Asee peer logo
Displaying results 451 - 480 of 810 in total
Conference Session
FPD VIII: Crossing Bridges and Easing Transitions into the First Year
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Helen M. Doerr, Syracuse University; Jonas Bergman Arleback, Syracuse University; AnnMarie H. O'Neil, Syracuse University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
the function. Building students’foundational understandings of functions and their rates of change, and applying theseunderstandings in meaningful contexts, while at the same time developing their basic algebraskills, appears to have contributed to their subsequent success in their first college mathematicscourse.References[1] National Science Foundation. (2008). Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure. Retrieved on 4/20/2011 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08542/nsf08542.htm[2] Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369-375.[3] Hartman, H., & Hartman, M. (2006
Conference Session
FPD XI: Tidbits and Cookies
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University; Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
-Bass Publishers.2. Augustine, N. (2005). Rising Above the gathering Storm: Engineering and Employing America for a Brighter Future.3. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshman Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross- Institutional Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477-489.4. Davey, F. H. (2001). The Relationship Between Engineering and Young Women’s Occupational Priorities. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 35(3), 221. Page 25.185.175. Dick, T., & Rallis, S. (1991). Factors and Influences on High School Students’ Career Choices. Journal for
Conference Session
FPD I: Attacking the Problems of Retention in the First Year
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yvette Pearson Weatherton, University of Texas, Arlington; Andrew P. Kruzic, University of Texas, Arlington; Beth R. Isbell, University of Texas at Arlington; Lynn L. Peterson, University of Texas, Arlington; Carter Tiernan, University of Texas, Arlington; Vu V. Pham, University of Texas at Arlington
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
one of the FIGs, called FORCES (FocusOn Retention in Cohorts of Engineering Students), compared to students in the other three FIGsand the College of Engineering as a whole. FORCES is funded by NSF’s S-STEM (Scholarshipsin Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) program and targets students inunderrepresented groups for recruitment with the broad goals of removing financial barriers andimproving student retention.Recognizing that success in mathematics is critical to engineering student success, key FORCESprogram elements were designed with a focus on calculus. FORCES scholars were required todemonstrate first fall semester calculus readiness by either earning an acceptable score on theuniversity’s Math Aptitude Test (MAT) or by
Conference Session
FPD 9: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part III: Research, Sustainability, and Professionalism
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.2. Loyens S, Gijbels D. Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments: introducing a multi- directional approach. Instructional Science [Internet]. 2008;36(5):351–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9059-43. Phillips DC, editor. Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. University of Chicago Press; 2000.4. Scala N, Soloway E, Jackson SL, Klein J, Quintana C, Reed J, et al. Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learner
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Focus on Student Success I
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University; Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
. Smith, D.S. Yeager and C.S. Dweck, "Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement," Psychological Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 784-793, 2015.[11] V.F. Sisk, A.P. Burgoyne, J. Sun, J.L. Butler and B.N. Macnamara, "To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses," Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549-571, 2018.[12] S. Claro, D. Paunesku and C.S. Dweck, "Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement," Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 113, no. 31, pp. 8664-8668, 2016.[13] T.A. Litzinger, J.C. Wise and S.H. Lee, "Self-directed learning readiness among
Conference Session
The Best of First-year Programs Division
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brooke Morin, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
] J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory.,” in The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education, Vol. 55, San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press, 2011, pp. 37–76.[6] F. Paas, J. E. Tuovinen, H. Tabbers, and P. W. M. Van Gerven, “Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 63–71, Mar. 2003.[7] J. Leppink, F. Paas, C. P. M. Van der Vleuten, T. Van Gog, and J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, “Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load,” Behav. Res. Methods, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1058–1072, 2013.[8] S.-S. Abdul-Rahman and B. du Boulay, “Learning programming via worked-examples: Relation of
