Persistence,” JEE, July 2005, 94 (3), pp.335-338. 4. Tinto, V., Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2nd Edition, Chicago Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 5. Pickering, James W., Calliotte, James A., “Using a Freshman Survey to Identify At-Risk Freshmen” Assessment in Practice: Putting Principles to Work on College Campuses, pp. 250-253. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996. 6. Woods, Donald R., and Crowe, Cameron M., “Characteristics of Engineering Students in Their First Two Years,” JEE, 1984, pp. 289-295. 7. Johnson, Carol S., “The Analytical Assessment of Online Portfolios in Undergraduate Technical Communication: A Model,” JEE, October 2006, 95 (4), pp.279
Figure 3: Pre-test and Post-test Results Table 2: Average Gain in Scores Group Average Gain t-value Level of Significance (S. Dev) All Students 2.24 4.57 P=0.00002 (<0.0001) (n=68) (4.04) Female Students 3.55 2.38 P=0.049 (<0.05) (n=8) (4.22) Male Students 2.07 3.73 P=0.0002 (<0.05
by S. Brown and A. Glasner, 1999 (Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press: Buckingham). 7. Goodman, C. Cunningham, C. Lachapelle, M. Thompson, K. Bittinger, R. Brennan, and M. Delci. FINAL REPORT OF THE WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES INCOLLEGE ENGINEERING (WECE)PROJECT. April 2002. http://www.grginc.com/WECE_FINAL_REPORT.pdf 8. G. Lichtenstein, H. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, B. Chen, S. Sheppard, and K. Jackson, An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: career decision-making among undergraduate engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 9. L. O’Moore and T. Baldock. Peer Assessment Learning Sessions (PALS): an innovative feedback technique for
., Lindsey, S. & Schooler, T. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107, 101-126 (2000).9. Kunda, Z., Davies, P., Adams, B. & Spencer, S. The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 283-299 (2002).10. Nosek, B., Banaji, M. & Greenwald, A. Math = male, me = female, therefore math not equal me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 44-59 (2002).11. Nosek, B. & Smyth, F. Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math interest, participation, and performance. (2011).12. White, M.J. & White, G.B. Implicit and Explicit Occupational Gender Stereotypes. Sex Roles 55, 259-266 (2006).13
Hurtado, S., & Carter, D.F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324-345.4 Flowers, L. A. (2004-2005). Retaining African-American students in higher education: An integrative review. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(1), 3-35.5 Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. S., & Johnson, R. M. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 12). New York: Agathon Press.6 Pascarella, E. T., &
College ofEngineering, an institution which promised integrated project work in all four years of itscurriculum.3 Before and since, and in many places besides Olin, promising engineering studentshave been enticed to attend a variety of innovative technical education programs that promisereal-world experience, training in widely applicable communications skills, and an impeccablefoundation in the principles of design and professional standards of practice.For example, WPI placed project-based learning at the core of its academic program in the early1970’s when it redesigned its graduation requirements to include two major projects.4 Oneproject undertaken within the student’s major field of study is usually completed during thesenior year. Another
. Page 22.1724.2Becoming an engineerThe background to being or becoming an engineer lies in studies of graduate attributes orcompetencies. This body of literature focuses on the need to develop core knowledge andskills for success as an engineer. In the mid to late 1990’s the focus was predominantlyconcerned with deficiencies in graduate engineers in terms of complementary skills such asteamwork, communications and business skills 1. More recently, there has been a shifttowards acknowledgement of the primacy of the ability to apply theoretical knowledge to realindustrial applications2 or as Ferguson warns, a danger of losing the basic analytical skills inthe push for employment ready graduates3.The response to these concerns includes the
Wisconsin-Madison Undergraduate Learning Center: http://studentservices.engr.wisc.edu/classes/tutoring/2 Northeastern University: http://www.coe.neu.edu/coe/undergraduate/studentservices/tutoring.html3 University of Washington Academic Workshops: http://www.engr.washington.edu/curr_students/academics/workshops.html4 UT Austin Cockerell School of Engineering & Division of Diversity and Community: http://www.utexas.edu/diversity/ddce/lcae/ace.php5 Navarra-Madsen, Junalyn and Ingram, Paul, ―Mathematics Tutoring and Student Success,‖ Proceedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 8 (2010) 207–212.6 Thompson, D. R. Langstraat, S. D. and Nichols, V., ―Engineering Center Residence Hall Program,” Proceedings of the 2002 American
, it began with the teacher performing some engaging demonstrationsabout heat transfer. In these demonstrations, the teacher modeled the experimental methods asthe “more knowledgeable other,” and students were shown how to undertake these methods ontheir own in teams.21 The teacher then elicited discussions and reflections on the discrepantevents students witness as s/he and the students “talked science.” The teacher described howexperiments are conducted with controls and a variable, and got students to identify theindependent and dependent variables and the controls. The teacher introduced the concept of heatby first finding out what students thought about it. Then presented the concepts of conduction,convection, and radiation, and performed
Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016, p. 26206. doi: 10.18260/p.26206.[6] J. D. Burton and D. M. White, “Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 327–332, 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00454.x.[7] L. G. Richards and S. Carlson‐Skalak, “Faculty Reactions to Teaching Engineering Design to First Year Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00290.x.[8] K. Sanford Bernhardt and M. Roth, “Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduction to Engineering Course,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2020. [Online
