of retention change throughout the firsttwo years of an engineering program and predictors of graduation vary across universities. 3Tinto’s 4 Student Integration Theory posits that students enter university with varied backgroundcharacteristics and goal commitments which in turn influences their integration into theinstitution’s environment and thus their performance in college. “Given individualcharacteristics, prior experiences, and commitments, … it is the individual’s integration into theacademic and social systems of the college that most directly relates to his continuance in thatcollege” (p. 96).A summer program represents a transition for targeted students who have been admitted to auniversity for the fall semester. Programs
difficulties caused by requiring students to enter calculus in their first semester have led tothe creation of several programs aimed at alleviating the hardship. One method presented byKlingbeil et al.3 reworks the curriculum to eliminate the need for calculus until the sophomoreyear through the addition of an engineering mathematics course. This solution does little toaddress the disparity among students and requires a multi-department, multi-college initiative toimplement. Thus, the implementation of this solution would be difficult at best. Anotherpopular method for addressing this issue is implementing a summer bridge program to eliminatedeficiencies in mathematical preparedness among incoming first-year students. These programsare a particularly
development of engineering community relate to the educational process.21 Others,such as race, gender, and interest in other fields depend on a particular student.22,23,24Engineering identity and self-efficacy are the factors that are influenced both by an individualstudent and the educational process.24,13 The first year curriculum is where many universitiesstart tackling all of these retention-related factors.4,25,26,27 Developing experiences in the first yearthat actively engage the student in learning, such as an integrated curriculum, updated teachingmethods, or a cornerstone course, can be used to counteract attrition by improving theeducational process and addressing issues related to student specific variables.28,29,30,31,32Educational
AC 2007-2076: EXPANDING UNDERSTANDING OF FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENT RETENTION AND TEAM EFFECTIVENESSTHROUGH SOCIAL STYLES ASSESSMENTDaniel Knight, University of Colorado at Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program and Laboratory. He holds a BS in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, he gained extensive experience in assessment and teamwork in an engineering education context through the development and evaluation of a
to working at NMSU, John worked at New Mexico’s first Early College High school and helped develop the curriculum for their STEM program, he also has 14 years’ experience in the Civil Engineering Industry. John Ross has a BS in Civil Engineering, and a MA in Agriculture and Extension Education with an emphasis in technology, both from New Mexico State University. Page 26.1461.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Teaching a college-wide Introductory Engineering Course within a Freshmen Year Experience College of
to the first-year engineering curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1653, 2001.3. Jacquez, R. B., Auzenne, M., Green, S., and Burnham, C., “Building a foundation for pre-calculus engineering freshmen through an integrated learning community,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1549, 2005.4. Hinds, T., Wolff, T., Buch, N., Idema, A. and Helman, C., “Integrating a first-year engineering program with a living-learning community,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2009- 1922, 2009.5. Manuel-Dupont, S., “Writing-across-the-curriculum in an engineering program,” Journal of Engineering
that may include science, mathematics, general education, and introductoryengineering requirements. In a review of over 1,800 ABET EAC-accredited programs with anintroductory course sequence, Chen (2014) identified 1,651 engineering programs that offer a 2-term suggested introductory course sequence, representing 88% of the accredited programs witha first-year curriculum. Of those 1,651 programs, 16% require or recommend an engineeringcourse in the first term and 17% require an engineering course in the second term. Consideringall of the two-term institutions further, Chen determined that approximately 95% of engineeringcourse credit in those programs is mandatory for students to complete. The engineering coursescould be classified as “general
: a) the differences in the demands of theengineering curriculum compared to other college majors5; b) the types of students who chooseto study engineering 6,7,8; and c) a belief that factors affect engineering students’ performanceand persistence decisions differently than non-engineering students9. Studies in engineering retention have been influenced by factors from the collegeretention literature. These factors include pre-entry characteristics such as skills and abilities10,11family background12, institutional experiences13,14, and finances15. While research in collegeretention has focused on integration into the university, research in engineering retention hasfocused more on integration into the engineering culture16
access, which in turn may lead to widedifferences in the quality and complexity of physical prototypes. There is a clear need for FYEengineering design curriculum that affords students an opportunity for hands-on, open-endedprototyping in an online-only setting.In this paper, we introduce a novel hands-on, mechanically-oriented product design module,called UDGears, which could be offered with fidelity in FYE engineering courses in acompletely online course setting. The UDGears curriculum was designed for a large-enrollmentcourse format but can be scaled to fit any class size. The curriculum addresses financial,material, and student safety constraints inherent to FYE courses of any size enrollment whilealso presenting students with a substantive
A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on stu- dent perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She was selected to participate in the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Frontiers of Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education
