Conference Session

First-year Programs: Focus on Student Success 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University; Baker A. Martin, Clemson University; Matthew K. Miller, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

the back-burner in order to help with Covid-19.” Otherslinked the pandemic to other crises around the globe, highlighting how “the virus Covid-19 isaffecting access to clean water a lot more than it seems.” Students also discussed their newawareness of COVID-19 funds and vaccination plans, as well as experts working to stop thespread. For example, “the United Nations has a COVID-19 fund that aims to support people thathave lower income and more vulnerable groups that are dealing with the impacts of thepandemic,” “UNICEF purchased over 520 million syringes for 2021, for COVID-19vaccination,” and “because of this goal [good health and well-being], scientists have learnedabout blood tests that can predict who will suffer from COVID-19 the worst

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the First Year

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Melissa Lynn Morris, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University; Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

planned co-curricular activities during the first semester in the AcES programbolstered the initial feelings of inclusion.A student’s feeling of inclusion is known to be a contributing factor in retention. The findings ofthis research indicate that internships should not only be strongly encouraged, but universityresources should be invested in helping students be prepared for, apply to, and obtain internships. 1The researchers suggest the study be expanded beyond the AcES program to examine a broadersample and greater number of students.1.0 IntroductionA background summary of research related to engineering identity formation and feelings

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Jamie R. Gomez, University of New Mexico; Sophia Bowers, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Paige Prescott, University of New Mexico; James Scacco, University of New Mexico; Jordan Orion James, University of New Mexico; Nicolai Loner, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. A member of the Grand Portage Band of the Lake Superior Chippewa Jordan obtained both his Masters of Community & Regional Planning and Bachelors of Media Arts from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque where he lives with his wife and three daughters.Mr. Nicolai Loner, University of New Mexico c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Asset-based design projects in a freshman level courseAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes how we identified diverse student assets and redesigneda first year course to develop professional engineering identity. Despite many efforts to diversifyengineering, first-generation college attendees, non-traditional students, and students

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University; Tricia Serviss, Santa Clara University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

who have researched the same academic skill and are tasked to summarize and develop steps to implement the skill into their learning practice, using a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle model (more information in Appendix B). At this time, student teams also review and choose an infographic platform; 3. Student teams develop a draft infographic using their chosen platform. Draft is to be scaled to a 8.5”x11” paper size and printed in color for in-class peer review; 4. Feedback is generated from in-class facilitated workshop and returned to student team in order to finalize infographic and formally submit. A quality effort is incentivized by giving some extra points for the student favorite (top vote

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3; The Best of All the FPD Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona; Rebecca Primeau, University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

developmental experience for first and second year students. The environmentof both peer and administrative support has given students the opportunity to thrive in rigorouscoursework, develop confidence in their planning, organization, and leadership skills, andconnect their academic work to real-life applications of engineering. IntroductionThe Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), in a 2007 report titledCollege Learning for a New Global Century, highlights integrative learning as one of fiveessential learning outcomes for preparing students to address twenty-first century challenges.Integrative learning, “the application of knowledge, skills and responsibilities to new settings

Conference Session

FPD6 - First Year Curricula Development

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; John Uhran, University of Notre Dame; Catherine Pieronek, University of Notre Dame; Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh; John Ventura, Christian Brothers University; Patricia Ralston, University of Louisville; John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Constance Slaboch, University of Notre Dame; Brenda Hart, University of Louisville; Rebecca Ladewski, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

universities will necessarily have different challenges than small private colleges.Whether large or small, public or private, elite or more mainstream, each type of institution canbring something to the discussion. Therefore, when planning panel discussions andpresentations, care should be taken to include representatives from a range of institutions. Page 13.977.9Finally, much of the best engagement in a dialogue-focused workshop occurs outside of theorganized sessions; it occurs at meals, informally in the hallways, and when milling aroundbetween sessions. Thus, such a workshop should leave plenty of time for the participants to talkwith each other