, 20203. K.P.Brannan and P.C. Wankat, Survey of first-year programs, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Portland Oregon, 2005.4. Orr, M. K., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Long, R. A. (2012). Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models. Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA.5. Clark, A., Desing, R., Wallwey, S.A., Louis Kajfez, R., Mohammadi-Aragh, J., Sassi, S., Tracking first-year engineering students’ identity metrics, International Journal of Engineering Education 36(5), 2020, pp. 1625-16396. Komlos, J, Walkup, S.L., Waters, K.A., Modernizing an introductory civil engineering
. Pinnell, M., et al. Can service-learning in K-12 math and science classes affect a student’s perception of engineering and their career interests. in 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. 2008. IEEE.25. Furco, A., Advancing Service-Learning at Research Universities. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001. 2001(114): p. 67-78.26. Conway, J.M., E.L. Amel, and D.P. Gerwien, Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 2009. 36(4): p. 233-245.27. Holland, D., et al., Identity and agency in cultural worlds. 1998, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press.28. Wortham, S., From good
integrated engineering curriculum ongraduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[2] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in afreshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288,1998.[3] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, "Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention," Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, vol. 8, p. 1,2003.[4] Cindy P. Veenstra, Eric L. Dey, and Gary D. Herrin. A model for freshman engineeringretention. Advances in Engineering
will continueto address what we can do to retain students in engineering, and what we can do to retainthe remaining students in technology. We plan on continuing our data collection, and havebegun giving semester-beginning and semester-ending surveys to the EGR120 students. Ifsuccessful, such a model can be extended to programs and departments offering both engi-neering and technology majors.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Janyce Selesky for collecting the student data.References[1] N. L. Fortenberry, J. F. Sullivan, P. N. Jordan, and D. W. Knight, “Engineering education research aids instruction,” Science, vol. 317, pp. 1175–1176, August 2007.[2] C. Triplett and S. Haag, “Freshman engineering retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference and
how analytics and statistics can be integrated early inengineering education successfully. In the future, we plan to implement the suggestionsdescribed in the previous paragraphs and continue to explore ways in which first-yearengineering students approach questioning and data analytics.References[1] T. H. Davenport, D. Cohen, and A. Jacobson, “Competing on analytics,” Babson Park, MA, 2005.[2] McKinsey Global Institute, The age of analytics: Competing in a data-driven world. McKinsey & Company, 2016.[3] D. Rose, Data science: Create teams that ask the right questions and deliver real value. Atlanta, GA: Apress, 2016.[4] C. Min, C. Roman, and S. Trevor, “Big data analytics in financial statements audits
be held in-class during class time without theinstructor or UGTA present.References[1] J. Crowe, R. Ceresola, and T. Silva, “Enhancing student learning of research methods through the use of undergraduate teaching assistants,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 759–775, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.871222.[2] T. Filz and R. A. R. Gurung, “Student Perceptions of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants,” Teach. Psychol., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 48–51, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0098628312465864.[3] J. Forbes, D. J. Malan, H. Pon-Barry, S. Reges, and M. Sahami, “Scaling Introductory Course Using Undergraduate Teaching Assistants,” SIGCSE 17 Proc. 2017 ACM SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ. 2017 Pages 657–658.[4] P
Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, August 8-9, 2013.6. Yoon, S., Imbrie, P., Reed, T., “First Year Mathematics Course Credits and Graduation Status in Engineering,” 6th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, College Station, TX, August 7 – 8, 2014.7. Tewari, D., “Is Matric Math a Good Predictor of Student’s Performance in the First Year of University Degree? A Case Study of Faculty of Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,” Int J Edu Sci, Vol 8, No. 1, pg. 233-237, 2014.8. Hamlin, B., Riehl, J., Hamlin, A., Monte, A., “Work in Progress - What are you thinking? Over Confidence in First Year Students,” 40th ASEE/FIE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC
the students free rein in theirreflections, we thought it more useful to prompt them through the following questions: ● Did you, as an individual, come up with more than one design idea when working on the project? How did you decide on which idea(s) to share with your team? ● Did your original design idea(s) change after listening to your teammates' ideas? If so, in what ways did they change? ● Were there any ideas that you or your team initially deemed "bad" ideas that you ended up using? Or were there any "good" ideas that you got rid of? Explain why. ● Describe the process your team went through to narrow down ideas and arrive at a final project design. What factors did your team
Engineering o Assembled a cantilever tower with and without a point mass. Recorded data of the tower vibration after introducing an initial displacement. o Determined the damping ratio and natural frequency of the tower using inverse analysis o Determined the pseudo lateral force acting of the tower using a response spectrum provided. Introduction to AutoCad® o Drew a 3D fan blade with the assistance of the instructor and video tutorials. Term Project: Design of a windmill fan blade system o Designed an optimal (least expensive) windmill blade system capable of producing 100 mW of power under a 5 m/s design wind velocity