curriculum.2-5 Ingeneral, women and underrepresented minority students are less likely to persist in engineering.6Reports also indicate that the persistence of women and underrepresented minority students inengineering may be adversely affected to a greater degree by their experiences within theengineering climate than their majority male counterparts. Here “climate” indicates perceptions ofstudent belonging and interpersonal interactions between student peers, students and faculty (bothin and out of the classroom), and individual compatibility with pedagogical styles in theirclasses.2,7 An undesirable climate also has the greatest impact on student retention in the first yearsof engineering study.8 Most students who leave engineering do so within
Environment at Arizona State University.Mrs. Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21161 Lindy Hamilton Mayled is a PhD candidate at Grand Canyon University. She is pursuing her PhD in Psychology of Learning, Education, and Technology. Her background in in K-12 education where she has served as a high school science teacher, Instructional and Curriculum Coach, and Assistant Principal. Her research and areas of interest are in improving STEM educational outcomes for Low-SES students through the integration of active learning and
in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1999.4. F. E. Weber, R. M. Bennett, J. H. Forrester, P. G. Klukken, J. R. Parsons, C. D. Pionke, W. Schleter, J. E. Seat, andJ. L. Yoder, “The ENGAGE Program: Results from Renovating the First Year Experience at the University ofTennessee,” presented at 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2000.5. D. Barrow, B. Bassichis, D. DeBlassie, L. Everett, P. Imbrie, and M. Whiteacre, “An Integrated FreshmanEngineering Curriculum, Why You Need It and How to Design It.”http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/journalpapers/fie95/3c12.pdf (accessed 11/28/07).6. J. Parker, D. Cordes, and Richardson J., “Engineering Design in the Freshman Year at the University of
attractingand retaining engineering talent with a range of specialties in narrowly defined fields. “Instead ofthe traditional engineering disciplines, these operations require engineering generalists with astrong theoretical background, broad knowledge in a range of areas, and specific skills inproblem solving to give them a sound but flexible base for managing and implementingtechnology change and operations.”1 East Carolina University initiated a bachelor’s degreeprogram in general engineering (BSE) to fill this requirement. The BSE curriculum isimplemented “through a concept and program identified as the Integrated CollaborativeEngineering Educational Environment, or ICE3 (pronounced “ice cube”). The ICE3 program…emphasizes a broad but highly
admitted to a university engineering program. Feedback fromthat initial deployment will drive enhancements to be incorporated in subsequent, and moreexpansive, distributions of the products (courses).As referenced previously, these college preparatory courses are an integral and foundationalelement of a larger enhancement strategy for the secondary school to first-year collegeengineering transition space. To build on the benefit of the pre-teaching activity provided bythese college preparatory courses, college instructors will need to “stimulate recall of priorlearning” (Gagne event number 3) [8, p. 248] in their lessons. Further reinforcement occurs withthe embedding of basic skills development in the college curriculum [9]. Looking to the
is the James F. Naylor, Jr. Endowed Professor and the Program Chair for Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. He received his B.S. from Louisiana Tech and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Georgia Tech. His research interests include trenchless technology and engineering education.Kelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Kelly Crittenden received his BS and PhD in BioMedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 1996 and 2001 respectively. He is often involved in multidisciplinary work at Louisiana Tech, either through the Integrated Engineering Curriculum or through the IMPaCT (Innovation through Multidisciplinary Projects and Collaborative Teams) program. He is
one of the orientation courses is required by all students in the CoE.Since the creation of these orientation courses, evaluations and student surveys have beenregularly assessed to continuously improve curriculum and better meet the needs of the differenttypes of incoming students.Undergraduate studies in both the United States and Canada have shown that students with peer-and near-peer mentoring supports are more heavily engaged in their academic curricula and aremore socially integrated into engineering-related programs than those students without mentors.1-6 Student evaluations in both the freshman and transfer sections at the University of Oklahomareflect that the mentorship techniques that are currently in place not only encourage
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Aksense: A General-Purpose Wireless Controlling & Monitoring Device for Teaching First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMS DIVISION CALL FOR PAPERS1. AbstractThis Work-in-Progress paper describes the integration of Aksense, a low-cost general-purpose wireless controlling and monitoring device, within the first-yearmultidisciplinary Introduction to Engineering at Sonoma State University. Our focus inthis project has been creating an affordable educational open source wireless platformthat enables first-year engineering and non-engineering students with any background todesign their own engaging
: Creating a First-Year Culture with a Multi-Faceted ApproachAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper presents an update of analysis and observations in arequired first-year engineering curriculum at Northeastern University, which is a medium-sized,private, urban university. A curricula redesign resulted in a “cornerstone to capstone” approachwith a pilot program rolled out to 2 sections of a first-year engineering course in the Fall of 2014.The goal of this cornerstone approach was to integrate design, programming, graphicalcommunication, and engineering analysis previously taught in two separate first-yearengineering courses by creating an 8 credit hour, 14 week course that focuses on real world,hands-on design
, Learning Outcomes, Project-based Learning (PBL).1. IntroductionThe role of introductory courses in engineering is commonly acknowledged to be extremelyimportant for student engagement as well as retention.4 The introductory courses in engineeringgenerally serve the purpose of raising student awareness about engineering careers and theengineering curriculum while trying to excite and motivate them by using hands-on activities,projects, etc. The core learning objectives of the introductory courses involve activities thatentail application and understanding rather than higher level cognitive outcomes involving Page 24.854.2design and analysis. An
are tightly integrated;writing and presentation assignments in 103 and 104 support lectures and lab content from 111and 112. The 103 and 104 courses meet in small sections only, with about 32 students persection. The 111 and 112 courses have both a large lecture section (with all ~300 students),and also small lab sections, again with approximately 24 students per section.Figure 1. Overview of freshman engineering curriculum at Binghamton UniversityThe main intent of these WTSN courses is to expose students directly to hands-on engineering intheir first year of college, as well as to help them make a more informed decision as to whichengineering major to select. As has been noted in several studies 3-7 it is believed that the highattrition
I can succeed in an engineering curriculum.0.814 0.188 18 I will succeed (earn an A or B) in my math courses.0.826 0.170 0.133 19 I will succeed (earn an A or B) in my physics courses.0.702 0.150 20 I will succeed (earn an A or B) in my chemistry courses.0.765 0.291 0.204 21 I will succeed (earn an A or B) in my engineering courses.Group 2: Satisfaction with Engineering, Sense of Fit At the present time, I am satisfied with my decision to0.343 0.567 0.231 14 study engineering. At the present time, I feel confident that I will keep
and to better appreciate the concrete applications of their engineering education. 3.1 Computational Method with MATLAB and C++ Application This topic in the SEE program provided students with some fundamental knowledge of engineering analysis and programming using both MATLAB and C++. Students were introduced to topics with application to engineering problems, such as Taylor Series, finite difference, root determination, complex number, and numerical integration. Both MATLAB and C++ were presented to students as a computing tool to generate results and investigate behavior in an engineering system. Through both computational and programming (MATLAB and C++) sessions, students were introduced to the following computational processes
… One School at a Time. Penguin Books, New York, NY, 2006.14. Michigan Technological University Reading as Inquiry, http://www.hu.mtu.edu/SummerReading/, accessed: January 19, 2009.15. Central Asia Institute, “Pennies for Peace”, http://www.penniesforpeace.org/home.html, accessed: January 19, 2009.16. Creighton, L., “An Earth Friendly Curriculum,” PRISM, January 2003, pgs. 42-43.17. Kemppainen, A. J., Hein, G.L., Shonnard, D.R., “A First-Year Engineering Experience in Sustainable Design” Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA. June 22 – 25, 2008.18. Ashby, M., Shercliff, H., and Cebon, D., Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design, Elsevier
engineering education community. He co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He has authored or co-authored over 70 papers on engineering education in areas ranging from curricular change to faculty development. He is currently an ABET Program Evaluator and a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal on Engineering Education.Natela Ostrovskaya, Texas A&M University Dr. Ostrovskaya is a senior lecturer in the Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University.Tatiana Erukhimova, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University Tatiana
Vertically Integrated Team Design Projects on First Year Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).9. H. Diefes-Dux, D. Follman, P.K. Imbrie, J. Zawojewski, B. Capobianco, and M. Hjalmarson, “Model Eliciting Activities: An In-class Approach to Improving Interest and Persistence of Women in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (2004).10. K. F. Reardon, “A Project-Oriented Introduction to Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (1999).11. R. Whalen, S. F. Freeman, B. K. Jaeger
itrequires a mix of technical and professional skills, an ability to communicate and workeffectively across disciplinary boundaries and with many different stakeholders, strong socialconsciousness, creativity, multicultural understanding, and business/entrepreneurialunderstanding [6].”Courses in the first year provide an important opportunity to frame students’ understanding ofengineering and shift preconceived notions of engineering as solely a technical discipline.Addressing these misconceptions in the engineering curriculum could improve retention forstudents who are socially inclined and indicate altruistic reasons for choosing a career in scienceand engineering, particularly women and historically underrepresented students [7], [8], [9], [10
andstudent affairs, and adequate resources), as well as a supportive academic (e.g., common courses,faculty advising, academically supportive climate) and co-curricular (e.g., study groups, socialactivities, career workshops) environment. The pinnacle of the best practices is an integration ofthese various layers and an assessment plan that allows practitioners to make changes.There are two types of research that has been conducted on LLCs: those that compare acrossmultiple programs and those that focus on one particular program. Research comparing LLCsacross programs have shown that they can have a positive impact on first-generation participants'transitions to college [2]; increased sense of belonging in their college [3]; and increasedopenness to
1992 and 1994. Following graduate school, Amy worked for Hewlett Packard in San Jose, CA and in Colorado Springs, CO. She joined the faculty at Boise State as an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering in August 200. Along with Dr. Bill Knowlton, Amy founded the Materials Science and Engineering Program at BSU and served as the first chair. In February 2011, Amy was became Dean of the College of Engineering. Amy’s research interests include microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices. Amy especially enjoys teaching the Introduction to Engineering and Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering courses as well as engineering outreach activities
earn a Master of Science in Engineering in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33350 Her love of learning was first fostered by an unusual elementary school education that was deeply inter- disciplinary with a substantial arts curriculum, which has informed all her subsequent thinking about the potential for education to transcend conventional models