Conference Session

FPD4 - Teaching Methods for First Year Students

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Stan Cronk, Louisiana Tech University; Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Mark Barker, Louisiana Tech University; Kelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Laboratory Improvement grant allowed us to extend the curriculum to all 280 freshman engineering students taking ENGR 120 in the fall of 2007. Approximately 400 freshman students have enrolled in the course sequences based on the Living with the Lab curriculum during the current 2007-2008 academic year. During efforts to develop a formal assessment plan to determine the effectiveness of the new courses, we realized that we needed a set of guideposts to help us determine if our strategies were effective not only in teaching students, but also in preparing them for their engineering careers. We realized that the work sponsored by the National Academy of Engineering to identify attributes of “The Engineer of 2020”17 aligned closely with our efforts

Conference Session

Beyond the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Bailey, North Carolina A&T State University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

and or processes. Finally,we discuss and plan simple experiments noting whether the experiment was controlled oruncontrolled, and identifying the independent and dependant variables.The skill-set found in Subgroup III is also developed by UNST 130 when topics of logicand more specifically arguments are explored. An educated engineer should be able torecognize and employ both deductive and inductive methods and arguments, and evaluate Page 14.1137.3arguments in terms of their validity, truth, soundness, strength, and cogency. They shouldalso have the ability to recognize fallacies in arguments and in ordinary language, both ofwhich will enhance the

Conference Session

FPD1 -- Implementing a First-Year Engineering Course

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech; Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech; Odis Griffin, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

planned to conduct longitudinal studies to assessthe long term impacts of freshman year instruction. Some new hands-on activities emphasizingsustainability are planned for the spring 2006. For example, in spring 2006 a population relatedhands-on workshop has been piloted. Students worked in group of four to build 3D models usinglegos to represent the population of different countries on a map of the world. Each groupexamined geographic, literacy, population, environment, life expectancy, etc. related data ofabout 15 countries located throughout the world. These data were obtained from the CIA WorldFact Book22 . Students were then asked a few free response questions such as: 1)What are themost common “Environment Related Current Issues?” 2) What

Conference Session

FPD2 -- Highlighting First-Year Programs

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Freeman, Northeastern University; Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Beverly Jaeger and Richard Whalen are members of Northeastern University's

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

assignments that allow for assessment of their proficiency in AutoCAD andMicrosoft Excel. Other team assignments include a reverse engineering exercise and posterpresentation, a movie scene dissection analysis, presentations on engineering disasters andrelevant case histories, and demonstrations of engineering products, devices, and systems.Active LearningKolb17 proposed a four-phase learning cycle, in which “half” of the effective learning sequenceinvolves passive observing and thinking (cognition). The remaining “half” involves planning,(active experimentation) and doing (concrete experience). When combined iteratively and inbalanced proportions, the combination of knowledge-based cognition and purposeful action canresult in improved and lasting

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter M. Ostafichuk, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Susan Nesbit, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Naoko Ellis P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Gerald Tembrevilla, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. Thisstrongly relates to metacognition.As described by Schraw and Dennison [2], metacognition refers to “the ability to reflect on,understand, and control one’s learning.” Sometimes described by the informal shorthand“thinking about thinking,” a more formal definition of metacognition typically includes elementsof knowledge of cognition (declarative knowledge involved with understanding learningprocesses and strategies, and knowing when to adopt a particular strategy), and regulation ofcognition (procedural knowledge of planning, monitoring, and adapting one’s learning) [3];although many other distinctions for elements of metacognition exist [4].Metacognition is a key asset as students transition to the more independent post-secondarylearning

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Celena Arreola, University of Texas, El Paso; Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso; Crystal Fernandez-Pena, University of Texas, El Paso; Helen Elizabeth Geller, University of Texas, El Paso; Giselle Andrade, STEMGrow; Diane Elisa Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas, El Paso; Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas, El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas, El Paso; Melissa Stearns

