research focus on the aerodynamics of jet engines, jet engine simulators, and jet engine testing facilities.Mr. Robert B. Rhoads, Ohio State University Robert B. Rhoads currently functions as the Multidisciplinary Capstone Program Coordinator for the Engineering Education Innovation Center at Ohio State University. He has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Ohio State University and Masters in Business Administration from Regis University. Prior to his involvement as the program coordinator, he had over 12 years of experience in industry with roles that varied from process engineering to sales engineering to design engineering. He has also functioned as an engineering technology faculty for three years
Design and Electrical Engineering at Penn State. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhancing engineering design education, teaching technological entrepreneurship, and global product design. He is course chair for ED&G 100: Introduction to Engineering Design. He is member of IEEE, AIAA, AGU, ASEE, URSI, and Sigma Xi. Page 11.1315.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The One-Minute Engineer: Getting Design Class out of the Starting Blocks Beverly K. Jaeger* and Sven G. Bilén
Paper ID #13475A Student Mentored Design Challenge Competition for First Semester Fresh-men Engineering StudentsMs. Jill S. K. Nakatsu, University of Hawaii at Manoa Jill Nakatsu is specialist faculty at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. She is an academic advisor for the College of Engineering working in particular with the pre-engineering student population. In addition to academic advising, she teaches the introduction to engineering course for freshmen. She received both her BS and MS in electrical engineering. She worked as an engineer in the medical technology industry and has research interests in machine learning
to student thought process, they do not offer a measure of student learning.Future work includes an analysis of gains in student knowledge across the semester usingdesigned assessments. Furthermore, overall course objectives should be considered across bothprojects in the semester to clarify how all course activities can be optimized to meet studentneeds.References 1. Frank, M., Lavy, I., and Elata, D., Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course. Journal of International Journal of Technology and Design Education (2003), Volume 13, No. 3, pp. 273-288. 2. Millis, J. and Treagust, D. ENGINEERING EDUCATION – IS PROBLEMBASED OR PROJECT- BASED LEARNING THE ANSWER? Australian
, he returned to academia at Tufts University, earning his MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering for his work with low-cost educational technologies and his develop- ment and use of technologies to aid usage tracking in makerspaces to examine them as interactive learning environments.Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame is an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University and a mem- ber of the first-year engineering team. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice- oriented mission of Northeastern University. She teaches the Cornerstone
AC 2007-105: A STUDY OF CHALLENGE-BASED LEARNING TECHNIQUES INAN INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSEChristopher Rowe, Vanderbilt University Christopher Rowe received his Bachelor of Engineering degree in Biomedical Engineering and Master of Engineering degree in Management of Technology from Vanderbilt University in 1996 and 1998, respectively. He joined the Engineering faculty in January 2003. His research interests include technical program management and engineering education and is the Director of the Freshman Year for the Engineering Dean's Office.Stacy Klein, Vanderbilt University Dr. Klein teaches undergraduate courses in biomedical engineering at Vanderbilt University. An
Black, T. C., “Using e-portfolios to support an undergraduate learning career: An experiment with academic advising,” Educause Quarterly, 2010, 33(4).12. Al-Atabi M., Mahdi, M. A. S., Younis, O., and Chung, E., “An integrated portfolio and advising system for undergraduate engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2011, 6(5), pp. 532- 541.13. Aguiar, E., Chawla, N.V., Brockman, J., Ambrose, G.A., Goodrich, V.E., “Engagement vs Performance: using electronic portfolios to predict first semester engineering student retention,” Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 2014, pp. 103-112
Model for Higher Level Undergraduate Education inGeneral. Johansson, G.T. and George, W.K. s.l. : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2005.Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.20. CFD Advanced Professional Education via the Internet. Baker, A.J. et. al. 2005 : American Society ofMechanical Engineers. International Mechanical Congress and Exposition.21. Disposable SMART Lab on a Chip for Point-of-Care Clinical Diagnostics. Ahn, C.H. et. al. s.l. : Instituteof Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2004.22. Imeplementation of a Continuous Adjoint for Topology Optimization of Ducted Flows. Othmer, C. s.l. :American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference.23. The
materials recycling for pavement construction and numerical analysis in engineering appli- cations. He teaches Statics, Soil Mechanics and Foundation (Lectures and Labs), and Transportation Engineering Laboratories at CSU Chico.Dr. Kathleen Meehan, California State University, Chico Kathleen Meehan earned her B.S. in electrical engineering from Manhattan College and her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Illinois. After graduation, she worked at Lytel, Inc., Polaroid Corporation, and Biocontrol Technology. She moved into academia full-time in 1997 and worked at the University of Denver, West Virginia University, and Virginia Tech. From 2013 to 2017, she was the director of the Electronics and Electrical Engineering
student immersion and growth in mind, the programhas developed to include an engineering cornerstone project in which students work in teams todesign, build, and program autonomous robots to complete tasks on an interactive roboticscourse. In support of the project, a variety of technologies were designed and polished as theprogram grew. Classroom methodologies were also evaluated and improved with time inresponse to student feedback and research on best practices.This paper provides a historical review of practice for the program with an emphasis on thetechnologies and methodologies that have been most effective in the program as it hasdeveloped.IntroductionFor 23 years researchers in autonomous robot design have worked on the advancement of
