Something I heard about through ELATE Other Something I heard about through teaching and learning services 0 2 4 6 8 10 Number of responses Figure 1. Motivation of faculty for applying for a TLIF project.The top reasons to apply for funding were to try something new in teaching followed by findingways to enhance student learning. Other reasons included adopting new assessment platforms,developing new teaching materials, and creating virtual or on-line laboratory
. David C. Mays, University of Colorado Denver David Mays is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver. He earned his B.S. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995, then taught high school through Teach for America and worked as a contractor at Los Alamos National Laboratory before earning his M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of California Berkeley in 1999 and 2005, respectively. He has been at CU Denver since 2005, where he teaches fluid mechanics and hydrology, studies flow in porous media using ideas from complex systems science, leads the graduate track in Hydrologic, Environmental, and Sustainability Engineering (HESE), and advocates for broadening
experiences in introductory STEM courses, student learning in the chemistry teaching laboratory, and faculty professional development related to teaching.Charles Ruggieri, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyCorey Ptak, Columbia University in the City of New YorkStacey Blackwell, Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyGabriel Lopez Zenarosa, Stony Brook University Gabriel Zenarosa (he/him) is an Associate Professor of Practice at the College of Business at Stony Brook University. He has over seven years of higher-education teaching experience and holds an ACUE Certificate in the Effective Teaching Practice Framework. He also has over eight years of industry experience, working as a software quality assurance test
engineering concepts such asthermodynamics and mechanics who had cited that their methods of delivery are based onexperience and the general situation of student's receptiveness in learning. As Alfred noted,“Teaching thermodynamics is about understanding core principles; AI doesn’t change that.”Others in the Sciences fields have stated that with technological progression, AI image analysingsoftware and tools have been integrated for practical laboratory sessions, providing students witha better visualisation of their analysis. As Edward remarked, “For practical lab sessions, AI helpsstudents visualize their analysis better,” illustrating AI’s role in enhancing experimental learningexperiences. Non-STEM instructors were more open to AI’s role in
Engineering Education, 2025Challenges and strategies of STEM instructors in adopting active learning: Insights from aHand-search of International Journal of STEM EducationAbstractThe literature review was conducted to synthesize the challenges and strategies faced bySTEM instructors in adopting active learning, drawing on 42 empirical studies publishedbetween 2014 and 2024 in the International Journal of STEM Education. Active learningrefers to evidence‐based, student‐centered teaching methods that engage learners throughindividual or group activities, yet it remains underutilized in STEM higher education despitewell‐documented benefits. This conference paper presents the preliminary results of thisliterature review project, including the nature of
and assessment practices. This paper aims to systematically review how engineeringfaculty engage with AI tools and practices to support and transform engineering education. Bysynthesizing existing research, we provide insights that can inform educators, curriculumdesigners, and researchers on emerging trends, opportunities, and challenges in AI adoptionwithin the engineering context.While AI has existed for over six decades, recent exponential advancements in its capabilitieshave driven a significant shift in how it is perceived and utilized, especially in academiccontexts. AI is increasingly being integrated into pedagogy, shaping assessment practices andenabling new instructional approaches to enhance teaching and learning in educational
Paper ID #47416Lessons Learned from Helping Faculty ”Make the Pivot” to New ResearchAreas through a Community of PracticeStephanos Matsumoto, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Stephanos (Steve) Matsumoto is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Olin College of Engineering. His research interests are in computing education, particularly in how to incorporate better software engineering practices when teaching computing in undergraduate STEM courses.Dr. Zachary Riggins Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Zachary del Rosario is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and
Gerhart, Ph.D. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is a Fellow of the Engineering Society of Detroit and is actively involved in ASEE and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, director of IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Design and Entrepreneurial Applications Sequence), chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem
Practices Research into effective mentoring practices reveals that successful mentoring programsshare key components, including structured training for both faculty mentors and students alongwith adequate resources including funding and research space. In the current study, the process ofimplementing effective mentorship is broken down into planning and execution phases. During UR mentoring, faculty mentors are involved in a broad range of activities, as notedby Brace et al. [18]. These include setting project expectations and timelines, introducing studentsto laboratory settings, discussing career opportunities, managing resources, teaching scientificresearch methods, holding weekly progress meetings, guiding students to prepare
), Executive Director for Gulf Coast Environmental Equity Center (GCEEC), Director for the Solid Waste Sustainability Hub, Director for the Gulf Coast Center for Addressing Microplastics Pollution (GC-CAMP), and Director for the Sustainable Asphalt Materials Laboratory, as well as the founding faculty advisor for the Society of Sustainable Engineering. He teaches a mixture of undergraduate and graduate engineering courses. Dr. Wu is a committee member for Transportation Research Board (TRB) AJE35 and AKM 90, a member of American Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and Academy of Pavement Science and Engineering (APSE), as well as an editorial member for Journal of Testing