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

], and the Lumina Foundation 's National Tech Challenge selectedEduGuide's intervention as a model for making college access and success more efficient. Theyhave supported EduGuide with a planning grant to further test and refine the platform, as has theW.K. Kellogg Foundation to help scale-up EduGuide’s platform and program.Assessment of Grit Levels of Participating StudentsOverall, 108 freshman-year STEM students participated in the baseline assessment of students’grit levels in early fall 2017. Of the 108 students, 81 were STEMGrow students, while 27 werenon-STEMGrow students (Control Group). The first post-assessment involved 64 students, 43of whom were STEMGrow students, and 21 were non-STEMGrow students. A total of 38students, 26 STEMGrow

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Retention

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ordel Brown, Northwestern University; Robin A.M. Hensel Ed.D., West Virginia University; Melissa Lynn Morris, West Virginia University; Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

most meals (shown in green in Table 1) arecovered by the students’ meal plans and are individual options, four meals (shown in orange inTable 1) - the welcome breakfast, Thursday pizza party, Friday lunch and final cookout/campfire- mark significant points for the students and are provided and organized by the AcES program.The design project activities (shown in blue in Table 1) provide students opportunities to workon teams to design, build, and test a product. Activities that occur outside of the engineeringcampus (shown in yellow in Table 1) provide opportunities for bonding, viewing engineeringprinciples in action, and becoming familiar with the region.The final day of the summer bridge component is a unique experience that re-emphasizes

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division: Online Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University; Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

successfully completing the first offering of this course, the two themes of engagement andretention emerged as important things to begin to address. Based on the nature of the course andthe MOOC environment, it is not expected that these two topics will be fully solved, but therewere some things that were changed for the Spring 2018 offering of the course. There are alsoimprovements planned for future offerings as well as marketing directions which may alsoimpact the course development.Since one of the concerns was engagement, especially during the 10-week project, optionaldiscussion boards were added so that students could post what they were working on so thatother students and instructors could give feedback and encouragement. This is meant to

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qudsia Tahmina, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

-requisites, it is expected to be the first semester courseand Fundamentals of Engineering II the second semester course for a regular (on-schedule)freshman. Some students coming in with lower mathematics background start with engineeringcurriculum in the spring semester (off-schedule) instead of autumn. Also, some transfer studentsend up taking the Fundamentals of Engineering I in their spring semester. The first semestercourse introduces topics such as problem solving, engineering design process, technicalcommunication, ethics in engineering, teamwork and engineering tools that aid in criticalthinking, planning and data analysis. Three major components of this course are: Data analysis inExcel, Programming in MATLAB and Design Project. Because of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet K. Lumpp, University of Kentucky; Jennifer Lovely, University of Kentucky; Laura Marie Letellier P.E., University of Kentucky; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Derek Lynn Englert, University of Kentucky; John R. Baker P.E., University of Kentucky; Neil Moore, University of Kentucky; John F. Maddox, University of Kentucky; Julie Gordon Whitney, University of Kentucky; Doug Klein, University of Kentucky; Whitney C. Blackburn-Lynch, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

program and allow students to explore before committing to a specific plan of study.For the new computer programming course, the content pairs the sensors and actuatorscommonly utilized by a variety of engineers with the programming skills needed to collect andinterpret data. These skills carry over to the team design project that involves programming,sensors, actuators, construction and testing of a complete system. The programming skillscarried into the sophomore level courses have been well received by some departments and lessthan satisfactory to other departments which has led to more deliberate independentprogramming assignments. In this paper, we describe the implementation of in a new coursesequence for ~900 students per year and