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Adia Radecka, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Alyssa Bradshaw, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Javi Cardenas, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sara Xochilt Lamer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Ilalee Harrison James, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Holly M. Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, University of Illinois (Grant #: GIANT2020-02).References[1] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, “THE PIPELINE: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548–549, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1140384.[2] G. D. Kuh, High-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2008.[3] F. Ilievski, A. D. Mazzeo, R. F. Shepherd, X. Chen, and G. M. Whitesides, “Soft Robotics for Chemists,” Angew. Chem., vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 1930–1935, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1002/ange.201006464.[4] N. G. Cheng et al., “Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-cost, Highly Articulated manipulator enabled
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Keyanoush Sadeghipour, Temple University; David Brookstein, Temple University; Shawn Fagan, Temple University; Cory Budischak, Temple University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
transfer. The classlectures were focused essentially on learning the engineering principles of these subjects andthen solving homework and quiz problems. The problems were clearly defined by the professorand/or textbook. Eventually, engineering students were exposed to ‘pencil and paper” designexercises with predetermined “right” solutions; actual class-related construction work tended tobe limited to small test devices, built by the book.In the 1970’s an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at MIT, WoodieFlowers, recognized that an innovative approach to engineering education would enhance thestudents’ education and he developed a hands-on project centered mechanical engineering designclass. This freshman course was
Conference Session
First-year Programs: Focus on Students
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University; Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, pp. 1-11, 2014.[8] D.S. Yeager and C.S. Dweck, "Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed," Educational Psychologist vol. 47(4), pp. 302-314, 2012.[9] D. Paunesku, G.M. Walton, C. Romero, E.N. Smith, D.S. Yeager and C.S. Dweck, "Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement," Psychological Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 784-793, 2015.[10] V.F. Sisk, A.P. Burgoyne, J. Sun, J.L. Butler and B.N. Macnamara, "To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses," Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549-571, 2018.[11] S. Claro, D. Paunesku
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Retention & Bridge Programs #2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ellise M. LaMotte, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
first year seminar, it is important for the cohort to include both studentsinterested in science majors as well as those interested in engineering majors because studentsare in either the School of Engineering or the School of Arts and Sciences. This inclusion allowsstudents to meet peers they would not normally interact with. This cohort model enablesstudents to broaden their perspectives as they potentially encounter students with interestsdifferent from their own.The RISE first year seminar is now offered in the fall and spring semesters, as a year-longopportunity for a cohort of s 25-30 students. The fall semester focuses on academicpreparedness and acclimates students to their college environment by introducing them to facultyand support
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Wednesday Potpourri
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenell Wilmot, University of Texas, Austin; Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
] Juacquez, R, Gude, V.G., Hanson, A., Auzenne, M, & Williamson, S., “Enhancing criticalthinking skills of civil engineering students through Supplemental Instruction”, Conference    Proceedings of the ASEE, 2007.[4] Lin, J., and Woolston, D.C., “Important lessons learned from seven years of experience inundergraduate academic support programs”, Conference Proceedings of the ASEE/IEE Frontiersin Education Conference, Saratoga Springs NY, 2008.[5] Mahdi, A. E., “Introducing peer-supported learning approach to tutoring in engineering andtechnology courses”, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 43(4), 2006,pp277-287.[6] Malm, J
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Monday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Curriculum: Paper to be presented at the American Society for Engineering Education 2017 Annual Conference and Exposition.Creative Commons. (2017). Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Retrieved 02/12, 2017, from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Crittenden, K., Hall, D., & Brackin, P. (2010). Living with the Lab: Sustainable Lab Experiences for Freshman Engineering Students. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education.Cronk, S., Hall, D., & Nelson, J. (2009). Living with the Lab: A Project-Based Curriculum for First-Year Engineering Students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.Hall, D., Barker
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Sunday 5-Minute Work-in-Progress Postcard Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie Chiki, Ohio University; Braden Vale Jay Robinson, Ohio University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
thehighest risk while still supporting those struggling to make efficient progress through thecurriculum. Our hope is that as the rate of student engagement with the assessment improves, sowill its impact on students.References[1] Tyson, C. (2014, September 10). The 'murky middle.' Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/09/10/maximize-graduation-rates-colleges- should-focus-middle-range-students-research-shows[2] Bloom, J. L., Hutson, B. L., & He, Y. (2008). The appreciative advising revolution. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.[3] Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Helen Yoonhee Jung P.E., California Baptist University; Ziliang Zhou, California Baptist University; Liya Ni, California Baptist University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
are as follows:  How was the quality of service delivered from our student volunteers?  How was their attitude towards your event/service opportunity?  Rate the following statement based on your experience with our service: The college of engineering student volunteer(s) performance was (were) excellent. From 1 to 5, where 5 is the best experience, please rate your overall experience.  Additional Comments and areas of improvement.Opportunity Highlight IOne of the many opportunities we had for the service learning course is through Nao robotoutreach team. Nao robot has capabilities of talking, walking, dancing, and etc., which attractspeople at the community outreach events. For engineering students, it is a great way
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Marcia Arambulo Rodriguez, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski, Fairfield University; Ryan Munden, Fairfield University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
-engineering-programs-2017-2018/#outcomes[4] M. Eodice, A.E. Geller, and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.Press, 2017.[5] S. Pearlman and D. Carrillo, The Critical Thinking Initiative. www.thecriticalthinkinginitiative.org(2017).[6] B. Wood and A. Ganago, Using Arduino in Engineering Education: Motivating Students to Growfrom a Hobbyist to a Professional. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. June2018.[7] Binary check sheet rubric, ABET Symposium, Baltimore, MD, 2017.[8] Wiggins, G. and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design (Expanded Second Edition). Alexandria, VA,USA, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD).[9] Siegel, C. Putting the Pieces Together: Linking Learning
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jenahvive K. Morgan, Michigan State University; Roya Solhmirzaei, Michigan State University; Hadi Salehi, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
further analysis needs to be done to be sure that students are makingimprovements in their teaming skills, and not just reporting an improvement. In addition to acloser look at assessing team performance, the formation of the teams can also be examined.Both the safe partner and the changing of teams after the first project could be analyzed todiscover if there are benefits to these teaming procedures.References[1] E. Seat and S. M. Lord, “Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for TeachingInteraction Skills,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 385-390, 1999.[2] H. A. Witkin and D. R. Goodenough, “Field Dependence and Interpersonal Behavior,”Psychological Bulletin, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 661-689, 1977.[3] L. J. Shuman, M
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Soundouss Sassi, Mississippi State University; Abigail Clark, Ohio State University; Jane Petrie, Ohio State University ; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
students’ pathways into and through engineering, so we candesign better experiences.Two recent studies that provide a foundation for this work are the studies by Chen, Brawner,Ohland, and Orr [3] and Reid, Hertenstein, Fennell, Spingola, and Reeping [4]. In these studies,researchers compare first-year engineering across institutions to create initial knowledge regardingdifferences across various universities and engineering programs. In the first study, Chen et al. [3]used the Multiple Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development(MIDFIELD) to create a taxonomy of approaches to matriculation in engineering. Chen et al.’s [3]research gives insight into the administrative perspective on first-year studentsexperiences
Conference Session
FPD5 -- Placement & Early Success
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua Peschel, Texas A&M University; Luciana Barroso, Texas A&M University; Anthony Cahill, Texas A&M University; James Morgan, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
instruction process, we incorporated this into the real-time quiz framework. Initially, each learner would take the quiz individually at their owncomputer workstation. The instructor would monitor the results on a separate screen, not visibleto the learners. Once the allotted quiz time had elapsed (which typically ranged from 5- to 10-minutes) the learners would break into their assigned teams. The teams were assigned by theinstructor at the beginning of the semester and were usually based on declared major. Teamsizes ranged from three to four learners, with four being the maximum. After forming into theteams, the learners were tasked with discussing the real-time quiz question(s) being asked andwere to arrive at a team answer. Each team would then
Conference Session
FPD1 - Early Success and Retention
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy Bell, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Moshe Kam, Drexel University; Joan Carletta, University of Akron; Douglas Gorham, IEEE
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
by the “PQRSTU” wave. A ventricular fibrillation arrhythmiaoccurs (right) when abnormal electrical activity upsets the heart’s normal contract-relax cycle. Page 13.683.4For selected abstracts, the authors were invited to submit a full proposal that consisted of a five-page document that elaborates on the key elements of the abstract. The review criteria employedfor the abstracts and proposals are threefold: relevance, quality, and discovery.‚ Relevance: Does the proposed project address a problem whose solution(s) benefits society? Is the project presented in the context of a real-world, contemporary
Conference Session
FPD10 - Freshman Engineering Introduction to Design
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Swanbom; David Hall, Louisiana Tech University; Kelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s Course,Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) program under Award No. 0618288. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Splitt, F.G., “Systemic Engineering Education Reform: A Grand Challenge.” The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, Spring 2003.2. Sheppard, S. and Jenison, R., “Examples of Freshman Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 13 (4), 1997, 248-261.3. Weggel, R.J., Arms, V., Makufka, M. and Mitchell, J., “Engineering Design for Freshmen.” prepared for Drexel University and
Conference Session
FPD4 - Teaching Methods for First Year Students
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sean Brophy, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
thischallenge the majority of the students favor its use. We need to use a more diverse set ofproblems to capture the interest of all the students.References 1. Diefes-Dux HA, Moore T, Zawojewski J, Imbrie PK, and Follman DA. A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: model-eliciting activities A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: model-eliciting activities. Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 34th Annual, edited by Moore T, 2004, p. F1A-3-8 Vol. 2. 2. Schwartz, D. L. and J. D. Bransford. "A Time For Telling." Cognition and Instruction 16(4): 475-5223. 1998 3. Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Bateman, H., Brophy, S. P., and Roselli, R.. Vanderbilt’s AMIGO Project: Knowledge of how people learn
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Paying More Attention to Retention
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Paa Kwasi Adusei, University of Cincinnati; Nora Honken, University of Cincinnati; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Department at The University of Cincin- nati. She holds a PhD in Educational Leadership and Organizational Development for the University of Louisville, a MS in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University and a BS in Industrial Engineer- ing from Virginia Tech. She also has extensive industrial experience.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Integrating Computing into the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa DeWitte, University of Florida; Pamela L. Dickrell, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
work Implementing these demonstrations into the coursework of Engineering Design and Societyis set to continue, and two additional demonstrations are currently being designed. Onedemonstration will focus on Aerospace Engineering by utilizing a Vernier Gas Pressure Sensorin a small-scale wind tunnel to observe the trailing pressure differences in aerodynamic and non-aerodynamic shapes. The next will feature Computer Science and Engineering through the use ofa Vernier Motion Detector in smart home and private security applications. Additional topics ofinterest will be chosen from student feedback data collected in the pilot introduction of thesedemonstrations.References[1] Steadman, S. J., & Jefferson, G. D., & Thomas, T. G., &
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Online Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Mahmood Moussavi, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Yasaman Amannejad, University of Calgary
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
space: Enhancing experientiallearning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2):193-212.E. Marasco, M. Moshirpour, L. Behjat, W. Rosehart. (2016). Studios and sustainability: Acreative CDIO approach to computer engineering education. 12th International CDIOConference, Turku, Finland.E. Marasco, M. Moshirpour, M. Moussavi. (2017). Flipping the Foundation: A multi-yearflipped classroom study for a large-scale introductory programming course. 2017 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.A. Pears, S. Seidman, L. Malmi, L. Mannila, and E. Adams. (2007). A survey of literature on theteaching of introductory programming. Working Group Report on ITiCSE on Innovation
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Student Success
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lydia Yang Yang, Kansas State University; Bette Grauer P.E., Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
peer-tutoring. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, MA.5. Hendriksen,S. I., Yang, L., Love, B., & Hall, M.C. (2005). Assessing academic support: The effects of tutoring on student learning outcomes. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(2), 56-65.6. Malm, J., Bryngfors, L., & Mörner, L. L. (2016). The potential of supplemental instruction in engineering education: creating additional peer-guided learning opportunities in difficult compulsory courses for first-year students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(5), 548-561.7. García, R., Morales, J. C., & Rivera, G. (2014). The use of peer tutoring to improve the passing rates in mathematics placement exams of
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division: Design
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oziel Rios, University of Texas, Dallas; Dani Fadda, University of Texas, Dallas
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
an everyday application for themechanism as this will give a better sense of purpose to the work the students are asked toperform.6. References[1] Bates, J. S., "A First Year Course Based on Conceptual Design," Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[2] Ambrose, S. A., Amon, C. H., "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86(2), 1997.[3] Pendergrass, N. A., Kowalczyk, R. E., Dowd, J. P., Laoulache, R. N., Nelles, W., Golen, J.A., Fowler, E., "Improving First-Year Engineering Education*," Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 90(1), 2001.[4] Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. J
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Farid Farahmand, Sonoma State University; David Andrew Story, Sonoma State University; David Anthony House, Sonoma State University; Robert Evan Rowlands, Gap Wireless
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
stablished eitherusing a Bluetooth wireless or a USB cable.In order to program Aksense the students only have to know the basic commands toactivate various components, such as LED and RGB. For example, using Chrome SerialTerminal if the command “G” is sent to Aksense the RGB will turn Green. Similarly, ifwe press the Push button switch on Aksense, character “S” will be displayed on theterminal. If the user send character “P”, then the current value of the voltage set by thepotentiometer is displayed.Figure 1: Basic communication between Aksense and a PC (or smartphone) usingpre-assigned command lines (e.g., “R” to turn the RGB RED).Figure 2(a) depicts Aksense’s PCB. Should time permits, the device can be used inconjunction with a breadboard and
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division - Visualization and Mathematics
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Edwin Hou, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Moshe Kam P.E., New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs, Mathematics
further suggestions and recommendations.References[1] Borgaonkar, A., Hou, E., Vandermark, S., Kam, M., 2015, “Engineering Math Summer Boot Camp to help Students Succeed in Remedial Courses,” Proceedings 2015 7th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Roanoke, VA, August 3-4, 2015.[2] Borgaonkar, A., Sodhi J. S., Hou, E.,Baldwin R,, Kam, M., 2017, “Helping First Year Students Start on Track in the Mathematics Sequence,” Proceedings 2017 9th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, August 6-8, 2017.[3] Klingbeil, N., Rattan, K., Raymer, M., Reynolds, D., Mercer, R., Kukreti, A. and Randolph, B., 2008, “The WSU Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: A Multiyear Assessment and Expansion to
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5B: Work-In-Progress: 5 Minute Postcard Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura A. Ruhala, Kennesaw State University; Hillary Steiner, Kennesaw State University; Catherine L. Bradford, Kennesaw State University; Ruth Ann Goldfine, Kennesaw State University; Nirmal Trivedi, Kennesaw State University; Scott Larisch, Kennesaw State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Peer Interaction and Learning in the Classroom through Reciprocal Questioning. American Educational Research Journal. 27 (4): 664–87. 1990.7. Springer, L., M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan. Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. 69 (1): 21–51. 1999
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tony Vercellino P.E., Youngstown State University; Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross‐Institutional Study. Journal of Engineering Education 2004;93(4):313-320.11. Ahuja S. Math Remediation in A First Semester Engineering Technology Course. 2006.12. Bamforth SE, Robinson CL, Croft T, Crawford A. Retention and progression of engineering students with diverse mathematical backgrounds. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications 2007;26(4):156-166.13. Beanland DG. Challenges and Opportunities Facing the Education of Engineers-Address to Victoria Division of Engineers Australia Seg Meeting. Melbourne; 2010.14. Craig TS. Conceptions of mathematics and student identity: implications for engineering education. International Journal of Mathematical