Paper ID #11398Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Online Team and Activity-Based Introduction to Engineering CourseDr. Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University Dr. Benjamin Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He is currently a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University that focuses on the first-year engineering experience, including developing and teaching the Introduction to Engineering course. He also teaches Thermo-Fluids and High Speed Aerodynamics for the
AC 2012-3820: THE NATURE OF PEER FEEDBACK FROM FIRST-YEARENGINEERING STUDENTS ON OPEN-ENDED MATHEMATICAL MOD-ELING PROBLEMSMiss Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University Kelsey Rodgers is a graduate student at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. She is currently conducting research on peer feedback within model-eliciting activities (MEAs) in the First- year Engineering program with her advisor, Professor Heidi Diefes-Dux. Prior to attending Purdue, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E in engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation. She began her research in engineering education on disassemble, analyze, assemble (DAA) activities with her previous advisor at
even millions through the thoughtful development of just a single well-designed project. As engineering educators, one of our roles is to raise awareness of both issuesand opportunities. All too often, students arrive at college with visions of designing that which isat the forefront of technology: a faster car, a longer bridge, or a next generation iPod. But whatabout the over two billion people in the world’s population who live on less than $2 a day?Visionaries such as Dr. Paul Polak, author of Out of Poverty 1 and a Distinguished Lecturer at the2008 ASEE Annual Conference, do not see this group as “poor people” but as potentialentrepreneurs and customers. Through his work in various Third World countries, Polak hassuccessfully demonstrated
?Many leading sources seem to indicate that social responsibility is in fact an important goal for Page 24.1089.2both engineering and college graduates. Social responsibility was included among “essentiallearning outcomes” in College Learning for the New Global Century.5 The American Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) “sees civil engineers as being entrusted by society as leaders in creatinga sustainable world and enhancing the global quality of life. …the profession’s primary concern[is] protecting public safety, health, and welfare.”6 In the American Society of MechanicalEngineers (ASME) Vision for 2028 the guiding theme was “technology
, such as Solid Mechanics, Mechanism Analysis and Design, Mechanical Design, Computer Aided Engineering, etc. Her interests include inno- vative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation, innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, as well as structured reflective practices throughout the engineering curriculum.Dr. Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University Dr. Benjamin Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He is currently a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University that focuses on the first-year engineering experience, including
processing. However, his actual Ph.D. dissertation was on thermal modeling and process control of a friction stir fabrication method of additive manufacturing. Dr. Gray followed up his Ph.D. with a position as a post-doctoral associate under the guidance of Dr. Dwight Veihland working with composite magnetic field sensors. After his education, Dr. Gray continued his research in small-business environ- ments, developing technologies and products across a wide range of fields including magnetic materials, sensors, and devices, energy harvesting technologies, harsh environment sensing, additive manufactur- ing, non-destructive inspection and evaluation, and vehicle autonomy. Dr. Gray came to the Engineering Education
engineering education and learning sciences explores how children learn through interactions with technologies ranging from manual manipulative like structures students design build and test with shake tables to digital manipulative with mobile devices. He continues to explore new methods to enhance informal and formal learning experiences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Asking Questions about Data: First-year Engineering Students’ Introduction to Data AnalyticsAbstractThis complete research paper aims to understand the question design’s process of first-yearengineering students when performing data analytics. Specifically, we aim to answer the
Fairfield University. She received her M.S. in Management of Technology from Fairfield University in 2015 and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Universidad Mayor de San Andres in La Paz, Bolivia.Dr. Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University Djedjiga Belfadel is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Fairfield University. She obtained her Ph.D. degree from University of Connecticut in 2015, in electrical engineering. Her interests include embedded systems, target tracking, data association, sensor fusion, machine vision, engineering service, and education.Dr. Michael Zabinski, Fairfield University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
and performance in science education. Additionally, Nisha has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked recently as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology Incubator, and has served as an adjunct faculty member in biology for South University.Dr. Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin Nina Telang is an associate professor of instruction in the Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She received the B.Tech degree in Engineering Physics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai in 1989, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 1992 and 1995