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Tatar, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Lauren Van Beek, University of St. Thomas; Laura Ann Lilienkamp, Smith College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

context, 4) clarification of self-concept, 5) sense of self in response tofeedback from respected others, 6) self-acceptance and self-esteem, and 7) personal stability andintegration.3 (p 49) As students develop in this vector they become more comfortable with whothey are, and a solid sense of self appears.Developing purpose includes three major categories, 1) vocational plans and aspirations, 2)personal interests, and 3) interpersonal and family commitments.3 (p 50) Students move fromhaving no purpose or sense of who they want to be to unifying their disparate goals and interestswithin a larger, meaningful purpose.Developing integrity includes 1) humanizing values- shifting away from applyinguncompromising beliefs and towards the use of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Evaluating and Measuring Recruiting and Major Selection Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaqi C. McNeil, University of Louisville; Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. (2010). An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319-336.6. Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525-548.7. Godfrey, E. (2007). Cultures within cultures: Welcoming or unwelcoming for women. In Proceedings of 2007 of American Society for Engineering Education. Honolulu, HI.8. Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). Women in Industrial Engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5A: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan W. Krauss, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; Ryan Fries, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville; Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

students were somewhat less motivated, and came with lessthan adequate science and math background. This student diversity made it a major challenge todesign the course content in a way that can be attractive to both populations. In addition, sectionsizes were very large (80-90 students in each) and the instructor’s interaction with students waslimited. As a result, mentoring and active learning opportunities were less than ideal.A large body of literature exists on the freshman experience. Based on existing research and ourprevious experiences with the course, plans were made to adopt the team teaching modelsuccessfully implemented at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Instead of usingadjunct faculty to teach the course, a team

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4B: Assessing Student Motivation and Student Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne Dudek Ronan P.E., New York University; Jack Bringardner, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Civil and Urban Engineering department. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing Gender Differences between Student Motivations for Studying EngineeringAbstractThis research paper investigates what motivates students to major in engineering, and how themotives differ between men and women. It aims to address curriculum planning in first-yearengineering programs to improve retention and diversity. Previous research has identified coursepractices – such as team-based projects – that have positively impacted engagement of women inengineering. Understanding the motivations for students to choose engineering can connect thereasons why certain curricular

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan McSpedon, Rice University; Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Michael Wolf, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

student needs. Some Scholars continuemeeting once a week through graduation while others make appointments as needed. Advisingcovers academic planning and success strategies, transition issues, and any personal problemsthat may impact a Scholar’s retention in STEM or at Rice. All student performance is activelymonitored, enabling advisors to intervene even if students are being seen less frequently. RESP’slongitudinal, intrusive advising model proved so successful it has been adapted for other Ricestudents through the development of the Office of Student Success Initiatives. RESP additionallyprovides ongoing term-time programming to address common transition issues, training inlearning and study technique, and student professional development.The

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Project-based Learning and Cornerstone Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Elmore, Binghamton University; Sharon B Fellows, Binghamton University; Koenraad E Gieskes, Binghamton University; Lee A Cummings, Binghamton University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Question 5 For the first-year engineering program in the Watson School retention has improved.Anecdotal evidence from students and instructors suggests that the change in the first-yearengineering program’s approach plays a large part in keeping students engaged and wanting tofurther experience the world of engineering. The engineering design process was built into thecurriculum in a way that allowed students to develop ideas, create designs, evaluate them, andcommunicate the results by thinking creatively and abstractly. Students developed effectivecommunication skills by presenting their design plans, results, tests, and redesigns. They wereable to articulate a particular approach to a design, what went wrong with a design, and whatsteps were

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 4: The Best of the All: FPD Best Papers

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary A. Fraley, Michigan Technological University; A. J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

times throughout the semester: asassigned and again before the midterm and final exams. Table 1. ENG1101 Pre-Lesson Videos Used in Fall 2014 Topic Length (minutes) Views Significant Digits 3.87 1182 Unit Conversions 6.71 684 Introduction to Spreadsheets 6.45 1267 Tables and Figures in Technical Documents 2.36 981 References in Technical Documents 2.52 1326 Management Plan (Gantt