Engineering, 2005. Educating the engineer of 2020: adapting engineering education to thenew century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[2] Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, 2005. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington,DC: National Academies Press. Page 26.259.18[3] Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy, 2006. Rising above the gathering storm: energizing andemploying America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[4] Sheppard, S., S. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, K. Donaldson, G. Lichtenstein, E. Özgür, M. Lande, and G. Toye., 2010.Exploring the engineering
project and do all the work; complete only your part, hoping there are no consequences; stop working and blame team members; talk to teacher or advisor; call a team meeting and resolve issues. The remaining questions were evaluated using a Likert scale (strongly disagree/disagree/neutral/agree/strongly agree): 6. In my previous experience, my team was responsible for determining the goals and outcome of the project. 7. On average, I have had a lot of responsibility on my team(s). 8. My ideas were respected and used by my team(s). 9. The workload was evenly distributed across all group members. 10. I know what to do to make sure all my teammates do their part to make a project a success. 11. I can accomplish more as a team rather than
the data and outcomes from this summer activity will help determine if the winterbreak is a more effective intervention period than the summer, since it happens earlier in thestudents’ academic career.AcknowledgmentThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1430398. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] US Census Bureau, Census Data for Kern County and Bakersfield, California, 2010 census and 2019 estimates.[2] California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, Kern High School District and California Mathematics
also believe the project quiz assessment strategy may be a viable strategy forsimilar programming courses.References[1] Terenzini, Patrick T., et al. "Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains." Journal of Engineering Education 90.1 (2001): 123-130.[2] Vitasari, P., Wahab, M. N. A., Othman, A., Herawan, T., & Sinnadurai, S. K. (2010). The relationship between study anxiety and academic performance among engineering students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 490-497.[3] Bell, A. E., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E., & Logel, C. E. (2003). Stereotype threat and women's performance in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 307-312.[4] Joy, M., & Luck, M. (1999
College (e.g., engineering career fairs) or University, ensuring equal representation on a departmental and/or major level. • When creating opportunities, it is important to understand that larger student attendance does not equate to larger major enrollment (via student retention or addition). Events that feature a smaller, but more focused student audience and events that feature smaller student-to-faculty ratios were more successful in terms of retaining and adding students. • The source(s) of potential added students should be recognized when creating major exploration opportunities. Added CE students most commonly intended to major in mechanical engineering while added EVEG
University.References[1] C. Seemiller and M. Grace, “Educating and engaging the next generation of students,” About Campus, vol. 22, pp. 21-26, 2017.[2] J. Cruz and N. Kellam, “Beginning an Engineer’s Journey: A Narrative Examination of How, When, and Why Students Choose the Engineering Major,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 556-582, 2018.[3] P. C. Rickes, “Generations in flux- How Gen Z will continue to transform higher education Space,” Planning for Higher Education Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, 2016.[4] L. S. Nadelson et al., “Knowledge in the making: What engineering students are learning in makerspaces,” in Proceedings, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019, Tampa, FL.[5] R. M. Carbonell, M. E
CoE students participating as mentees after the two-week trial period was Page 11.887.6320. Of the 320 mentees, 310 were freshman accounting for 26.8% of the entering freshman CoEpopulation. Original Number of Mentoring Program Participants as of 08/22/2005 381 Mentees, 79 Mentors 300 274 250 Total Num ber of S tudents
. Page 24.48.14References1. Carlson, L.E. and Sullivan, J.F., (1999). Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the Integrated Teachingand Learning Program, International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 20-31.2. Hein, G.L. and Sorby, S.A., (2001). Engineering Explorations: Introducing First-Year Students to Engineering,31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV, T3C 15-19.3. Hall, D., Cronk, S., Brackin, P., Barker, M., Crittenden, K., (2008). Living with the Lab: A Curriculum to PrepareFreshman Students to Meet the Attributes of “The Engineer of 2020”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Pittsburgh, PA, AC 2008-2281.4. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory
meetings which took placeduring Fall 2011, the first semester of the pilot year. Of the 9 groups with mentors, only onefailed to schedule and complete a meeting. Group# Student Group Major Mentor Major Meeting(s) 1a Mechanical Mechanical Dessert night; Dinner/bonfire at mentor's home 1b Mechanical (no mentor) 1c Mechanical (no mentor) 2a Civil Civil Group Meeting 2b Civil Civil Café Dinner
Century,” Corwin Press.6. Boss, S., Krauss, J., 2007, “Reinventing Project-Based Learning,” International Society for Technology inEducation, Eugene, OR.7. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., Bogue, B., 2012, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year SingleInstitutional Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101, pp. 6-27.8. Mena, I. B., Zappe, S. E., Litzinger, T. A., 2013, “Examining the Experiences and Perceptions of First-YearEngineering Students,” AC2013-6270, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.9. Esmaeili, M., Eydgahi, A., 2013, “By the Students, for the students: A New Paradigm for Better Achieving theLearning Objectives,” AC2013-7138, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta