019. TheScience of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University; Lani Draper, Texas A&M University; Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University; Sandra R. Childers, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

development", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.25 No. 1, pp. 5-32. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614 [Accessed April 10,2023]. [4] Kaya, N., Aydın, S. ve Durgut, S. (2016). Training performance evaluation using the360-degree feedback method. 19th EBES Conference. s. 623-628. [Online] Available:http://acikerisim.maltepe.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12415/2875 [Accessed February 28, 2023]. [5] Phuong, T.T., Foster, M.J. and Reio, T.G., Jr (2020), Faculty Development: ASystematic Review of Review Studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human ResourceDevelopment, 32: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20294 [Accessed February 10, 2023] [6] Draper, L. (2022, August), “Lessons Learned: Boosting Faculty

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Edward Latorre-Navarro, University of Florida; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shams El-Adawy, Kansas State University ; Christopher A. F. Hass; Eugene Y. Vasserman, Kansas State University; Mary Bridget Kustusch, DePaul University; Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology; Eleanor C. Sayre, Kansas State University and Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,” International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL), 2022. https://issotl.com/ (accessed Dec. 09, 2022).[6] P. Young, “Generic or discipline‐specific? An exploration of the significance of discipline‐specific issues in researching and developing teaching and learning in higher education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 115–124, Feb. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525887.[7] A. Jenkins, “Discipline‐based educational development,” Int. J. Acad. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 1996, doi: 10.1080/1360144960010106.[8] S. V. Chasteen and R. Chattergoon, “Insights from the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop: How do new physics

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Boni Frances Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adam Steinberg; Carol Subiño Sullivan, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lance Matthew Crawford

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ha Pho, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Hsien-Yuan Hsu, University of Massachusetts Lowell

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, Three magic letters: Getting to Ph. D. JHU Press, 2006.[2] L. Lunsford, "Doctoral advising or mentoring? Effects on student outcomes," Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 251-270, 2012.[3] L. L. Paglis, S. G. Green, and T. N. Bauer, "Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes," Research in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 451-476, 2006.[4] J. Muschallik and K. Pull, "Mentoring in higher education: Does it enhance mentees’ research productivity?," Education Economics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 210-223, 2016.[5] K. Levecque, F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and L. Gisle, "Work organization and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 8

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ben Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Curtiss Larry Davis II, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Daniel Tetteh-Richter; Kay C. Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, vol. 32, no. 4, 2000.[6] S. L. Johnson, "Community college leadership in the age of technology," Leadership Abstracts, vol. 10, no. 5, 1997.[7] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed., New York: The Free Press, 1995.[8] M. Jacobson, "Examining Technology Adoption Patterns by Faculty in Higher Education," in Proceedings of ACEC2000: Learning Technologies, Teaching and the Future of Schools, Melbourne, Australia, 2000.[9] P. Kopfer, "Teachers’ perspectives on dealing with students’ errors," Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, 2022.[10] A. Havnes, K. Smith, O. Dysthe and K. Ludvigsen, "Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible," Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 21-27, 2012.[11] J