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caitlin Cairncross, University of Portland; Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland; Zulema Naegele, University of Portland; Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

their first two years of college1. Therefore, it is particularly important to support studentsduring this critical period in their education, and help them build the skills necessary to ensuretheir continued success in engineering.To help combat this problem, the University of Portland introduced a retention programspecifically to assist 1st and 2nd year students who are behind in their degrees, and who areconsidered at risk of leaving engineering. During the year-long program, students work with acounselor to explore tactics for academic success, and to discuss educational planning(particularly with regards to getting on track to graduate in four years). For many of thesestudents, the perceived inability to graduate in four years, and the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2B: Strategies for Writing and Communication Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto; Micah Stickel P.Eng., University of Toronto; Brian M. Frank, Queen's University; James A. Kaupp, Queen's University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

ofthe academic literacy skills identified in the Screening and the Diagnostic. CommunicationInstructors who work with the two first-year courses were made aware of the students whoscored in Band 1 and given access to their diagnostic results in order to better inform theirinteractions with the students on their written assignments. These are only preliminary responsesto the screening and diagnostic process. Currently, plans are being made to address thechallenges of earlier and more efficient communication of the diagnostic results to both studentsand instructors. Plans are also being made to more efficiently collaborate with students throughstrategy sessions and their course assignments.At Queens University the 24 students whose diagnostic

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2A: Using Alternative Measurements to Look at Students and Their Success

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jack Bringardner, New York University; Christopher Leslie, New York University; Gunter W. Georgi, New York University; Alyssa Marie D'Apice, New York University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

backgrounds.This increased demand is reflected in the proposed revision to the ABET teamwork guideline inCriterion 3, now labeled number 7: one outcome of an engineering education should be thatstudents have gained the ability to function on teams, but also that these teams should “establishgoals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty.” In previous work at theNYU Tandon School of Engineering (previously known as Polytechnic University) in Brooklyn,New York, it was found that many students thought that they had experience working on teams,but it was suspected that many of those team experiences were working on a projectsimultaneously. Engineering programs will have to do more to demonstrate their effort forgenuine teamwork outcomes

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 2: Identity and Sense of Belonging

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sura Al-Qudah, Western Washington University ; Jill Davishahl, Bellingham Technical College; Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Michael Andrew Greiner

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Discussion  Orthographic Homework assignments  CAD Labs using CATIA  TA assistance in the lab and eventsIt is important to note that faculty at each institution could include additional questions to thesurveys to gather information from students related solely to their particular course and/orinstitution. The additional questions were not used for this research project.Challenges and Next StepsAs this is a WIP research, the researchers are planning to keep collecting more data throughout therest of this academic year and during the next academic year to ensure a representative sample andto draw inclusive conclusions about the data and the approach. The focus of this work to date wason conducting a literature review, development of the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division - Visualization and Mathematics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College; Mary Roth P.E., Lafayette College

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Mathematics

Paper ID #22569Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduc-tion to Engineering CourseDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, engineering economics, and Lafayette’s

Conference Session

FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jillian Beth Schmidt, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs

this technology Provide any additional feedback you Free response haveIn this initial module deployment, collection of student feedback was somewhat limited in aneffort to keep the module similar in workload and structure to the other software options. Notwanting to deter interested students during the pilot test of this module, the feedback wasrestricted to a single online survey at the conclusion of the module. In future semesters,instructors plan to survey students both before and after completing the module (weeks 1 and 4)to investigate changes in perceived knowledge and attitudes about the technology. In addition,students will be asked to complete a short reflection about their experience during the module,whether they consulted

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University; Laurel Whisler, Clemson University; Abigail T. Stephan, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, integrating knowledge, collaborating, and synthesizing learning into one’s own narrative as a portfolio [9]. Figure 5. Entangled Learning Design EL principles guided program design decisions, such c2017 Paul Treuer & Clemson University as planning for initial community-development and workshop programming during an initial Early FallMove-In period, as well as the structure and assignments of the study skills course.Our analysis involved a mixed methods approach to understanding students’ success. We usedquantitative data to evaluate utilization of services to support academic