a lengthy period of time. (6 teams)2. Develop a mechanism that would vary the position of horizontal axis wind turbines to maximize electrical output in any wind conditions. (4 teams)3. Design a system that controls access to the Binghamton University Bike Share bikes. (1 team)4. Design a prosthetic hand using a combination of 3D printer and hobbyist single board microcontroller technologies that results in a more dexterous hand than the whole-hand-grasp mechanism. (8 teams)5. Design a system that generates usable electrical power from the doors in a specific building on campus. (10 teams)6. Design a wearable power system for personal electronic. (7 teams)The Engineering Conceptual Design Project Overview The key steps in the
, engineering is more oftenassociated with math and science and “things” rather than people19. Engineers are also associatedwith poor social skills and jobs that are nearly entirely technical15. These associations can makeit hard for some students to see themselves as engineers. For example, Du5 notes that theprofessional identity of an engineer is associated with technology and mechanical ability, thusaligning engineering with the male gender. This alignment is reinforced by the long history ofprimarily male engineers. This restrictive definition of what an engineer is can make it harder formany students (especially women and students of color) who are interested in engineering toidentify with engineering.Identity development depends on two factors
Engineering, and Engineering, Civil Engineering Technology Engineering, and volunteered between one Engineering Technology day and two weeks of volunteered between one their time to teach topics day and two weeks of from their discipline their time to teach topics from their disciplineFreshman • Taught by the Director of • Taught by the Director of • Taught by a
Northern, James, “Recruitment and retention programs for minorities in engineering programs” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2007, 7p.7 Ferrara, Irene “Analysis of the retention of students and possible recruitment into technology in a common first year course for engineering and engineering technology students” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Page 22.1222.11 Conference Proceedings, 20078 Gattis, Carol “A successful engineering peer mentoring program” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings,20079 Pai, D.M. “A supplemental instruction program for enhanced retention of
Physics I courses.2 While calculus and physics are tools to be utilized by engineers to solveproblems, our students are often unable to see that the knowledge presented in the mathematicaland physics context can be transferred to solving engineering problems. Students also tend toview programming as an isolated component of engineering. They should understand instead thatprogramming is yet another tool to verify results and to solve more complex problems, reducingrisks of algebraic errors.3Design/MethodThree faculty members linked their classes to create a STEM (science, technology, engineering,and mathematics) small-learning-community (SLC). The same set of students is registered forthe three linked courses: Calculus I, Physics I, and
5,120 graduatestudents.The College of Engineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS) has nine EAC-ABET accreditedengineering programs, three ETAC-ABET accredited engineering technology programs, and oneCAC-ABET accredited computer science program. In addition, CEAS offers nine master and sixdoctoral programs. Fall 2012 enrollment consists of 2,222 undergraduate and 403 graduatestudents. In 2011-12, CEAS awarded 324 bachelor, 100 master, and 12 doctoral degrees. Theaverage ACT sub-score for mathematics for first-time first-year CEAS students is 25.2. WMU isclassified by the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange (CSRDE) as “ModeratelySelective.”Since 2005, first-time first-year CEAS students have been placed in STEP cohorts during
related to first-year programs and critical thinking instruction.Dr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress: Impacts of COVID-19 on Diverse Engineering Students’ Sense of BelongingABSTRACTThis work-in-progress paper
percentage of students graduating with engineering degrees in theU.S. compared to the rest of the world. This creates a shortage of skilled engineers required tokeep pace with the rest of the world in terms of technological and industrial development.Therefore, there is a significant emphasis on improving engineering education in the UnitedStates. For instance, in a report by the U.S. National Academy of Engineering titled “Educatingthe engineer of 2020” [4], it was recommended that engineering education be reinvented. Thesame report discussed the importance of understanding the students’ learning challenges anddevising better pedagogical approaches to improve engineering education. Along the same lines,one of the grand challenges [5] in the
positions at John Deere and Amkor Technology. Her research interests are in the area of quality, productivity improvement, supply chain, lean manufacturing and engineering education. Dr. Bonilla consults, instructs, and collaborates on quality improvement projects with representatives from healthcare, as well as traditional manufacturing operations. She is an ASQ certified Six-Sigma Black-Belt.Leonard Perry, University of San Diego Leonard Perry is an Associate Professor of Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of San Diego. He has research interests in the area of system improvement via quality improvement methods especially in the area of applied statistics, statistical
Paper ID #26688Student Success Initiative to Engage and Provide Academic Support for First-Year Engineering StudentsDr. Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University Lindsay Corneal is an Associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Windsor, a M.B.A. from Lawrence Technological University, and a Ph.D. from Michigan State University in Materials Science and Engineering.Dr. Nicholas A. Baine, Grand Valley State University Nicholas Baine, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of
Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2. National Center for Education Statistics (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields. NCES 2014-001. Washington, DC. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf3. Grillo, M. C. & Leist, C. W. (2013). Academic support as a predictor of retention to graduation: new insights on the role of tutoring, learning assistance, and supplemental instruction. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. 15(3), 387-408.4. Henderson, N., Fadali, M.S., & Johnson, J. (2002, November). An investigation of First-year engineering students’ attitude toward