Paper ID #25055Testing a Reflective Judgement Scale for Suitability with First-Year StudentReflective ResponsesMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking as aids to enhanced student
Paper ID #23700Work in Progress: Students’ Reflection Quality and Effective Team Member-shipMs. Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette Saira Anwar is a second-year Ph.D. student at School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. Be- fore joining the doctoral program, she had the masters degree in computer science and had served for about eight years as assistant professor in a university at Pakistan. She has taught several courses in com- puter programming and software engineering. She received various awards for her teaching at Pakistan and was also awarded the Outstanding Teacher Award 2013 from Forman
Paper ID #12671Why Think about Learning? The Value of Reflective Learning in First YearEngineering DesignMrs. Natalie CT Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines Natalie Van Tyne is a Teaching Associate Professor at Colorado School of Mines, where she teaches first and second year engineering design as foundation courses for CSM’s thirteen undergraduate degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learning and critical thinking as aids to enhanced student learning.Dr. M Brunhart-Lupo
Paper ID #12234Assessing first-year students’ ability to critically reflect and build on theirteam experiencesDr. Nick Tatar, Olin College of Engineering Nick Tatar, Associate Dean of Student Affairs and Instructor of Education: Dr. Tatar received his PhD from the University of New Hampshire where he focused on student learning and student motivation dur- ing the high school to college transition. He initiated and developed a first-year seminar course at Olin College, a course that focuses on working in teams, diversity, and self-directed learning. He enjoys collab- orating with other faculty members in the classroom and
Paper ID #28530First-Year Engineering Students’ Interpretation of Curiosity in theEntrepreneurial Mindset Through Reflective PracticeCourtney A. LeMasney, Rowan University Courtney LeMasney is a second-year undergraduate at Rowan University pursuing a B.S. in Chemical En- gineering. During her time there, she has been awarded the Kupersmith and John D Cook III scholarship awards, and has expressed increased interest in fire protection and materials engineering.Hayley M. Shuster, Rowan University Hayley Shuster is a sophomore engineering student pursuing a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at Rowan University. She
2006-1362: THE SHOW MUST GO ON - REFLECTIONS ON THE PURSUIT OFENGINEERING THROUGH INTER-DISCIPLINARY DESIGN CHALLENGESBenjamin Kidd, University of Virginia Benjamin holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, also from the University of Virginia. His current research involves a project called "ecoMOD", a collaborative effort between the University's Engineering and Architecture schools to design and build energy efficient affordable housing. Benjamin is also the recipient of the 2004-2005 Outstanding GTA Award for the Electrical Engineering Department, and a recipient of the All-University Teaching Assistant Award. His interests include Amateur Radio (Call sign KG4EIF), stage lighting, pyrotechnics
2006-1278: USING REFLECTIVE ESSAYS AS PART OF A MIXED METHODAPPROACH FOR EVALUATING A FRESHMAN LIVING-LEARNINGCOMMUNITY FOR ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE STUDENTSJennifer Light, University of Washington Jennifer Light is a 2005 Ph.D. graduate in Engineering Education from Washington State University and was recently awarded a National Academy of Engineering post doctoral appointment with the University of Washington Center for Engineering Education. She is the author of several publications on engineering learning communities and assessment.Laura Girardeau, Washington State University Laura Girardeau, M.S., is a Learning Designer at Washington State University’s Center for Teaching, Learning, and
Paper ID #13336A reflection on the process of selecting, developing, and launching a new de-sign project in a large-scale introduction to engineering design courseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes
Paper ID #14864Utility of Post-Hoc Audio Reflection to Expose Metacognition and StrategyUse by First-Year Engineering Students for Different Problem TypesMs. Heidi Cian, Clemson University Heidi Cian is a PhD student enrolled in Clemson University’s Curriculum and Instruction program with a concentration in science education. Heidi is a former high school biology and anatomy teacher.Dr. Michelle Cook, Clemson University Michelle Cook is an Associate Professor of Science Education in the Eugene T. Moore School of Educa- tion at Clemson University.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of
cycle of activity in four areas that supports individual and collaborativeself-directed learning and metacognitive processing. The model emphasizes reflection,evaluation, and integration while individuals design their learning, engage with resources tosupport individual study or learning in a community of practice [3], develop practices or projectsto integrate conceptual into applied knowledge with an iterative cycle of quality improvement[4], and engage in practices to increase awareness of and synthesize learning. Having completedone course through the cycle, learners synthesize and enhance awareness of their knowledgethrough curating their learning narrative in an ePortfolio [5].After evaluating student and instructor feedback over the past
productively withengineering design practices while using a CAD software in a group setting in a classroomenvironment. Existing research has classified students as mostly beginning designers or informeddesigners. The data collected are reflections written by 10 students in an introductory designcourse, one reflection after working individually in a design of an energy efficient house andanother after working as part of a team on the same problem. The data were analyzed using asconceptual framework the informed design teaching and learning matrix developed by Crismondand Adams. Findings suggest the presence of a continuum consisting of four levels and highlightthe shift in students’ design practices towards higher expertise levels after using the
, Searle Center for Advancing Learning and Teaching Susanna Calkins, PhD is the Director of Faculty Initiatives and the Senior Associate Director of the Searle Center for Advancing Learning and Teaching at Northwestern University. She is co-author of two books, Reflective Teaching (Bloomsbury Press, 2020) and Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional ( Sage, 2009). She has also co-authored over thirty articles related to conceptions and approaches to teaching, the assessment of learning, program evaluation, mentoring, and has been a co-PI on several NSF grants. She also teaches in the Masters of Higher Education Administration Program at Northwestern.Dr. Lisa M. Davidson, Northwestern
) as an assessment tool for their Introduction toEngineering course sequence. While each year the ePortfolio assignments have expanded, theyhave been focused largely in three types of reflections: (1) student experiences within the collegebut outside of the course, (2) the skills gained specifically through course projects, and (3) theirfour year plan to be a successful engineering student as defined by the ABET a-k criteria.ePortfolio assignments were initially included to allow students to reflect on their education,develop evidence of their blossoming skills, and take control of their graduation plan. After thefirst year of practice, there was a clear secondary benefit to the faculty and student advisors.Anecdotally, student reflections
framework to guide and help students reflect on their thinking. InFall 2014, faculty sought to enhance and expand critical thinking instruction in the course byproviding students with more meaningful opportunities to apply the framework. Several writtenassignments for this course were crafted around the Grand Challenges. The purpose of theseassignments was two-fold. First, students would have meaningful opportunities to develop theircritical thinking skills by analyzing current engineering issues. Second, it was hoped thatstudents would gain an awareness of engineers’ roles in the global community by exposure to theGrand Challenges.Student written assignments were assessed for their demonstration of critical thinking ability andintegration of the
which all engineering freshmen work on real design projects for real clients.Prof. Adam GoodmanMs. Koshonna Brown, Northwestern University Center for Leadership Koshonna Brown is a Life Science doctoral student at Northwestern University. As a fellow with North- western University’s Center for Leadership, she analyzes the date collected through the Center’s online assessment tools. Such assessments allow students and faculty to reflect and develop their own leadership and apply lessons and insights gained to current leadership challenges and positions. Page 24.1048.1 c American
-disciplinary courses and concepts, and providing learning opportunities for students toconnect, integrate, and synthesize knowledge (8).Two underlying assumptions are at play when considering how integrative learning takes place:(1) students do not naturally integrate, or translate, their experiences to novel complex issues orchallenges (9); (2) how a student integrates knowledge across contexts and over time takes work,and is unlikely to occur without commitment from the educational institution (8). The mostprominent pedagogies of integration include service-learning, problem-based learning,collaborative learning, and experiential learning (10). What is essential to each of thesepedagogies is the practice of reflection; “these pedagogies necessitate
purposes of this analysis, weconsider the outcomes to be recommendations we would make to others because they representthe tangible and transferable outcomes. Autoethnography is a research methodology thatanalyzes a phenomenon through the use of self-narratives, which would otherwise remain privateor buried [3]. This approach enables us to share the combined but individual experiences of theprofessors of practice that completed the curriculum restructuring situated within the context ofwork.Theoretical FrameworkOur study is guided by the central constructs in the Interconnected Model of Teacher Growth [4].While this model focuses on the individual growth of the teacher, it is also a relevant perspectivefor reflecting on instructor engagement with
Paper ID #19581A Sea of Variations: Lessons Learned from Student Feedback about the Roleof Trust in First-year Design TeamsMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking as aids to enhanced
to become familiar with a number of personal and professional strategies for successwithin the structure of the learning strategies course. The goal of the peer sharing presentations isto provide students with the opportunity to explore evidence-based practices and share theirfindings with peers. The peer sharing presentation process includes students selecting a strategy,learning about the selected strategy, creating a set of informative and engaging slides, presentingtheir findings to peers, and reflecting on their peers’ presentations. Through this process, the peersharing presentations are an innovative way for students to engage as active learners in thecollaborative construction of new knowledge.The effectiveness of peer sharing
program’s learning strategies course employed a three-pronged approach towardsusing the LASSI. First, students took the assessment online at the beginning and end of thesemester. Second, students were prompted to reflect on their pre-intervention scores throughstructured reflection assignments at three points throughout the semester. Third, students weresupported by several campus resources in interpreting and improving their performance acrossthe ten LASSI dimensions. The following paragraphs detail these interconnected approaches ingreater depth.Students completed the 3rd Edition of the LASSI [6] once at the outset of the semester and oncemore at its conclusion. Students took the LASSI online, with the first administration due at theend of the
types of service opportunities they resonate with the most, see how toconnect with the surrounding community, and be able to reflect on their experiences and see thevalue of service. The course meets the ABET Criterion 5 by broadening of the role engineeringcan make in the world and seeing engineering as service, by planting a seed for seeingopportunities for lifelong learning and engaging the community.There are three major assignments to meet the course requirement. The first assignment is to readfirst two chapters of ‘Service Learning: Engineering In Your Community’1 by Marybeth Lima,PhD and William C. Oakes, PhD, PE. The first two chapters lay out the detailed linkage betweenengineering and service learning. After the reading assignment the
increasing first year students’ understandingof diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) issues without impacting the overall learning outcomesof the course. These changes included: ● Creation of a pre-class/-lab assignment ● In-class/-lab discussions ● Collaborative creation of team and Class/Lab RulesAt the core of these course additions were case studies related to diversity and inclusion issuespresented at the STEM diversity forum. Students were tasked to read the case studies, reflect onquestion prompts and submit their ideas towards the creation of team or class rules that could beput in place to prevent the situation or what action they would take if they witness similarsituations on their own team or another team. This approach of
retention of information; most universityengineering classes are still primarily lecture based. Therefore, students are oblivious to thebenefits of the methods and thus are resistant to the learning approaches. The method employed toaid this problem was developing a series of worksheets that use IBL strategies to introduceintroductory engineering material. Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of this approachwas conducted by comparing summative exams and real-time feedback of student thoughts usinga daily in-class reflection. Preliminary analysis of the exam comparison and student reflections ispromising. From reflections, the majority of the students filled out the statement sections of thereflection sheet. Fewer students filled out the
. While the basic assignment has remained the same each year, the application haschanged in some way each year. In 2012, four regularly scheduled class sessions were cancelledto provide additional time for students to attend or reflect on their events. Students wereprovided a list of possible events to attend and regular announcements were made of appropriateevents that were being hosted around the university. Based on student feedback from the firstyear’s offering, along with the recognition that the cancelled classes provided additionalopportunities to bring in exploration content (and that some students, due to other constraints,could attend only activities during normal class times), the second year offering was modified.The first-year
, retain, andprepare students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields to addresschallenges facing the 21st Century. This paper describes a method for integrating behavioralinstinct learning modules into freshman engineering classes. The method includes an onlineinstinct assessment, in-class activities created to illustrate instinctive behavior related toengineering tasks, practicing awareness through class projects, and reflective writing toencourage students to critically think about this awareness for future classes, activities, andcareers. The effectiveness of the methods described herein will be evaluated through the use ofsurveys, reflective essays, and interviews with faculty and students. The assessments have
engineeringdegree, and whether a student have chosen an engineering discipline to pursue. Several surveysadministered at strategic time points during the semester were used to track level of interest inpursuing engineering and to identify key events that can be consider as precursors to leavingengineering. Reflection essays were also employed to understand how the first semesterexperience affects student’s perception of engineering as a career of choice.An analysis of entrance surveys indicated a high level of interest in pursuing an engineeringdegree in most students surveyed. Key events, such as their first calculus test, triggeredindecision in some of the students. Early results identified a group of students at risk of leavingengineering during the
-longcalculus course.Entangled Learning [2] provides the pedagogical framework for the learning strategies course.The pedagogy is an action-based metacognitive framework for individual and collective self-directed learning. The active processes of Entangled Learning, “design,” “learn,” “apply,” and“know,” are informed by cycles of documenting, self-regulating, critically reflecting, integrating,and collaborating. Course activities and assignments scaffold learning through these actions.Most of the assignments are learning journal activities for which students identify adevelopmental behavior. Students identify a resource that will inform their decisions onchanging their behavior or conceptual understanding, engage with and document their activity
paired with a “student ambassador”. For Cohort1 Scholars (recruited for Fall 2018), student ambassadors consisted of academically successfuljuniors and seniors who were also leaders of professional societies. These Cohort 1 Scholars will,in turn, serve as student ambassadors for Cohort 2 Scholars (to be recruited for Fall 2019). Underthe mentorship of student ambassadors, the Scholars take part in a variety of daily activitiesincluding a moderated reflection session at the end of each day.The program is structured as follows: It takes place during the summer prior to entering college. It spans two full weeks, from Sunday through the second Saturday. Each Scholar is paired with a student ambassador throughout the course of the program
students.To understand how students’ initial information-seeking behavior evolved in our first-yearengineering-communications course, we conducted a pedagogical reflective case study of our279 students in thirteen sections of the course. We assessed the students’ initial information-seeking behavior with a pre-research task, a librarian delivered training in source-evaluationstrategies to accommodate students’ uses of diverse source types, students created a final projectin which they investigated a real engineering problem and proposed future design work toaddress that problem, and we evaluated the final projects to determine whether the students hadused credible sources and whether they had improved their use of such sources in the course.Some of
experience also asks the freshmen to consider diverse perspectives as theydesign for the targeted populations. The paper describes the project implementation and presentsresults from student reflections and from a survey. Lessons learned and recommendations forbest practices are also presented.Freshmen Year Context and ObjectivesDuring the 2010-2011 academic year the department of Mechanical Engineering at CaliforniaPolytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly) began a process of redesigning thefreshmen year experience for its incoming Mechanical Engineering students. At Cal Polystudents enter the university with a declared major and begin taking major courses their firstquarter. The department is large, with 180-240 incoming freshmen